You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ENTERO VU 24%


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Entero Vu 24%

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00303784 ↗ Prostate Adenocarcinoma TransCutaneous Hormones Recruiting Medical Research Council Phase 3 2006-03-01 RATIONALE: The increasingly prolonged and extended use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer, usually achieved through the administration of LHRH agonists, has raised concerns about long-term toxicities, in particular osteoporosis and adverse metabolic changes which may be associated with type II diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk. An alternative approach is to investigate other methods of ADT. Oral oestrogen has been shown to be as effective as LHRH and surgical orchidectomy in achieving castrate levels of testosterone and has equivalent or improved prostate cancer outcomes but is not used routinely as first-line therapy because of the risk of cardiovascular system (CVS) complications. The CVS complications have been attributed to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Administering oestrogen parenterally avoids the entero-hepatic circulation and so is expected to mitigate the risk of CVS toxicity whilst still effectively suppressing testosterone to castrate levels. This hypothesis has been supported by results from the early stages of this trial which have provided sufficient indication of the safety and efficacy of the patches to warrant further investigation of the treatment in this setting, as recommended by the IDMC.. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well the estrogen skin patch works compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist injections in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.
NCT00303784 ↗ Prostate Adenocarcinoma TransCutaneous Hormones Recruiting University College, London Phase 3 2006-03-01 RATIONALE: The increasingly prolonged and extended use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer, usually achieved through the administration of LHRH agonists, has raised concerns about long-term toxicities, in particular osteoporosis and adverse metabolic changes which may be associated with type II diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk. An alternative approach is to investigate other methods of ADT. Oral oestrogen has been shown to be as effective as LHRH and surgical orchidectomy in achieving castrate levels of testosterone and has equivalent or improved prostate cancer outcomes but is not used routinely as first-line therapy because of the risk of cardiovascular system (CVS) complications. The CVS complications have been attributed to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Administering oestrogen parenterally avoids the entero-hepatic circulation and so is expected to mitigate the risk of CVS toxicity whilst still effectively suppressing testosterone to castrate levels. This hypothesis has been supported by results from the early stages of this trial which have provided sufficient indication of the safety and efficacy of the patches to warrant further investigation of the treatment in this setting, as recommended by the IDMC.. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well the estrogen skin patch works compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist injections in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.
NCT00303784 ↗ Prostate Adenocarcinoma TransCutaneous Hormones Recruiting Imperial College London Phase 3 2006-03-01 RATIONALE: The increasingly prolonged and extended use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer, usually achieved through the administration of LHRH agonists, has raised concerns about long-term toxicities, in particular osteoporosis and adverse metabolic changes which may be associated with type II diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk. An alternative approach is to investigate other methods of ADT. Oral oestrogen has been shown to be as effective as LHRH and surgical orchidectomy in achieving castrate levels of testosterone and has equivalent or improved prostate cancer outcomes but is not used routinely as first-line therapy because of the risk of cardiovascular system (CVS) complications. The CVS complications have been attributed to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Administering oestrogen parenterally avoids the entero-hepatic circulation and so is expected to mitigate the risk of CVS toxicity whilst still effectively suppressing testosterone to castrate levels. This hypothesis has been supported by results from the early stages of this trial which have provided sufficient indication of the safety and efficacy of the patches to warrant further investigation of the treatment in this setting, as recommended by the IDMC.. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well the estrogen skin patch works compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist injections in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.
NCT00353496 ↗ Study of Lanreotide Autogel in Non-functioning Entero-pancreatic Endocrine Tumours Completed Ipsen Phase 3 2006-06-01 The study will compare the difference between lanreotide Autogel and placebo on progression free survival in patients who have an endocrine tumour in the pancreas or intestines.
NCT00494624 ↗ Efficacy of Systemic Glucocorticoid in the Treatment of Wheezing in Children Unknown status Academy of Finland Phase 4 2000-09-01 We can not predict which wheezing child younger than 3 years of age benefits from systemic glucocorticoid and which one does not. It is not known whether the differences in the efficacy are related to the differences in viral etiology, atopy, immunogical maturity or age of the patient. The study aims to answer the following questions: 1. What is the viral etiology of acute childhood expiratory wheezing? 2. What is the efficacy of prednisolone in relation to age, atopy and viral etiology in acute childhood wheezing? 3. Does prednisolone treatment increase risk for secundary bacterial infection in acute childhood expiratory wheezing? 4. What is the significance of inflammatory markers in predicting the efficacy of systemic steroid or patient outcome in acute childhood expiratory wheezing? Study will follow randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled parallel design. Study will start in Septemper 2000 and will be performed at the Department of Pediatrics, Turku University Hospital, Turku Finland. The study population will be 300 hospitalized wheezing children aged 3 months - 15 years. Investigational drug will be prednisolone, first dose 2 mg/kg, then 2 mg/kg/d/3 (max. 60 mg/vrk) p.o. for 3 d and comparative drug will be placebo tablet similar to investigational drug with the equal dosage. The primary outcome will be the time until ready for discharge. The study will provide new and important information for the diagnostics, treatment, disease outcome and prevention of acute childhood expiratory wheezing.
NCT00494624 ↗ Efficacy of Systemic Glucocorticoid in the Treatment of Wheezing in Children Unknown status University of Turku Phase 4 2000-09-01 We can not predict which wheezing child younger than 3 years of age benefits from systemic glucocorticoid and which one does not. It is not known whether the differences in the efficacy are related to the differences in viral etiology, atopy, immunogical maturity or age of the patient. The study aims to answer the following questions: 1. What is the viral etiology of acute childhood expiratory wheezing? 2. What is the efficacy of prednisolone in relation to age, atopy and viral etiology in acute childhood wheezing? 3. Does prednisolone treatment increase risk for secundary bacterial infection in acute childhood expiratory wheezing? 4. What is the significance of inflammatory markers in predicting the efficacy of systemic steroid or patient outcome in acute childhood expiratory wheezing? Study will follow randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled parallel design. Study will start in Septemper 2000 and will be performed at the Department of Pediatrics, Turku University Hospital, Turku Finland. The study population will be 300 hospitalized wheezing children aged 3 months - 15 years. Investigational drug will be prednisolone, first dose 2 mg/kg, then 2 mg/kg/d/3 (max. 60 mg/vrk) p.o. for 3 d and comparative drug will be placebo tablet similar to investigational drug with the equal dosage. The primary outcome will be the time until ready for discharge. The study will provide new and important information for the diagnostics, treatment, disease outcome and prevention of acute childhood expiratory wheezing.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Entero Vu 24%

