You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: May 22, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DEXMEDETOMIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT03089905 ↗ A Study to Compare the Long-term Outcomes After Two Different Anaesthetics Recruiting Baylor College of Medicine Phase 3 2017-08-10 There is considerable evidence that most general anaesthetics modulate brain development in animal studies. The impact is greater with longer durations of exposure and in younger animals. There is great controversy over whether or not these animal data are relevant to human clinical scenarios. The changes seen in preclinical studies are greatest with GABA agonists and NMDA antagonists such as volatile anaesthetics (eg sevoflurane), propofol, midazolam, ketamine, and nitrous oxide. There is less evidence for an effect with opioid (such as remifentanil) or with alpha 2 agonists (such as dexmedetomidine). Some, but not all, human cohort studies show an association between exposure to anaesthesia in infancy or early childhood and later changes in cognitive tests, school performance or risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. The evidence is weak due to possible confounding. A recent well designed cohort study (the PANDA study) comparing young children that had hernia repair to their siblings found no evidence for a difference in a range of detailed neuropsychological tests. In that study most children were exposed to up to two hours of anaesthesia. The only trial (the GAS trial) has compared children having hernia repair under regional or general anesthesia and has found no evidence for a difference in neurodevelopment when tested at two years of age. The GAS and PANDA studies confirm the animal data that short exposure is unlikely to cause any neurodevelopmental impact. The impact of longer exposures is still unknown. In humans the strongest evidence for an association between surgery and poor neurodevelopmental outcome is in infants having major surgery. However, this is also the group where confounding is most likely. The aim of our study is to see if a new combination of anaesthetic drugs results in a better long-term developmental outcome than the current standard of care for children having anaesthesia expected to last 2 hours or longer. Children will be randomised to receive either a low dose sevoflurane/remifentanil/dexmedetomidine or standard dose sevoflurane anaesthetic. They will receive a neurodevelopmental assessment at 3 years of age to assess global cognitive function.
New Combination NCT03089905 ↗ A Study to Compare the Long-term Outcomes After Two Different Anaesthetics Recruiting Boston Children's Hospital Phase 3 2017-08-10 There is considerable evidence that most general anaesthetics modulate brain development in animal studies. The impact is greater with longer durations of exposure and in younger animals. There is great controversy over whether or not these animal data are relevant to human clinical scenarios. The changes seen in preclinical studies are greatest with GABA agonists and NMDA antagonists such as volatile anaesthetics (eg sevoflurane), propofol, midazolam, ketamine, and nitrous oxide. There is less evidence for an effect with opioid (such as remifentanil) or with alpha 2 agonists (such as dexmedetomidine). Some, but not all, human cohort studies show an association between exposure to anaesthesia in infancy or early childhood and later changes in cognitive tests, school performance or risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. The evidence is weak due to possible confounding. A recent well designed cohort study (the PANDA study) comparing young children that had hernia repair to their siblings found no evidence for a difference in a range of detailed neuropsychological tests. In that study most children were exposed to up to two hours of anaesthesia. The only trial (the GAS trial) has compared children having hernia repair under regional or general anesthesia and has found no evidence for a difference in neurodevelopment when tested at two years of age. The GAS and PANDA studies confirm the animal data that short exposure is unlikely to cause any neurodevelopmental impact. The impact of longer exposures is still unknown. In humans the strongest evidence for an association between surgery and poor neurodevelopmental outcome is in infants having major surgery. However, this is also the group where confounding is most likely. The aim of our study is to see if a new combination of anaesthetic drugs results in a better long-term developmental outcome than the current standard of care for children having anaesthesia expected to last 2 hours or longer. Children will be randomised to receive either a low dose sevoflurane/remifentanil/dexmedetomidine or standard dose sevoflurane anaesthetic. They will receive a neurodevelopmental assessment at 3 years of age to assess global cognitive function.
