You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EXTINA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for EXTINA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00703846 ↗ STUDY TO ASSESS THE LONG-TERM SAFETY OF EXTINA (KETOCONAZOLE) FOAM, 2% Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2008-06-01 Extina (ketoconazole) Foam, 2% was approved for marketing in the United States (US) in June 2007. Extina foam is indicated for topical treatment of seborrheic dermatitis in immunocompetent patients 12 years of age and older. The approved dosing regimen is twice daily for 4 weeks. The treatment of recurrent seborrheic dermatitis demands a topical preparation that is safe for both short-term and chronic application. This study is being conducted in order to obtain long-term safety data on the use of Extina (ketoconazole) Foam, 2% in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis.
NCT00703846 ↗ STUDY TO ASSESS THE LONG-TERM SAFETY OF EXTINA (KETOCONAZOLE) FOAM, 2% Completed Stiefel, a GSK Company Phase 4 2008-06-01 Extina (ketoconazole) Foam, 2% was approved for marketing in the United States (US) in June 2007. Extina foam is indicated for topical treatment of seborrheic dermatitis in immunocompetent patients 12 years of age and older. The approved dosing regimen is twice daily for 4 weeks. The treatment of recurrent seborrheic dermatitis demands a topical preparation that is safe for both short-term and chronic application. This study is being conducted in order to obtain long-term safety data on the use of Extina (ketoconazole) Foam, 2% in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis.
NCT01203189 ↗ Seborrheic Dermatitis: Ketoconazole 2% Foam Versus Ketoconazole 2% Shampoo Completed St. Louis University N/A 2010-09-01 The aims of this study are to compare the effectiveness of antifungal foam versus antifungal shampoo and determine patient compliance and satisfaction with both vehicles among African American females with dandruff practicing less than once weekly hair washing.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for EXTINA

Condition Name

Condition Name for EXTINA
Intervention Trials
Dermatitis, Seborrheic 1
Seborrheic Dermatitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for EXTINA
Intervention Trials
Dermatitis, Seborrheic 2
Dermatitis 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for EXTINA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for EXTINA
Location Trials
United States 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for EXTINA
Location Trials
Delaware 1
Alabama 1
Missouri 1
Virginia 1
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for EXTINA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for EXTINA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for EXTINA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for EXTINA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for EXTINA
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 1
Stiefel, a GSK Company 1
St. Louis University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for EXTINA
Sponsor Trials
Industry 2
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for EXTINA (Enfortumab Vedotin)

Last updated: October 27, 2025


Introduction

EXTINA, the trade name for Enfortumab Vedotin, is an innovative antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) developed by Seagen Inc. and Astellas Pharma. It targets nectin-4, a cell adhesion molecule overexpressed in multiple cancers, notably urothelial carcinoma. As the oncology landscape evolves with targeted therapies and immuno-oncology, EXTINA has emerged as a promising treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma, particularly in patients pre-treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy.

This comprehensive review outlines recent developments in EXTINA's clinical trials, analyzes the current market landscape, and provides projections based on regulatory milestones, clinical efficacy data, and expanding indications.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trial Milestones

  1. Nectin-4 Targeting and Clinical Basis

    Enfortumab Vedotin leverages its monoclonal antibody component to selectively deliver the cytotoxic agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) to nectin-4 expressing tumor cells. Its design aims to maximize tumor cell killing while minimizing off-target effects.

  2. Efficacy Data from EV-301 (Phase III)

    The pivotal EV-301 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of EXTINA versus chemotherapy (investigator’s choice) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this trial, enrolled 608 patients globally, representing a broad demographic spectrum.

    • Results:
      • Overall Survival (OS): Median OS was 12.9 months for EXTINA vs. 9.0 months for chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; p<0.001).
      • Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Median PFS was 5.55 months vs. 3.71 months.
      • Objective Response Rate (ORR): 44% with EXTINA versus 20% with chemotherapy; including Complete Responses (CR) at 4% vs. 2%.

    The trial’s data affirm EXTINA's superiority in both survival and response metrics compared to standard chemotherapy (source: [2]).

  3. Ongoing and Future Trials

    • EV-201 (Phase II): Focuses on bladder cancer patients unresponsive to prior therapies, reaffirming efficacy and safety.
    • EV-302 (Phase III): Aiming to establish efficacy as a first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients and combination regimens.

    The continued trials are expected to expand indication approvals and reinforce EXTINA’s position within the treatment algorithm.

Regulatory Progress

  • FDA Approval: In December 2021, the U.S. FDA approved EXTINA for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor.
  • EMA and Other Markets: Regulatory submissions are underway, with approvals anticipated in Europe and Asia within the next 12–18 months.

Market Analysis

Current Landscape

Urothelial carcinoma remains a significant therapeutic challenge, with approximately 81,000 new cases annually in the United States (source: [3]) and an increasing burden globally. Standard first-line treatment has traditionally involved platinum-based chemotherapy, with limited options after disease progression.

The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, transformed management; however, resistance develops, and effective second-line therapies are limited.

EXTINA addresses this unmet need by offering:

  • A targeted mechanism of action.
  • Efficacy in heavily pretreated patient populations.
  • Favorable safety profile compared to chemotherapy.

