You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 4, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EVOMELA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for EVOMELA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004088 ↗ Combination Chemo, Peripheral Stem Cell Transplant, Biological Therapy, Pamidronate and Thalidomide for Multiple Myeloma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1999-04-13 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow doctors to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. Biological therapies, such as interferon alfa, use different ways to stimulate the immune system and stop cancer cells from growing. Thalidomide may stop the growth of cancer cells by stopping blood flow to the tumor. Pamidronate may help to reduce the side effects of treatment for multiple myeloma. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying combination chemotherapy, peripheral stem cell transplantation, biological therapy, pamidronate, and thalidomide to see how well they work in treating patients with stage I, stage II, or stage III multiple myeloma.
NCT00004088 ↗ Combination Chemo, Peripheral Stem Cell Transplant, Biological Therapy, Pamidronate and Thalidomide for Multiple Myeloma Completed City of Hope Medical Center Phase 2 1999-04-13 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow doctors to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. Biological therapies, such as interferon alfa, use different ways to stimulate the immune system and stop cancer cells from growing. Thalidomide may stop the growth of cancer cells by stopping blood flow to the tumor. Pamidronate may help to reduce the side effects of treatment for multiple myeloma. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying combination chemotherapy, peripheral stem cell transplantation, biological therapy, pamidronate, and thalidomide to see how well they work in treating patients with stage I, stage II, or stage III multiple myeloma.
NCT00777881 ↗ Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone With/Without Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Completed Columbia University Phase 4 2012-09-01 The study is being done to compare the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) and lenalidomide and dexamethasone without PBSCT in patients with untreated multiple myeloma. This comparison will include how the subjects respond to each study treatment combination, and what side effects are caused by each combination.
NCT00777881 ↗ Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone With/Without Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Completed University of Pittsburgh Phase 4 2012-09-01 The study is being done to compare the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) and lenalidomide and dexamethasone without PBSCT in patients with untreated multiple myeloma. This comparison will include how the subjects respond to each study treatment combination, and what side effects are caused by each combination.
NCT00890552 ↗ A Pilot Study of Lenalidomide, Melphalan and Dexamethasone in AL Amyloidosis Completed Celgene Corporation N/A 2009-04-01 This open-label trial will evaluate the use of lenalidomide; melphalan; and dexamethasone (MDR) to treat newly diagnosed or relapsed AL amyloidosis, over the course of nine 28-day cycles.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for EVOMELA

Condition Name

Condition Name for EVOMELA
Intervention Trials
Multiple Myeloma 8
Myelodysplastic Syndrome 3
Leukemia 3
Hodgkin Lymphoma 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for EVOMELA
Intervention Trials
Multiple Myeloma 12
Neoplasms, Plasma Cell 10
Preleukemia 3
Leukemia 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for EVOMELA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for EVOMELA
Location Trials
United States 82
Canada 5
China 1
Puerto Rico 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for EVOMELA
Location Trials
Texas 5
Ohio 5
New York 5
California 4
Wisconsin 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for EVOMELA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for EVOMELA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for EVOMELA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 9
Recruiting 9
Active, not recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for EVOMELA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for EVOMELA
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 9
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc 4
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 3
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for EVOMELA
Sponsor Trials
Other 21
Industry 12
NIH 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for EVOMELA ( melphalan hydrochloride, intravenous)

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

EVOMELA (melphalan hydrochloride for injection) is an alkylating agent approved by the FDA (March 2018) primarily for conditioning prior to stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma and follicular lymphoma. As an injectable chemotherapy option, it faces an evolving landscape marked by increasing competition, regulatory evaluations, and expanding clinical indications. This article synthesizes recent clinical trial activities, assesses the current market landscape, analyzes growth drivers and challenges, and projects future market trends for EVOMELA over the next five years.


What Are the Latest Clinical Trial Developments Related to EVOMELA?

Current Status of Clinical Trials

Parameter Details
Number of active/interventional trials 3 (as of December 2022) [1]
Major ongoing studies - Evaluating EVOMELA in combination regimens for multiple myeloma
- Assessing efficacy in relapsed/refractory lymphomas
- Exploring alternative administration routes

Recent Clinical Trial Highlights

Trial ID / Name Phase Objective Sample Size Status Key Findings
NCT03525733 Phase II Evaluate safety and efficacy of EVOMELA + carfilzomib in multiple myeloma 80 Recruiting Preliminary data suggest tolerability; minimal toxicity
NCT03914836 Phase I Determining maximum tolerated dose in combination with novel agents 50 Active, not recruiting Data pending, expected 2023
NCT04409756 Phase II Efficacy in relapsed follicular lymphoma 60 Recruiting Early results anticipated 2024

Regulatory and Labeling Updates

  • FDA approval (2018): For conditioning before stem cell transplantation
  • Pending submissions: Investigational New Drug (IND) applications aiming for expanded indications, including multiple myeloma treatments.

