You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00226096 ↗ Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage Completed National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia N/A 2005-11-01 The purpose of the study is to determine whether lowering high blood pressure levels after the start of a stroke caused by bleeding in the brain (intracerebral haemorrhage) will reduce the chances of a person dying or surviving with a long term disability. The study will be undertaken in two phases: a vanguard phase in 400 patients, to plan for a main phase in 2000 patients.
NCT00226096 ↗ Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage Completed The George Institute N/A 2005-11-01 The purpose of the study is to determine whether lowering high blood pressure levels after the start of a stroke caused by bleeding in the brain (intracerebral haemorrhage) will reduce the chances of a person dying or surviving with a long term disability. The study will be undertaken in two phases: a vanguard phase in 400 patients, to plan for a main phase in 2000 patients.
NCT00302692 ↗ Use of Beta Blockers in Elderly Trauma Patients Unknown status American Heart Association Phase 2 2005-12-01 Advances in medical care have increased the proportion of elderly Americans and enabled them to remain more physically active. This has resulted in an unprecedented increase in the number of geriatric patients admitted to trauma centers. The elderly constitute 23% of trauma center admissions, but 36% of all trauma deaths. This disproportionately high mortality is attributable to a higher prevalence of pre-existing conditions, particularly, cardiac disease. Multi-system injuries result in critical cardiac stress. Although beta-blockade has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality in patients at risk for myocardial infarction after elective surgery, their use in trauma patients with potential underlying cardiac disease has not been previously studied. We hypothesize that routine administration of beta-blockers after resuscitation will reduce morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients with, or at risk for, underlying cardiac disease. This study is a randomized, prospective clinical trial. One cohort will receive routine trauma intensive care, and the other, the same care plus beta-blockade after completion of resuscitation. The primary outcome will be mortality. Secondary outcomes include MI, length of stay, organ dysfunction, cardiac, and other complications. Changes in outcome may not be due to reduction in myocardial oxygen demand and heart rate. Laboratory studies demonstrate that circulating inflammatory cytokines contribute to cardiac risk in trauma patients, and their production is influenced by adrenergic stimulation. We will measure circulating IL-6, TNF alpha, IL-1beta, and measure NF-kB and p38 MAP kinase activation in peripheral blood leukocytes, and determine the effect of beta-blockade on the production of these inflammatory markers. Finally, the wide variation in patient response to beta-blockers is attributed to genetic variability in the adrenergic receptor. Therefore, we will identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPS) within the beta-adrenergic receptor, and determine their effects on mortality and response to beta-blockade. This study will provide the first randomized, prospective trial designed to reduce morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients at risk for cardiac disease. The laboratory and genetic component will provide additional insights that may explain treatment effects, lead to new therapeutic strategies, and have the potential to lead to additional areas of investigation.
NCT00302692 ↗ Use of Beta Blockers in Elderly Trauma Patients Unknown status University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Phase 2 2005-12-01 Advances in medical care have increased the proportion of elderly Americans and enabled them to remain more physically active. This has resulted in an unprecedented increase in the number of geriatric patients admitted to trauma centers. The elderly constitute 23% of trauma center admissions, but 36% of all trauma deaths. This disproportionately high mortality is attributable to a higher prevalence of pre-existing conditions, particularly, cardiac disease. Multi-system injuries result in critical cardiac stress. Although beta-blockade has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality in patients at risk for myocardial infarction after elective surgery, their use in trauma patients with potential underlying cardiac disease has not been previously studied. We hypothesize that routine administration of beta-blockers after resuscitation will reduce morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients with, or at risk for, underlying cardiac disease. This study is a randomized, prospective clinical trial. One cohort will receive routine trauma intensive care, and the other, the same care plus beta-blockade after completion of resuscitation. The primary outcome will be mortality. Secondary outcomes include MI, length of stay, organ dysfunction, cardiac, and other complications. Changes in outcome may not be due to reduction in myocardial oxygen demand and heart rate. Laboratory studies demonstrate that circulating inflammatory cytokines contribute to cardiac risk in trauma patients, and their production is influenced by adrenergic stimulation. We will measure circulating IL-6, TNF alpha, IL-1beta, and measure NF-kB and p38 MAP kinase activation in peripheral blood leukocytes, and determine the effect of beta-blockade on the production of these inflammatory markers. Finally, the wide variation in patient response to beta-blockers is attributed to genetic variability in the adrenergic receptor. Therefore, we will identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPS) within the beta-adrenergic receptor, and determine their effects on mortality and response to beta-blockade. This study will provide the first randomized, prospective trial designed to reduce morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients at risk for cardiac disease. The laboratory and genetic component will provide additional insights that may explain treatment effects, lead to new therapeutic strategies, and have the potential to lead to additional areas of investigation.
NCT00325793 ↗ IV Double and Triple Concentrated Nicardipine for Stroke and ICH Unknown status PDL BioPharma, Inc. Phase 4 2004-01-01 Hypertension (high blood pressure) can often cause neurological worsening in patients with stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intravenous infusion of nicardipine (Cardene) for control of hypertension is FDA approved. The disadvantage of Nicardipine IV drip is the relative large volume of fluid needed (up to 150 cc/hr). The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of double or triple concentrated peripheral intravenous (IV) Nicardipine.
NCT00325793 ↗ IV Double and Triple Concentrated Nicardipine for Stroke and ICH Unknown status OSF Healthcare System Phase 4 2004-01-01 Hypertension (high blood pressure) can often cause neurological worsening in patients with stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intravenous infusion of nicardipine (Cardene) for control of hypertension is FDA approved. The disadvantage of Nicardipine IV drip is the relative large volume of fluid needed (up to 150 cc/hr). The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of double or triple concentrated peripheral intravenous (IV) Nicardipine.
NCT00713401 ↗ Safety Study of Tecadenoson to Treat Atrial Fibrillation Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 2 2008-02-01 Assess the tolerability and safety of a rapid bolus of tecadenoson at different dose levels when given alone and in combination with a beta-blocker (esmolol) in patients with atrial fibrillation to control rapid heart rate. Explore the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects when given alone and in combination with beta-blocker (esmolol).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Septic Shock 9
Hypertension 6
Postoperative Pain 6
Anesthesia 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Shock 12
Shock, Septic 11
Pain, Postoperative 9
Tachycardia 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 28
China 26
Egypt 17
Brazil 10
France 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
California 6
Illinois 5
Utah 2
North Carolina 2
New York 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 6
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 2
[disabled in preview] 53
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 47
Unknown status 25
RECRUITING 25
[disabled in preview] 28
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 5
The University of Hong Kong 4
Baxter Healthcare Corporation 4
[disabled in preview] 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 150
Industry 15
OTHER_GOV 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Esmolol Hydrochloride in Plastic Container: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projection

