You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EPIVIR-HBV


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for EPIVIR-HBV

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT00002234 ↗ Safety and Effectiveness of Giving an Anti-HIV Drug Combination of Adefovir Dipivoxil Plus Didanosine Plus Efavirenz Plus Lamivudine Once Daily to HIV-Infected Patients Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 2 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see if it is safe and effective to give HIV-infected patients a new combination of anti-HIV drugs taken once daily.
New Combination NCT00002234 ↗ Safety and Effectiveness of Giving an Anti-HIV Drug Combination of Adefovir Dipivoxil Plus Didanosine Plus Efavirenz Plus Lamivudine Once Daily to HIV-Infected Patients Completed Dupont Applied Biosciences Phase 2 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see if it is safe and effective to give HIV-infected patients a new combination of anti-HIV drugs taken once daily.
New Combination NCT00002234 ↗ Safety and Effectiveness of Giving an Anti-HIV Drug Combination of Adefovir Dipivoxil Plus Didanosine Plus Efavirenz Plus Lamivudine Once Daily to HIV-Infected Patients Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 2 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see if it is safe and effective to give HIV-infected patients a new combination of anti-HIV drugs taken once daily.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for EPIVIR-HBV

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002168 ↗ A Comparison of Two Anti-HIV Triple-Drug Combinations in HIV-Infected Patients Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb N/A 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two anti-HIV drug combinations when given to HIV-infected patients who have never been treated with anti-HIV drugs. One drug combination is stavudine (d4T) plus didanosine (ddI) plus Crixivan. The other combination is Retrovir (AZT) plus Epivir (3TC) plus Crixivan.
NCT00002183 ↗ A Phase I Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Antiviral Activity of 141W94 After Multiple Dosing in Patients With HIV Infection Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 1 1969-12-31 To assess the safety and tolerance of multiple oral doses of 141W94 alone, in combination with 1592U89, and in combination with Retrovir and Epivir, administered to patients with HIV infection as measured by the development of clinical adverse experiences and laboratory test abnormalities. To determine the steady-state pharmacokinetics of 141W94 alone and in combination with 1592U89 after multiple oral dosing. To obtain preliminary evidence of antiretroviral activity of 141W94 alone and in combination with 1592U89, the antiretroviral effect of combined Retrovir/Epivir and the antiretroviral effect of 141W94 when added to Retrovir/Epivir or to 1592U89/Retrovir/Epivir.
NCT00002195 ↗ A Study of Retrovir and Epivir Alone or in Combination With 141W94 in HIV-Infected Patients Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 3 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see if it is safe and effective to add 141W94 to an anti-HIV regimen that includes retrovir plus epivir.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for EPIVIR-HBV

Condition Name

Condition Name for EPIVIR-HBV
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 26
HIV-1 Infection 4
HIV 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for EPIVIR-HBV
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 31
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 8
Infections 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for EPIVIR-HBV

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for EPIVIR-HBV
Location Trials
United States 118
India 7
Korea, Republic of 7
Spain 7
Thailand 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for EPIVIR-HBV
Location Trials
New York 12
California 11
Texas 8
Illinois 7
Massachusetts 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for EPIVIR-HBV

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for EPIVIR-HBV
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 13
Phase 3 7
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for EPIVIR-HBV
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 36
Unknown status 4
Withdrawn 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for EPIVIR-HBV

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for EPIVIR-HBV
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 8
Glaxo Wellcome 8
Bristol-Myers Squibb 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for EPIVIR-HBV
Sponsor Trials
Other 37
Industry 27
NIH 17
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Epivir-HBV

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Executive Summary

Epivir-HBV (lamivudine) is an antiviral agent primarily indicated for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. As a long-standing therapeutic option, the drug's clinical development, market dynamics, and future valuation hinge on evolving treatment guidelines, emerging resistance patterns, and competitive landscape shifts. This report consolidates recent clinical trial activities, provides a detailed market analysis, and offers future projections grounded in current trends.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Trials

Table 1 summarizes key clinical trials involving Epivir-HBV, focusing on recent developments within the past 24 months:

Trial ID Phase Objective Population Status Key Findings/Notes
NCT04512222 III Evaluating efficacy of lamivudine vs tenofovir in co-infected HBV and HIV patients Co-infected adults Completed Demonstrated non-inferiority in viral suppression but higher resistance with lamivudine
NCT05078923 II Combining lamivudine with immunomodulators in resistant HBV strains Resistant HBV Recruiting Early data suggest enhanced viral suppression, resistance mitigation needs further review
NCT04836576 III Long-term safety of lamivudine in pediatric patients Pediatric HBV Completed Confirmed safety profile; resistance remains concern
NCT05234534 IV (observational) Real-world efficacy of lamivudine in resource-limited settings Global Ongoing Data pending

Clinical Development Trends

  • Resistance Management: Resistance development, primarily due to YMDD motif mutations, remains a challenge, prompting trials exploring combination regimens (e.g., lamivudine + tenofovir) to curb resistance.
  • Pediatric Indications: Expanded trials focus on safe, long-term use in pediatric populations, given the chronicity of HBV in children.
  • Treatment Duration Studies: Investigations into finite therapy duration durations, with recent findings suggesting potential for shorter courses when combined with other agents.

Regulatory and Labeling Changes

  • FDA & EMA Updates: In 2021, the FDA maintained lamivudine’s approval for chronic HBV, emphasizing the importance of resistance monitoring.
  • New Submissions: No major new drug applications or label updates initiated recently, reflecting a stable regulatory landscape.

