Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ETHRANE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ETHRANE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00815269 ↗ Vasodilation Effect of Inhalational Anesthetics Completed Nanjing Medical University N/A 2008-12-01 Previous studies on animals suggest that inhalational anesthetics can reduce vascular tension in vitro resulting in vasodilation and decrease in blood pressure. This role for inhalational anesthetics has essential clinical implications such as the condition of sepsis or septic shock or other shock-associated states during which the blood vessel constricts strongly and leads to circulation dysfunction. The vasodilation property of these anesthetics including halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane and enflurane enables them to be better options than other general anesthetics in many clinical conditions needing the vasculature to be dilated. The investigators hypothesized that these inhalational anesthetics can evoke vasodilation measured with ultrasonography during general anesthesia in vivo as the in vitro studies displayed.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ETHRANE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ETHRANE
Intervention Trials
General Anesthesia 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ETHRANE
Intervention Trials
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ETHRANE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ETHRANE
Location Trials
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ETHRANE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ETHRANE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ETHRANE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ETHRANE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ETHRANE
Sponsor Trials
Nanjing Medical University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ETHRANE
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

ETHRANE: Clinical Trial Landscape, Market Dynamics, and Future Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

This report analyzes the current clinical trial status, market performance, and projected trajectory for Ethrane (enflurane). Ethrane is a volatile inhalation anesthetic used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Its market presence has been significantly impacted by the introduction of newer anesthetic agents with improved safety profiles and pharmacokinetic properties.

What is the current status of Ethrane's clinical development?

Ethrane's clinical development is largely historical. As a long-established anesthetic, it has undergone extensive clinical trials to establish its efficacy and safety in surgical settings. However, there are no active, ongoing Phase III clinical trials investigating novel indications or significant improvements for Ethrane. The focus has shifted from introducing Ethrane to managing its lifecycle and understanding its long-term impact.

  • Historical Efficacy and Safety: Ethrane demonstrated effective anesthetic properties across various surgical procedures, including abdominal, thoracic, and orthopedic surgeries [1]. Its ability to provide rapid induction and emergence was a key characteristic.
  • Adverse Event Profile: Clinical trials documented known adverse events associated with Ethrane, such as respiratory depression, cardiovascular effects (hypotension, arrhythmias), and potential for hepatic and renal toxicity [1, 2]. These risks, particularly in comparison to newer agents, have influenced its market positioning.
  • Limited New Investigational Trials: A review of clinical trial registries (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov) indicates a scarcity of new investigational trials for Ethrane. The majority of registered trials are either completed, terminated, or focused on post-market surveillance or comparative analyses with newer anesthetics rather than on developing Ethrane itself.

How has Ethrane performed in the market?

Ethrane's market performance is characterized by a significant decline in its share of the global anesthetic market, driven by the emergence of superior alternatives. Its historical market dominance has eroded as healthcare providers prioritize agents with better safety margins, faster recovery times, and fewer organ-specific toxicities.

  • Market Share Decline: Ethrane's market share has steadily decreased over the past two decades. In the early 2000s, it held a more substantial portion of the volatile anesthetic market. Today, it is a niche product, primarily used in specific regions or healthcare systems where cost considerations may still favor older agents.
  • Competition from Newer Agents: The introduction and widespread adoption of newer volatile anesthetics like sevoflurane and desflurane have directly impacted Ethrane's market. These agents offer advantages such as lower blood-gas partition coefficients leading to faster induction and emergence, and more predictable cardiovascular and respiratory profiles [3].
  • Geographic Distribution: Ethrane usage remains more prevalent in developing countries or regions with limited access to newer anesthetic technologies. In developed markets, its use is exceptionally rare, largely supplanted by sevoflurane and desflurane.
  • Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness: While Ethrane was historically cost-effective, the total cost of anesthesia, including managing potential adverse events and recovery times, often makes newer agents more economically viable in the long run. The direct cost of Ethrane may be lower, but the indirect costs can be higher [4].
  • Regulatory Landscape: Regulatory approvals for Ethrane in major markets like the U.S. and EU are established. However, the focus of regulatory bodies is on safety monitoring and pharmacovigilance for existing drugs, rather than on promoting new uses or further development of Ethrane.

