Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00351468 ↗ EXTEND (Eltrombopag Extended Dosing Study) Completed Novartis Phase 3 2006-06-01 An open-label, dose-adjustment, extension study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for the treatment of subjects with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who have previously been enrolled in an eltrombopag trial. This study will allow adjustment of the eltrombopag dose to achieve an individualized dose and schedule for each subject. In addition, the ability to reduce the dose of concomitant ITP medications in the presence of eltrombopag, while maintaining platelet counts = 50,000/μL will be investigated.
NCT00351468 ↗ EXTEND (Eltrombopag Extended Dosing Study) Completed Novartis Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2006-06-01 An open-label, dose-adjustment, extension study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for the treatment of subjects with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who have previously been enrolled in an eltrombopag trial. This study will allow adjustment of the eltrombopag dose to achieve an individualized dose and schedule for each subject. In addition, the ability to reduce the dose of concomitant ITP medications in the presence of eltrombopag, while maintaining platelet counts = 50,000/μL will be investigated.
NCT00370331 ↗ RAISE: Randomized Placebo-Controlled Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Study With Eltrombopag Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2006-11-01 The rationale for this Phase III study is to evaluate the 6 month safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in the treatment of previously treated subjects with chronic ITP. The starting dose of eltrombopag, 50 mg, once daily was selected based upon the observed efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics in a dose-finding Study (TRA100773). This Phase III study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study, to evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of eltrombopag, initially administered as 50 mg oral tablets once daily for six months in adult subjects with previously treated chronic ITP. Subjects will be randomized 2:1, eltrombopag to placebo, and will be stratified based upon splenectomy status, use of ITP medication at baseline and baseline platelet count less than or equal to 15,000/µL. Subjects will receive study medication for 6 months, during which the dose of study medication may be adjusted based upon individual platelet counts. In addition, subjects may taper off concomitant ITP medications and may receive any rescue treatments as dictated by local standard of care. After discontinuation of study medication, subjects will complete follow-up visits at weeks 1, 2, 4 and months 3 and 6.
NCT00424177 ↗ Repeated Exposure to Eltrombopag in Adults With Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (REPEAT) Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 2 2007-03-01 This open-label, repeat dosing study, TRA108057, will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of eltrombopag, when administered in a repeat, cyclic dosing schedule. The study will describe the effect of repeated (3 cycles), intermittent dosing of eltrombopag on the pharmacodynamics and durability of eltrombopag response as measured by the peripheral platelet counts. For more information or to see if you qualify, please visit: http://www.itpstudy.com/gov
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE
Intervention Trials
Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic 5
Thrombocytopenia 3
Adult Erythroleukemia (M6a) 2
Adult Acute Monocytic Leukemia (M5b) 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE
Intervention Trials
Thrombocytopenia 8
Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic 8
Purpura, Thrombocytopenic 6
Purpura 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE
Location Trials
United States 90
Germany 34
Italy 31
China 17
Canada 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE
Location Trials
New York 8
Texas 6
Georgia 6
Virginia 5
Missouri 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 11
Active, not recruiting 3
Terminated 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 7
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 5
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 4
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE
Sponsor Trials
Other 25
Industry 17
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 25, 2026

Eltrombopag Olamine (PROMACTA) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis and Projection

Where is eltrombopag olamine in the clinical pipeline?

Eltrombopag olamine is an established, approved thrombopoietin receptor agonist. Current public clinical-trial activity is concentrated in (1) label expansion, (2) combination regimens, and (3) real-world evidence rather than broad Phase 3 de novo programs. The most consistently referenced ongoing clinical development themes for eltrombopag across registries include chronic liver disease-associated thrombocytopenia, immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) refinements, and safety/efficacy in special populations.

Regulatory footprint that anchors development

  • Japan: PMDA approval for eltrombopag for chronic immune thrombocytopenia (primary ITP) and other thrombocytopenic conditions in line with local label structures. (Japan package insert data referenced in prescribing information sources.)
  • US / EU: Global brand and label structures under PROMACTA and related EMA/HCP documents; dosing and monitoring are standardized in product monographs and clinician guidance.

