Last Updated: August 15, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EZETIMIBE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for EZETIMIBE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00045812 ↗ SCH-58235 (Ezetimibe) to Treat Homozygous Sitosterolemia Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 2 2001-03-01 This study will test the safety and effectiveness of SCH-58235 (Ezetimibe) in lowering sitosterol, plant sterol and cholesterol blood levels in patients with homozygous sitosterolemia when added to the patients' current treatment regimen. Homozygous sitosterolemia is an inherited disorder of sterol metabolism in which an excess of many plant sterols, including sitosterol, is absorbed and not enough excreted. (Sterols are substances used to form hormones, vitamins and membranes found in animal and plant lipids.). Patients can develop atherosclerosis with coronary heart disease as early as childhood, as well as other problems including arthritis, arthralgia, and tendon xanthomas (lipid deposits). Current sitosterolemia treatments may include a low sterol diet, medications, intestinal surgery, or a combination of these. Ezetimibe is a member of a new class of drugs called "specific cholesterol absorption inhibitors" that may lower cholesterol, sitosterol and other plant sterol blood levels. Patients with homozygous sitosterolemia 10 years of age and older may be eligible for this study. Participants will have a medical history and physical examination and will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group, which will include about 80 percent of all study participants, will take 10 mg of Ezetimibe a day, and the second group (20 percent of participants) will take a placebo (an inactive look-a-like pill). Patients will have 7 clinic visits during the 12-week study, when some or all of the following procedures and tests will be done: - Measurement of vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, breathing rate and temperature) - Dietary maintenance - interview about how well that patient is adhering to the diet - Medication review - interview about other medications the patient is taking - Blood draw for tests - Urine sample for tests - Pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential - Electrocardiogram (ECG) to measure the electrical activity of the heart - Blood draw to determine sitosterol, other plant sterol levels, and lipid levels (cholesterol and other blood lipid concentrations) - Xanthoma measurement (with a ruler and X-ray of the foot)
NCT00079638 ↗ Comparative Efficacy Evaluation of Lipids When Treated With Niaspan & Statin or Other Lipid-Modifying Therapies-COMPELL Completed Kos Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2004-04-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of first-line treatment using Niaspan (an extended release version of niacin) and statins versus other drugs that lower lipid levels, in subjects with elevated fat levels in their blood (dyslipidemia). Statins are a class of medication that is often prescribed to patients who need to lower their cholesterol levels.
NCT00090298 ↗ Study to Evaluate the Cholesterol Lowering Effects of Two Marketed Drugs in Patients With Elevated Cholesterol Levels (0653A-058) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2004-04-01 A 10-week study to compare the reduction in cholesterol following treatment with two different marketed drugs in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for EZETIMIBE

Condition Name

Condition Name for EZETIMIBE
Intervention Trials
Hypercholesterolemia 143
Atherosclerosis 24
Hyperlipidemia 21
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for EZETIMIBE
Intervention Trials
Hypercholesterolemia 178
Coronary Artery Disease 50
Myocardial Ischemia 45
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for EZETIMIBE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for EZETIMIBE
Location Trials
United States 550
China 73
Canada 56
Korea, Republic of 48
United Kingdom 32
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for EZETIMIBE
Location Trials
California 31
Ohio 29
Texas 26
New York 25
Florida 25
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for EZETIMIBE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for EZETIMIBE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 13
PHASE3 8
PHASE2 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for EZETIMIBE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 248
Recruiting 51
Unknown status 26
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for EZETIMIBE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for EZETIMIBE
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 118
Sanofi 15
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for EZETIMIBE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 288
Other 262
NIH 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ezetimibe Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, Patent Status and 2030 Projection

Last updated: July 31, 2026

Ezetimibe is a mature oral cholesterol-lowering drug with broad generic availability, extensive cardiovascular-outcomes evidence and limited remaining product-level exclusivity. Its commercial value has shifted from the original Zetia brand to low-cost generic monotherapy and fixed-dose combinations, especially with simvastatin, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and bempedoic acid. Clinical demand remains durable because ezetimibe lowers LDL cholesterol by approximately 15% to 25%, has a favorable safety profile and is recommended when statins do not achieve LDL targets or are not tolerated.

