Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EPZICOM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for EPZICOM

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00244712 ↗ Abacavir/Lamivudine Versus Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Both In Combination With Lopinavir/Ritonavir For The Treatment Of HIV Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2005-07-01 This study was designed to test the safety and effectiveness of EPZICOM(abacavir/lamivudine) and TRUVADA (emtricitabine/tenofovir) for the treatment of HIV infection when both are used in combination with KALETRA (lopinavir/ritonavir) over 96 weeks
NCT00280969 ↗ Comparing the Effectiveness Between Ritonavir Boosted Atazanavir and Efavirenz for the First HIV Treatment Completed Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan Phase 3 2005-09-01 A selection study in treatment naive HIV patients to compare the virologic success rate of once daily antiretroviral treatment regimens at the 48th week with Epzicom(lamivudine and abacavir) plus efavirenz and Epzicom plus ritonavir boosted atazanavir. The superior regimen will be hired to the comparative study to the current first line regimen (tenofovir plus lamivudine plus efavirenz)
NCT00280969 ↗ Comparing the Effectiveness Between Ritonavir Boosted Atazanavir and Efavirenz for the First HIV Treatment Completed International Medical Center of Japan Phase 3 2005-09-01 A selection study in treatment naive HIV patients to compare the virologic success rate of once daily antiretroviral treatment regimens at the 48th week with Epzicom(lamivudine and abacavir) plus efavirenz and Epzicom plus ritonavir boosted atazanavir. The superior regimen will be hired to the comparative study to the current first line regimen (tenofovir plus lamivudine plus efavirenz)
NCT00335270 ↗ A Randomized, Prospective Study of the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Two Doses of GW433908Ritonavir Given With Abacavir/Lamivudine Fixed Dose Combination Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2006-03-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antiretroviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fos-amprenavir boosted with either of two doses of ritonavir (RTV) when administered in combination with ABC/3TC (abacavir/lamivudine, Epzicom®) FDC (fixed dose combination) in a once-daily regimen over 96 weeks in ART-naïve, HIV-infected adults
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for EPZICOM

Condition Name

Condition Name for EPZICOM
Intervention Trials
Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus 5
HIV Infection 5
HIV Infections 4
HIV-1 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for EPZICOM
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 15
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes 6
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 6
Infections 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for EPZICOM

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for EPZICOM
Location Trials
United States 111
Canada 8
Germany 6
Italy 4
Spain 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for EPZICOM
Location Trials
Texas 7
Florida 7
California 7
New York 6
District of Columbia 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for EPZICOM

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for EPZICOM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 10
Phase 3 6
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for EPZICOM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Terminated 1
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for EPZICOM

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for EPZICOM
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 9
ViiV Healthcare 5
Gilead Sciences 4
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for EPZICOM
Sponsor Trials
Industry 22
Other 12
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

EPZICOM Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

Epzicom (abacavir + lamivudine): What the clinical program and market data indicate

Clinical Trials Update: What is the current evidence base for Epzicom?

Epzicom is a fixed-dose combination of abacavir (600 mg once daily) + lamivudine (300 mg once daily). The evidence supporting use is rooted in historical antiretroviral clinical development of the individual components and earlier combination trials; there is no ongoing, widely disclosed modern Phase 2/3 clinical program for Epzicom itself in major public trial registries based on current available market-standard reporting.

What is available in standard public sources

  • No new Phase 3 efficacy trials for Epzicom are disclosed in major registries at the level typically required for a “current clinical trial update” (e.g., large, randomized trials with primary endpoints for HIV viral suppression).
  • The commercial labeling and prescribing practice rely on established dosing and long-standing clinical evidence for abacavir/lamivudine combination therapy rather than incremental new endpoints.

Regimen positioning in HIV care

  • Epzicom is used as part of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-1 infection and is not a complete regimen by itself. The clinical rationale remains consistent with long-term ART combination strategy using nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) backbone.

Key safety monitoring that continues to drive clinical decisioning

  • Hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir: clinicians must screen and apply risk mitigation tied to *HLA-B5701** status, per product labeling and accepted clinical standards.
  • Ongoing pharmacovigilance continues to focus on the known abacavir hypersensitivity risk and other class-associated toxicities.

Practical interpretation for an R&D or investment view

  • The “clinical trials update” for Epzicom is primarily a label-driven and real-world evidence-driven story, not a pipeline-driven story.
  • Any material competitive or lifecycle value would come from (1) label extensions and (2) formulation or dosing refinements, not from a new late-stage development wave for Epzicom specifically.

Market Analysis: Where does Epzicom sit commercially and competitively?

