Last Updated: July 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DEXAMETHASONE SODIUM PHOSPHATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00122278 ↗ Headache in the Emergency Department (ED) - A Multi-Center Research Network to Optimize the ED Treatment of Migraines Completed Montefiore Medical Center Phase 3 2005-07-01 Migraines are a specific type of headache that frequently recur and are very painful. Although there are many medications that are effective against migraines, none of these medications cure 100% of migraines. Another problem with migraines is that although many times they get better after intravenous (IV) treatment in the emergency room (ER), about 1/3 of the time migraines recur the next day. The purpose of this research project is to see if adding a medication called dexamethasone to standard ER therapy will help patients get better quicker and stay pain-free more often than if they receive placebo.
NCT00258245 ↗ Arsenic Trioxide and Ascorbic Acid Combined With Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Plasma Cell Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2005-05-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as arsenic trioxide and dexamethasone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Ascorbic acid may help arsenic trioxide work better by making cancer cells more sensitive to the drug. Bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Thalidomide may stop the growth of cancer cells by stopping blood flow to the cancer. Giving arsenic trioxide and ascorbic acid together with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone may stop the growth of and kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: This phase I trial is studying the side effects and best dose of arsenic trioxide when given together with ascorbic acid, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in treating patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma or plasma cell leukemia.
NCT00258245 ↗ Arsenic Trioxide and Ascorbic Acid Combined With Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Plasma Cell Leukemia Completed Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute Phase 1 2005-05-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as arsenic trioxide and dexamethasone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Ascorbic acid may help arsenic trioxide work better by making cancer cells more sensitive to the drug. Bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Thalidomide may stop the growth of cancer cells by stopping blood flow to the cancer. Giving arsenic trioxide and ascorbic acid together with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone may stop the growth of and kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: This phase I trial is studying the side effects and best dose of arsenic trioxide when given together with ascorbic acid, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in treating patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma or plasma cell leukemia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate

Condition Name

Condition Name for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate
Intervention Trials
Postoperative Pain 4
Multiple Myeloma 3
Genetic Syndrome 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate
Intervention Trials
Multiple Myeloma 7
Neoplasms, Plasma Cell 6
Leukemia 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate
Location Trials
United States 187
Canada 8
Australia 7
India 7
China 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate
Location Trials
California 11
New York 11
Pennsylvania 10
Texas 10
Ohio 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 3
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 13
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 27
Recruiting 16
Not yet recruiting 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 7
Erydel 4
Mercator MedSystems, Inc. 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate
Sponsor Trials
Other 68
Industry 26
NIH 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 26, 2026

Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast

Executive summary: Dexamethasone sodium phosphate remains a widely used, off-patent corticosteroid with broad manufacturing by multiple generic suppliers. Clinical development activity is concentrated on (1) new indications and (2) alternative delivery systems (ocular, inhaled, and parenteral regimens) rather than new chemical entities. Market growth is driven by ongoing demand for anti-inflammatory and antiemetic use cases, hospital formularies, and continued generic availability, with pricing pressure typical of legacy steroids.

Core points

  • The molecule is a long-established generic active ingredient; commercial differentiation largely comes from formulation, device, presentation strength, and label expansion rather than platform IP.
  • Clinical trials commonly involve corticosteroid dosing optimization, combination regimens, and specialty routes (eye, perioperative, and respiratory).
  • Near-to-midterm market upside is tied to label updates and sustained hospital and specialist use rather than a single late-stage breakthrough.
  • Competitive risk is structural: multiple suppliers, substitution across corticosteroids, and limited ability to sustain premium pricing absent differentiation.

What is the current clinical trials pipeline for dexamethasone sodium phosphate?

Featured snippet answer: Clinical activity is centered on new or refined uses of dexamethasone sodium phosphate (or its same-active therapeutic equivalents) across ocular inflammation, perioperative inflammation, chemotherapy-related symptoms, and inflammation/airway use cases through specialty delivery or optimized dosing.

How are trials typically structured for dexamethasone sodium phosphate?

Common trial designs include:

  • Randomized controlled studies comparing dexamethasone sodium phosphate dosing schedules vs comparator steroids (or placebo plus standard of care).
  • Multi-arm protocols for combination anti-inflammatory or antiemetic regimens (steroid plus 5-HT3 antagonist, NK1 antagonist, or anesthetic pathways depending on indication).
  • Route-of-administration studies testing eye drops/ointments, intravitreal-adjacent periocular regimens, inhaled steroid equivalents, and IV/IM perioperative dosing.

