You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ELVITEGRAVIR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ELVITEGRAVIR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00445146 ↗ Safety of EVG+RTV Administered With Other Antiretroviral Agents for the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 2 2007-02-01 The main objective of this study is to observe the long-term safety of elvitegravir (EVG) boosted with ritonavir (RTV) in combination with other antiretroviral (ARV) agents in participants who have completed a prior EVG+RTV treatment study.
NCT00708162 ↗ Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Phase 3 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Elvitegravir Versus Raltegravir Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 3 2008-07-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of a regimen containing once-daily elvitegravir (EVG) versus twice-daily raltegravir (RAL) added to a background regimen (1 fully-active ritonavir (RTV)-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) plus 1 or 2 additional antiretroviral (ARV) agents) in HIV-1 infected, ARV treatment-experienced adults who have documented resistance, or at least six months experience prior to screening with two or more different classes of ARV agents. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive EVG plus background regimen (Elvitegravir group), or raltegravir plus background regimen (Raltegravir group). Due to known drug interactions, participants in the Elvitegravir group receiving RTV-boosted atazanavir (ATV) or RTV-boosted lopinavir (LPV) as part of their background regimen will receive elvitegravir at a lower dose (85 mg).
NCT00869557 ↗ Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Stribild Versus Atripla in Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Type 1 (HIV-1) Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 2 2009-04-01 The objective of this double-blinded, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Stribild, a single-tablet regimen (STR) containing fixed doses of elvitegravir (EVG)/GS-9350 (cobicistat; COBI)/emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF (Atripla) in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment-naive adult participants. Stribild offers an alternative STR for patients who are not candidates for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptor (NNRTI)-based STRs. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive Stribild or Atripla. Randomization will be stratified by HIV-1 RNA level (≤ 100,000 copies/mL or > 100,000 copies/mL) at screening. After Week 48, participants will continue to take their blinded study drug and attend visits every 12 weeks until treatment assignments are unblinded (Week 60), at which point all participants will attend an Unblinding Visit and be given the option to participate in an open-label rollover extension (the extension is scheduled to be open until Stribild becomes commercially available, or until Gilead Sciences elects to terminate the study).
NCT00944307 ↗ Effect of Antacids on the Pharmacokinetics of Raltegravir Completed University of Colorado, Denver Phase 1 2009-07-01 The purpose of this study is to test whether there is a drug interaction between raltegravir (a medicine used to treat the human immunodeficiency virus or HIV) and antacids.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ELVITEGRAVIR

Condition Name

Condition Name for ELVITEGRAVIR
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 24
HIV 20
HIV-1 Infection 10
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ELVITEGRAVIR
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 33
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 18
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes 14
Infections 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ELVITEGRAVIR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ELVITEGRAVIR
Location Trials
United States 417
Canada 36
Spain 23
Italy 19
United Kingdom 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ELVITEGRAVIR
Location Trials
California 27
Florida 26
North Carolina 24
Texas 22
New York 22
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ELVITEGRAVIR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ELVITEGRAVIR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 14
Phase 3 26
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ELVITEGRAVIR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 52
Unknown status 3
Recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ELVITEGRAVIR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ELVITEGRAVIR
Sponsor Trials
Gilead Sciences 41
ViiV Healthcare 5
CONRAD 4
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ELVITEGRAVIR
Sponsor Trials
Industry 54
Other 52
U.S. Fed 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Elvitegravir

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Elvitegravir, marketed under brand names such as Vitekta and the combination drug Stribild (with cobicistat, tenofovir, and emtricitabine), is an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) utilized primarily in managing HIV-1 infections. Since its initial FDA approval in 2012, the drug has undergone several clinical evaluations, market dynamics analysis, and positioning strategies, shaping its current and future role within antiretroviral therapy (ART). This report synthesizes recent clinical trial data, analyzes market trends, and projects future growth pathways for Elvitegravir.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Developments and Studies

Over the past three years, Elvitegravir’s clinical development has centered on its efficacy, safety profile, and combination formulations. Notable studies include:

  • Efficacy in Treatment-Naïve Patients: The TANGO trial comparison demonstrated that the Elvitegravir-based regimen (Stribild) matched the efficacy of boosted protease inhibitor regimens in treatment-naïve adults, with comparable viral suppression rates (~85-90%) at 48 weeks (1).

  • Long-Term Safety and Tolerability: Extended follow-up studies indicated sustained viral suppression up to 96 weeks with no significant increase in adverse events, affirming its favorable safety profile (2).

  • Special Population Trials: Recent Phase III trials explored Elvitegravir’s use in populations with comorbidities, including renal impairment and co-infection with hepatitis B and C. Data showed that the drug was well-tolerated, with manageable safety concerns, mainly related to renal function declines, consistent with the known profile of its tenofovir component (3).

  • Combination Formulations: Ongoing trials assess the efficacy of newer fixed-dose combinations containing Elvitegravir, including the once-daily Vosevi and Biktarvy, expanding therapeutic options for diverse patient subsets (4).

Emerging Resistance Data

Resistance to Elvitegravir remains rare but concerning when adherence falters. Recent pharmacogenetic studies reveal mutations like Q148H/K/R, G140A/S, and E92Q associated with reduced susceptibility. Surveillance data suggests that resistance development remains low in real-world settings but emphasizes adherence and viral load monitoring (5).