The principal growth opportunity is not a new ezetimibe molecule. It is combination treatment, secondary prevention, high-risk cardiovascular care, statin-intolerance management and expansion in markets where generic lipid therapy remains underused.

What is ezetimibe and how does it work?

Ezetimibe is an oral cholesterol-absorption inhibitor marketed originally as Zetia in the United States and Ezetrol in several international markets. It inhibits the Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1, or NPC1L1, transporter in the small intestine, reducing absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol. The resulting increase in hepatic LDL-receptor activity lowers circulating LDL cholesterol.

Ezetimibe is approved as:

  • Monotherapy for primary hypercholesterolemia.
  • Combination therapy with statins for primary hypercholesterolemia.
  • Treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia with a statin.
  • Treatment of homozygous sitosterolemia.
  • Combination therapy with simvastatin for certain forms of familial hypercholesterolemia.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Zetia in 2002 and Vytorin, the ezetimibe/simvastatin combination, in 2004. The FDA later approved ezetimibe/simvastatin as a generic product and authorized additional fixed-dose combination products in various jurisdictions (U.S. Food and Drug Administration [FDA], 2024a).

What clinical trials established ezetimibe’s cardiovascular benefit?

How did IMPROVE-IT affect ezetimibe’s clinical position?

The IMPROVE-IT trial was the most important cardiovascular-outcomes study for ezetimibe. It randomized 18,144 patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome to simvastatin plus ezetimibe or simvastatin plus placebo. After a median follow-up of approximately six years, the combination produced a modest but statistically significant reduction in the primary composite cardiovascular endpoint.

The primary endpoint occurred in 32.7% of patients receiving ezetimibe/simvastatin and 34.7% receiving simvastatin/placebo. The hazard ratio was 0.936, representing an absolute risk reduction of about 2 percentage points (Cannon et al., 2015).

The clinical effect was consistent with the LDL reduction achieved. The study supported the proposition that additional LDL lowering through a nonstatin mechanism can reduce cardiovascular events when added to statin therapy.

What did the SHARP trial show?

SHARP evaluated simvastatin plus ezetimibe in 9,270 patients with chronic kidney disease, including patients receiving dialysis. The combination reduced major atherosclerotic events by 17% compared with placebo, largely through reductions in nonhemorrhagic stroke and coronary revascularization (Baigent et al., 2011).

SHARP expanded the evidence base for ezetimibe in high-risk renal patients. The trial did not establish broad use in every chronic kidney disease population, but it supported intensive lipid lowering in patients with elevated cardiovascular risk.

What did EWTOPIA 75 show?

EWTOPIA 75 studied ezetimibe in 3,796 Japanese patients aged 75 years or older with elevated LDL cholesterol and no history of coronary artery disease. Ezetimibe reduced the composite cardiovascular endpoint compared with dietary counseling alone, although the open-label design and event composition limit direct extrapolation to all elderly populations (Ouchi et al., 2019).

The study remains relevant because older adults often have statin intolerance, polypharmacy concerns or inadequate LDL control.

How does ezetimibe compare with high-intensity statin monotherapy?

The RACING trial compared moderate-intensity rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe with high-intensity rosuvastatin in 3,780 patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The combination strategy achieved a similar three-year composite cardiovascular outcome while producing lower LDL cholesterol and fewer treatment discontinuations related to intolerance (Hong et al., 2022).

The commercial implication is important: ezetimibe can be used to reach LDL targets without increasing statin dose. This supports combination prescribing in patients who cannot tolerate high-intensity statins.

What clinical trials are currently relevant to ezetimibe?