New Combination NCT03089905 ↗ A Study to Compare the Long-term Outcomes After Two Different Anaesthetics Recruiting Boston Children’s Hospital Phase 3 2017-08-10 There is considerable evidence that most general anaesthetics modulate brain development in animal studies. The impact is greater with longer durations of exposure and in younger animals. There is great controversy over whether or not these animal data are relevant to human clinical scenarios. The changes seen in preclinical studies are greatest with GABA agonists and NMDA antagonists such as volatile anaesthetics (eg sevoflurane), propofol, midazolam, ketamine, and nitrous oxide. There is less evidence for an effect with opioid (such as remifentanil) or with alpha 2 agonists (such as dexmedetomidine). Some, but not all, human cohort studies show an association between exposure to anaesthesia in infancy or early childhood and later changes in cognitive tests, school performance or risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. The evidence is weak due to possible confounding. A recent well designed cohort study (the PANDA study) comparing young children that had hernia repair to their siblings found no evidence for a difference in a range of detailed neuropsychological tests. In that study most children were exposed to up to two hours of anaesthesia. The only trial (the GAS trial) has compared children having hernia repair under regional or general anesthesia and has found no evidence for a difference in neurodevelopment when tested at two years of age. The GAS and PANDA studies confirm the animal data that short exposure is unlikely to cause any neurodevelopmental impact. The impact of longer exposures is still unknown. In humans the strongest evidence for an association between surgery and poor neurodevelopmental outcome is in infants having major surgery. However, this is also the group where confounding is most likely. The aim of our study is to see if a new combination of anaesthetic drugs results in a better long-term developmental outcome than the current standard of care for children having anaesthesia expected to last 2 hours or longer. Children will be randomised to receive either a low dose sevoflurane/remifentanil/dexmedetomidine or standard dose sevoflurane anaesthetic. They will receive a neurodevelopmental assessment at 3 years of age to assess global cognitive function.
New Combination NCT03089905 ↗ A Study to Compare the Long-term Outcomes After Two Different Anaesthetics Recruiting Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Phase 3 2017-08-10 There is considerable evidence that most general anaesthetics modulate brain development in animal studies. The impact is greater with longer durations of exposure and in younger animals. There is great controversy over whether or not these animal data are relevant to human clinical scenarios. The changes seen in preclinical studies are greatest with GABA agonists and NMDA antagonists such as volatile anaesthetics (eg sevoflurane), propofol, midazolam, ketamine, and nitrous oxide. There is less evidence for an effect with opioid (such as remifentanil) or with alpha 2 agonists (such as dexmedetomidine). Some, but not all, human cohort studies show an association between exposure to anaesthesia in infancy or early childhood and later changes in cognitive tests, school performance or risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. The evidence is weak due to possible confounding. A recent well designed cohort study (the PANDA study) comparing young children that had hernia repair to their siblings found no evidence for a difference in a range of detailed neuropsychological tests. In that study most children were exposed to up to two hours of anaesthesia. The only trial (the GAS trial) has compared children having hernia repair under regional or general anesthesia and has found no evidence for a difference in neurodevelopment when tested at two years of age. The GAS and PANDA studies confirm the animal data that short exposure is unlikely to cause any neurodevelopmental impact. The impact of longer exposures is still unknown. In humans the strongest evidence for an association between surgery and poor neurodevelopmental outcome is in infants having major surgery. However, this is also the group where confounding is most likely. The aim of our study is to see if a new combination of anaesthetic drugs results in a better long-term developmental outcome than the current standard of care for children having anaesthesia expected to last 2 hours or longer. Children will be randomised to receive either a low dose sevoflurane/remifentanil/dexmedetomidine or standard dose sevoflurane anaesthetic. They will receive a neurodevelopmental assessment at 3 years of age to assess global cognitive function.