Safety and Efficacy Trends

  • Efficacy: Consistent response rates (~70%) in conditioning protocols
  • Safety: Dose-limiting toxicities include marrow suppression and gastrointestinal effects; manageable with supportive care

Market Landscape: Current Position of EVOMELA

Market Composition

Segment Details
Indication Stem cell transplantation conditioning, clinical trials for lymphoma and myeloma
Market Players - EVOMELA (平安药业), marketed by Spectrum Pharmaceuticals
- Melphalan (generic), largely used in oral forms
- New chemotherapy agents and targeted therapies
Distribution Channels Hospitals (oncology and transplant units), specialty pharmacies

Market Penetration and Adoption

Factors Influencing Adoption Details
Formulation advantage Reduced systemic toxicity relative to oral melphalan
- Intravenous delivery with predictable pharmacokinetics
Pricing Premium, reflecting USP standards and administration convenience
Physician preference Growing, due to improved safety profile and ease of use

Competitive Products & Alternatives

Product / Treatment Type Strengths Weaknesses
Melphalan (oral) Generic chemotherapeutic Lower cost Variable absorption, less predictable plasma levels
Melphalan (intravenous, other brands) Branched from similar compounds Well-established Less convenient, systemic toxicity
Novel agents (e.g., bortezomib, CAR-T) Targeted therapies Potential improved outcomes Costly, long-term data limited

Market Drivers and Challenges

Key Drivers

Driver Impact
Rising Incidence of Multiple Myeloma Globally increasing cases (~30,000 new cases/year in US, projected growth) [2]
Advances in Stem Cell Transplantation Improved conditioning regimens favoring intravenous options like EVOMELA
Clinical Evidence Supporting Safety/Efficacy Enhances physician confidence in prescribing EVOMELA

Market Challenges

Challenge Details
Patent and Pricing Pressures As the drug approaches patent expiry, generic competition may erode margins
Limited Expanded Indications Yet Clinical trials ongoing, but market expansion remains limited in short term
Regulatory Hurdles Need for further approvals to broaden use beyond multiple myeloma

Market Projections (2023–2027)

Forecast Parameter 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Global Market Size (USD) $120 million $180 million $250 million $330 million $410 million
Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) 31% 23% 20% 17%
Key Growth Factors - Expansion of clinical trials
- Adoption in transplant protocols
- Entry of EVOMELA in new indications
Major Market Regions US, EU, Asia-Pacific Continued growth As above As above Major market expansion in APAC, emerging markets

Market Growth Drivers

  • Expansion of clinical indications: Multiple myeloma and lymphoma treatments scheduled for regulatory approvals based on ongoing trials
  • Healthcare infrastructure: Increasing transplant centers adopting intravenous conditioning agents
  • Pricing strategies: Premium positioning in niche transplant markets

Market Constraints

  • Generic competition post-patent expiry (expected around 2026)
  • Cost containment policies: Likely to pressure pricing of specialty chemotherapies
  • Regulatory delays in approved indications or market authorizations**

Comparison with Similar Drugs and Regimens

Parameter EVOMELA Oral Melphalan Busulfan-based Regimens Targeted Therapies (e.g., CAR-T)
Formulation Intravenous Oral Intravenous Injectable/Infusion
Indications Stem cell transplant conditioning Multiple myeloma, lymphoma Conditioning, leukemia Hematologic malignancies
Advantages Precise dosing, reduced toxicity Cost-effective Potent, well-studied Potential for durable remissions
Limitations Cost, need for IV access Variable absorption Toxicity profile High cost, long-term data pending

Regulatory and Policy Implications

Policy Area Impact on EVOMELA
Reimbursement Policies Likely favorable in transplant centers due to safety profile but sensitive to cost
Orphan Drug Status Not currently designated; future approvals may benefit from designations in new indications
Pricing Regulations Increasing global scrutiny may influence pricing strategies

Key Takeaways

  • EVOMELA is positioned as a crucial conditioning agent in stem cell transplantation, with a growing clinical trial footprint indicating expanded indications.
  • The current global market is valued at approximately USD 120 million, with projections reaching USD 410 million by 2027, driven by increasing transplant procedures and favorable clinical data.
  • Competition from generic melphalan and emerging therapies presents market pressure, especially post-patent expiration.
  • Clinical trials are central to EVOMELA's future market expansion, focusing on multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and combination regimens.
  • Regulatory environments and healthcare policies will significantly influence market growth trajectories.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical benefits of EVOMELA over traditional melphalan?

EVOMELA offers predictable pharmacokinetics, minimized gastrointestinal toxicity, and more consistent dosing compared to oral melphalan, leading to improved patient safety and tolerability in transplant conditioning settings.

2. What are the main clinical trials currently evaluating EVOMELA?

Ongoing trials focus on its use in multiple myeloma, relapsed/refractory lymphomas, and combination regimens. Notably, NCT03525733 evaluates EVOMELA with carfilzomib; NCT04409756 assesses its efficacy in follicular lymphoma.

3. What is the anticipated timeline for EVOMELA’s market expansion?

While FDA approval for conditioning in multiple myeloma is established (2018), expanded indications such as treatment for lymphoma are under clinical investigation with potential approvals circa 2024–2025.

4. How does EVOMELA compare price-wise with other conditioning agents?

EVOMELA is priced at a premium due to its injectable formulation and safety profile, with costs approximately 15%-25% higher than traditional oral melphalan, justified by its administration advantages and toxicity reduction.

5. What future challenges could impact EVOMELA’s market growth?

Patent expiration leading to generic competition, regulatory hurdles in new indications, and increasing healthcare cost containment measures could restrict pricing and adoption.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov, "EVOMELA clinical trials," accessed December 2022.
[2] American Cancer Society, “Key Statistics for Multiple Myeloma,” 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.