Ezetimibe is no longer a primary innovation target for large registration trials as a standalone drug. Current clinical development is concentrated in four areas:

Ezetimibe in fixed-dose combinations

Companies are studying or commercializing ezetimibe in combinations with:

  • Rosuvastatin.
  • Atorvastatin.
  • Bempedoic acid.
  • Simvastatin.
  • Other emerging lipid-lowering agents.

The most important newer combination is bempedoic acid/ezetimibe, marketed in the United States as Nexlizet. Bempedoic acid is activated primarily in the liver and is designed to reduce muscle-related adverse effects associated with statins. The combination targets patients with hypercholesterolemia who require additional LDL lowering or cannot use adequate statin doses.

Ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients

The CLEAR Outcomes program established cardiovascular benefit for bempedoic acid in statin-intolerant patients. Ezetimibe is relevant because it can be paired with bempedoic acid and because guidelines commonly use ezetimibe as the first nonstatin option after inadequate response or intolerance to statins (Nissen et al., 2023).

Ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia

Ezetimibe remains part of combination regimens for heterozygous and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. In severe disease, it is generally combined with a statin and may be used with PCSK9 inhibitors, inclisiran, lomitapide or evinacumab.

Ezetimibe in diabetes, chronic kidney disease and older adults

Clinical studies continue to assess treatment intensification in patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease and advanced age. These populations have high cardiovascular event rates and often require multiple lipid-lowering therapies.

What is the FDA regulatory status of ezetimibe?

The FDA has approved ezetimibe tablets in 10 mg strength. The drug is available as a generic prescription product and as part of approved combination products.

Product Active ingredients U.S. status Primary use
Zetia Ezetimibe Brand largely displaced by generics LDL reduction
Vytorin Ezetimibe/simvastatin Brand and generic availability LDL reduction
Nexlizet Bempedoic acid/ezetimibe Approved in 2020 LDL reduction
Generic ezetimibe Ezetimibe Approved through ANDA pathway LDL reduction
Generic ezetimibe/simvastatin Ezetimibe/simvastatin Approved through ANDA pathway LDL reduction

Ezetimibe does not have biologic-drug status. Biosimilar risk therefore does not apply to ezetimibe itself. The relevant competitive threat is generic substitution and, for combination products, abbreviated new drug applications or other jurisdiction-specific generic pathways.

What patents protect ezetimibe?

The core U.S. composition-of-matter patent for ezetimibe was U.S. Patent No. 5,767,115, assigned to Schering Corporation. The patent covered the compound class that included ezetimibe and expired in 2017 after applicable patent-term adjustments and pediatric exclusivity considerations.

Key patent categories associated with ezetimibe products include:

Patent category Representative protection Commercial status
Core compound U.S. Patent No. 5,767,115 Expired
Zetia formulation and use claims Product-specific patents listed historically by Merck/Schering Expired or no longer commercially blocking
Ezetimibe/simvastatin Combination and formulation claims Generic competition established
Bempedoic acid/ezetimibe Combination-product patents held by Esperion and related entities Relevant to branded combination competition
Manufacturing and crystalline forms Process, polymorph and formulation claims in multiple jurisdictions May affect selected generic or regional launches

The patent estate for plain ezetimibe is weak from an exclusivity perspective because the primary compound patent has expired and generic products are established. Patent risk remains more relevant for branded combinations, specific formulations and manufacturing processes than for 10 mg ezetimibe tablets.

When did ezetimibe lose exclusivity?

U.S. market exclusivity for ezetimibe ended in stages:

  • 2002: FDA approval of Zetia.
  • 2004: FDA approval of Vytorin.
  • 2016: U.S. generic competition began for ezetimibe tablets after patent and regulatory barriers were resolved.
  • 2017: Core composition-of-matter patent protection expired, subject to applicable term calculations.
  • 2020: FDA approved Nexlizet, creating a separate branded combination-product lifecycle.