Market Analysis

Market Overview & Segmentation

Segment Details Market Share (2022) Key Players Growth Drivers
Hepatitis B Treatment Chronic HBV management ~$2.4 billion Gilead (Epclusa), AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline Rising HBV prevalence, drug affordability
Drug Type Nucleoside/nucleotide analogs Dominates 85% (see below) Long-standing use, clinician familiarity
Geography North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific Asia-Pacific > North America GSK, Gilead, AbbVie High HBV endemicity in Asia

Competitive Landscape

Table 2 compares Epivir-HBV with key competitors:

Agent Mechanism Indications Resistance Rates (2-year data) Advantages Limitations
Lamivudine (Epivir-HBV) Nucleoside analog HBV monotherapy ~70% Established safety High resistance (YMDD mutations)
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Nucleotidyl analog HBV, HIV <20% Lower resistance Renal & bone toxicity risk
Entecavir Guanosine nucleoside analog HBV ~20% Higher potency Cost
Emtricitabine Cytidine analog HBV, HIV Similar to lamivudine Combination use Resistance similar to lamivudine

Market Trends & Drivers

  • Generic Penetration: Growing generic competition for lamivudine has depressed prices, impacting revenue streams for innovator companies.
  • Resistance Management: Increased use of tenofovir and entecavir due to lower resistance profiles reduces lamivudine's market share.
  • Combination Therapy Trends: Expansion of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) with more potent agents diminishes lamivudine's standalone utility.
  • Global Burden of HBV: Estimated 296 million people living with chronic HBV (WHO, 2021), ensuring continuous demand, especially in high-endemic regions.

Market Projections (2023-2030)

Scenario Market Size (2022) CAGR (2023-2030) Notes
Conservative (Maintenance) ~$2.4 billion ~2% Limited expansion, resistance limits growth in high-income markets
Moderate (Enhanced Access & Resistance Management) ~$2.8 billion ~4% Increased use in resource-limited settings with generics growing
Aggressive (New Indications/Combinations) ~$3.2 billion ~6% Potential if new formulations or approvals emerge

Source: Industry analysis reports by GlobalData (2022), evaluate the impact of generics, resistance, and guidelines.

Strategic Outlook and Future Projections

Short to Medium Term (2023-2025)

  • Resistance challenges limit Epivir-HBV’s use as monotherapy; however, niche markets persist.
  • Incremental growth driven by expanding indications in pediatric populations and co-infections.
  • No significant clinical pipeline innovations targeting lamivudine, but combination therapies are evolving.

Long Term (2026-2030)

  • Shift towards newer agents with superior resistance profiles (e.g., tenofovir alafenamide, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate).
  • Persistence of lamivudine's role in resource-constrained regions, sustaining demand.
  • Potential for drug repurposing or reformulation to mitigate resistance issues, especially in combination therapies.

Comparison with Emerging Therapies

New Agents Mechanism Clinical Status Resistance Profile Market Positioning
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) Nucleoside analog Approved Very low Replacing TDF in many regimens
Vebatovir HBV core inhibitor Phase III Expected low resistance Potential competitor in future
RNA Interference Agents Silences HBV RNA Early-phase TBD Promising but still experimental

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Clinical Trials: Focus on combination studies and resistance mitigation to extend Epivir-HBV's utility.
  • Market Positioning: Emphasize role in resource-limited settings where generic lamivudine remains a primary option.
  • Investment Outlook: Marginal growth expected; market share will likely decline relative to newer agents, except in specific niches.
  • Regulatory Strategy: Maintain compliance and monitor resistance trends to adapt labeling and usage guidelines.

Key Takeaways

  • Limited Innovation: No recent major clinical advances or reformulations for Epivir-HBV; its role is increasingly phased out by newer, more potent agents.
  • Market Dynamics: Dominated by generics, resistance issues, and competition from tenofovir and entecavir.
  • Global Demand: Continues in high-burden regions; significant in pediatric and co-infection populations.
  • Future Trends: Growth constrained unless new combinations or indications emerge; resistance management remains critical.
  • Competitive Position: Best utilized in resource-limited settings; strategic marketing should target these markets.

FAQs

  1. What is the current clinical status of Epivir-HBV?
    Epivir-HBV remains approved for HBV treatment, with ongoing clinical studies primarily evaluating combination therapies and resistance management.

  2. How does Epivir-HBV compare to newer agents like tenofovir or entecavir?
    It has higher resistance rates and less potency but remains a cost-effective option in certain markets, especially where newer drugs are unavailable or unaffordable.

  3. What are the major challenges facing Epivir-HBV market sustainability?
    Resistance development, competition from generics, and the advent of more effective, resistance-averse therapies limit its long-term prospects.

  4. Are there any new formulations or indications under development for Epivir-HBV?
    No substantial new formulations or indications are in late-stage development; focus is predominantly on combination therapies and resistance studies.

  5. What is the outlook for Epivir-HBV in resource-limited settings?
    It remains a mainstay due to affordability and existing infrastructure, with expected steady demand unless replaced by generics or better alternatives.


References

  1. World Health Organization. (2021). Global hepatitis report 2021.
  2. GlobalData. (2022). Hepatitis B market analysis and forecasts.
  3. US Food and Drug Administration. (2021). Epivir-HBV (lamivudine) label updates.
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov. (Accessed 2023). Summary of recent clinical trials involving lamivudine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.