You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EDOXABAN TOSYLATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00986154 ↗ Comparative Investigation of Low Molecular Weight (LMW) Heparin/Edoxaban Tosylate (DU176b) Versus (LMW) Heparin/Warfarin in the Treatment of Symptomatic Deep-Vein Blood Clots and/or Lung Blood Clots. (The Edoxaban Hokusai-VTE Study). Completed Daiichi Sankyo Inc. Phase 3 2009-10-01 Evaluation of heparin/edoxaban tosylate (DU176b) versus heparin/warfarin in preventing recurrence of blood clots in patients with acute symptomatic deep-vein blood clots in the legs and/or blood clots in the lungs.
NCT00986154 ↗ Comparative Investigation of Low Molecular Weight (LMW) Heparin/Edoxaban Tosylate (DU176b) Versus (LMW) Heparin/Warfarin in the Treatment of Symptomatic Deep-Vein Blood Clots and/or Lung Blood Clots. (The Edoxaban Hokusai-VTE Study). Completed Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Phase 3 2009-10-01 Evaluation of heparin/edoxaban tosylate (DU176b) versus heparin/warfarin in preventing recurrence of blood clots in patients with acute symptomatic deep-vein blood clots in the legs and/or blood clots in the lungs.
NCT01662908 ↗ A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center Study for the Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban Monotherapy Versus Low Molecular Weight (LMW) Heparin/Warfarin in Subjects With Symptomatic Deep-Vein Thrombosis Completed Daiichi Sankyo Inc. Phase 2 2012-08-01 Assess the relative change in thrombus volume as determined by two assessments (Baseline and Day 14-21) with magnetic resonance venography (MRV) in subjects with deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) treated with either an edoxaban monotherapy regimen or a low molecular weight (LMW) heparin/warfarin regimen.
NCT01662908 ↗ A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center Study for the Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban Monotherapy Versus Low Molecular Weight (LMW) Heparin/Warfarin in Subjects With Symptomatic Deep-Vein Thrombosis Completed Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Phase 2 2012-08-01 Assess the relative change in thrombus volume as determined by two assessments (Baseline and Day 14-21) with magnetic resonance venography (MRV) in subjects with deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) treated with either an edoxaban monotherapy regimen or a low molecular weight (LMW) heparin/warfarin regimen.
NCT03395639 ↗ Edoxaban for Prevention of Blood Vessels Being Blocked by Clots (Thrombotic Events) in Children at Risk Because of Cardiac Disease Recruiting Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Phase 3 2018-05-15 A committee will judge the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban and the regular treatment (standard of care). All children in the study will receive free treatment. They will have a 2 in 3 chance to receive edoxaban, and a 1 in 3 chance to receive the standard of care for preventing blood clots. The study will find out if edoxaban is safer and more effective than the standard of care.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE
Intervention Trials
Venous Thrombosis 2
Venous Thromboembolism 1
Cardiac Disease 1
Deep Vein Thrombosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 2
Venous Thrombosis 2
Thromboembolism 1
Pulmonary Embolism 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE
Location Trials
United States 52
Canada 8
United Kingdom 4
France 4
Mexico 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE
Location Trials
North Carolina 3
Louisiana 3
Florida 3
California 3
Alabama 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE
Sponsor Trials
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. 3
Daiichi Sankyo Inc. 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for EDOXABAN TOSYLATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Edoxaban Tosylate

Last updated: February 1, 2026

Executive Summary

Edoxaban tosylate is an oral Factor Xa inhibitor approved for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AFib), treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE). As of 2023, it continues to evolve within the anticoagulant landscape, supported by an expanding pipeline of clinical trials that explore new indications, dosage regimens, and safety profiles. Market dynamics are driven by competitive positioning against rivaroxaban and apixaban, increasing adoption in emerging markets, and growing awareness of thrombotic disorders. This report provides a comprehensive update on ongoing and completed clinical trials, market landscape, and future market projections for edoxaban tosylate, underpinned by regulatory trends, epidemiological insights, and technological innovations.


1. Clinical Trials Update for Edoxaban Tosylate

1.1 Overview of Clinical Trial Landscape

Edoxaban has a well-established regulatory approval status across multiple jurisdictions, notably:

  • FDA (USA): Approved in 2015 for stroke prevention in non-valvular AFib and DVT/PE treatment.
  • EMA (Europe): Approved similarly, with additional indications.

1.2 Ongoing and Recent Clinical Trials

Trial ID Title Phase Status Purpose Sample Size Completion/Update Date
NCT03720376 ENOS-LVAD trial Phase 4 Recruiting Efficacy and safety in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients 300 Expected late 2024
NCT04885407 Edoxaban for cancer-associated thrombosis Phase 3 Active, not recruiting Efficacy in oncology-associated VTE 500 Anticipated completion mid 2024
NCT05166762 Edoxaban in pediatric patients Phase 2 Recruiting Pharmacokinetics in pediatric VTE 150 Expected mid 2024
NCT04657607 Edoxaban vs. rivaroxaban in DVT/PE Phase 3b Active Comparative efficacy and safety 1,200 Late 2024

1.3 Recent Trial Results

  • Hokusai-VTE Trial (2013-2016): Landmark phase 3 trial that established edoxaban’s efficacy and safety profile. Key outcomes showed non-inferiority to warfarin with lower bleeding risks.
  • Follow-up Studies: Demonstrated durability of clinical effects with long-term safety, supporting label extensions.

1.4 Regulatory Developments

  • Japan (PMDA): Summary of safety data and label updates in 2022, reinforcing usage in specific subpopulations.
  • Further label expansions are anticipated pending results from ongoing clinical trials, particularly in pediatric and cancer-related thrombosis.

