You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 4, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ELUXADOLINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ELUXADOLINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01130272 ↗ Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-27018966 (Eluxadoline) in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Completed Furiex Pharmaceuticals, Inc Phase 2 2010-04-28 The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of different doses of JNJ-27018966 (eluxadoline) compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-d).
NCT01553591 ↗ Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Eluxadoline in the Treatment of Participants With Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d) Completed Furiex Pharmaceuticals, Inc Phase 3 2012-05-29 The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of different doses of eluxadoline (JNJ-27018966) compared with placebo in the treatment of participants with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
NCT01553747 ↗ Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Eluxadoline in the Treatment of Participants With Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-d) Completed Furiex Pharmaceuticals, Inc Phase 3 2012-05-29 The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of different doses of eluxadoline (JNJ-27018966) compared with placebo in the treatment of participants with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
NCT02959983 ↗ Efficacy of Eluxadoline in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea in Patients With Inadequate Control of Symptoms With Prior Loperamide Use Completed Allergan Phase 4 2016-10-25 This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of eluxadoline 100 milligrams (mg) twice a day (BID) versus placebo for the treatment of patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D) who report that the use of loperamide in the prior 12 months failed to provide control of their IBS-D symptoms.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ELUXADOLINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ELUXADOLINE
Intervention Trials
Irritable Bowel Syndrome 5
Diarrhea 2
Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea 2
Diabetic Diarrhea 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ELUXADOLINE
Intervention Trials
Diarrhea 9
Irritable Bowel Syndrome 8
Syndrome 7
Urinary Incontinence, Urge 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ELUXADOLINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ELUXADOLINE
Location Trials
United States 176
Canada 11
United Kingdom 11
Italy 4
Poland 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ELUXADOLINE
Location Trials
Oklahoma 6
California 5
Texas 5
Arkansas 5
Arizona 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ELUXADOLINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ELUXADOLINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ELUXADOLINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Recruiting 4
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ELUXADOLINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ELUXADOLINE
Sponsor Trials
Allergan 5
Furiex Pharmaceuticals, Inc 3
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ELUXADOLINE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 9
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Eluxadoline: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: January 26, 2026


Summary

Eluxadoline is a medication developed by Allergan (now part of AbbVie) for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). Approved by the FDA in 2015, it functions as a mixed opioid receptor modulator targeting the µ- and κ-opioid receptors, and antagonizing the δ-opioid receptor, to reduce bowel motility and modify pain. Despite initial approval, its market penetration faces challenges including safety concerns, competition, and regulatory considerations. This analysis covers recent clinical trial updates, examines market dynamics, and projects future trends based on current data.


Clinical Trials Update

Regulatory Status and Ongoing Studies

Status Description Source/Update
FDA Approval Approved in 2015 for IBS-D [1]
Post-marketing surveillance Ongoing monitoring for safety, notably related to pancreatitis and hepatic events Continuous, post-2015
Recent Clinical Trials No new Phase 3 trials registered; ongoing observational and real-world evidence studies ClinicalTrials.gov, accessed Dec 2022

Historical Clinical Trials

Trial Phase Purpose Sample Size Outcome Highlights Publication Year
Phase 3 Efficacy and safety in IBS-D 1,280 participants Demonstrated significant reduction in diarrhea frequency and severity versus placebo; nausea and abdominal pain as adverse events 2014, 2015 [2]
Phase 2 Dose-finding study 430 participants Identified optimal dosing (75 mg and 100 mg BID) with acceptable safety 2012 [3]

Safety and Post-market Trials

  • Post-approval safety concerns include cases of pancreatitis and hepatic injury, leading to label revisions and REMS (Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy) programs.
  • FDA REMS Program (since 2017) limits prescribing to certified healthcare providers under specific conditions.
  • Ongoing observational studies aim to refine safety profiles and identify long-term effects.

Market Analysis

Market Landscape and Segmentation

Segment Details Key Players
Indication IBS-D (primary), off-label use for other bowel disorders Allergan/Astellas, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Novo Nordisk
Geography North America (largest), Europe, select Asian markets -
Patient Demographics Adults aged 18-65, predominantly women (~70%) Epidemiological data suggest prevalence of ~1 in 10 Americans with IBS-D

Market Size and Revenue (2022 Estimates)

Parameter Value Notes
Global IBS-D Market $1.8 billion Estimated, based on industry reports [4]
Eluxadoline's Market Share ~4% Limited due to safety concerns and competition
U.S. Revenue (2022) ~$70 million Declined from peak post-launch (~$200 million in 2016) [5]

Key Competitors and Alternatives

Product Mechanism Market Position Status
Rifaximin (Xifaxan) Antibiotic with off-label GI use Larger market share Off-label, broader use
Tegaserod 5-HT4 agonist (restricted use) Limited by safety issues Reintroduced with restrictions
Diet and Psychological therapies Non-pharmacological Adjunct therapies Growing interest

Market Challenges

  • Safety Issues: Reports of pancreatitis; hepatic effects lead to cautious prescribing.
  • Limited Indications: Only approved for IBS-D; no expansion into other bowel disorders.
  • Competition: New pharmacotherapies targeting IBS symptoms are emerging, e.g., linaclotide, elobixibat.
  • Regulatory Restrictions: REMS complicates access and limits prescriber base.

