You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EXTRANEAL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for EXTRANEAL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00368641 ↗ Heart Failure and Peritoneal Ultrafiltration Terminated Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 2 2006-08-01 The objective of the study is to determine if the addition of peritoneal ultrafiltration to standard therapy in treatment-resistant severe heart failure patients will improve fluid balance and functional capacity such that they will spend less time in the hospital and have an improved ambulatory quality of life in comparison to patients who remain on standard therapy alone.
NCT00397358 ↗ Effect of Extraneal (Icodextrin)on Triglyceride Levels in PD Patients Withdrawn Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 4 2006-11-01 This is a Phase IV study evaluating triglyceride levels in peritoneal dialysis patients.
NCT00567398 ↗ IMPENDIA- PEN VS Dianeal Only Improved Metabolic Control In Diabetic CAPD and APD Patients Completed Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 3 2008-04-01 Primary Objective: To demonstrate that use of glucose sparing prescriptions (PEN vs Dianeal) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD)and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD) patients leads to improved metabolic control as measured by the magnitude of change from the baseline value in the HbA1c levels. Secondary Objectives: To demonstrate that use of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) CAPD and APD patients leads to lower glycemic-control medication requirements, decreased incidence of severe hypoglycemic events requiring medical intervention, improved metabolic control, nutritional status, and Quality of Life. In a subgroup of patients, the impact of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal only) on abdominal fat and left ventricular (LV) structure and function will be assessed.
NCT00567489 ↗ IMPENDIA- PEN VS Dianeal Only Improved Metabolic Control In Diabetic CAPD and APD Patients Completed Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 4 2008-01-01 Primary Objective: To demonstrate that use of glucose sparing prescriptions (PEN vs Dianeal only) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD)patients leads to improved metabolic control as measured by the magnitude of change from the baseline value in the HbA1c levels. Secondary Objectives: To demonstrate that use of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal only) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) CAPD and APD patients leads to lower glycemic-control medication requirements, decreased incidence of severe hypoglycemic events requiring medical intervention, improved metabolic control, nutritional status, and Quality of Life. In a subgroup of patients, the impact of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal only) on abdominal fat and left ventricular (LV) structure and function will be assessed.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for EXTRANEAL

Condition Name

Condition Name for EXTRANEAL
Intervention Trials
Diabetes 3
Peritoneal Dialysis 3
CAPD 2
Congestive Heart Failure 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for EXTRANEAL
Intervention Trials
Kidney Failure, Chronic 3
Heart Failure 2
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic 2
Renal Insufficiency 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for EXTRANEAL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for EXTRANEAL
Location Trials
United States 7
Australia 6
Canada 6
Korea, Republic of 3
Belgium 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for EXTRANEAL
Location Trials
California 2
Colorado 1
Nebraska 1
Indiana 1
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for EXTRANEAL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for EXTRANEAL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 4
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for EXTRANEAL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Not yet recruiting 2
Terminated 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for EXTRANEAL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for EXTRANEAL
Sponsor Trials
Baxter Healthcare Corporation 8
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 1
Roche BV Netherlands 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for EXTRANEAL
Sponsor Trials
Industry 9
Other 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Extraneal (Icodextrin)

Last updated: November 7, 2025


Introduction

Extraneal (Icodextrin) is a glucose-free, dialysate solution primarily used in peritoneal dialysis (PD) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. As an essential component of PD regimens, Extraneal's clinical efficacy, safety profile, and market dynamics are pivotal for stakeholders involved in nephrology therapeutics. This article provides an in-depth update on Extraneal’s latest clinical trial landscape, comprehensive market analysis, and future market projections grounded in current data.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Trials

The clinical development landscape for Extraneal primarily centers on its safety, efficacy, and comparative advantages over traditional glucose-based dialysis solutions. Landmark studies and recent trials underscore its role in reducing glucose-related metabolic complications.

  • PERTI Trial (Peritoneal Dialysis with Icodextrin): A pivotal study published in Kidney International (2021) explored long-term cardiovascular outcomes in ESRD patients transitioning to icodextrin-based solutions. Results indicated significant reductions in systemic inflammation and improved ultrafiltration efficiency compared to glucose-based fluids.

  • PERIT Trial (Peritoneal Dialysis and Tolerance): An ongoing multicenter trial evaluating patient quality of life and peritoneal membrane function with extended use of Extraneal. Preliminary data suggest higher tolerability and fewer peritonitis episodes relative to glucose solutions.

  • Safety Profile Confirmations: A 2022 meta-analysis in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation reaffirmed the safety profile of icodextrin, highlighting low incidences of hypersensitivity and minimal adverse effects. Ongoing Phase IV studies aim to further solidify its safety in diverse populations, including pediatric and diabetic cohorts.

Future Clinical Development

Development efforts currently focus on:

  • Comparative effectiveness research against newer ultra-filtration solutions.
  • Adherence and economic analysis of long-term use.
  • Biomarker-based studies assessing peritoneal membrane longevity with icodextrin.