What to monitor in trial updates (actionable signals)

  1. Combination and sequencing strategies for ITP and chronic liver disease thrombocytopenia, where the practical endpoint is platelet durability and bleeding risk reduction rather than single-dose response.
  2. Dialed-in starting dose and monitoring protocols for patients with liver impairment and high baseline bleeding risk, where safety endpoints drive trial design and publication probability.
  3. Long-term safety registries and post-approval cohort studies that quantify thromboembolic and hepatic safety signals in broader populations.

Key practical point for investors
With eltrombopag already marketed in multiple jurisdictions, the marginal clinical value most often comes from incremental label claims and regimen optimization that can translate into formulary access or reimbursement expansion, not from “new mechanism” breakthroughs. This shifts “trial success” from novelty to pragmatic endpoints: platelet response durability, bleeding outcomes, and tolerability.


What does the evidence base show across labeled indications?

Eltrombopag is approved for:

  • ITP (immune thrombocytopenia) in adults (and pediatric where the local label supports it), including chronic ITP and prior therapy failures depending on jurisdiction.
  • Chronic liver disease-associated thrombocytopenia to reduce the need for platelet transfusions prior to procedures in line with local indications.
  • Other thrombocytopenia use-cases where local approvals exist, tied to platelet rise and procedure-related bleeding-risk mitigation.

Standard clinical outcomes used in practice

  • Platelet response rate and durability (commonly assessed against baseline and timing windows).
  • Bleeding event rates and need for rescue therapy.
  • Safety: thromboembolic events, hepatic enzyme elevations, and marrow/reticuloendothelial effects that track class risk for thrombopoietin receptor agonists.

How these outcomes impact commercialization

  • Payors and guideline committees typically weigh “procedure feasibility” and “bleeding-risk reduction” more heavily than platelet count alone, especially in chronic liver disease populations.
  • In ITP, durable platelet response and reduced bleeding translate into direct health economics benefits through decreased steroids/IVIG use and fewer rescue interventions (jurisdiction dependent).

What is the current market structure for eltrombopag olamine?

Eltrombopag’s market is shaped by three factors: (1) entrenched use in ITP and chronic liver disease settings, (2) competitive pressure from other thrombopoietin receptor agonists, and (3) reimbursement and patient access constraints driven by monitoring requirements and class safety considerations.

Competitive set (class context)

  • Thrombopoietin receptor agonists that compete in chronic ITP and related thrombocytopenia settings include avatrombopag and romiplostim (and in some regions, other sequencing or access-dependent brands).
  • Competition is not purely “efficacy per se” but operational: route of administration, monitoring burden, onset of platelet rise, and contraindication profiles in liver disease.

Market drivers

  • Chronic ITP prevalence is stable and drives recurring therapy demand.
  • Chronic liver disease procedure volumes (endoscopy, invasive diagnostics, surgeries) create recurring “platelet optimization” demand, especially where transfusion avoidance is monetized.
  • Formulary access depends on guideline alignment and payer comfort with class safety monitoring.

Market constraints

  • The therapy requires careful dose titration and monitoring, which limits physician adoption if reimbursement or workflow support is weak.
  • Long-term safety surveillance and class-related risk perception can slow uptake in certain geographies.

What is the pricing and reimbursement reality that governs uptake?

Pricing varies by geography and payer; commercial decisions for eltrombopag typically hinge on:

  • Reimbursement authorization requirements (baseline platelet thresholds, documented prior therapy, procedure timing).
  • Step edits between first-line options and TPO-R agonists.
  • Monitoring frequency expectations and requirements for hepatic labs.

Because these parameters differ materially by country, the most robust commercial read-through is:

  • Uptake is highest where prescribing pathways are stable (clear criteria for ITP chronic therapy and for procedure-related thrombocytopenia).
  • Market share is defended through established safety management protocols and guideline familiarity.

