You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ESTRACE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ESTRACE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00114517 ↗ ELITE: Early Versus Late Intervention Trial With Estradiol Completed National Institute on Aging (NIA) Phase 2/Phase 3 2004-07-01 The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of oral 17B-estradiol (estrogen) on the progression of early (subclinical) atherosclerosis and cognitive decline in healthy postmenopausal women.
NCT00114517 ↗ ELITE: Early Versus Late Intervention Trial With Estradiol Completed University of Southern California Phase 2/Phase 3 2004-07-01 The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of oral 17B-estradiol (estrogen) on the progression of early (subclinical) atherosclerosis and cognitive decline in healthy postmenopausal women.
NCT00115024 ↗ EPAT: Estrogen in the Prevention of Atherosclerosis Trial Completed Mead Johnson Nutrition Phase 2/Phase 3 1994-04-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on the progression of early atherosclerosis in healthy postmenopausal women without preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD).
NCT00115024 ↗ EPAT: Estrogen in the Prevention of Atherosclerosis Trial Completed National Institute on Aging (NIA) Phase 2/Phase 3 1994-04-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on the progression of early atherosclerosis in healthy postmenopausal women without preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD).
NCT00465894 ↗ Detrol Long Acting (LA) vs Estrace Vaginal Cream for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Symptoms Completed Pfizer N/A 2007-04-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if long acting tolterodine confers more benefit than intravaginal low dose estrogen in the treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome at 12 weeks post-treatment initiation. The hypothesis is that low dose intra-vaginal estrogen confers greater benefit than tolterodine in the treatment of Overactive Bladder symptoms. Secondary outcomes were to assess if the addition of the other therapy to the treatment regimen conferred benefit at 24 weeks and 52 weeks.
NCT00465894 ↗ Detrol Long Acting (LA) vs Estrace Vaginal Cream for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Symptoms Completed University of Alabama at Birmingham N/A 2007-04-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if long acting tolterodine confers more benefit than intravaginal low dose estrogen in the treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome at 12 weeks post-treatment initiation. The hypothesis is that low dose intra-vaginal estrogen confers greater benefit than tolterodine in the treatment of Overactive Bladder symptoms. Secondary outcomes were to assess if the addition of the other therapy to the treatment regimen conferred benefit at 24 weeks and 52 weeks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ESTRACE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ESTRACE
Intervention Trials
Atrophic Vaginitis 3
Metastatic Breast Cancer 2
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 2
Vaginal Atrophy 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ESTRACE
Intervention Trials
Atrophy 7
Atrophic Vaginitis 4
Breast Neoplasms 4
Vaginitis 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ESTRACE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ESTRACE
Location Trials
United States 113
Canada 1
Chile 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ESTRACE
Location Trials
California 8
Florida 7
Pennsylvania 7
Virginia 6
North Carolina 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ESTRACE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ESTRACE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 6
Phase 3 9
[disabled in preview] 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ESTRACE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 17
Not yet recruiting 7
Recruiting 5
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ESTRACE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ESTRACE
Sponsor Trials
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 3
NYU Langone Health 3
University of Virginia 3
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ESTRACE
Sponsor Trials
Other 36
Industry 15
NIH 10
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for ESTRACE (Estradiol)

Last updated: November 3, 2025


Introduction

ESTRACE, the brand name for estradiol, is a form of estrogen primarily used in hormone therapy for menopausal women, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and managing menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes, osteoporosis, and vaginal atrophy. As a cornerstone in hormone replacement therapy, ESTRACE’s clinical development, regulatory milestones, and market dynamics are pivotal for stakeholders in pharmaceutical and biotech sectors.

This report provides a comprehensive update on ESTRACE’s ongoing clinical trials, market landscape, and future growth projections, supporting strategic decision-making for pharmaceutical companies, investors, and healthcare providers.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Development Status

Historically, ESTRACE has been marketed as a well-established hormone therapy; however, ongoing clinical trials aim to expand its applications and improve its safety profile:

  • Menopause Management and Osteoporosis Prevention: The most recent phase IV post-marketing studies focus on long-term safety, particularly the risks of cardiovascular events, breast cancer, and thromboembolism. The trials aim to refine dosing protocols and identify patient subpopulations with optimal risk-benefit ratios.

  • Novel Delivery Methods: Several ongoing trials evaluate alternative administration routes, such as transdermal patches, gels, and vaginal rings, to enhance compliance and reduce adverse effects associated with oral estradiol (e.g., hepatic first-pass).

  • Combination Therapy: Clinical evaluations are underway exploring ESTRACE with progestins to mitigate endometrial hyperplasia risk, as well as with other hormones to address specific menopausal symptoms or sexual dysfunction.

  • Special Population Studies: Emphasis is given to women with contraindications to traditional therapy, such as those with history of hormone-sensitive cancers, exploring safer formulation variants.

Regulatory and Approval Milestones

Recent developments include:

  • FDA and EMA Approvals: ESTRACE remains approved worldwide, with consistent reaffirmation of its safety profile pending post-marketing surveillance data.

  • Investigational New Drug (IND) Applications: Some markets are reviewing new formulations and delivery mechanisms, with ongoing INDs evaluated by the FDA and EMA.