Generic ezetimibe is therefore the dominant U.S. product category. Pricing and volume depend on payer formularies, pharmacy benefit manager contracting, retail generic competition and the use of fixed-dose combinations.

What is the Orange Book status of ezetimibe?

Zetia and Vytorin were historically listed in the FDA Orange Book with patents covering the active ingredient, combinations and related product claims. Those listings supported patent certifications and Paragraph IV litigation during the period when generic manufacturers sought approval.

The current commercial issue is not whether a generic can enter plain ezetimibe. Generic entry has already occurred. The relevant Orange Book questions concern newer combination products, including bempedoic acid/ezetimibe, where listed patents may cover formulation, combination use, dosing and product-specific characteristics (FDA, 2024b).

Which companies challenged ezetimibe patents?

Major generic companies that participated in the U.S. ezetimibe and ezetimibe/simvastatin market included Teva, Mylan, Sandoz, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Apotex and other ANDA applicants. Patent disputes involving Merck, Schering-Plough and generic applicants centered on the timing and scope of generic approval rather than the long-term validity of the ezetimibe market.

The competitive outcome was accelerated generic access. The original brand franchise lost substantial value once multiple manufacturers entered.

What patent litigation and settlement agreements affected ezetimibe?

The historical litigation record involved ANDA applicants filing Paragraph IV certifications against patents associated with Zetia and Vytorin. Settlements in pharmaceutical patent litigation can include agreed launch dates, licenses, authorized generic provisions and restrictions on the scope of challenged products. The commercial impact was a delay or acceleration of generic entry depending on the agreement.

For current investment analysis, historical Zetia litigation has limited forward relevance. The more important litigation risk lies in:

  • Nexlizet patent challenges.
  • Combination-product patents.
  • Process and polymorph claims.
  • Orange Book listing disputes.
  • Patent-term and pediatric-exclusivity calculations.
  • Product-specific labeling claims.

How strong is the ezetimibe patent estate?

The patent estate for plain ezetimibe is weak because the core patent has expired and the market has multiple generic suppliers. The estate for ezetimibe combinations is stronger but varies by product.

Asset Patent strength Generic entry risk Commercial assessment
Ezetimibe 10 mg Low High Mature generic market
Ezetimibe/simvastatin Low to moderate High Generic combination market
Rosuvastatin/ezetimibe Moderate by jurisdiction Moderate to high Combination-driven opportunity
Bempedoic acid/ezetimibe Moderate to high Moderate Branded lifecycle asset
Specialty formulations Variable Variable Dependent on claim scope and approval pathway

Manufacturing patents can retain value after compound patents expire, but they rarely prevent all generic entry if alternative synthesis routes are available. Ezetimibe’s relatively small-molecule structure and established manufacturing history reduce the likelihood of a durable manufacturing barrier across major markets.

What is the ezetimibe market size and revenue outlook?

Published market estimates differ because analysts define the market differently. Some count only ezetimibe active pharmaceutical ingredient and finished-dose products. Others include branded and generic combinations, hospital procurement, and related nonstatin lipid-lowering products.

The market has three distinct revenue pools:

  1. Generic ezetimibe tablets, which generate high prescription volume but low unit prices.
  2. Fixed-dose combinations, which carry higher average revenue per treated patient.
  3. Branded nonstatin combinations, especially bempedoic acid/ezetimibe.

The original Zetia franchise generated billions of dollars before generic erosion. After generic entry, brand revenue fell sharply, while total patient access increased through lower prices. The relevant commercial metric is now treated-patient volume rather than originator sales.

Ezetimibe market projection, 2024-2030

The following projection is a scenario-based estimate for global ezetimibe-containing products, including generic monotherapy and selected fixed-dose combinations. It assumes low single-digit annual volume growth, continued price erosion in generic tablets and faster growth for branded combinations.

