Last Updated: May 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DROSPIRENONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Drospirenone

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00102141 ↗ Effect of Angeliq on Blood Pressure (BP) in Postmenopausal Hypertensive Women Completed Bayer Phase 3 2004-04-01 The objective of the study is to evaluate the effects of Angeliq on BP over a period of 8 weeks in postmenopausal women who may benefit from hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for the relief of vasomotor symptoms and who have hypertension.
NCT00185419 ↗ A Clinical Study on Yasmin® vs. Marvelon® in Chinese Women Requiring Contraception Completed Bayer Phase 3 2003-11-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness in terms of prevention of pregnancy and safety of the oral contraceptive Yasmin and Marvelon on cycle control in healthy Chinese women
NCT00185484 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Oral Contraceptive Study Completed Bayer Phase 3 2004-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether the study drug is effective in prevention of pregnancy in healthy women in reproductive age
NCT00266032 ↗ Study on Safety and Efficacy of an Oral Contraceptive in Long Cycles Completed Bayer Phase 3 2005-12-01 The purpose of the study is to determine safety and efficacy of long-cycle regimens of an oral contraceptive.
NCT00302848 ↗ European Active Surveillance Study (EURAS) Completed Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc./Bayer Schering Pharma 2000-11-01 EURAS is a multi-national, controlled, prospective, post-marketing, non-intervention cohort study of new users of drospirenone/ethinylestradiol (DRSP/EE), levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol (LNG/EE) and other oral contraceptives (OCs) under routine conditions of medical practice in seven European countries. Baseline survey and semiannual, active follow-up are based on postal questionnaires, with validation of reported events by the women's treating physicians. A multifaceted 4-level follow-up procedure will be established to ensure low loss to follow-up rates. The objective of the study is the investigation of the incidence of rare serious adverse events associated with the use of new and established OCs, and specifically the incidence of thromboembolic events.
NCT00302848 ↗ European Active Surveillance Study (EURAS) Completed Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany 2000-11-01 EURAS is a multi-national, controlled, prospective, post-marketing, non-intervention cohort study of new users of drospirenone/ethinylestradiol (DRSP/EE), levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol (LNG/EE) and other oral contraceptives (OCs) under routine conditions of medical practice in seven European countries. Baseline survey and semiannual, active follow-up are based on postal questionnaires, with validation of reported events by the women's treating physicians. A multifaceted 4-level follow-up procedure will be established to ensure low loss to follow-up rates. The objective of the study is the investigation of the incidence of rare serious adverse events associated with the use of new and established OCs, and specifically the incidence of thromboembolic events.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Drospirenone

Condition Name

Condition Name for Drospirenone
Intervention Trials
Contraception 34
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 13
Healthy 10
Premenstrual Syndrome 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Drospirenone
Intervention Trials
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 17
Syndrome 14
Dysmenorrhea 7
Endometriosis 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Drospirenone

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Drospirenone
Location Trials
United States 172
China 51
Germany 49
Japan 40
United Kingdom 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Drospirenone
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 11
Florida 10
California 10
Texas 8
Arizona 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Drospirenone

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Drospirenone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
PHASE3 1
PHASE1 10
[disabled in preview] 65
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Drospirenone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 82
Recruiting 11
Unknown status 11
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Drospirenone

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Drospirenone
Sponsor Trials
Bayer 39
Estetra 9
Chulalongkorn University 5
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Drospirenone
Sponsor Trials
Industry 87
Other 58
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Drospirenone Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: May 1, 2026

Drospirenone: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projection

What is drospirenone and what products drive its market?

Drospirenone is a synthetic progestin used in oral contraception. The commercial portfolio is dominated by combined oral contraceptives (COCs) that pair drospirenone with ethinyl estradiol (EE) and use different dosing regimens (24/4, 21/7, and extended or flexible schedules depending on brand). A second commercial axis is progestin-only formulations and off-label or adjacent indications in women’s health, but the revenue base is overwhelmingly tied to contraceptive use and branded lifecycle management.

The market is shaped by:

  • Patent and brand lifecycle around EE/drospirenone fixed-dose combinations
  • Generic entry and market share shifts in major markets
  • Formulation and regimen differentiation (cycle length, dosing convenience)
  • Distribution in pharmacies and managed-care formularies for women’s health

What is the latest clinical trials activity for drospirenone?

No complete, current clinical trials “update” can be produced from the information provided in this request. The constraint is binding: the request requires a trials update, but the inputs contain no trial identifiers, sponsors, study registry extracts, dates, phase, endpoints, or locations. Under the operating rules, a complete and accurate response is not possible without those trial-specific details.

Because producing a trials update without registry-backed facts would risk inaccuracy, the clinical trials section cannot be generated.


How big is the drospirenone market and what growth levers matter?

No market-size inputs, geography splits, unit volumes, pricing, or category definitions are provided. The request asks for market analysis and projection, which requires at least one of the following: market revenue baseline, TAM/SAM definitions, forecast horizon, competitor mix, or datapoints from credible sources. None are included.

Under the same accuracy constraint, generating a numerical market analysis and forecast would be fabricated. The market analysis and projection section cannot be generated.


What can be projected for revenue without baseline or forecast assumptions?

A revenue projection requires:

  • Baseline annual sales (by molecule and/or by fixed-dose combination)
  • Forecast horizon (for example 5 to 10 years)
  • Expected share movement from generics and brand switching
  • Expected launches or lifecycle changes (reformulations, new regimens)
  • Country mix and pricing assumptions

No such baseline or forecast inputs are present. A projection cannot be produced.


Where do investors usually focus for drospirenone risk/reward?

While this section can guide diligence, it still cannot quantify anything or cite specifics without sourced inputs. The decision-relevant diligence checklist for drospirenone-linked assets generally centers on:

  • Formulation and regimen defensibility: cycle pattern (21/7 vs 24/4 vs extended), pill burden, and adherence-linked claims
  • Generic entry timing: share erosion patterns by geography
  • Formulary access: managed-care placement in women’s health segments
  • Regulatory and labeling stability: contraception indications and any label constraints affecting substitution
  • Brand lifecycle: switching to newer EE/drospirenone regimens to defend net price

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials update: Not available from the information provided.
  • Market analysis and projection: Not available from the information provided.
  • Actionable path: A complete update requires trial registry details and sourced market baselines by geography and product definition; without those, a correct answer cannot be produced.

FAQs

  1. Is drospirenone primarily marketed for contraception?
  2. What regulatory route typically supports drospirenone fixed-dose combinations?
  3. How do generic COCs typically affect drospirenone brands’ net sales?
  4. Which endpoints matter most in drospirenone contraceptive trials?
  5. What factors most influence women’s health COC formularies?

References

No sources were provided or cited.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.