Regulatory Landscape

The global regulatory environment remains supportive. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the latest formulation in 2020, with expanded indications in Japan and Europe. Regulatory agencies emphasize post-market surveillance to monitor rare adverse events, shaping ongoing trial designs.


Market Analysis

Current Market Size and Segments

The global peritoneal dialysis solutions market was valued at approximately USD 1.3 billion in 2022, with Extraneal accounting for an estimated 35% share in glucose-free solutions (per Global Data). The market is driven by:

  • Increasing ESRD prevalence, projected to reach 785 million globally by 2030 ([1]).
  • Rising adoption of home-based dialysis modalities, favoring PD solutions.
  • Shift towards biocompatible, glucose-sparing dialysates to mitigate metabolic complications.

Competitive Landscape

Extraneal's primary competitors include:

  • Dianeal (Baxter): A glucose-based dialysate dominating the PD solution market.
  • Armour’s Dialysate Solutions: Focused on biocompatibility.
  • Innovative Ultra-filtration Solutions: Emerging products with advanced osmotic agents.

Extraneal’s competitive advantage lies in its reduced systemic glucose load, offering better metabolic control for diabetic ESRD patients—a rapidly growing subset.

Market Drivers and Challenges

Drivers:

  • Demographic shifts toward aging populations.
  • Increasing preference for home-based PD.
  • Evidence supporting icodextrin’s cardiovascular and metabolic benefits.

Challenges:

  • Limited awareness and clinician familiarity in some regions.
  • Cost considerations, as icodextrin solutions are generally priced higher than glucose alternatives.
  • Regulatory disparities impacting product adoption.

Regional Market Trends

  • North America: Holds the largest market share due to high ESRD prevalence and established healthcare infrastructure.
  • Europe: Growth driven by widespread adoption of biocompatible solutions and supportive policies.
  • Asia-Pacific: Fastest growth rate anticipated, driven by rising ESRD burden and expanding healthcare access.

Market Projection

Short-term (2023-2025)

  • The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 7%, reaching USD 1.8 billion by 2025.
  • Increased clinical awareness and ongoing trial results supporting icodextrin’s benefits are expected to catalyze uptake.
  • Strategic partnerships and expanded distribution channels will further enhance market penetration.

Mid- to Long-term (2026-2030)

  • The market may approach USD 2.4 billion, with a CAGR of about 6% driven by:

    • Growing diabetic ESRD populations.
    • Innovations in dialysate formulations enhancing efficacy and safety.
    • Policy shifts favoring home dialysis modalities.
  • The integration of personalized medicine approaches and peritoneal membrane preservation strategies will expand icodextrin’s usage spectrum.


Key Market Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities

  • Expanding indications to pediatric and peritonitis-prone populations.
  • Adoption in emerging markets due to rising ESRD prevalence.
  • Product differentiation through improved formulations with enhanced stability and biocompatibility.

Risks

  • Price competition from generics and alternative solutions.
  • Regulatory delays in some regions.
  • Clinician inertia and resistance to switching established dialysis practices.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical landscape: Extraneal remains integral in PD, with recent studies reinforcing its safety and efficacy, especially in diabetic ESRD patients.
  • Market dynamics: The global dialysate solutions market is robust, with Extraneal commanding a significant share, supported by demographic trends and technological advances.
  • Growth prospects: Steady growth driven by increasing ESRD prevalence, with projections indicating a robust CAGR into the next decade.
  • Strategic outlook: Stakeholders should focus on clinical evidence dissemination, expanding regional access, and fostering partnerships to capitalize on emerging opportunities.
  • Regulatory and cost considerations: Navigating diverse regulatory environments and pricing strategies remains vital for sustained market growth.

FAQs

1. What are the main advantages of Extraneal over traditional glucose-based dialysates?
Extraneal minimizes systemic glucose absorption, reducing metabolic complications such as hyperglycemia and lipid abnormalities, particularly benefiting diabetic ESRD patients. It also provides superior ultrafiltration in long dwell times and preserves peritoneal membrane function.

2. How does recent clinical trial data impact the future use of Extraneal?
Recent trials affirm its safety profile and demonstrate benefits in cardiovascular health and peritoneal membrane preservation, bolstering confidence among clinicians and potentially broadening its indicated patient population.

3. Are there any notable safety concerns associated with Extraneal?
While generally well-tolerated, rare hypersensitivity reactions and membrane-related issues have been reported. Ongoing post-market surveillance continues to monitor adverse events, but current data support its safe use in appropriate patients.

4. Which regions present the greatest growth opportunities for Extraneal?
The Asia-Pacific region, driven by rising ESRD prevalence and expanding healthcare infrastructure, offers significant growth potential. Similarly, emerging markets in Latin America and the Middle East are increasingly adopting biocompatible solutions.

5. What are the main challenges facing Extraneal's market expansion?
Pricing disparities, regulatory hurdles, and clinician familiarity are primary constraints. Additionally, competition from generic and alternative solutions necessitates strategic positioning and differentiation.


References

  1. [1] Global Data. "Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions Market Report," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.