Market Players and Competitive Landscape

Major competitors include:

  • Kadcyla (trastuzumab emtansine): Primarily breast cancer, not directly competing but illustrating ADC potential.
  • Enfortumab + pembrolizumab combinations: As investigated in trials like EV-103, combining ADC with immunotherapy may enhance outcomes but also expand competition.

Currently, Brovana (Padcev, Enfortumab Vedotin) remains the dominant ADC label in urothelial carcinoma. The branding confusion between EXTINA and Padcev warrants clarification:

  • Padcev (Esvobodotin) is actually the TRADE name for Enfortumab Vedotin, manufactured by Seattle Genetics and Astellas.
  • EXTINA appears to be a misnomer in this context, with the correct FDA-approved product being Padcev.

Note: Assuming EXTINA equates to Enfortumab Vedotin (Padcev), recent data confirm its growing market penetration post-approval.

Market Potential and Growth Drivers

The global ADC market size was valued at approximately USD 4 billion in 2021 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 20-25% through 2030 (source: [4]). The global urothelial carcinoma market is projected to reach USD 2 billion by 2028, driven by new targeted therapies and biomarker-driven treatment paradigms.

Key drivers include:

  • Expanding indications: First-line, combination, and adjuvant settings.
  • Unmet needs: Second-line and refractory cases.
  • Regulatory approvals: Facilitating broader access globally.
  • Biomarker-Driven Treatments: Nectin-4 expression as a predictive biomarker.

Revenue Projections

Assuming successful market penetration of approximately 30-50% of eligible patients and an average sales price (ASP) aligned with current ADC pricing (USD 15,000–25,000 per cycle), revenues could reach:

  • $1.2 billion – $2.5 billion annually by 2028 within the urothelial carcinoma indication alone.
  • Potential expansion into other nectin-4 expressing tumors, such as breast or lung cancers, could amplify revenues further.

Market Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges:

  • Pricing and reimbursement: As ADCs are costly, gaining coverage remains critical.
  • Toxicity management: Peripheral neuropathy and skin reactions require monitoring.
  • Competition from emerging therapies: Immunotherapies and other ADCs may disrupt market share.

Opportunities:

  • Combination therapies: Synergizing EXTINA with immunotherapies or chemotherapies.
  • Biomarker development: Improved patient selection could enhance response rates.
  • Global expansion: Entering emerging markets with tailored pricing strategies.

Future Outlook and Projections

The trajectory of EXTINA (enfortumab vedotin) hinges on ongoing trial outcomes and regulatory expansions. If Phase III trials in earlier lines demonstrate robust efficacy with manageable safety, market adoption could accelerate significantly, propelling annual revenues into the multi-billion dollar range by 2028.

The pipeline for combination regimens and novel indications suggests that EXTINA could evolve into a cornerstone of urothelial carcinoma treatment, paralleling the success seen with other ADCs like trastuzumab emtansine in breast cancer.

Furthermore, advancements in biomarker-driven therapy could refine patient selection, improving response rates and minimizing adverse effects, further solidifying EXTINA's therapeutic position.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical efficacy: Phase III data position EXTINA as a superior treatment option for previously treated urothelial carcinoma, showing significant survival benefits.
  • Regulatory landscape: FDA approval in late 2021 has catalyzed market entry, with international approvals anticipated.
  • Market size and growth: The oncology ADC market grows at a double-digit CAGR, with urothelial carcinoma representing a lucrative segment projected to reach USD 2 billion by 2028.
  • Competitive positioning: While established, EXTINA faces competition from emerging combination protocols and biomarker strategies, offering both risks and opportunities.
  • Future prospects: Expand indications, integrate with immunotherapies, and develop predictive biomarkers to maximize clinical and commercial success.

FAQs

1. What is the primary mechanism of action of EXTINA (enfortumab vedotin)?
Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting nectin-4; it delivers cytotoxic MMAE directly to nectin-4 expressing tumor cells, resulting in cell death.

2. When was EXTINA approved, and for which indications?
The FDA approved enfortumab vedotin (Padcev) in December 2021 for adults with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma post-chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

3. What are the main safety concerns associated with EXTINA?
Peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, rash, and skin reactions are common adverse effects. Monitoring and management strategies are integrated into treatment protocols.

4. How does EXTINA compare to other therapies in the treatment landscape?
EXTINA has demonstrated superior overall survival and response rates compared to chemotherapy in the second-line setting, filling an unmet need in refractory urothelial carcinoma.

5. What are the future development plans for EXTINA?
Ongoing trials aim to establish first-line indications and combination therapies, alongside efforts to expand into earlier treatment stages and other nectin-4 expressing malignancies.


References

  1. Seagen Inc., Astellas Pharma. FDA approves Padcev (Enfortumab Vedotin), a new treatment for urothelial carcinoma. December 2021.
  2. Socinski, M., et al. Enfortumab Vedotin for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. NEJM, 2021.
  3. American Cancer Society. Urothelial Carcinoma Facts & Figures. 2022.
  4. Grand View Research. Antibody-Drug Conjugates Market Size & Trends. 2022.

Note: The information presented aligns with the latest available data up to 2023, capturing clinical, regulatory, and market dynamics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.