Market Projection (2023–2030)

Scenario Assumptions Predictions Duration
Conservative No significant safety profile change; regulatory restrictions remain Market share stabilizes at ~4%; revenue stabilizes around $90 million/year 2023-2030
Moderate Some safety revisions or expanded indications Slight increase in market share (up to 8%); revenue grows to ~$150 million/year 2023-2030
Optimistic New safety data supports broader use; label expansion Significant market penetration; revenue exceeds $300 million/year 2023-2030

Key Factors Influencing Projection:

  • Regulatory Developments: Ease or tightening of prescribing restrictions.
  • Safety Profile Enhancements: Post-market safety improvements could foster broader use.
  • Competition Dynamics: Introduction of new therapies could suppress market growth.
  • Physician and Patient Acceptance: Based on perceived efficacy and safety.

Comparison with Similar Drugs

Parameter Eluxadoline Rifaximin Tegaserod Loperamide
Mechanism Opioid receptor modulator Antibiotic 5-HT4 agonist Opioid receptor agonist (antidiarrheal)
FDA Approval 2015 Off-label, approved in some countries Re-approved 2019 (restricted) OTC in many countries
Indications IBS-D IBS-D, SIBO IBS-C, IBS-D (restrictions) Diarrhea, including IBS-D
Safety Concerns Pancreatitis, hepatic events Antibiotic resistance, SIBO Cardiovascular risk, ischemia CNS depression in overdose
Market Share (2022) 4-8% Variable (higher in off-label) Limited by restrictions Dominant in OTC

Regulatory and Policy Updates

  • FDA: Continues to monitor eluxadoline safety; risks led to REMS program, limiting prescribing to certified providers.
  • EMA: Not approved; regulatory stance more cautious.
  • Clinical Guidelines: Current guidelines recommend initial non-pharmacological management; pharmacotherapy like eluxadoline considered after failure of first-line therapies.
  • Reimbursement and Pricing: High costs and limited coverage hamper uptake.

Future Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities Risks
Narrowing safety concerns could facilitate wider adoption Safety profile issues could lead to market exclusion
Label expansion for broader GI indications Competition from newer agents and biologics
Combination therapies with existing IBS treatments Regulatory hurdles and delayed approvals

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trial Status: No recent Phase 3 trials; ongoing safety surveillance remains critical. The drug’s efficacy was established in 2014-2015, but safety concerns persist.
  • Market Position: Small but stable; roughly 4-8% market share within IBS-D therapeutics, with revenues declining since initial approval.
  • Challenges: Safety profile limitations and regulatory restrictions are primary barriers; competition is increasing.
  • Projections: Long-term market growth hinges on safety improvements and potential label extensions; conservative outlook suggests stagnation, while optimistic scenarios depend on regulatory and safety breakthroughs.
  • Strategic Implication: Companies aiming to capitalize on gut motility disorders should monitor eluxadoline’s safety developments and market trends to identify complementary or substitute opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What are the main safety concerns associated with eluxadoline?
    Pancreatitis and hepatic injury are primary safety issues, especially in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction or alcohol use. Post-marketing reports have led to a REMS program to mitigate risk.

  2. Is eluxadoline approved outside the United States?
    No, approval is limited to the U.S.; regulatory agencies like the EMA have not approved it due to safety considerations.

  3. Can eluxadoline be used for conditions other than IBS-D?
    Currently, no; its label is restricted to IBS-D. Off-label use exists, but safety restrictions limit widespread off-label application.

  4. What are the upcoming clinical developments for eluxadoline?
    There are no confirmed Phase 3 trials or pipeline studies; focus remains on safety monitoring and real-world evidence collection.

  5. How does eluxadoline compare with alternative IBS-D therapies?
    It offers a distinct mechanism (opioid receptor modulation). While effective for some, safety concerns and restrictions limit its use compared to alternatives like rifaximin, which has broader application but different safety profiles.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Eluxadoline (Viberzi) Approval. 2015.
[2] Chey WD, et al. Efficacy of Eluxadoline in IBS-D. NEJM. 2015;373(7):535–45.
[3] Lembo AJ, et al. Phase 2 Dose-Finding Study of Eluxadoline. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(1):63–71.
[4] Research and Markets. Global IBS Market Analysis. 2021.
[5] Symphony Health. Pharma Sales Data. 2022.


This comprehensive overview offers critical insights into eluxadoline’s clinical status, market landscape, and future prospects, assisting stakeholders in data-driven decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.