Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ELOCON


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ELOCON

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00763529 ↗ Elocon vs Fluticasone in Localized Psoriasis (P03197) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 4 2003-01-01 This is an open-label, randomized, parallel-group clinical study. The primary objective is to assess the difference in response rate between mometasone furoate cream 0.1% (once daily) vs fluticasone propionate cream 0.05% (twice daily) by the end of Day 4 and Day 8 in the management of Indian patients with localized psoriasis.
NCT00763529 ↗ Elocon vs Fluticasone in Localized Psoriasis (P03197) Completed Schering-Plough Phase 4 2003-01-01 This is an open-label, randomized, parallel-group clinical study. The primary objective is to assess the difference in response rate between mometasone furoate cream 0.1% (once daily) vs fluticasone propionate cream 0.05% (twice daily) by the end of Day 4 and Day 8 in the management of Indian patients with localized psoriasis.
NCT01108198 ↗ Treatment of Phimosis With Topical Steroid Cream -Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study Unknown status University of Oulu Phase 4 2006-10-01 During last years topical steroid creams have been suggested to be effective treatment for non-retractable foreskin instead of circumcision. Aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy, safety and persistence of treatment results of a medium potent steroid cream in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
NCT02973776 ↗ Vasoconstriction Trial With LEO 90100 Aerosol Foam Completed LEO Pharma Phase 1 2016-12-01 Vasoconstriction study with LEO 90100
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ELOCON

Condition Name

Condition Name for ELOCON
Intervention Trials
Phimosis 1
Psoriasis 1
Psoriasis Vulgaris 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ELOCON
Intervention Trials
Psoriasis 2
Phimosis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ELOCON

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ELOCON
Location Trials
France 1
Finland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ELOCON

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ELOCON
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ELOCON
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ELOCON

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ELOCON
Sponsor Trials
Schering-Plough 1
University of Oulu 1
LEO Pharma 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ELOCON
Sponsor Trials
Industry 3
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: April 23, 2026

ELOCON (Mometasone furoate) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is ELOCON and what is its regulatory market status?

ELOCON is a topical corticosteroid brand containing mometasone furoate (commonly 0.1% strength in ointment/cream/lotion formats). As a known active ingredient with long commercial history, ELOCON’s market dynamics are driven less by new-drug clinical development and more by:

  • Formulation/label differentiation across geographies
  • Competitor positioning among topical steroids and fixed-combination dermatology products
  • Generic penetration and channel pricing

Regulatory status: ELOCON is an established marketed medicine in multiple countries; its competitive outlook is shaped by generic availability of mometasone furoate and by the erosion of brand premiums over time.


What is the clinical trials update for ELOCON?

ELOCON’s asset is a well-characterized, off-patent active ingredient. Recent “clinical trials” updates for ELOCON specifically are generally limited to:

  • Bioequivalence / formulation comparability studies for generic or alternative presentations
  • Post-marketing real-world evidence and label-supporting studies for topical corticosteroid class use
  • Comparative trials vs other topical anti-inflammatory agents at a class or mechanism level

At the ingredient level, mometasone furoate has an extensive clinical literature base, including controlled trials across inflammatory dermatoses where topical corticosteroids are indicated. For ELOCON-branded products, the current cycle typically does not resemble an R&D “pipeline” profile with active late-stage registration programs, because the branded product is mature and the active ingredient is widely available generically.

Practical implication for decision-makers: the near-term clinical question for ELOCON is not whether it works, but whether the brand (or its marketer) can maintain differential value in access, dosing convenience, safety messaging, and contracted channel placement versus low-cost generics.


Which indications and label mechanics typically drive ELOCON demand?

Demand for topical mometasone products is tied to the clinical use patterns for the topical corticosteroid class. Commercial positioning usually maps to:

  • Eczematous and inflammatory dermatoses
  • Steroid-responsive inflammatory skin conditions
  • Short-course, stepped-care use (severity- and location-based selection)

Brand demand often depends on how payers and formularies steer patients toward lower-cost options and how well prescribers trust a specific product form factor (ointment vs cream vs lotion) for body site and adherence.


How big is the topical corticosteroid opportunity and where does ELOCON sit?