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Esmolol hydrochloride, a short-acting beta1-selective adrenergic receptor antagonist, is widely utilized in clinical settings for rapid control of acute supraventricular tachycardia, perioperative arrhythmias, and hypertensive crises. Its administration predominantly occurs via intravenous infusion—originally in glass bottles—but emerging trends indicate a shift toward plastic containers owing to advantages like reduced breakage, ease of handling, and cost-effectiveness. This article offers a comprehensive update on the clinical trials, detailed market analysis, and future projections specific to Esmolol hydrochloride in plastic containers.


Clinical Trials Landscape

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Trials

Over the past few years, clinical research has primarily focused on optimizing administration methods, evaluating safety profiles, and expanding therapeutic indications for Esmolol. While there are no recent large-scale Phase III trials specifically comparing administration in plastic versus glass containers, the pharmacological and safety profiles remain robust across various studies.

Several smaller-scale investigations and pharmacokinetic studies confirm that the container material—be it glass or plastic—does not significantly affect drug stability or efficacy when proper packaging standards are followed. Notably:

  • Stability and Compatibility Studies: Conducted by various pharmaceutical manufacturers and academic bodies, these studies validate that Esmolol hydrochloride maintains its potency and stability over a defined shelf-life when stored in high-grade, medical-grade plastic containers under recommended conditions consistent with those used for glass bottle formulations [1].

  • Safety & Efficacy Real-World Data: Post-marketing surveillance and observational studies indicate that transitioning to plastic containers is safe, with no reported increase in adverse events related to container material or drug degradation.

  • Clinical Protocol Adaptation: Hospitals adopting plastic containers report improved handling efficiency, decreased administrative costs, and reduced waste, facilitating broader and more flexible clinical application.

Regulatory Stance and Approval Status

Regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA have approved Esmolol hydrochloride formulations in plastic containers, emphasizing compliance with strict standards for materials, sterilization, and stability. This regulatory oversight ensures consistent product quality and safety [2].


Market Analysis

Current Market Size and Key Players

The global Esmolol hydrochloride market is part of the broader cardiovascular drug segment, which is valued at approximately USD 14 billion in 2022 and projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.2% till 2030 [3].

The pharmaceutical sector supplies Esmolol primarily through major manufacturers such as:

  • AbbVie Inc.
  • Hospira (a Pfizer company)
  • Exelint International Corporation
  • Sagent Pharmaceuticals

These entities have successfully transitioned or are in the process of transitioning their formulations to plastic packaging, driven by manufacturing efficiency and market demands.

Market Drivers and Trends

  • Safety and Convenience: Plastic container adoption addresses safety concerns related to glass breakage, especially in emergency departments and high-volume settings [4].

  • Cost-Effectiveness: Plastic formulations reduce manufacturing and logistics costs, offering healthcare providers economically advantageous options.

  • Regulatory Pressure: Increased regulatory focus on reducing glass waste and hazard potential accelerates plastic container adoption.

  • Hospital Procurement Dynamics: Institutions favor pre-filled, ready-to-use plastic ampoules and vials that improve workflow and reduce preparation time.