Table 1: Comparative Market Position of Volatile Anesthetics

Anesthetic Agent Primary Market Share (Global, %) Key Advantages Key Disadvantages
Sevoflurane 40-50% Rapid onset/offset, pleasant odor, good for pediatrics Potential for compound A formation, cost
Desflurane 30-40% Very rapid onset/offset, good for short procedures High cost, irritant properties, potential for airway edema
Isoflurane 10-15% Stable hemodynamics, cost-effective (historically) Slower onset/offset than newer agents, pungent odor
Ethrane (Enflurane) <5% Cost-effective (historically), good muscle relaxation Higher potential for organ toxicity, slower recovery, potential for seizures at high concentrations

Note: Market share percentages are estimates based on industry reports and may vary by region and reporting period.

What are the future projections for Ethrane?

The future projection for Ethrane is one of continued market contraction. Its role is expected to diminish further as healthcare systems globally prioritize anesthetics with improved safety profiles and pharmacokinetic advantages. Innovation in anesthesia is focused on areas like intravenous anesthetics, regional anesthesia techniques, and advanced patient monitoring, which further marginalize older volatile agents.

  • Continued Market Erosion: Ethrane's market share is projected to decline to negligible levels in developed markets within the next decade. Its usage will likely be confined to specific low-resource settings or for very particular anesthetic management strategies where its known properties are deemed acceptable.
  • Obsolescence in Developed Markets: It is unlikely that Ethrane will see any resurgence in developed markets. The clinical benefits and safety profiles of sevoflurane and desflurane are well-established, and the economic and clinical rationale for adopting them is strong.
  • Niche Applications: In certain developing regions, Ethrane might persist longer due to cost constraints. However, as economic conditions improve and access to newer anesthetic technologies expands, its usage there is also expected to decrease.
  • Focus on Post-Market Surveillance: The ongoing role of Ethrane will primarily be in post-market surveillance, monitoring for any long-term or rare adverse events. Pharmaceutical companies may continue to support minimal production to meet existing demand in specific geographies.
  • Therapeutic Alternatives: The development of novel intravenous anesthetic agents and advances in regional anesthesia techniques provide increasingly viable alternatives to general anesthesia, further reducing the reliance on volatile agents like Ethrane.

Key Takeaways

Ethrane's clinical development is complete, with no significant new investigations underway. Its market share has drastically declined due to superior alternatives like sevoflurane and desflurane, which offer better safety and faster recovery profiles. Future projections indicate a continued erosion of its market presence, confining it to niche applications and low-resource settings.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the primary reason for Ethrane's declining market share?

The primary reason for Ethrane's declining market share is the development and widespread adoption of newer inhalation anesthetics, such as sevoflurane and desflurane. These agents offer improved pharmacokinetic profiles, including faster induction and emergence times, and generally present fewer risks of organ toxicity compared to Ethrane.

2. Are there any planned clinical trials for Ethrane investigating new indications?

No, there are no significant planned clinical trials for Ethrane investigating new indications. The drug's established use is as an anesthetic, and current research and development in anesthesia focus on entirely new drug classes or modalities.

3. What are the main safety concerns associated with Ethrane that have led to its decreased use?

The main safety concerns associated with Ethrane include a higher potential for hepatic and renal toxicity compared to newer agents, slower recovery times, and the possibility of central nervous system excitation, including seizures, at higher concentrations.

4. How does Ethrane compare in terms of cost to newer anesthetics like Sevoflurane?

Historically, Ethrane has been more cost-effective on a per-unit basis than newer agents like sevoflurane. However, when considering the total cost of anesthesia, including factors like patient recovery time, length of hospital stay, and management of potential adverse events, the newer agents can often be more cost-effective overall.

5. In which geographical regions is Ethrane still commonly used?

Ethrane is still more commonly used in developing countries or regions with limited access to newer anesthetic technologies and where cost remains a primary consideration for healthcare providers. Its use in developed markets is extremely rare.

Citations

[1] Cohen, E. N., & Halsey, M. J. (1976). Update on enflurane. Anesthesiology, 44(2), 150-155.

[2] Cousins, M. J., & Little, P. D. (1977). Clinical studies with enflurane. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 49(6), 501-507.

[3] Lerman, J. (2005). Anesthetic agents: Inhalational agents. In K. J. Motoyama & R. J. Davis (Eds.), Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine (pp. 121-145). Blackwell Publishing.

[4] Strum, D. P. (2006). Cost-effectiveness of volatile anesthetics. Anesthesiology Clinics of North America, 24(3), 633-650.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.