Which trial phases are most active?

For a legacy generic steroid, late-phase “new drug” programs are less common. Activity tends to cluster in:

  • Phase 2 and Phase 3 for label-expansion or specific clinical endpoints (ocular inflammation scores, postoperative pain/edema endpoints, emesis control, inflammation biomarkers).
  • Phase 1/2 for formulation or delivery optimization (bioavailability and local tolerability), especially where drug-device combinations exist.

Key clinical endpoints used

Trials typically report:

  • Ocular: anterior chamber cell/flare, vitreous haze, time to resolution, and visual function measures.
  • Perioperative/inflammation: time to reduced inflammation, pain scores, swelling indices, and need for rescue medication.
  • Antiemetic: complete response rates for nausea/vomiting in defined chemotherapy and delayed emesis windows.
  • Airway/inflammatory: symptom scores, exacerbation endpoints, lung function metrics where applicable.

Which indications have the most dexamethasone sodium phosphate clinical trial activity?

Featured snippet answer: Trials most frequently target inflammation-driven endpoints in ophthalmology and perioperative settings and supportive-care endpoints such as chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, with ongoing interest in optimizing dosing and route.

Ophthalmic inflammation and postoperative control

  • Trials evaluate steroid potency and dosing schedules to reduce postoperative inflammation after cataract or retinal procedures and to control noninfectious ocular inflammation.
  • Many programs compare steroid regimens for onset and duration of therapeutic effect with safety outcomes including intraocular pressure changes and infection risk monitoring.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) support

  • Studies typically test steroid dose and timing in combination regimens.
  • Endpoint focus is complete response and durability in acute versus delayed phases, plus tolerability.

Perioperative inflammation and pain/edema control

  • Studies evaluate IV/IM dosing schedules around surgery to reduce postoperative inflammation.
  • Comparators include other systemic corticosteroids and standard care regimens.

Respiratory inflammatory and airway use (subset)

  • Steroid trial activity exists around anti-inflammatory benefits in airway inflammation contexts.
  • Programs often emphasize dosing schedules and safety rather than novel mechanism-of-action.

How does dexamethasone sodium phosphate compare with other corticosteroids in trials?

Featured snippet answer: Dexamethasone sodium phosphate competes mainly on potency, dosing convenience (IV/IM), and route options rather than new pharmacology. Trials commonly include other corticosteroids as comparators, with outcomes driven by efficacy on inflammation endpoints and safety.

Common comparator steroids

  • Prednisolone and prednisolone sodium phosphate (route-specific formulations)
  • Methylprednisolone (dose-equivalent comparisons)
  • Triamcinolone formulations in ophthalmic settings

What does comparative evidence usually show?

  • Efficacy: similar anti-inflammatory effect profiles when dose is normalized and timing is optimized.
  • Safety: differences tend to appear in local ocular pressure effects (ophthalmic use), systemic hyperglycemia risk (systemic use), and infection risk monitoring requirements.

What is the Orange Book status of dexamethasone sodium phosphate products?

Featured snippet answer: Dexamethasone sodium phosphate is an established generic ingredient with multiple FDA-approved products. Orange Book “exclusivity” typically attaches to specific listed drug products, but the active ingredient itself has broad generic presence and limited remaining market exclusivity tied to any one formulation or presentation.

How to interpret Orange Book listings in this category

For a legacy steroid, Orange Book analysis usually turns on:

  • Specific sponsor and listed drug (RLD) status
  • Patent type listed (drug substance, drug product formulation, method of use, or manufacturing)
  • Expiration/expiry per listed patent family
  • Whether challenges have occurred and what settlement occurred (if any)

What “status” usually means for commercialization

  • For most presentations, market entry barriers are low because manufacturing of a known steroid is well-established.
  • Remaining barriers are usually product-specific: formulation salt stability, container-closure compatibility, or method-of-use label restrictions where applicable.

When does dexamethasone sodium phosphate lose exclusivity and what patents matter?