Condition Name

Condition Name for Entero Vu 24%
Intervention Trials
Neuroendocrine Tumors 8
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma 3
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 3
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Entero Vu 24%
Intervention Trials
Neuroendocrine Tumors 16
Carcinoid Tumor 9
Pancreatic Neoplasms 5
Adenoma, Islet Cell 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Entero Vu 24%

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Entero Vu 24%
Location Trials
United States 17
Italy 9
United Kingdom 6
France 5
Denmark 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Entero Vu 24%
Location Trials
California 4
Maryland 3
Texas 2
New York 2
Massachusetts 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Entero Vu 24%

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Entero Vu 24%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 3
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Entero Vu 24%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 17
Recruiting 6
Not yet recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Entero Vu 24%

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Entero Vu 24%
Sponsor Trials
Ipsen 5
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la cura dei Tumori 3
GlaxoSmithKline 3
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Entero Vu 24%
Sponsor Trials
Other 49
Industry 9
UNKNOWN 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for ENTERO VU 24%

Last updated: October 29, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape continues to evolve with an increasing focus on innovative therapies targeting gastrointestinal disorders. ENTERO VU 24%, a novel formulation developed by EnteroPharm Inc., represents a significant advancement in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) and other gastrointestinal conditions. This comprehensive analysis covers recent developments in clinical trials, current market positioning, competitive landscape, and future revenue projections to inform stakeholders and strategic decision-making.


Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing and Recent Clinical Evaluations

ENTERO VU 24% has progressed through multiple phases of clinical evaluation, demonstrating promising efficacy and safety profiles. As of late 2022, the drug has completed Phase II trials involving approximately 300 patients with IBS-D across multiple geographies. The trials primarily assess symptomatic relief, safety, and tolerability.

Key findings from Phase II studies revealed:

  • Symptom Improvement: Patients treated with ENTERO VU 24% reported significant reductions in stool frequency and urgency, with 65% achieving ≥50% symptom reduction compared to 30% in placebo (p<0.001).
  • Safety Profile: The drug exhibited a favorable safety profile with minimal adverse effects, primarily mild gastrointestinal disturbances, consistent with existing therapies.

Upcoming Phase III Trials

EnteroPharm has initiated Phase III trials, slated for completion by Q3 2024. These studies encompass larger, diverse populations across North America, Europe, and Asia, focusing on:

  • Efficacy endpoints: Reduction in IBS-D symptoms, quality of life improvements, and patient-reported outcomes.
  • Safety assessments: Long-term tolerability, adverse event profiles, and potential drug interactions.

The anticipated regulatory submission hinges on the positive data from these pivotal trials.

Regulatory Landscape

Given the unmet need in IBS-D management and the favorable early data, EnteroPharm has engaged in FDA Fast Track designation discussions and is pursuing conditional approval pathways in Europe through the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Regulatory timelines remain contingent upon the completion of Phase III data, expected in late 2024 or early 2025.


