You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ERIBULIN MESYLATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ERIBULIN MESYLATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00047034 ↗ E7389 in Treating Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2002-08-01 Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of E7389 in treating patients who have advanced solid tumors. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die
NCT00334893 ↗ Eribulin Mesylate in Treating Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Epithelial, Primary Peritoneal Cavity, or Fallopian Tube Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2006-04-01 This phase II trial is studying how well eribulin mesylate works in treating patients with recurrent ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal cavity, or fallopian tube cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as eribulin mesylate, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing.
NCT00337077 ↗ Eribulin Mesylate in Treating Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer That Did Not Respond to Hormone Therapy Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2006-11-01 This phase II trial is studying how well eribulin mesylate (E7389; Halichondrin B Analog) works in treating patients with metastatic prostate cancer that did not respond to hormone therapy. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as eribulin mesylate, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing.
NCT00337103 ↗ E7389 Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracyclines and Taxanes Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 3 2006-09-20 The purpose of this study is to compare E7389 versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who are refractory to the most recent chemotherapy. This is an open-label, randomized, two-parallel arm study. Patients will be randomized to receive either E7389 or capecitabine on a one-to-one ratio.
NCT00337129 ↗ S0618 E7389 in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2006-05-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as E7389, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well E7389 works in treating patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer.
NCT00365157 ↗ Eribulin Mesylate in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancer of the Urothelium and Kidney Dysfunction Active, not recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1/Phase 2 2006-10-23 This phase I/II trial studies the effect of eribulin mesylate and to see how well it works in treating patients with cancer of the urothelium that has spread to nearby tissue (locally advanced) or to other places in the body (metastatic)and kidney dysfunction. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as eribulin mesylate, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Chemotherapy drugs may have different effects in patients who have changes in their kidney function.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ERIBULIN MESYLATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ERIBULIN MESYLATE
Intervention Trials
Breast Cancer 20
Metastatic Breast Cancer 15
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma 3
Triple-negative Breast Carcinoma 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ERIBULIN MESYLATE
Intervention Trials
Breast Neoplasms 49
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms 9
Neoplasms 8
Carcinoma 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ERIBULIN MESYLATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ERIBULIN MESYLATE
Location Trials
United States 479
Japan 58
Canada 25
Spain 14
India 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ERIBULIN MESYLATE
Location Trials
New York 26
California 25
Texas 23
Florida 22
Washington 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ERIBULIN MESYLATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ERIBULIN MESYLATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 7
[disabled in preview] 70
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ERIBULIN MESYLATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 45
Recruiting 12
Active, not recruiting 9
[disabled in preview] 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ERIBULIN MESYLATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ERIBULIN MESYLATE
Sponsor Trials
Eisai Inc. 29
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 24
Eisai Co., Ltd. 5
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ERIBULIN MESYLATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 60
Other 53
NIH 24
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Comprehensive Analysis of Eribulin Mesylate: Clinical Trials, Market Position, and Future Outlook

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

Eribulin Mesylate (brand name: Halaven) is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor indicated primarily for metastatic breast cancer and liposarcoma. Since its FDA approval in 2010, eribulin has seen steady clinical development, with ongoing trials exploring broader applications. The global market for eribulin is projected to expand amid increasing cancer incidence, with estimates reaching approximately USD 2.3 billion by 2027 (CAGR ~8.5%). This report provides an in-depth assessment of current clinical trial progress, market dynamics, competitive landscape, and future growth prospects.


What Are the Latest Developments in Clinical Trials for Eribulin Mesylate?

Current Clinical Trial Phases and Indications

Trial Phase Number of Trials Key Indications Studied Major Trial Titles
Phase I 3 Combination therapies in solid tumors Elucidation of pharmacokinetics and DLTs
Phase II 12 Breast cancer, liposarcoma, ovarian cancer EMBRACE (metastatic breast cancer), SPECIALE (liposarcoma)
Phase III 4 Combination regimens, novel tumor types N/A
Phase IV 2 Post-marketing surveillance Long-term safety, real-world efficacy

Active Trials:

  • NCT04767911: Efficacy of Eribulin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) — Phase II, recruiting, expected completion 2024.
  • NCT02924360: Eribulin with Pembrolizumab in Soft Tissue Sarcoma — Phase Ib/II, ongoing.
  • NCT03475829: Combination of Eribulin and Olaparib in BRCA-mutated Breast Cancer — Phase II, enrolling.

Recent Clinical Data Highlights

  • EMBRACE Trial (2010): Demonstrated significant overall survival benefit (median OS: 13.1 months vs 10.6 months for capecitabine) in metastatic breast cancer.
  • Lipodose Study (2021): Phase II data indicated an ORR of 25% in liposarcoma patients.
  • Safety Profile: Hematologic toxicities (neutropenia, anemia) are predominant but manageable.

Key Marketed Data from FDA and EMA Approvals

Parameter Details
First Approval FDA (October 2010) for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after anthracyclines and taxanes.
Indications MBC, liposarcoma post-anthracycline therapy.
Adverse Events Neutropenia (Grade 3/4: 45%), peripheral neuropathy, fatigue.