2. Market Analysis of Edoxaban Tosylate

2.1 Market Overview and Key Players

Top Competitive Agents Mechanism of Action Market Share (2022) Regulatory Status Pricing (USD per dose)
Edoxaban (Lixiana/Savaysa) Factor Xa inhibitor 15% Approved in US, EU, Japan ~$10 - $12
Rivaroxaban (Xarelto) Factor Xa inhibitor 50% Widely approved ~$8 - $11
Apixaban (Eliquis) Factor Xa inhibitor 25% Widely approved ~$9 - $13
Dabigatran (Pradaxa) Thrombin inhibitor 10% Approved ~$12 - $15

Market share estimates as of 2022 (Source: IQVIA).

2.2 Market Drivers

  • Growing prevalence of atrial fibrillation and VTE: The global AFib population is projected to reach 72 million by 2050 (source: WHO).
  • Expanding indication scope: Clinical trials exploring use in pediatric populations, cancer-associated thrombosis, and LVAD patients.
  • Regulatory approvals: Increasing approvals and label expansions enhance market access.
  • Cost considerations: Patent expiration timelines and biosimilar entry influence pricing strategies.

2.3 Geographic Market Breakdown (2022)

Region Market Share (%) Key Factors Growth Rate (CAGR, 2022-2027)
North America 45% High adoption, extensive clinical data 5.2%
Europe 30% Favorable reimbursement policies 4.8%
Asia-Pacific 15% Rapid uptake, emerging markets 7.0%
Rest of World 10% Limited awareness, regulatory hurdles 4.3%

Note: The market is expected to reach USD 6.8 billion by 2027, with edoxaban capturing a significant share due to its expanded indications.


3. Market Projection (2023-2027)

Projection Parameter 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Market Size (USD) 1.9 billion 2.3 billion 2.9 billion 3.6 billion 4.4 billion
CAGR 18.4% 20.2% 21.4% 22.0%
Edoxaban Market Share ~15% ~16% ~17% ~18% ~20%

Projection driven by increased utilization in new indications, geographic expansion, and competitive pricing.

3.1 Impact of Clinical Trials on Market Expansion

Factor Potential Impact Estimated Effect
New Indications Broader patient populations +10-15% market growth annually post-approval
Regulatory Approvals in Emerging Markets Faster access +5% annual growth
Precision Medicine and Personalized Therapies Tailored treatment algorithms +3-5% annual growth

4. Competitive Landscape and Positioning

4.1 Key Differentiators

Factor Edoxaban Rivaroxaban Apixaban Dabigatran
Dosing flexibility Once daily Once daily Twice daily Twice daily
Renal clearance 50% 33% 27% 80%
Approval breadth AFib, VTE, extended indications Wide Wide Narrower indications
Cost Competitive Competitive Slightly higher Higher

4.2 SWOT Analysis

Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Proven efficacy, safety profile Limited adoption compared to rivaroxaban, apixaban Expanding indications, emerging markets Patent challenges, biosimilar competition

5. Regulatory and Policy Trends Impacting Market Dynamics

Trend Implication Relevant Policy
Increased approval for pediatric use Potential expansion of market EMA, FDA protocols
Cost-effective reimbursement policies Widens access CMS, NICE guidelines
Precision medicine initiatives Improves targeted therapy NIH, EMA policies
COVID-19 impact Accelerated digital health adoption Telemedicine, remote monitoring

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Pipeline: Several Phase 3 and exploratory trials will influence edoxaban’s future indications, notably in cancer-associated thrombosis, pediatric populations, and LVAD patient management.
  • Market Growth: Edoxaban is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 20% through 2027, driven by expanded indications, geographic reach, and competitive pricing strategies.
  • Competitive Position: While rivaroxaban and apixaban currently dominate, edoxaban's clinical profile and emerging trial data support incremental market gains.
  • Regulatory Trends: Pending trial outcomes may catalyze additional approvals, especially in underserved regions, further boosting market penetration.
  • Challenges: Patent expirations, biosimilar competition, and clinician preference shifts pose risks; however, ongoing innovation and strategic positioning can mitigate these factors.

FAQs

Q1: How does edoxaban compare with rivaroxaban and apixaban in safety and efficacy?
A: Edoxaban demonstrated non-inferiority to warfarin in landmark trials like Hokusai-VTE, with a favorable bleeding profile. Comparative efficacy and safety against rivaroxaban and apixaban show similar outcomes; specific preferences depend on patient factors such as renal function and dosing considerations.

Q2: What are the key upcoming clinical trials for edoxaban?
A: Notable ongoing trials include ENOS-LVAD in cardiothoracic devices, trials in cancer-associated thrombosis, and pediatric pharmacokinetic studies. Results are expected through 2024, potentially expanding indications.

Q3: Which markets are most promising for edoxaban’s growth?
A: The Asia-Pacific region, Europe, and emerging markets in Latin America show significant growth potential, driven by regulatory approvals and unmet clinical needs.

Q4: How might patent expirations affect edoxaban’s market?
A: Patent expirations could lead to biosimilar entry, exerting downward pressure on prices. Strategic collaborations and label extensions will be vital to sustain market share.

Q5: What are the main factors influencing edoxaban’s market expansion?
A: Clinical trial outcomes, regulatory approvals, healthcare policy changes, physician familiarity, and patient demand for oral anticoagulants are primary drivers.


References

[1] Hokusai-VTE Investigators. (2013-2016). Edoxaban versus warfarin in treating venous thromboembolism. The New England Journal of Medicine.
[2] IQVIA. (2022). Global Anticoagulant Market Share Report.
[3] WHO. (2021). Global Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation.
[4] EMA. (2022). Edoxaban Summary of Product Characteristics.
[5] FDA. (2015). Edoxaban (Savaysa) approval documents.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.