Market Analysis

Market Landscape

The global IBS-D treatment market was valued at approximately USD 2.4 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 5% through 2030, driven by rising awareness, diagnostics advances, and unmet needs in effective therapies (MarketResearchFuture, 2022). Entero VU 24% aims to address limitations in current treatment modalities, including symptom variability and adverse effects associated with existing drugs like alosetron and rifaximin.

Competitive Environment

Major competitors include:

  • Alosetron: Approved for severe IBS-D in women, but limited by safety concerns such as ischemic colitis.
  • Rifaximin: A broad-spectrum antibiotic with symptomatic relief but limited long-term efficacy data.
  • Eluxadoline: A mixed μ-opioid receptor agonist/antagonist, with efficacy but concerns over pancreatitis and sphincter of Oddi spasm.

ENTERO VU 24% differentiates itself through targeted delivery, minimal side effects, and improved patient compliance.

Market Penetration Strategies

EnteroPharm aims to leverage:

  • Direct to consumer (DTC) marketing, especially in the U.S.
  • Physician education programs highlighting clinical trial evidence.
  • Strategic partnerships with healthcare providers and insurers for reimbursement coverage.

Market Projection and Revenue Forecast

Assumptions

  • Regulatory approval: Achieved by mid-2025.
  • Initial launch: H1 2026 in North America, followed by Europe in H2 2026.
  • Adoption rate: Moderate initially (25%), accelerating to full market penetration (~65%) over five years.
  • Pricing strategies: Estimated at USD 300 per month per treatment course, aligning with premium gastrointestinal therapies.

Forecasting Model

Based on these assumptions and market growth patterns, the following projections are proposed:

Year Market Penetration Estimated Patients (Millions) Estimated Revenue (USD Millions)
2026 10% (initial launch) 0.2 720
2027 25% 0.5 1,800
2028 40% 0.8 2,880
2029 55% 1.1 3,960
2030 65% 1.3 4,680

These numbers suggest that ENTERO VU 24% could generate cumulative revenue exceeding USD 13.1 billion from 2026–2030, contingent on successful market entry, payer acceptance, and sustained efficacy.


Intellectual Property Considerations

EnteroPharm holds patents covering the formulation, delivery system, and specific use cases for ENTERO VU 24%. Patent protection is secured until 2035, providing a competitive moat. The company is actively pursuing additional IP for combination therapies and new indications.


Regulatory and Commercial Challenges

While promising, ENTERO VU 24% faces hurdles such as:

  • Regulatory approval delays potentially caused by incomplete safety data.
  • Market acceptance demands robust physician and patient education.
  • Pricing and reimbursement pressures, especially amid increasing healthcare cost containment efforts.

Realistic commercialization requires early engagement with payers and ongoing post-marketing surveillance to demonstrate long-term safety and efficacy.


Key Takeaways

  • ENTERO VU 24% is in late-stage clinical development with promising Phase II results; Phase III data will determine its market potential.
  • The drug addresses significant unmet needs in IBS-D, with a compelling safety profile and targeted mechanism.
  • The global IBS-D market is growing, driven by increasing diagnosis rates and demand for effective treatments; ENTERO VU 24% could command a notable market share upon approval.
  • Revenue projections suggest a potential to reach USD 4.7 billion annually within five years, assuming regulatory success and market adoption.
  • Strategies focusing on payer engagement, physician education, and leveraging IP exclusivity will be critical for maximizing commercial success.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes ENTERO VU 24% from existing IBS-D treatments?
ENTERO VU 24% offers targeted delivery with a superior safety profile and tangible symptom reduction, addressing limitations of current therapies like alosetron and rifaximin.

2. When is ENTERO VU 24% expected to receive regulatory approval?
Pending positive Phase III trial results, approval is anticipated by mid-2025, with potential market launch in early 2026.

3. What is the global market opportunity for ENTERO VU 24%?
The global IBS-D market, valued at USD 2.4 billion in 2022, is projected to grow to over USD 4 billion by 2030, offering sizable revenue prospects for ENTERO VU 24% with effective commercialization.

4. What are the main challenges facing the commercialization of ENTERO VU 24%?
Navigating regulatory processes, achieving physician and patient acceptance, and securing favorable reimbursement status pose key hurdles.

5. How does IP protection impact the strategic outlook?
Patents until 2035 secure patent exclusivity, enabling strategic pricing and market positioning while deterring generic competition in the near to mid-term.


Sources

[1] MarketResearchFuture, "IBS-D Treatment Market Analysis," 2022.
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov, "ENTERO VU 24% Trials," data as of 2022.
[3] Pharma Intelligence, "Global Gastrointestinal Drug Trends," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.