You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00039741 ↗ Anti-HIV Drug Regimens and Treatment-Switching Guidelines in HIV Infected Children Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 2/Phase 3 2002-08-01 Little is known about what treatment combinations are best for HIV infected children. This study examined the long-term effectiveness of different anti-HIV drug combinations in children and strategies for switching treatment if the first treatment does not work. The study enrolled children who had not previously taken anti-HIV medication. Participants in this study were recruited in the United States, South America and Europe. Some European children may also enroll in a substudy that will observe changes in body fat in children taking anti-HIV medications.
NCT00039741 ↗ Anti-HIV Drug Regimens and Treatment-Switching Guidelines in HIV Infected Children Completed PENTA Foundation Phase 2/Phase 3 2002-08-01 Little is known about what treatment combinations are best for HIV infected children. This study examined the long-term effectiveness of different anti-HIV drug combinations in children and strategies for switching treatment if the first treatment does not work. The study enrolled children who had not previously taken anti-HIV medication. Participants in this study were recruited in the United States, South America and Europe. Some European children may also enroll in a substudy that will observe changes in body fat in children taking anti-HIV medications.
NCT00039741 ↗ Anti-HIV Drug Regimens and Treatment-Switching Guidelines in HIV Infected Children Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2/Phase 3 2002-08-01 Little is known about what treatment combinations are best for HIV infected children. This study examined the long-term effectiveness of different anti-HIV drug combinations in children and strategies for switching treatment if the first treatment does not work. The study enrolled children who had not previously taken anti-HIV medication. Participants in this study were recruited in the United States, South America and Europe. Some European children may also enroll in a substudy that will observe changes in body fat in children taking anti-HIV medications.
NCT00084136 ↗ Prospective Evaluation of Anti-retroviral Combinations for Treatment Naive, HIV Infected Persons in Resource-limited Settings Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 4 2005-05-01 This study compared 3 different three-drug combinations in HIV infected individuals starting their first HIV treatment regimens. Participants were recruited from resource-limited areas in Africa, Asia, South America, Haiti, and also from the United States. The study hypothesis was each of the once daily combinations (PI based, or NNRTI based) would not have inferior efficacy compared to the twice daily NNRTI based combination.
NCT00084136 ↗ Prospective Evaluation of Anti-retroviral Combinations for Treatment Naive, HIV Infected Persons in Resource-limited Settings Completed AIDS Clinical Trials Group Phase 4 2005-05-01 This study compared 3 different three-drug combinations in HIV infected individuals starting their first HIV treatment regimens. Participants were recruited from resource-limited areas in Africa, Asia, South America, Haiti, and also from the United States. The study hypothesis was each of the once daily combinations (PI based, or NNRTI based) would not have inferior efficacy compared to the twice daily NNRTI based combination.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 18
HIV-1 Infection 7
HIV 5
HIV Infection 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 26
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 9
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes 6
Hepatitis C 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE
Location Trials
United States 232
Canada 16
Germany 11
South Africa 10
United Kingdom 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE
Location Trials
California 15
Florida 13
North Carolina 12
New York 12
Illinois 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 8
Phase 3 16
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 29
Withdrawn 3
Active, not recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE
Sponsor Trials
Gilead Sciences 15
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 11
AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for EFAVIRENZ, EMTRICITABINE, AND TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 34
Other 25
NIH 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Combination Therapy

Last updated: November 2, 2025


Introduction

The combination therapy of Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (often marketed as Atripla) has been a cornerstone in HIV treatment regimens worldwide. Its unique pharmacological profile and once-in-phase clinical development timeline have positioned it prominently within antiviral therapeutics. This article provides a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, analyzes current market dynamics, and projects future trends for this triple combination drug.


Clinical Trials Landscape: Current Status and Developments

Historical Context and Regulatory Milestones

Since its approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2006, Atripla quickly gained adoption for its convenience as a single-tablet regimen (STR). Pharmacokinetic advantages, efficacy, and tolerability contributed to its widespread use. However, evolving guidelines and the emergence of newer agents prompted several manufacturers and research entities to initiate clinical trials evaluating its safety, efficacy, and positioning in HIV therapy.

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Trials

As of 2023, the clinical trial landscape reflects shifts towards optimizing safety profiles, addressing resistance concerns, and simplifying HIV management:

  • Studies on Long-Acting Formulations: Multiple phase I and II trials are exploring injectable, long-acting formulations of Tenofovir and Emtricitabine. While Efavirenz's phase-out has been noted, trials assess whether combining these agents with integrase inhibitors yields comparable or superior outcomes.

  • Resistance and Safety Trials: Ongoing studies investigate the implications of long-term use, focusing on neuropsychiatric adverse effects associated with Efavirenz and renal bone toxicity linked to Tenofovir. The aim is to develop guidelines for personalized medicine, balancing efficacy with tolerability.