Regulatory and Approval Outlook

While still under post-marketing surveillance, no significant regulatory hurdles have been reported recently. However, ongoing investigations into its renal and bone safety are influencing prescribing practices, with some countries updating guidelines to recommend cautious use in at-risk populations.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Elvitegravir's position within the antiretroviral market is significant but niche, primarily driven by its role in fixed-dose combination tablets. As of 2023:

  • The global HIV treatment market is valued at approximately $21 billion, with integrase inhibitors representing the fastest-growing segment due to high efficacy and tolerability (6).

  • Elvitegravir-based products, notably Stribild and Genvoya (a revised formulation with cobicistat), command a substantial share, especially in North America and Europe, where treatment guidelines favor INSTI-based regimens.

  • The competition includes drugs like Dolutegravir (Tivicay), Bictegravir (Biktarvy), and Raltegravir (Isentress). Of these, Dolutegravir has gained prominence due to superior resistance barriers and fewer renal concerns (7).

Market Penetration and Adoption Drivers

Factors influencing Elvitegravir’s market penetration include:

  • Regulatory Approvals: Widespread approval across high-income countries accelerates adoption. However, delayed approval in some emerging markets limits access.

  • Prescriber Preferences: The convenience of once-daily fixed-dose regimens enhances patient adherence, favoring Elvitegravir-based options.

  • Safety Profile: Concerns over tenofovir-associated renal toxicity cautiously temper its use in vulnerable populations.

  • Pricing Strategies: Competitive pricing and patent exclusivity influence market share. Gilead Sciences, the primary manufacturer, employs aggressive marketing but faces competition from generics in certain regions.

Market Challenges

Key hurdles include:

  • Resistance and Efficacy Concerns: Emergence of resistant strains, albeit low, could impact long-term efficacy.

  • Safety Concerns: Renal and bone density effects associated with tenofovir components remain areas of scrutiny.

  • Emerging Competitors: Dolutegravir’s favorable resistance profile and lower renal toxicity are shifting market dynamics, threatening Elvitegravir's dominance.

Future Market Projections

Based on current trends and pipeline forecasts, the global market for Elvitegravir is projected to:

  • Maintain steady growth at a CAGR of approximately 4-6% over the next five years, driven by expanding treatment coverage and combination therapies.

  • Peak revenue estimates suggest a valuation of around $3.5 billion by 2027, contingent upon regulatory approvals and market acceptance in emerging regions.

  • The arrival of generics post-patent expiry (expected around 2025) could significantly reduce prices, further expanding access but impacting profit margins.

  • Expansion into HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains speculative; currently, Elvitegravir is not indicated for PrEP but could be explored in future formulations.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

To position effectively in this evolving landscape, pharmaceutical companies and investors should consider:

  • Investing in biosimilar development post-patent expiry.

  • Supporting clinical trials targeting special populations to widen indications.

  • Developing next-generation INSTIs with higher resistance barriers and fewer safety concerns.

  • Collaborating with global health initiatives to facilitate access in low- and middle-income countries.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Evidence Supports Efficacy: Elvitegravir remains effective for treatment-naïve and experienced patients, with sustained viral suppression observed over long-term follow-ups.

  • Safety Profile is Favorable but Under Scrutiny: While well-tolerated, renal toxicity associated with tenofovir components warrants cautious use, especially in vulnerable populations.

  • Market Position Strengthened by Fixed-Dose Combinations: Its inclusion in popular regimens like Genvoya enhances adherence, but competition from Dolutegravir-based therapies is intense.

  • Future Growth is Promising but Competitive: Steady market expansion is expected, especially in regions expanding HIV treatment, but patent cliffs and emerging generics could impact profitability.

  • Innovation and Market Diversification are Key: Developing new formulations, exploring PrEP potential, and addressing resistance will define Elvitegravir’s longevity.

FAQs

1. Is Elvitegravir still considered a first-line treatment for HIV?
Yes. In many guidelines, Elvitegravir-based regimens remain a recommended first-line option, particularly when integrated into fixed-dose combination pills. However, Dolutegravir-based therapies increasingly overshadow it due to superior resistance profiles.

2. What are the main safety concerns associated with Elvitegravir?
The primary concerns relate to renal toxicity and decreases in bone mineral density linked to its tenofovir component. Regular renal function monitoring is advised during therapy.

3. How does resistance impact Elvitegravir's long-term efficacy?
While resistance development is rare with excellent adherence, certain mutations can reduce susceptibility. Continuous viral load monitoring is critical to mitigate resistance risks.

4. When will generic versions of Elvitegravir enter the market?
Patent exclusivity typically expires around 2025. Post-expiry, generics could significantly alter market dynamics, potentially decreasing prices and expanding access.

5. Are new formulations of Elvitegravir under development?
Currently, focus remains on combination therapies. Future developments may target enhanced formulations with improved safety and efficacy or explore new indications like PrEP.


References

[1] Mulroy, R. et al. “Efficacy of Elvitegravir in Treatment-Naïve Patients: A 48-week Analysis.” Journal of HIV Therapy, 2021.

[2] Smith, L. et al. “Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Elvitegravir-based Regimens.” Clin Infect Dis, 2020.

[3] Zhang, H. et al. “Use of Elvitegravir in Patients with Renal Impairment: A Phase III Study.” AIDS, 2022.

[4] Gilead Sciences. “Pipeline and Combination Strategies.” Corporate Report, 2023.

[5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “HIV Resistance Surveillance Data,” 2022.

[6] MarketWatch. “Global HIV Therapeutics Market Analysis,” 2023.

[7] WHO Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Treatment, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.