Featured snippet answer: Exclusivity is typically not a driver at the active ingredient level; it is product- and label-specific. For most dexamethasone sodium phosphate presentations, exclusivity windows are already expired, and patent landscapes are dominated by older families and formulation or method-of-use listings if present for specific RLDs.

Patent estate structure (typical)

  • Drug substance patents are generally expired for this molecule.
  • The practical IP remaining tends to be:
    • Formulation patents for specific strengths/concentrations and excipient systems
    • Manufacturing process patents for sterile handling or stability claims (rare in this class unless tied to a specific product line)
    • Method-of-use patents for narrow label claims where still active

Commercial implication

  • Market access often depends on:
    • Label match and indication scope
    • Sterility and stability requirements for parenteral presentations
    • Device/presentation compliance for ophthalmic or perioperative offerings

How many Paragraph IV challenges exist for dexamethasone sodium phosphate?

Featured snippet answer: Paragraph IV litigation history exists primarily at the level of specific RLD product listings rather than the active ingredient. For widely marketed generics of this category, most competitive launches occur through routine generic pathways with limited ongoing Paragraph IV activity compared with patent-protected brand products.

Why the Paragraph IV profile is muted

  • Lack of strong, late-life patent protection on the active ingredient.
  • High generic manufacturing readiness and multiple suppliers reduce incentives to pursue aggressive challenges unless a particular presentation still has listed patents.

What patent litigation affects dexamethasone sodium phosphate generic entry?

Featured snippet answer: Litigation, when it occurs, is usually tied to specific RLD presentations and listed patents rather than the molecule broadly. For decision-making, the relevant risk is whether an actively listed patent constrains label use or composition for a particular strength or route.

Litigation risk points

  • Method-of-use claims that restrict the indication or dosing regimen on the label.
  • Formulation patents that prevent direct “sameness” arguments on excipient or stability profiles.
  • Manufacturing method patents that could affect sterile fill-finish steps if still active for a specific product line.

What formulations are protected for dexamethasone sodium phosphate?

Featured snippet answer: Any remaining protection is typically formulation- and product-specific: excipient composition, concentration/strength, sterile stability specifications, or packaging compatibility for specific presentations.

Common protected elements in steroid formulation patents

  • Buffer system selection and pH range targets
  • Antioxidant or stabilizer choices (where claimed)
  • Vehicle and tonicity agents for ocular or injectables
  • Sterility assurance and container-closure stability criteria

Practical effect on market access

  • If patents exist, generics typically design around by changing excipients, adjusting pH, or using different manufacturing processes that meet FDA quality specs.

What clinical safety and efficacy considerations show up most for dexamethasone sodium phosphate?

Featured snippet answer: Safety monitoring concentrates on systemic corticosteroid effects (hyperglycemia, infection risk, hypertension) for parenteral use and ocular risks (intraocular pressure rise, infection monitoring) for ophthalmic use.

Systemic adverse events

  • Hyperglycemia
  • Blood pressure elevation
  • Increased susceptibility to infection
  • GI irritation and mood/sleep impacts (context dependent)

Ocular adverse events

  • Increased intraocular pressure
  • Cataract risk with prolonged steroid exposure (use-dependent)
  • Infection and delayed wound healing risks in the presence of noninfectious vs infectious etiologies

Dose-timing

Clinical trials emphasize:

  • Timing around surgery or chemotherapy
  • Avoidance of underdosing that fails to control inflammation or delayed symptoms
  • Management of steroid-related metabolic effects in at-risk populations

Market analysis for dexamethasone sodium phosphate: demand drivers and pricing

Featured snippet answer: Demand is supported by hospital and specialty use, with pricing pressured by multi-source generic competition. Growth is mostly steady rather than explosive.

Demand drivers

  • Perioperative and hospital anti-inflammatory protocols
  • Ophthalmology procedure-related steroid needs
  • Supportive care in oncology pathways for CINV
  • Broad clinician familiarity and inclusion in formularies

Pricing and margin reality

  • Generic competition typically compresses margins.
  • Differentiation tends to come from:
    • Supply reliability
    • Presentation convenience (pack sizes, strengths, routes)
    • Quality and stability track record
    • Contracting position with GPOs and IDNs

Supply constraints and procurement

  • Sterile injectables can face manufacturing capacity constraints in industry-wide cycles.
  • Procurement strategies often prioritize continuity of supply over narrow product-level features.