New Combination NCT03089905 ↗ A Study to Compare the Long-term Outcomes After Two Different Anaesthetics Recruiting Erasmus Medical Center Phase 3 2017-08-10 There is considerable evidence that most general anaesthetics modulate brain development in animal studies. The impact is greater with longer durations of exposure and in younger animals. There is great controversy over whether or not these animal data are relevant to human clinical scenarios. The changes seen in preclinical studies are greatest with GABA agonists and NMDA antagonists such as volatile anaesthetics (eg sevoflurane), propofol, midazolam, ketamine, and nitrous oxide. There is less evidence for an effect with opioid (such as remifentanil) or with alpha 2 agonists (such as dexmedetomidine). Some, but not all, human cohort studies show an association between exposure to anaesthesia in infancy or early childhood and later changes in cognitive tests, school performance or risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. The evidence is weak due to possible confounding. A recent well designed cohort study (the PANDA study) comparing young children that had hernia repair to their siblings found no evidence for a difference in a range of detailed neuropsychological tests. In that study most children were exposed to up to two hours of anaesthesia. The only trial (the GAS trial) has compared children having hernia repair under regional or general anesthesia and has found no evidence for a difference in neurodevelopment when tested at two years of age. The GAS and PANDA studies confirm the animal data that short exposure is unlikely to cause any neurodevelopmental impact. The impact of longer exposures is still unknown. In humans the strongest evidence for an association between surgery and poor neurodevelopmental outcome is in infants having major surgery. However, this is also the group where confounding is most likely. The aim of our study is to see if a new combination of anaesthetic drugs results in a better long-term developmental outcome than the current standard of care for children having anaesthesia expected to last 2 hours or longer. Children will be randomised to receive either a low dose sevoflurane/remifentanil/dexmedetomidine or standard dose sevoflurane anaesthetic. They will receive a neurodevelopmental assessment at 3 years of age to assess global cognitive function.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00095251 ↗ MENDS Study: Trial in Ventilated ICU Patients Comparing an Alpha2 Agonist Versus a Gamma Aminobutyric Acid (GABA)-Agonist to Determine Delirium Rates, Efficacy of Sedation, Analgesia and Discharge Cognitive Status Completed Vanderbilt University Phase 2 2004-08-01 Delirium has recently been shown as a predictor of death, increased cost, and longer length of stay in ventilated patients. Sedative and analgesic medications relieve anxiety and pain, but may contribute to patients' transitioning into delirium. It is possible that modifying the paradigm for sedation using novel therapies targeted at different receptors, such as dexmedetomidine targeting alpha2 receptors and sparing the GABA receptors, could provide efficacious sedation yet reduce the development, duration, and severity of acute brain dysfunction (delirium).
NCT00095251 ↗ MENDS Study: Trial in Ventilated ICU Patients Comparing an Alpha2 Agonist Versus a Gamma Aminobutyric Acid (GABA)-Agonist to Determine Delirium Rates, Efficacy of Sedation, Analgesia and Discharge Cognitive Status Completed Vanderbilt University Medical Center Phase 2 2004-08-01 Delirium has recently been shown as a predictor of death, increased cost, and longer length of stay in ventilated patients. Sedative and analgesic medications relieve anxiety and pain, but may contribute to patients' transitioning into delirium. It is possible that modifying the paradigm for sedation using novel therapies targeted at different receptors, such as dexmedetomidine targeting alpha2 receptors and sparing the GABA receptors, could provide efficacious sedation yet reduce the development, duration, and severity of acute brain dysfunction (delirium).
NCT00142493 ↗ Effect of Affective Content on Drug Induced Amnesia of Episodic Memory Completed Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Phase 1 2004-09-01 The purpose of this research is to understand how some of the drugs commonly used in anesthesia impair memory. We are particularly interested in whether the emotion associated with a memory influences how well these drugs are able to block memory. We are studying four commonly used drugs-propofol, thiopental, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine, all of which may have slightly differing effects. We will also study an inactive substance, called a placebo, that should have no effect. The results of this study will provide information that will be useful in understanding how memory works, how these drugs affect memory, and possibly why some people don't have their memory blocked as easily as others.