Year Estimated treated-patient demand index Estimated market revenue Main driver
2024 100 $1.2 billion to $1.6 billion Generic volume and combination use
2025 104 $1.2 billion to $1.7 billion Broader nonstatin prescribing
2026 108 $1.3 billion to $1.8 billion Combination products
2027 112 $1.3 billion to $1.9 billion Cardiovascular prevention
2028 116 $1.4 billion to $2.0 billion Emerging-market penetration
2029 120 $1.4 billion to $2.1 billion Fixed-dose combinations
2030 124 $1.5 billion to $2.2 billion Higher treatment intensity

The projected revenue range reflects the tension between rising prescriptions and generic price compression. A volume-only forecast would imply stronger growth than a revenue forecast. Branded combination products could increase market value, while generic tablet pricing could continue to decline.

How does ezetimibe compare with PCSK9 inhibitors and bempedoic acid?

Attribute Ezetimibe PCSK9 inhibitors Bempedoic acid
Administration Oral, once daily Injectable Oral
Typical LDL reduction 15% to 25% Approximately 50% to 60% Approximately 15% to 25%
Cost Low High Moderate to high
Generic availability Yes Generally no broad biosimilar substitution Limited
Outcomes evidence Strong add-on evidence Strong outcomes evidence for major agents Cardiovascular benefit in statin-intolerant patients
Main role First-line nonstatin add-on Very high-risk or severe LDL elevation Oral option for statin intolerance or inadequate response

Ezetimibe remains the most cost-effective nonstatin escalation option for many patients. PCSK9 inhibitors are more potent but face access controls, prior authorization and injection barriers. Bempedoic acid is positioned between ezetimibe and PCSK9 therapy in oral treatment algorithms, particularly for statin-intolerant patients.

What generic launch scenarios exist for ezetimibe combinations?

Plain ezetimibe

Generic launch risk is already realized. Additional suppliers can reduce prices and increase substitution, but they do not change the basic market structure.

Ezetimibe/simvastatin

The combination is vulnerable to continued generic competition. Commercial differentiation depends on tablet strengths, supply reliability, payer contracts and geographic distribution.

Rosuvastatin/ezetimibe

This combination has greater commercial potential because rosuvastatin is widely prescribed and the combination can simplify treatment. Patent and regulatory status varies by country. In jurisdictions where product patents have expired or are weak, generic entry risk is high.

Bempedoic acid/ezetimibe

Nexlizet has greater exposure to patent challenges because the product is newer and branded. Generic entry depends on the remaining patent estate, regulatory exclusivity and any Paragraph IV filings. The product’s principal market risk is competition from generic ezetimibe, branded bempedoic acid, PCSK9 therapies and fixed-dose alternatives.

What geographic markets offer the strongest opportunity?

North America and Western Europe have high diagnosis and treatment rates but intense generic price pressure. Growth is more likely to come from treatment intensification and combinations than from higher tablet prices.

Emerging markets offer greater volume potential because statin and nonstatin therapy remains underused. Key variables include:

  • National reimbursement policies.
  • Generic manufacturing capacity.
  • Cardiovascular disease prevalence.
  • Physician adoption of LDL targets.
  • Local registration requirements.
  • Access to fixed-dose combination products.

Japan is clinically important because of evidence in elderly patients and a high prevalence of older cardiovascular-risk populations. China, India, Southeast Asia and Latin America offer volume opportunities, but local pricing and tender systems can materially reduce revenue per prescription.

What manufacturing and intellectual-property barriers affect ezetimibe?

Ezetimibe manufacturing requires control of stereochemistry, impurity profiles, particle characteristics and solid-state properties. Generic manufacturers must demonstrate pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence, while suppliers must maintain consistent active pharmaceutical ingredient quality.

The main barriers are operational rather than fundamental:

  • Qualified API production.
  • Stable supply of starting materials.
  • Control of chiral impurities.
  • Regulatory documentation.
  • Batch-to-batch consistency.
  • Approval of combination-product manufacturing.
  • Compliance with U.S., European and local GMP standards.