Epzicom’s market is constrained by two forces: (1) HIV ART regimen evolution toward newer classes with improved tolerability and simplified dosing; and (2) the routine move away from older NRTI backbones in many settings as alternative fixed-dose combinations dominate formularies.

Core commercial facts that shape market trajectory

  • Epzicom is a fixed-dose combination of abacavir and lamivudine supplied as a single tablet regimen component for once-daily use.
  • In many markets, competitors include:
    • Alternative fixed-dose abacavir/lamivudine options (where available),
    • Newer fixed-dose combination products that reduce pill burden using modern agents,
    • Generic NRTI combinations where pricing compresses total revenue pools.

Demand drivers

  • Clinical suitability: patients who are HLA-B*5701 negative and for whom clinicians select abacavir-based regimens may keep abacavir/lamivudine backbone usage stable.
  • Access and formulary inertia: established regimens can persist in public programs and payer formularies even as guidelines evolve.

Demand inhibitors

  • Payer and guideline drift: HIV care increasingly uses regimens that avoid or de-emphasize abacavir in patient groups where alternatives are preferred.
  • Competitive generic pricing: abacavir and lamivudine generics in combination or as co-packaged alternatives apply downward pressure.

What to watch

  • Changes in HLA-B*5701 screening policies do not remove abacavir from the market, but they can affect prescriber comfort and utilization rates.
  • Any conversion from older NRTI-based backbones to modern regimens tends to reduce the addressable use-case for Epzicom over time.

Market Projection: What is the likely sales direction for Epzicom?

A defensible projection for Epzicom is constrained by a lack of new late-stage development signals and the typical lifecycle behavior of mature HIV agents: steady use in eligible cohorts with gradual share pressure from newer fixed-dose ART options and generics.

Projection pattern expected

  • Short-to-mid term: modest decline or flat volumes driven by continued eligibility and existing formularies, offset by competition.
  • Mid-to-long term: gradual erosion as newer regimens with better tolerability and simplified dosing expand adoption and as payer policies shift.

Quantitative forecasting (directional, not point-estimate)

  • Without a current, disclosed Phase 3/label-expansion catalyst, Epzicom’s sales trajectory is most likely governed by:
    • Abacavir/lamivudine cohort size,
    • HLA-B*5701-screened adoption rates,
    • Generic pricing pressure and substitution,
    • Competitive fixed-dose combinations.

Actionable takeaway

  • Epzicom is best treated as a mature franchise rather than an active growth platform. Value is more likely protected via (1) competitive pricing strategies and (2) retention in regimens for HLA-B*5701 negative patients than through new clinical differentiation.

Where are patents and exclusivity most relevant for Epzicom?

For a mature FDC like Epzicom, patent strategy typically shifts from breakthrough protection to:

  • Formulation, manufacturing, and method-of-use maintenance (where available),
  • Jurisdiction-specific lifecycle extensions that may delay generic entry in specific markets,
  • Enforcement posture against generics and combination challengers.

Because the prompt requests only clinical trials update and market analysis/projection, and because patent specifics depend on jurisdiction and filing data not included here, patent timing cannot be stated as a complete, accurate market driver within this response.


Key Takeaways

  • Epzicom’s clinical relevance is grounded in established abacavir/lamivudine evidence; there is no clear signal of a major new Phase 3 Epzicom program in public trial reporting.
  • The market is shaped by regimen evolution in HIV care and generic/fixed-dose competition, limiting growth potential and favoring volume retention among eligible patients.
  • A realistic sales outlook is stable-to-declining over time, driven by cohort stability offsetting competition, not by a new clinical catalyst.

FAQs

  1. What is Epzicom’s composition and standard dosing?
    Epzicom is abacavir + lamivudine dosed as once-daily fixed-dose therapy for HIV-1 when used within combination ART.

  2. Does Epzicom act as a complete regimen?
    No. Epzicom is used as part of combination ART and is not used as monotherapy.

  3. What safety issue most affects clinical use?
    Hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir, managed through *HLA-B5701** risk screening and labeling-based precautions.

  4. What competitive forces most impact Epzicom sales?
    Newer ART fixed-dose regimens, payer formulary changes, and generic substitution that compress pricing and shift patient selection.

  5. What would most likely change Epzicom’s market trajectory?
    A meaningful clinical or regulatory catalyst such as a new label expansion backed by robust trial results, or changes that increase the eligible abacavir cohort or reduce substitution pressure.


References (APA)

  1. FDA. (n.d.). Epzicom (abacavir and lamivudine) prescribing information. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. World Health Organization. (2023). Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection (updated recommendations). World Health Organization.
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Epzicom (abacavir; lamivudine) search results. U.S. National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.