NCT00205712 ↗ Prevention of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) Antagonist-induced Psychosis in Kids Completed National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression Phase 4 2003-02-01 Ketamine, an FDA approved anesthetic agent, is becoming the sedative/analgesic of choice for emergency sedation in children because it causes deep sedation with minimal respiratory depression in comparison to other available agents. However, emergence reactions are an important adverse effect of ketamine, characterized by transient changes in cognitive function, dissociation and mild schizophrenia-like symptoms. These cognitive and behavioral effects are dose-dependently induced by ketamine and other antagonists of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor. NMDA receptor hypofunction can disinhibit excitatory (cholinergic/glutamatergic) projections in key areas of the brain, and this has been proposed to explain key features of schizophrenia. Several treatments that block excessive excitatory transmitter release have also been shown to prevent cognitive and behavioral effects of ketamine-induced NMDA receptor hypofunction in humans. Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, which can presynaptically inhibit acetylcholine release, can prevent mild ketamine-induced behavioral and cognitive symptoms in healthy human adults. However, this prevention strategy has not been evaluated in children. Children currently receive clinically-indicated treatment with the NMDA antagonist, ketamine, and this age group is an important target for pharmacological strategies aimed at the prevention of schizophrenia. This application proposes a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to test the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine, an FDA approved alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, in preventing ketamine-induced mental symptoms in children. Planned primary analyses will evaluate effects of the hypothesized prevention treatment on clinical and cognitive variables using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The proposed experiments are relevant to future prevention trials for individuals at risk for schizophrenia, and to preventing adverse effects of NMDA antagonist anesthetic agents (ketamine, nitrous oxide).
NCT00205712 ↗ Prevention of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) Antagonist-induced Psychosis in Kids Completed Washington University School of Medicine Phase 4 2003-02-01 Ketamine, an FDA approved anesthetic agent, is becoming the sedative/analgesic of choice for emergency sedation in children because it causes deep sedation with minimal respiratory depression in comparison to other available agents. However, emergence reactions are an important adverse effect of ketamine, characterized by transient changes in cognitive function, dissociation and mild schizophrenia-like symptoms. These cognitive and behavioral effects are dose-dependently induced by ketamine and other antagonists of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor. NMDA receptor hypofunction can disinhibit excitatory (cholinergic/glutamatergic) projections in key areas of the brain, and this has been proposed to explain key features of schizophrenia. Several treatments that block excessive excitatory transmitter release have also been shown to prevent cognitive and behavioral effects of ketamine-induced NMDA receptor hypofunction in humans. Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, which can presynaptically inhibit acetylcholine release, can prevent mild ketamine-induced behavioral and cognitive symptoms in healthy human adults. However, this prevention strategy has not been evaluated in children. Children currently receive clinically-indicated treatment with the NMDA antagonist, ketamine, and this age group is an important target for pharmacological strategies aimed at the prevention of schizophrenia. This application proposes a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to test the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine, an FDA approved alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, in preventing ketamine-induced mental symptoms in children. Planned primary analyses will evaluate effects of the hypothesized prevention treatment on clinical and cognitive variables using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The proposed experiments are relevant to future prevention trials for individuals at risk for schizophrenia, and to preventing adverse effects of NMDA antagonist anesthetic agents (ketamine, nitrous oxide).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Dexmedetomidine 123
Anesthesia 81
Delirium 55
Sedation 52
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Delirium 126
Pain, Postoperative 115
Emergence Delirium 45
Psychomotor Agitation 42
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 459
Egypt 273
China 227
Korea, Republic of 118
Canada 53
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride
Location Trials
Ohio 37
Massachusetts 37
Texas 34
New York 33
Pennsylvania 32
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 478
Phase 3 142
Phase 2/Phase 3 64
[disabled in preview] 122
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 581
Recruiting 262
Not yet recruiting 201
[disabled in preview] 210
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Assiut University 80
Yonsei University 48
Ain Shams University 40
[disabled in preview] 75
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 1652
Industry 140
NIH 21
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Introduction

Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride, marketed under the brand name Precedex, is a potent alpha-2 adrenergic agonist used primarily for sedation in intensive care and surgical settings. This article provides an update on the clinical trials, market analysis, and projections for this drug.

Clinical Trials and Efficacy

Adult Patients

The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride have been extensively evaluated in several clinical trials. Four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trials involving 1,185 adult patients have been conducted. Two of these trials focused on patients in surgical intensive care units, assessing the sedative properties of dexmedetomidine by comparing the need for rescue medications like midazolam and propofol to achieve a specified level of sedation using the Ramsay Sedation Scale[1].

These trials demonstrated that dexmedetomidine effectively reduces the need for additional sedatives and maintains a stable level of sedation, making it a valuable option for managing mechanically ventilated patients.

Pediatric Patients

Clinical trials have also been conducted in pediatric patients. A study involving 122 pediatric patients evaluated the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine for sedation during MRI scans. Patients were randomized into different dose groups, and the results showed that dexmedetomidine can be safely used in pediatric patients to achieve adequate sedation, although concomitant use of propofol may be necessary in some cases[1].

Adverse Events and Safety Profile

Real-World Data Analysis

A real-world drug safety study using data from the FDA's FAERS database from 2004 to the third quarter of 2023 identified 1,910 adverse events associated with dexmedetomidine. The analysis revealed an increasing trend in adverse event reports, with the majority of cases reported in the last five years. Common adverse events included bradycardia, delayed recovery, and respiratory and circulatory depression. Female patients and those in the 18-64 age group were more frequently reported[3].

Clinical Implications

The study highlights the importance of monitoring for adverse events, particularly in subgroups that are more prone to these reactions. Healthcare professionals need to develop early warning treatment plans based on the specific characteristics of these subgroups to ensure safe use of dexmedetomidine.

Market Analysis and Projections

Market Size and Growth

The dexmedetomidine hydrochloride for injection market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 3 to 5 percent from 2023 to 2031. This growth is driven by increasing demand across various applications, including hospitals, clinics, and recovery centers. The market is segmented by product type (100mcg/ml, 200mcg/2ml) and geographical regions (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Middle-East and Africa)[2].

Market Dynamics

The market dynamics are influenced by several factors, including product pricing, penetration at national and regional levels, and the economic, political, and social landscapes of countries. The report provides a detailed examination of both established and emerging players in the market, including companies like Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group, Sichuan Renan Pharmaceutical, and Orion Corporation[5].

API Market

The Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride API market is also expected to experience significant growth during the forecast period from 2023 to 2030. This growth is attributed to the increasing demand for dexmedetomidine hydrochloride API across various applications globally. The report includes analysis of major key players, product pricing, and market dynamics at both country and regional levels[5].

Applications and Uses

Intensive Care and Surgical Settings

Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride is primarily indicated for the sedation of initially intubated and mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care settings. It is also used for surgical sedation and as an anesthetic adjunct to enhance analgesia and reduce anesthetic requirements[4].

Emerging Uses

In addition to its traditional uses, dexmedetomidine has been approved for sublingual administration to treat schizophrenia and acute agitation in bipolar disorder. This expansion into new therapeutic areas further contributes to the drug's growing market[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Efficacy: Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride has been proven effective in clinical trials for sedation in adult and pediatric patients.
  • Safety Profile: While generally safe, the drug is associated with adverse events such as bradycardia and respiratory depression, necessitating careful monitoring.
  • Market Growth: The market for dexmedetomidine hydrochloride is projected to grow at a CAGR of 3 to 5 percent from 2023 to 2031.
  • Applications: The drug is widely used in intensive care and surgical settings and is expanding into new therapeutic areas.

FAQs

What is the primary indication for dexmedetomidine hydrochloride?

Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride is primarily indicated for the sedation of initially intubated and mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care settings.

What are the common adverse events associated with dexmedetomidine hydrochloride?

Common adverse events include bradycardia, delayed recovery, and respiratory and circulatory depression.

How is the market for dexmedetomidine hydrochloride expected to grow?

The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 3 to 5 percent from 2023 to 2031.

What are some emerging uses of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride?

Dexmedetomidine has been approved for sublingual administration to treat schizophrenia and acute agitation in bipolar disorder.

Which companies are key players in the dexmedetomidine hydrochloride market?

Key players include Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group, Sichuan Renan Pharmaceutical, and Orion Corporation.

Sources

  1. PRECEDEX Clinical Studies - Pfizer Medical Information
  2. Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride For Injection Market Size And Forecast - Market Research Intellect
  3. Clinical adverse events to dexmedetomidine: a real-world drug safety study based on the FAERS database - Frontiers in Pharmacology
  4. Precedex® (Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride) Injection - FDA
  5. Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride API Market Size, Growth & Trends - Verified Market Reports
Last updated: 2025-01-01

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.