Get our Free Patent Expiration Newsletter

Serving leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

AstraZeneca
Baxter
Dow
Mallinckrodt
McKinsey
Harvard Business School

Last Updated: November 18, 2019

DrugPatentWatch Database Preview

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DIDANOSINE

See Plans and Pricing

« Back to Dashboard

505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for Didanosine

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT00002234 Safety and Effectiveness of Giving an Anti-HIV Drug Combination of Adefovir Dipivoxil Plus Didanosine Plus Efavirenz Plus Lamivudine Once Daily to HIV-Infected Patients Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 2 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see if it is safe and effective to give HIV-infected patients a new combination of anti-HIV drugs taken once daily.
New Combination NCT00002234 Safety and Effectiveness of Giving an Anti-HIV Drug Combination of Adefovir Dipivoxil Plus Didanosine Plus Efavirenz Plus Lamivudine Once Daily to HIV-Infected Patients Completed Dupont Applied Biosciences Phase 2 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see if it is safe and effective to give HIV-infected patients a new combination of anti-HIV drugs taken once daily.
New Combination NCT00002234 Safety and Effectiveness of Giving an Anti-HIV Drug Combination of Adefovir Dipivoxil Plus Didanosine Plus Efavirenz Plus Lamivudine Once Daily to HIV-Infected Patients Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 2 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see if it is safe and effective to give HIV-infected patients a new combination of anti-HIV drugs taken once daily.
New Combination NCT00002234 Safety and Effectiveness of Giving an Anti-HIV Drug Combination of Adefovir Dipivoxil Plus Didanosine Plus Efavirenz Plus Lamivudine Once Daily to HIV-Infected Patients Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 2 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see if it is safe and effective to give HIV-infected patients a new combination of anti-HIV drugs taken once daily.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for Didanosine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000625 A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II/III Trial of Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy With Nucleoside Analogs in HIV-Infected Persons With CD4 Cells of 200-500/mm3 Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 2 1969-12-31 To determine the efficacy and safety of zidovudine ( AZT ) versus didanosine ( ddI ), AZT plus ddI, and AZT plus zalcitabine ( ddC ) in preventing disease progression in HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts of 200-500 cells/mm3.
NCT00000625 A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II/III Trial of Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy With Nucleoside Analogs in HIV-Infected Persons With CD4 Cells of 200-500/mm3 Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 2 1969-12-31 To determine the efficacy and safety of zidovudine ( AZT ) versus didanosine ( ddI ), AZT plus ddI, and AZT plus zalcitabine ( ddC ) in preventing disease progression in HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts of 200-500 cells/mm3.
NCT00000625 A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II/III Trial of Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy With Nucleoside Analogs in HIV-Infected Persons With CD4 Cells of 200-500/mm3 Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 To determine the efficacy and safety of zidovudine ( AZT ) versus didanosine ( ddI ), AZT plus ddI, and AZT plus zalcitabine ( ddC ) in preventing disease progression in HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts of 200-500 cells/mm3.
NCT00000637 A Randomized Comparative Trial of Zidovudine (AZT) Versus 2',3'-Dideoxyinosine (ddI) Versus AZT Plus ddI in Symptomatic HIV-Infected Children Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 3 1969-12-31 To compare the effectiveness of treatment with zidovudine (AZT) compared to didanosine (ddI) and compared to the combination of AZT and ddI as determined by survival and disease progression. To compare the relative safety and tolerance of AZT versus ddI versus AZT plus ddI in symptomatic HIV infected children; to compare the virological and immunological parameters in the three treatment groups. AZT has been shown to delay the progression of AIDS in HIV infected individuals. However, bone marrow toxicity is a frequent adverse effect. Also, HIV resistance to AZT sometimes occurs in patients who initially respond to treatment, but later have progression of the disease. Thus, new drug treatments are needed. Studies of ddI in adults and children indicate some effectiveness of the drug. A direct comparison of AZT and ddI treatment in children has not been made. Combination antiviral treatment (AZT plus ddI) may give added therapeutic benefit to children.
NCT00000637 A Randomized Comparative Trial of Zidovudine (AZT) Versus 2',3'-Dideoxyinosine (ddI) Versus AZT Plus ddI in Symptomatic HIV-Infected Children Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 3 1969-12-31 To compare the effectiveness of treatment with zidovudine (AZT) compared to didanosine (ddI) and compared to the combination of AZT and ddI as determined by survival and disease progression. To compare the relative safety and tolerance of AZT versus ddI versus AZT plus ddI in symptomatic HIV infected children; to compare the virological and immunological parameters in the three treatment groups. AZT has been shown to delay the progression of AIDS in HIV infected individuals. However, bone marrow toxicity is a frequent adverse effect. Also, HIV resistance to AZT sometimes occurs in patients who initially respond to treatment, but later have progression of the disease. Thus, new drug treatments are needed. Studies of ddI in adults and children indicate some effectiveness of the drug. A direct comparison of AZT and ddI treatment in children has not been made. Combination antiviral treatment (AZT plus ddI) may give added therapeutic benefit to children.
NCT00000637 A Randomized Comparative Trial of Zidovudine (AZT) Versus 2',3'-Dideoxyinosine (ddI) Versus AZT Plus ddI in Symptomatic HIV-Infected Children Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 To compare the effectiveness of treatment with zidovudine (AZT) compared to didanosine (ddI) and compared to the combination of AZT and ddI as determined by survival and disease progression. To compare the relative safety and tolerance of AZT versus ddI versus AZT plus ddI in symptomatic HIV infected children; to compare the virological and immunological parameters in the three treatment groups. AZT has been shown to delay the progression of AIDS in HIV infected individuals. However, bone marrow toxicity is a frequent adverse effect. Also, HIV resistance to AZT sometimes occurs in patients who initially respond to treatment, but later have progression of the disease. Thus, new drug treatments are needed. Studies of ddI in adults and children indicate some effectiveness of the drug. A direct comparison of AZT and ddI treatment in children has not been made. Combination antiviral treatment (AZT plus ddI) may give added therapeutic benefit to children.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Didanosine

Condition Name

Condition Name for Didanosine
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 135
AIDS 3
HIV Infection 3
HIV 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Didanosine
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 139
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 36
Infection 32
Communicable Diseases 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Clinical Trial Locations for Didanosine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Didanosine
Location Trials
Puerto Rico 36
Thailand 27
Spain 16
Canada 10
South Africa 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Didanosine
Location Trials
California 88
New York 71
Illinois 57
Florida 53
Massachusetts 49
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Clinical Trial Progress for Didanosine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Didanosine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 12
Phase 3 15
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 91
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Didanosine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 125
Unknown status 7
Terminated 5
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Didanosine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Didanosine
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 75
Bristol-Myers Squibb 44
Glaxo Wellcome 17
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Didanosine
Sponsor Trials
Industry 109
NIH 89
Other 34
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Export unavailable in trial.
Subscribe for complete access.

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Serving leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

Mallinckrodt
Harvard Business School
Express Scripts
Baxter
Boehringer Ingelheim
Moodys

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verifification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.