Mometasone furoate competes in the broad topical anti-inflammatory space dominated by:

  • Generic topical corticosteroids (multiple strengths and vehicles)
  • Other mid- to high-potency corticosteroids
  • Steroid-sparing agents that can shift use patterns in chronic atopic dermatitis and long-duration care (timing and patient selection drive substitution)

Market reality for ELOCON: when a product is not protected by active brand exclusivity in key markets, revenue is primarily a function of:

  • Market share within corticosteroid class selection
  • Pricing and contracting power
  • Vehicle preference (cream vs ointment vs lotion)
  • Line-extensions and packaging that reduce pharmacy dispensing friction

What drives pricing power or margin compression for ELOCON?

Commercial performance for established topical steroids with generic competition typically tracks:

  • Wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) to contract price spread and PBM/formulary access
  • Generic substitution pressure and pharmacist-initiated substitution rules
  • Competitor lifecycle (other brands with remaining exclusivity or better formulary status)
  • Vehicle-level differentiation that preserves some brand preference

In mature categories, brand pricing power erodes as generic share increases, unless the brand wins access through negotiated discounts, rebates, or prescriber preference tied to tolerability or vehicle feel.


What is the competitive landscape for mometasone furoate topical products?

ELOCON’s competitive set includes:

  • Generic mometasone furoate products across vehicles
  • Other topical corticosteroids (mid to high potency)
  • Combination products in select dermatologic categories
  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapies for chronic control where used

Because the active ingredient is widely available, the competitive advantage for ELOCON generally comes from brand-level execution rather than clinical differentiation.


Market projections for ELOCON (base, bull, bear)

Given ELOCON’s mature active ingredient position, the reasonable projection framework for a branded mometasone product is:

  • Base case: gradual volume erosion from generics and substitution, partially offset by market growth in dermatology care and vehicle-driven preference.
  • Bull case: improved formulary position (or higher effective net price) in priority geographies and vehicles; stable share despite generic competition.
  • Bear case: accelerating generic substitution, worsening contract terms, or increased formulary steering to cheaper agents.

Projection ranges (directional, category-consistent) typically move with:

  • Dermatology steroid category maturity
  • Generic penetration speed by country and channel
  • Substitution migration to steroid-sparing therapies

Because the active ingredient is established and brand-level exclusivity is limited, the strongest forecast differentiators are commercial execution and access rather than new clinical evidence.


How should investors and R&D teams think about “next moves” for ELOCON?

For a brand like ELOCON, the investment decision usually turns on:

  • Access strategy (formularies, PBM coverage, payer contracts)
  • Portfolio rationalization (vehicle-specific focus where uptake is strongest)
  • Lifecycle management via line extensions that can protect net pricing (packaging, vehicle optimization)
  • Defensive evidence (safety and comparative tolerability messaging)

If you are evaluating “clinical trial value” for ELOCON, the dominant value typically comes from comparative and real-world studies that support differentiation in prescribing and formulary decisions rather than from late-stage registration trials.


Key Takeaways

  • ELOCON is a mature topical mometasone furoate brand where clinical differentiation is limited by extensive historical evidence and generic availability.
  • Clinical “updates” are mostly formulation/positioning and post-market evidence rather than a pipeline of new registrational trials tied to brand exclusivity.
  • Market outlook is driven by access, net pricing, and vehicle preference, with share pressure from generics and substitution to other dermatologic therapies.
  • Projections should be framed around commercial execution (formulary and contracting) more than on new clinical milestones.

FAQs

1) Is there meaningful late-stage clinical development for ELOCON?
ELOCON’s branded pathway is typically not characterized by late-stage, registration-grade development because mometasone furoate is established and widely generic.

2) What conditions most influence ELOCON prescribing demand?
Inflammatory, steroid-responsive dermatoses, with utilization patterns shaped by body site and vehicle choice.

3) How does generic competition affect ELOCON’s market trajectory?
Generic substitution generally compresses net pricing and shifts demand toward lower-cost options unless the brand holds formulary access and vehicle preference.

4) What are the most important commercial levers for ELOCON?
Payer/formulary placement, contracted net pricing, and differentiation by vehicle and pack format.

5) What would most change ELOCON’s outlook in the next 3-5 years?
Changes in formulary access and contracting terms, plus class-level substitution patterns in dermatology.


References

[1] FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[2] EMA. European public assessment reports (EPAR) and related assessment documents for mometasone furoate-containing products. European Medicines Agency.
[3] PubMed. Search results for “mometasone furoate” topical clinical trials and post-marketing studies. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. Registry results for “mometasone furoate” topical studies and formulation studies. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
[5] GlobalData/IMS/industry market research summaries on topical corticosteroids and dermatology therapeutics (category-level context).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.