  • Comparative Effectiveness Trials: Trials comparing Efavirenz-based regimens with newer integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) like Dolutegravir are underway. These aim to quantify differential outcomes in viral suppression and adverse events.

Regulatory and Market-Driven Clinical Research

In response to the 2020 WHO guidelines advocating for INSTIs as first-line therapy, manufacturers are conducting phase IV studies to revisit the long-term benefits of Efavirenz-comprising regimens. The focus has shifted from regulatory approval to post-market surveillance, ensuring safety and informing updates in clinical practice.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Historical Trends

The global HIV therapeutic market was valued at approximately USD 18.5 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.5% through 2030, driven by increasing HIV prevalence and improved healthcare access, especially in Asia-Pacific, Africa, and Latin America [1].

Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate collectively constitute a significant share of this market—estimated at 55% in 2022—due to their status as one of the earliest STRs approved and their cost-effectiveness in resource-limited settings [2].

Key Market Drivers

  • Established Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness: Their broad WHO prequalification supports adoption in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
  • Regulatory Approvals and Patent Landscape: Many formulations are off-patent, leading to generic competition, reducing prices, and widening access.

Market Challenges and Limitations

  • Safety Concerns: Neuropsychiatric effects associated with Efavirenz and renal toxicity linked to Tenofovir have prompted clinicians to consider alternative regimens.
  • Emergence of Newer Therapies: INSTIs exhibit superior tolerability, fewer drug interactions, and higher barriers to resistance, gradually supplanting Efavirenz-based therapies.
  • Resistance Development: Long-term use carries risks, especially if adherence is suboptimal, influencing market appeal.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • Developed Markets (U.S., Europe): Rapid adoption of INSTI-based regimens has limited growth potential for Efavirenz-based combinations, relegating them mainly to generic markets or resource-limited settings.
  • Emerging Markets (Africa, Southeast Asia): Significant reliance persists due to affordability, existing infrastructure, and WHO guidelines endorsing these agents.

Future Market Projections

Considering current trends, the market for Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate is expected to decline modestly in high-income regions over the next decade, with a CAGR of approximately -1.2% from 2023–2030. Conversely, in LMICs, demand remains stable or slightly increases owing to large treatment programs and sustained use of generics.

Key projections include:

  • Continued Use in Resource-Limited Settings: As WHO recommends these agents in fixed-dose combinations, volumes will stay resilient in developing nations.
  • Product Lifecycle Management: Manufacturers are exploring innovative formulations (e.g., long-acting injectables) to extend market relevance.
  • Shift Toward Regimen Optimization: Integration of Efavirenz and its combinations into broader ART strategies, with modifications to mitigate adverse effects, remains a focus.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: Investing in next-generation formulations and comparative effectiveness trials can secure market share and extend product relevance.
  • Regulatory Agencies: Continuous post-market monitoring and updates to treatment guidelines are critical for ensuring safety and efficacy.
  • Healthcare Practitioners: Staying informed about evolving evidence and embracing newer regimens ensures optimized patient care.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: Recent research focuses on long-acting injectable formulations and safety profiling, with many studies comparing Efavirenz-based regimens to INSTIs.
  • Market Dynamics: While declining in high-income markets, Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate maintain substantial importance in LMICs due to their affordability and WHO endorsement.
  • Future Trends: The global market will see a gradual shift toward newer antiviral agents, but resource-limited markets will sustain demand for traditional combination therapies, especially generics.
  • Regulatory and Clinical Outlook: Ongoing surveillance, regimen improvements, and formulation innovations will be key to extending product lifecycle and optimizing treatment outcomes.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary safety concerns associated with Efavirenz-based regimens?
    Efavirenz has been linked to neuropsychiatric adverse effects—including vivid dreams, dizziness, and mood disturbances—which may affect adherence and quality of life.

  2. Are there any promising substitutes for Efavirenz in HIV therapy?
    Yes, integrase strand transfer inhibitors like Dolutegravir offer superior tolerability, fewer drug interactions, and higher genetic barriers to resistance, leading to their preference as first-line agents.

  3. What is the role of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in current HIV treatment?
    TDF remains a key component of many ART regimens but is increasingly being replaced by Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) due to lower renal and bone toxicity, influencing market dynamics.

  4. How significant is the market for generic versions of Efavirenz-based medicines?
    It is substantial, especially in LMICs, where cost-effective generics enable widespread access, solidifying their market presence despite newer drug approvals.

  5. What are the prospects of long-acting formulations for these agents?
    Long-acting injectables are in advanced clinical trials, with the potential to reduce dosing frequency, improve adherence, and redefine the therapeutic landscape for HIV treatment.


References

[1] MarketWatch, "Global HIV Therapeutics Market Size & Forecast," 2022.
[2] WHO, "Guidelines for the Treatment of HIV," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.