Last Updated: June 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EDECRIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for EDECRIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02852564 ↗ Ethacrynic Acid Elimination in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection Completed University of Kansas Medical Center Phase 1 2016-08-01 Phase 1 study to provide quantitative characterization of the renal elimination of ethacrynic acid and metabolites in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) at the time of transurethral resection of bladder tumor
NCT02852564 ↗ Ethacrynic Acid Elimination in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection Completed Eugene Lee, MD Phase 1 2016-08-01 Phase 1 study to provide quantitative characterization of the renal elimination of ethacrynic acid and metabolites in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) at the time of transurethral resection of bladder tumor
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for EDECRIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for EDECRIN
Intervention Trials
Bladder Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for EDECRIN
Intervention Trials
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for EDECRIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for EDECRIN
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for EDECRIN
Location Trials
Kansas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for EDECRIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for EDECRIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for EDECRIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for EDECRIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for EDECRIN
Sponsor Trials
University of Kansas Medical Center 2
Eugene Lee, MD 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for EDECRIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 5, 2026

What is the current clinical and market position of EDECRIN (ethacrynic acid)?

EDECRIN is the brand name for ethacrynic acid, a loop diuretic. The product is older, and the available public evidence does not show a recent, active, drug-development clinical pipeline under the EDECRIN brand label. Market performance is dominated by (1) the historical role of ethacrynic acid in edema and (2) competitive substitution by widely available loop diuretics (notably furosemide) and by off-patent older generics.

Because EDECRIN is an established active ingredient, the most actionable “clinical trials update” in practice is whether any new formulation, new indication, or new dosing regimen studies are being run today, and whether any regulatory events indicate a near-term life-cycle expansion. The public record does not support a robust, contemporary, brand-led trial program.


Are there current or recent clinical trials for EDECRIN (ethacrynic acid)?

Trial record observed in public registries (high-level)

Public registries generally show that ethacrynic acid is an established drug, with limited visibility of brand-specific, ongoing, interventional Phase 2 to Phase 3 programs in recent years. The clinical evidence base is primarily historical, reflecting older-era loop diuretic development and use rather than current late-stage brand expansion.

Practical implication for an R&D or investment view

  • No visible new late-stage program under “EDECRIN” as a brand suggests the asset is not being actively developed for a new entrant differentiation pathway.
  • Any near-term clinical activity would most likely be off-label evidence generation, comparative PK/BE studies tied to generics/formulations, or limited investigator-led work rather than a brand-funded registration program.

Bottom line: The “clinical trials update” for EDECRIN is best treated as status quo rather than a pipeline signal.


How does EDECRIN compete in the loop diuretic market?

Category placement

Ethacrynic acid competes in the loop diuretic class used for:

  • edema states associated with heart failure
  • renal disease-related fluid retention
  • other indications where loop diuretics are standard

Competitive reality: substitution pressure is high

Loop diuretics are among the most generically available drug classes. In most markets, patients and prescribers have strong alternatives (typically inexpensive, widely stocked products), which compress pricing and reduce brand share unless differentiation is clinically decisive.

Differentiation levers that matter for an older loop diuretic

For ethacrynic acid, the market lever is not “novel mechanism” but:

  • a role in diuretic rescue or specific patient tolerance scenarios
  • legacy prescribing patterns in regions where it is stocked
  • generic availability and procurement channels

Net effect: Brand-level growth is structurally constrained; value depends on continued access, stocking, and niche prescribing.


What market dynamics and pricing pressures apply to EDECRIN?

Off-patent economics

Given EDECRIN’s age and established active ingredient status, the brand faces typical off-patent dynamics:

  • price compression from generics
  • payer-driven substitution
  • tender-based procurement favoring lowest-cost options

Demand drivers

Demand is largely tied to:

  • underlying prevalence of edema indications in clinical practice
  • prescriber willingness to use ethacrynic acid versus other loops
  • formulary placement

Supply and procurement impact

Loop diuretics are often procured through:

  • hospital formularies
  • pharmacy benefit designs
  • national tenders

For an older loop diuretic, these channels typically reduce brand premiums and limit marketing-led expansion.


What is the plausible revenue outlook and market projection for EDECRIN?

Projection framework (what can be projected from public reality)

Without evidence of a new regulatory or late-stage expansion program, a reasonable projection framework is:

  • Base case: slow-to-flat demand with potential erosion from substitution to dominant loop diuretics
  • Downside: loss of formulary placement or stronger generic substitution
  • Upside: renewed niche use in specific patient profiles or constrained availability of substitutes

Directional outlook

  • Near term (next 1-2 years): modest volume stability at best; pricing pressure remains the dominant factor.
  • Medium term (3-5 years): incremental decline risk unless procurement channels keep ethacrynic acid available as a usable alternative.

Actionable investment read-through: EDECRIN behaves less like a growth pipeline asset and more like a legacy portfolio maintenance asset, where the key levers are supply continuity, formulation lifecycle management, and access.


What regulatory or lifecycle signals should be tracked for EDECRIN?

Even if no active clinical program is visible, lifecycle events can still move market access:

  • new generic launches (or increased competitor presence) that shift tender outcomes
  • formulary changes in major hospitals or payer tiers
  • changes in availability (manufacturing continuity, shortages, or packaging/strength updates)
  • label updates tied to safety monitoring or wording changes (common for older drugs)

What matters for decision-making: absence of new clinical development reduces the signal value of trials; instead, regulatory and access events drive near-term economics.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical pipeline: public evidence does not indicate a current, brand-led late-stage development program for EDECRIN; the asset reads as established drug status rather than active expansion.
  • Market position: EDECRIN faces heavy substitution within loop diuretics, with generics compressing brand economics.
  • Projection: directionally flat to declining absent formulary reinforcement or clear clinical differentiation that sustains demand.
  • Decision focus: monitor access levers (tenders, formularies, availability) more than late-stage trial milestones.

FAQs

1) Is EDECRIN being tested in new Phase 3 trials right now?
Publicly visible evidence does not support a current, brand-led Phase 3 program for EDECRIN in recent years.

2) What market segment does EDECRIN target?
It targets the loop diuretic segment used in edema and related fluid-retention indications.

3) Why does EDECRIN face strong pricing pressure?
Because ethacrynic acid is established and typically off-patent, with substitution by widely available generics and dominant loop diuretics.

4) What could improve EDECRIN’s outlook?
Formulary reinforcement, tender inclusion, and any credible niche positioning that sustains physician adoption despite substitutes.

5) What should be tracked instead of trial headlines?
Regulatory and access events: generics/competitors in tenders, formulary tiering, and supply continuity.


References (APA)

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Search results for ethacrynic acid. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug safety and labeling resources for ethacrynic acid products. https://www.fda.gov/
[3] DailyMed. (n.d.). EDECRIN (ethacrynic acid) prescribing information. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.