What market share and revenue potential exist by region and channel?

Featured snippet answer: The market is largest in North America and Europe for institutional steroids due to hospital concentration and guideline adherence, while emerging regions grow with oncology throughput and surgical volumes.

Channel split (typical)

  • Hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers: major share for IV/IM perioperative uses.
  • Specialty clinics and ophthalmology: major share for ocular formulations.
  • Oncology infusion centers: relevant share through antiemetic supportive care.

Regional dynamics

  • North America: heavy GPO contracting and frequent generic switches.
  • Europe: similar generic maturity, with tender-based procurement.
  • Asia-Pacific and LATAM: structural growth tied to procedural volumes and expanding oncology services.

Market forecast for dexamethasone sodium phosphate (2025–2035)

Featured snippet answer: Expect low-to-mid single-digit growth in value terms driven by volume expansion and inflation pass-through in certain contract environments, with faster growth in segments tied to label expansions or procedure volume than in the overall active ingredient category.

Base-case projection logic

  • Volume: rises with surgical and oncology service volumes.
  • Price: generally flat to declining in competitive tenders.
  • Mix: modest improvement if distribution shifts toward presentations with stronger contracting preference (e.g., certain strengths, pack sizes, and route-specific clinical adoption).

Scenario framework

  • Base case: steady volume growth, modest value growth, continued price pressure.
  • Downside: accelerated price competition, supply normalization in constrained periods, and label-conservative prescribing.
  • Upside: additional label expansions and procedure-volume growth in aging populations.

What generic entry risks exist for dexamethasone sodium phosphate?

Featured snippet answer: Entry risks are generally QC/CMC and label restrictions, not chemistry IP. The practical barriers are sterile manufacturing compliance, stability validation, and any remaining product-specific patents for particular RLD presentations.

CMC/IP constraints

  • Sterile fill-finish capability and validated hold times
  • Container closure and stability data for each strength/presentation
  • Bioequivalence or clinical bridge requirements as applicable to route and formulation

Label match risk

  • Method-of-use constraints can block generic label alignment even if composition matches, depending on remaining patent status.

Which companies are dominant manufacturers and distributors of dexamethasone sodium phosphate?

Featured snippet answer: Market leadership is typically shared among major generic sterile manufacturers and specialty pharma distributors with established injectable and ophthalmic manufacturing footprint.

How dominance typically manifests

  • Wide product portfolios and multiple presentations
  • Contract performance under GPO and IDN tenders
  • Distribution reach for hospital procurement

(A precise dominance ranking requires product-level sourcing from FDA labels, distribution data, and RLD-specific market share series, which are not provided here.)


Key Takeaways

  • Dexamethasone sodium phosphate is a mature generic steroid with clinical development focused on optimized dosing, label expansion, and delivery route refinement.
  • Market growth is steady and anchored in hospital and specialty procedure demand, offset by persistent price competition.
  • Exclusivity and patent risk are product-specific; most active ingredient-level protections have expired.
  • Competitive barriers are primarily CMC/sterility compliance and label/presentation constraints tied to any remaining listed patents for specific RLD products.

FAQs

1) Are dexamethasone sodium phosphate and dexamethasone phosphate the same for clinical and regulatory purposes?

They are commonly treated as related active ingredient salt forms under differing FDA product specs, but substitution for a specific regimen depends on the approved labeling, route, and presentation.

2) Does dexamethasone sodium phosphate have biosimilar risk?

No biosimilar framework applies to small-molecule corticosteroids; the competitive framework is generic entry and, where relevant, “authorized” manufacturing or label-limited competition.

3) What route has the highest clinical evidence base for dexamethasone sodium phosphate?

Parenteral use in perioperative and supportive oncology contexts and ophthalmic use in ocular inflammation are among the most studied routes, with trial endpoints tailored to each setting.

4) What is the biggest driver of cost pressure in dexamethasone sodium phosphate markets?

Multi-source generic competition plus tender-driven contracting and frequent formulary switching reduce pricing power.

5) What are the main regulatory hurdles for a new entrant making dexamethasone sodium phosphate injections?

Sterile manufacturing controls, stability and compatibility validation for each strength and container-closure system, and any label constraints if method-of-use patents remain for specific RLD listings.


References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate clinical studies. U.S. National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.