These requirements can delay individual suppliers, but they do not create a durable monopoly for the active ingredient.

Key Takeaways

  • Ezetimibe is a mature, genericized oral LDL-lowering drug with durable clinical demand.
  • IMPROVE-IT, SHARP, EWTOPIA 75 and RACING support its use in cardiovascular prevention and combination therapy.
  • The core ezetimibe patent estate has expired, and plain ezetimibe has high generic-entry exposure.
  • The strongest remaining commercial opportunities are fixed-dose combinations and use in statin-intolerant or high-risk patients.
  • Nexlizet is the most important branded ezetimibe-containing product, but its value depends on patent durability and differentiation from low-cost ezetimibe.
  • Biosimilar risk does not apply because ezetimibe is a small-molecule drug.
  • Global revenue is likely to grow slowly through 2030, with prescription volume increasing faster than market value because of generic price erosion.
  • Generic competition, payer substitution and manufacturing scale are more important than composition-of-matter patent risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ezetimibe still commercially attractive after generic entry?

Yes, but mainly as a high-volume generic and as a component of fixed-dose combinations. Originator economics have largely disappeared, while combination-product economics remain more favorable.

Can ezetimibe be used without a statin?

Yes. Ezetimibe is approved as monotherapy for hypercholesterolemia and is commonly used when a patient cannot tolerate statins or requires a nonstatin option.

Does ezetimibe reduce cardiovascular mortality?

Ezetimibe has demonstrated reductions in composite cardiovascular events when added to statin therapy. Individual trial effects on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality are more limited than the evidence for event reduction.

What drug is most likely to replace ezetimibe?

No single product is likely to replace ezetimibe across the market. PCSK9 inhibitors compete on potency, while bempedoic acid competes on oral administration and statin-intolerance positioning. Ezetimibe’s low cost preserves its role as the usual first nonstatin add-on.

Is Nexlizet a biosimilar or generic version of ezetimibe?

No. Nexlizet is a branded fixed-dose combination of bempedoic acid and ezetimibe. It is regulated as a small-molecule drug product, not as a biologic or biosimilar.

References

  1. Baigent, C., Landray, M. J., Reith, C., Emberson, J., Wheeler, D. C., Tomson, C., Wanner, C., Krane, V., Judge, C., et al. (2011). The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease. The Lancet, 377(9784), 2181-2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60739-3

  2. Cannon, C. P., Blazing, M. A., Giugliano, R. P., McCagg, A., White, J. A., Theroux, P., Darius, H., Lewis, B. S., Ophuis, T. O., et al. (2015). Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(25), 2387-2397. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1410489

  3. Hong, S. J., Lee, Y. J., Lee, S. J., Chun, E. J., Ahn, C. M., Kim, J. S., Kim, B. K., Ko, Y. G., Choi, D., et al. (2022). Treat-to-target or high-intensity statin in patients with coronary artery disease. The Lancet, 400(10350), 380-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00916-3

  4. Nissen, S. E., Lincoff, A. M., Brennan, D., Ray, K. K., Mason, D., Kastelein, J. J. P., Thompson, P. D., Libby, P., Cho, L., et al. (2023). Bempedoic acid and cardiovascular outcomes in statin-intolerant patients. New England Journal of Medicine, 388(14), 1353-1364. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2215024

  5. Ouchi, Y., Sasaki, J., Arai, H., Yokote, K., Harada, K., Katayama, Y., Urabe, T., Uchida, Y., Hayashi, M., et al. (2019). Ezetimibe lipid-lowering trial on prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in 75 or older patients. Circulation, 140(12), 992-1003. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039415

  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024a). Drugs@FDA: FDA-approved drugs, ezetimibe products. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/

  7. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024b). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations: Orange Book. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/approved-drug-products-therapeutic-equivalence-evaluations-orange-book

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.