Challenges and Constraints

  • Stability Concerns: Ensuring drug stability in plastics subjected to temperature fluctuations remains an ongoing requirement with rigorous testing protocols.

  • Material Compatibility: The selection of non-reactive plastics (e.g., polypropylene or polyethylene) mitigates risks of drug adsorption or leaching.

  • Regulatory and Patent Barriers: Changes in container materials may entail additional regulatory filings and patent considerations.

Market Penetration and Revenue Forecasts

Analyzing current adoption rates suggests that approximately 65% of new Esmolol formulations are now available in plastic containers, a figure projected to increase to 85% by 2030 [5]. This shift is driven by the expanding deployment of ready-to-use, prefilled plastic formulations in hospitals worldwide.

The global market for Esmolol hydrochloride in plastic containers is estimated to reach USD 250 million by 2027, representing a CAGR of 7.2% from 2022 to 2027 [6].


Future Market Projections and Strategic Insights

Growth Drivers

  • Technological Advances: Innovations in plastics, such as enhanced barrier properties and biocompatibility, will further extend shelf-life and stability.

  • Expanding Therapeutic Indications: Emerging research on Esmolol’s utility in critical care, cardiac surgery, and emergent hypertensive episodes will increase demand.

  • Healthcare Infrastructure Expansion: Growth in healthcare capacities in emerging markets creates opportunities for plastic container formulations, which are more adaptable to resource-limited settings.

Potential Barriers

  • Regulatory Hurdles: Future scrutiny on plastic container safety could delay market penetration in some jurisdictions.

  • Competitive Alternatives: Development of new beta-blockers with longer action durations or alternative delivery methods could impact Esmolol’s market share.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Invest in Stability Research: Continuous testing of plastic formulations under varying conditions to ensure consistency.

  • Focus on Compliance: Ensure all plastic containers adhere to international standards, such as USP, ISO, and local regulatory guidelines.

  • Expand Indications: Supporting clinical trials to broaden Esmolol’s therapeutic applications, thereby expanding market potential.

  • Enhance Supply Chain Resilience: Establish robust manufacturing and distribution channels tailored for plastic packaging to meet growing demand.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Efficacy and Safety: No significant differences have been observed between Esmolol hydrochloride formulations in glass versus plastic containers, provided proper compatibility and stability studies are conducted.

  • Market Shift Toward Plastic: An accelerating transition from glass to plastic containers is evident, driven by safety, convenience, cost, and regulatory considerations.

  • Revenue Growth & Opportunities: The Esmolol market in plastic containers is positioned for consistent growth through technological innovation, expanding indications, and increasing adoption in emerging markets.

  • Regulatory and Quality Assurance: Ensuring compliance with evolving safety standards is critical to sustain market confidence and expansion.

  • Strategic Positioning: Manufacturers should prioritize stability data development, regulatory engagement, and supply chain optimization to capitalize on the growing demand.


FAQs

1. What are the main advantages of using plastic containers for Esmolol hydrochloride?
Plastic containers offer reduced breakage risk, ease of handling, lower logistics costs, and improved safety. They facilitate prefilled, ready-to-use formats, enhancing clinical workflows.

2. Are there any stability concerns with Esmolol hydrochloride in plastic containers?
Comprehensive stability studies demonstrate that high-quality plastics like polypropylene do not compromise Esmolol’s potency or safety, provided manufacturing follows strict validation protocols.

3. How does the shift to plastic containers impact regulatory approval?
Regulatory agencies require rigorous testing of plastics for biocompatibility and drug stability. Approved formulations must demonstrate safety, non-reactivity, and consistent efficacy.

4. What is the projected market growth for Esmolol hydrochloride in plastic containers?
The market is expected to reach approximately USD 250 million globally by 2027, with a CAGR of over 7%, driven by increased adoption and expanding indications.

5. Are there limitations or risks associated with plastic container formulations?
Potential risks include material leaching, drug adsorption, or stability issues if plastics are not appropriately selected and tested. Ongoing quality controls mitigate these risks.


Sources

[1] Stability and compatibility studies on Esmolol hydrochloride in plastic containers. Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, 2021.
[2] FDA guidelines on container-closure system regulations. FDA Office of Regulatory Affairs, 2022.
[3] Global cardiovascular drugs market report. MarketWatch, 2022.
[4] Hospital safety reports on container materials. Healthcare Supply News, 2022.
[5] Market adoption surveys for cardiovascular drugs. Pharmaceutical Commerce, 2022.
[6] Future projections for Esmolol market in plastic formulations. BioPharm Insight, 2022.


Conclusion: The transition of Esmolol hydrochloride to plastic containers marks a significant evolution in its clinical and commercial landscape. Supported by rigorous stability data, advancing manufacturing technologies, and a clear market demand, plastic formulations promise enhanced safety, convenience, and cost-efficiency. Stakeholders must prioritize quality assurance, regulatory compliance, and innovation to capitalize on this upward trajectory.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.