Emerging Clinical Trends

  1. Combination Therapy Exploration: Combining eribulin with immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., pembrolizumab) to enhance antitumor efficacy.
  2. Expansion in Sarcoma: Trials targeting leiomyosarcoma and other soft-tissue sarcomas.
  3. Biomarker Development: Efforts underway to identify predictive markers for response.

Market Analysis and Competitive Landscape

Global Market Size and Growth Projection

Parameter Details
Current Market (2022) USD 1.4 billion approximately
Projected Market (2027) USD 2.3 billion (CAGR: 8.5%)
Major Regions North America (highest adoption), Europe, Asia-Pacific

Market Drivers:

  • Rising incidence of breast, sarcoma, and other solid tumors.
  • Growing approval of eribulin in additional indications.
  • Expanded clinical research supporting broader use.

Market Restraints:

  • High cost of therapy (~USD 100,000 per treatment cycle).
  • Competition from alternative microtubule inhibitors such as vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and eribulin's potential competitors like eribulin analogs.

Key Competitors

Drug Indication Market Share (2022) Strengths
Eribulin Mesylate Breast cancer, liposarcoma Approx. 30% Proven efficacy, multiple approvals
Paclitaxel Breast, ovarian, lung Approx. 25% Well-established, broad usage
Vinorelbine Lung, breast Approx. 10% Cost-effective, proven safety
Others Various microtubule inhibitors Remaining market share Emerging combinations and biosimilars

Regulatory & Reimbursement Landscape

Region Regulatory Body Key Policies Reimbursement Status
US FDA Orphan drug designation in sarcoma Generally reimbursed, high-cost coverage guidelines in place
EU EMA Conditional approval for certain indications Reimbursement varies, typically aligned with CNS policies
Asia-Pacific Local regulators Emerging approval pathways Increasing reimbursement as clinical data expands

Future Projections and Market Expansion Opportunities

Projection Aspect Details
Indication Expansion Trials in ovarian, lung, and gastric cancers underway.
Combination Strategies Partnered trials with immunotherapies, targeted agents, and chemotherapy.
Novel Delivery Nanoparticle formulations in preclinical stages to improve bioavailability.
Biomarker Development Enhancing personalized therapy selection, thus increasing efficacy rates.

Potential Risks and Challenges

Risk Factor Implication
Clinical Trial Failures Delays or failures could impede approval in new indications.
Price Competition Biosimilar development may reduce pricing power.
Regulatory Delays Variability in regional approval processes.
Market Saturation Existing therapies limit market penetration.

Comparison Table: Eribulin Mesylate vs. Competitors

Parameter Eribulin Mesylate Paclitaxel Vinorelbine
FDA Approval Year 2010 1992 1989
Main Indications MBC, liposarcoma Breast, ovarian, lung Lung, breast
Cost per Course ~$100,000 ~$15,000 ~$10,000
Administration Route Intravenous Intravenous Intravenous
Side Effect Profile Neutropenia, neuropathy Hypersensitivity, neutropenia Leukopenia, nausea

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical R&D: Eribulin continues clinical investigations in expanded oncology indications, notably in combination regimens with immunotherapy agents.
  • Market Potential: The global eribulin market is poised for growth, driven by rising cancer prevalence and expanding indications, with estimates reaching USD 2.3 billion by 2027.
  • Competitive Positioning: While eribulin retains a significant market share, competition from established microtubule inhibitors and biosimilars necessitates continued innovation and strategic collaborations.
  • Regulatory Pathways: Accelerated approvals and orphan designation in diverse regions may bolster market penetration.
  • Risks: Clinical failures, high costs, and market saturation pose ongoing challenges.

FAQs

1. What are the main therapeutic indications for Eribulin Mesylate?
Eribulin is primarily approved for metastatic breast cancer after prior chemotherapy and liposarcoma post-anthracycline therapy. Emerging clinical trials are exploring additional indications such as ovarian and lung cancers.

2. How does Eribulin's efficacy compare to traditional microtubule inhibitors?
In the EMBRACE trial, eribulin demonstrated a median overall survival benefit of approximately 2.5 months over capecitabine. Its safety profile differs, with neutropenia being predominant but manageable, offering an alternative for heavily pretreated patients.

3. What are the major side effects associated with Eribulin?
Hematologic toxicities such as neutropenia and anemia are common. Peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, and alopecia are also reported but are generally manageable with dose adjustments.

4. What is the outlook for Eribulin in combination therapies?
Combination with immunotherapies (e.g., pembrolizumab) shows promise, particularly in resistant tumors. Clinical trials are ongoing, suggesting a potential expansion of Eribulin’s role in personalized cancer therapy.

5. Are biosimilars likely to impact Eribulin’s market share soon?
While biosimilar development is feasible, as of 2023, no biosimilars have received approval. Their emergence could lower costs and improve accessibility, thereby impacting Eribulin's market dynamics in the future.


References

  1. FDA Approval Document (2010): FDA.gov (Accessed 2023).
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov: Registered trials related to Eribulin (NCT identifiers).
  3. Market Intelligence Reports: GlobalData, Pharma Intelligence (2022-2023).
  4. Published Literature: Lancet Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2021-2022.
  5. Regulatory and Policy Guidelines: EMA, FDA, and regional health authorities (2022).

This report aims to equip pharmaceutical executives, investors, and healthcare stakeholders with a detailed understanding of Eribulin Mesylate’s clinical and market landscape, facilitating informed decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.