Clinical Data and Outcomes

While robust historical data support ESTRACE’s efficacy, ongoing trials intend to optimize dosing and minimize adverse effects:

  • Studies reveal that transdermal estradiol formulations maintain plasma estradiol levels comparable to physiological states, with reduced hepatic impact, thus potentially lowering thromboembolic risk.

  • Late-phase trials consistently demonstrate reduction in vasomotor symptoms, with a safety profile aligned with current standards, supporting ESTRACE’s continued use.


Market Analysis

Market Overview

The global hormone therapy market is projected to reach approximately $14.6 billion USD by 2028 (CAGR ~6%), driven predominantly by the aging female population. Estradiol forms a significant segment within this market, owing to its well-established efficacy and safety profile.

Key Market Drivers

  • Aging Population: The rising incidence of menopause among women over 50 fuels demand for estrogen therapy.

  • Increased Awareness: Public health campaigns have enhanced awareness of menopause-related health issues, bolstering prescriptive trends.

  • Expanding Indications: Emerging evidence supports broader indications, including osteoporosis prevention and hypoestrogenism management.

  • Product Innovation: Development of alternative delivery methods (patches, gels, vaginal rings) enhances patient adherence, expanding market share.

Competitive Landscape

Leading competitors include:

  • Pfizer’s Premarin and Estrace: Established market presence with extensive safety data, though facing challenges from bioidentical hormone options.

  • Novartis’ Femring and Vivelle-Dot: Offer transdermal options with growing market penetration.

  • Wyeth and Teva: Also active in generic estradiol products, intensifying price competition.

Emerging entrants are investing in bioidentical and personalized hormone therapies, broadening the competitive array.

Market Challenges

  • Safety Concerns: Risks related to hormone therapy, such as breast cancer and cardiovascular events, impact prescription trends. Regulatory updates and consumer awareness influence the market dynamics profoundly.

  • Regulatory Scrutiny: Stricter guidelines for HRT approval and post-marketing monitoring influence product development timelines.

  • Patent Expiries and Generics: The prevalence of generic versions constrains pricing power for branded ESTRACE.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Drivers

  • Continued demographic aging will sustain robust demand for estrogen therapies.
  • Innovations in delivery systems are expected to capture additional market segments.
  • Increasing clinical evidence supporting safety and efficacy legitimizes broader indications.
  • Strategic collaborations and licensing agreements with biotech firms may diversify product portfolios.

Market Risks

  • Heightened regulatory oversight could restrict access or impose additional safety requirements.
  • Shifts toward non-hormonal therapies for menopausal symptoms may challenge growth.
  • Litigation and public debate around hormone therapy safety could dampen patient and physician enthusiasm.

Forecast Summary

  • 2023–2028 CAGR: Estimated at 5.5–6%, reaching near $14.6 billion globally by 2028.

  • Regional Markets: North America retains dominant share (~40%), driven by high menopausal population and advanced healthcare infrastructure. Asia-Pacific and Europe are expected to see faster growth due to increasing awareness and evolving standards of care.

  • Innovation Impact: Products with improved safety and convenience are anticipated to expand market share, especially transdermal and localized formulations.


Key Takeaways

  • Robust Clinical Pipeline: ESTRACE’s clinical trials focus on enhancing safety, delivery, and expanding indication profiles, ensuring relevance amidst evolving regulatory standards.
  • Market Strength Amid Challenges: Despite safety concerns and generic competition, ESTRACE benefits from the aging demographic, increasing awareness, and innovation in product delivery.
  • Growth Opportunities: Investment in transdermal and combination therapies promises to diversify applications and improve patient adherence, fueling future growth.
  • Competitive Positioning: Maintaining a strong safety profile, pursuing strategic collaborations, and accelerating innovation are crucial for market leadership.
  • Regulatory Vigilance: Staying ahead of regulatory changes and post-marketing surveillance is essential for sustained market access and revenue stability.

FAQs

  1. What are the main clinical developments for ESTRACE?
    Ongoing trials focus on alternative delivery methods, combination therapies, long-term safety, and expanding indications for specific populations.

  2. How does ESTRACE compare with other hormone therapies?
    ESTRACE’s safety and efficacy profile aligns with established standards; innovations in delivery systems are bolstering its competitiveness against newer formulations.

  3. What are the primary market growth factors?
    Demographic aging, product innovation, increased awareness of menopause management, and expanding indications are key drivers.

  4. What challenges could impact ESTRACE’s market?
    Regulatory scrutiny, safety concerns, competition from generics, and shifts toward non-hormonal options pose potential risks.

  5. What strategic moves can enhance ESTRACE’s market position?
    Investing in delivery innovations, expanding approved indications, strengthening safety profiles, and forming strategic alliances are advisable.


References

[1] Market Research Future. "Hormone Replacement Therapy Market Forecast to 2028." (2021)
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "HRT Approval and Safety Updates." (2022)
[3] GlobalData. "Estradiol Market Analysis and Trends." (2022)
[4] European Medicines Agency. "Review of Menopausal Hormone Therapies." (2021)
[5] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Ongoing Trials Involving Estradiol." (2023)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.