How should you project market growth for eltrombopag through the next cycle?

Base case projection framework (business logic grounded in market mechanics)
Projected demand for eltrombopag is driven by:

  • Units: number of treated patients in ITP and per-procedure use in chronic liver disease.
  • Persistence: discontinuation rates are influenced by response durability and tolerability.
  • Price realization: pressured by class competition and biosimilar or generics in some markets (brand exclusivity and local availability govern this).

Directional projection (not calendar-dependent to one country)

  • Low-to-mid single digit volume growth in established markets is the typical profile for mature branded TPO-RAs, unless new label expansions materially open larger subsegments.
  • Share shifts against competitors occur when a rival has operational advantages (route, titration ease, or payer contracting).

What would move the projection up

  • New or broadened approvals that clearly expand the treatable population (for example, expanded pediatric or earlier-line placement).
  • Stronger guideline inclusion for chronic liver disease procedure workflows that can be reimbursed.
  • Evidence that reduces bleeding-related rescue therapy use.

What would move the projection down

  • Safety signal amplification tied to liver impairment or thromboembolic risk perceptions that tighten payer criteria.
  • Loss of formulary access to competitors with easier administration and tighter payer support.

How do lifecycle and competition affect profit trajectory?

Eltrombopag is in a mature lifecycle where margin depends on:

  • Net price after rebates (payer contracting strength and competitive positioning).
  • Patient mix (ITP persistence typically supports baseline revenue; procedure-based liver disease cohorts can be more seasonal and volume-driven).
  • Share vs class peers (titration burden and route of administration affect clinician and payer preferences).

Competitive positioning plays out clinically

  • In practice, physicians choose among thrombopoietin receptor agonists based on patient liver function, risk tolerance, and logistical feasibility.
  • Payers often converge on preferred agents through tendering or formulary agreements in some regions.

Key Takeaways

  • Eltrombopag olamine is a mature, approved thrombopoietin receptor agonist with clinical development focused on incremental label utility and regimen optimization rather than discovery-stage shifts.
  • Market demand is anchored in chronic ITP persistence and procedure-related chronic liver disease use, with growth constrained by class competition and payer-driven monitoring and authorization pathways.
  • Near- to mid-term market projection is best modeled as low-to-mid single digit growth in mature markets, with upside tied to label expansion and guideline uptake and downside tied to safety perception and formulary share loss.
  • Business focus should track payer access criteria, safety surveillance outcomes, and trial/regulatory updates that alter treatable population size.

FAQs

1) What are eltrombopag olamine’s primary commercial indications?

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and chronic liver disease-associated thrombocytopenia for procedure management are the dominant drivers across major markets.

2) What endpoints matter most for commercialization in TPO-RAs?

Platelet response durability, bleeding risk outcomes, procedure feasibility, and safety monitoring performance (especially hepatic and thromboembolic events).

3) How does competition typically shift market share for eltrombopag?

Class competitors gain share when they offer payer-friendly reimbursement pathways and operational advantages (administration, titration ease, and monitoring burden) that improve real-world workflow.

4) What is the most sensitive variable in market projection?

Reimbursement access criteria and net price realization, because they determine treated patient volume and persistence more directly than incremental efficacy.

5) Does eltrombopag’s clinical development still create “step-change” value?

Usually through incremental label expansions, new regimen strategies, and long-term safety evidence that unlocks broader access, rather than through new mechanism-of-action advances.


References

  1. FDA. PROMACTA (eltrombopag) prescribing information. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. EMA. EPAR for PROMACTA (eltrombopag) and associated product information. European Medicines Agency.
  3. PMDA / Japan package insert. PROMACTA (eltrombopag olamine) package insert (Japan prescribing information). Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA).
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov. Eltrombopag olamine clinical trials listings (search results and registry entries). U.S. National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.