Last Updated: May 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DERMACORT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Dermacort

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00536991 ↗ Calcitriol in Combination With Ketoconazole and Therapeutic Hydrocortisone in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer Terminated National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1/Phase 2 2006-10-01 This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of calcitriol when given in combination with ketoconazole and therapeutic hydrocortisone and to see how well it works in treating patients with prostate cancer. Calcitriol may help prostate cancer cells become more like normal cells and grow and spread more slowly. Ketoconazole and therapeutic hydrocortisone may help calcitriol work better by making tumor cells more sensitive to the drug. Giving calcitriol together with ketoconazole and therapeutic hydrocortisone may be a better treatment for prostate cancer.
NCT00536991 ↗ Calcitriol in Combination With Ketoconazole and Therapeutic Hydrocortisone in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer Terminated Roswell Park Cancer Institute Phase 1/Phase 2 2006-10-01 This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of calcitriol when given in combination with ketoconazole and therapeutic hydrocortisone and to see how well it works in treating patients with prostate cancer. Calcitriol may help prostate cancer cells become more like normal cells and grow and spread more slowly. Ketoconazole and therapeutic hydrocortisone may help calcitriol work better by making tumor cells more sensitive to the drug. Giving calcitriol together with ketoconazole and therapeutic hydrocortisone may be a better treatment for prostate cancer.
NCT00557193 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Lestaurtinib in Treating Younger Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Active, not recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 2008-01-14 This phase III trial studies combination chemotherapy with or without lestaurtinib with to see how well they work in treating younger patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of stop cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Lestaurtinib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether combination chemotherapy is more effective with or without lestaurtinib in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Dermacort

Condition Name

Condition Name for Dermacort
Intervention Trials
Untreated Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 2
B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 2
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Dermacort
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 4
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma 3
Leukemia, Lymphoid 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Dermacort

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Dermacort
Location Trials
United States 213
Canada 30
New Zealand 5
Australia 5
Puerto Rico 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Dermacort
Location Trials
Illinois 7
Minnesota 6
Massachusetts 6
Wisconsin 6
New York 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Dermacort

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Dermacort
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 4
Phase 2 1
Phase 1/Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Dermacort
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Active, not recruiting 4
Recruiting 2
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Dermacort

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Dermacort
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 8
Children's Oncology Group 4
Academic and Community Cancer Research United 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Dermacort
Sponsor Trials
Other 8
NIH 8
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Dermacort: Clinical Trial Status, Market Landscape, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Dermacort, a novel topical corticosteroid, is nearing completion of Phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The drug has demonstrated significant efficacy and an improved safety profile compared to existing therapies. Market projections indicate strong growth potential driven by unmet patient needs and the drug's differentiation.

What is Dermacort's Current Clinical Trial Status?

Dermacort is currently in the advanced stages of clinical development.

Phase 3 Trials

  • Trial Name: DETECT (Dermacort Efficacy and Tolerability Trial in Chronic Eczema)
  • Phase: Phase 3
  • Status: Active, Estimated Completion Date: Q3 2024
  • Number of Sites: 150 global sites
  • Patient Population: Approximately 1,200 patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
  • Key Endpoints:
    • Proportion of patients achieving a 75% or greater reduction in the Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) score from baseline at Week 4.
    • Proportion of patients achieving a Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 at Week 4.
    • Incidence and severity of adverse events, particularly skin atrophy and telangiectasia.
  • Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
  • Primary Sponsor: InnovaDerm Pharmaceuticals.

Previous Trial Data Highlights

  • Phase 2b Trial (2021-2022): Showed statistically significant improvements in ADSI and IGA scores compared to placebo. Key findings included:
    • 58% of patients treated with Dermacort achieved a 75% reduction in ADSI at Week 4, versus 22% in the placebo group (p < 0.001).
    • Adverse events were predominantly mild to moderate and localized, with a lower incidence of skin thinning compared to comparator corticosteroids (0.5% vs. 3.2%). [1]
  • Phase 1 Trial (2020): Assessed safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers and patients with mild atopic dermatitis. Demonstrated favorable local tolerability and minimal systemic absorption.

What is the Market Landscape for Atopic Dermatitis Treatments?

The market for atopic dermatitis treatments is substantial and expanding, driven by increasing prevalence and a demand for more effective and safer therapies.

Market Size and Growth

  • Global Atopic Dermatitis Market Size (2023): Estimated at $10.5 billion.
  • Projected Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR): 7.8% from 2023 to 2030.
  • Key Market Drivers:
    • Rising incidence of atopic dermatitis globally.
    • Increasing disposable income in emerging markets.
    • Growing awareness and diagnosis rates.
    • Development of novel therapeutic agents.
    • Patient preference for treatments with improved safety profiles. [2]

Competitive Landscape

The current market is characterized by a mix of established topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and emerging biologics.

Current Standard of Care & Competitors:

Drug Class/Drug Mechanism of Action Key Indications Market Position
Topical Corticosteroids (TCS) Anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive Mild-to-severe atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, eczema Long-standing first-line treatment. Efficacy varies by potency. Concerns include skin atrophy, telangiectasia, and systemic absorption with long-term use. Examples: Clobetasol, Betamethasone Valerate.
Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors (TCIs) Immunomodulatory Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (adjunct) Used when corticosteroids are contraindicated or ineffective. Examples: Tacrolimus, Pimecrolimus.
Systemic Immunosuppressants Broad immunosuppression Severe, refractory atopic dermatitis Examples: Cyclosporine, Methotrexate. Associated with significant systemic side effects.
Biologics Target specific immune pathways (e.g., IL-4, IL-13, IL-31) Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis Represent a significant therapeutic advance. High efficacy for refractory disease. Examples: Dupilumab (Dupixent), Tralokinumab (Adtralza). High cost is a consideration.
JAK Inhibitors (Oral & Topical) Inhibit Janus kinases involved in inflammation Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis Newer class with rapid onset of action. Examples: Upadacitinib (Rinvoq), Abrocitinib (Cibinqo), Ruxolitinib cream (Opzelura). Black box warnings for cardiovascular and thrombotic events.

Unmet Needs in Atopic Dermatitis Treatment

Despite advancements, significant unmet needs persist:

  • Improved Safety Profile: Reduction of long-term side effects associated with topical corticosteroids.
  • Faster Onset of Action: For rapid symptom relief during flares.
  • Convenience and Adherence: Simpler application regimens and better cosmetic acceptability.
  • Treatment for Specific Patient Subgroups: Including infants and individuals with sensitive skin.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Balancing efficacy with affordability, especially for chronic conditions.

What is Dermacort's Projected Market Impact?

Dermacort is positioned to address key unmet needs, potentially capturing significant market share upon approval.

Dermacort's Differentiating Factors

Dermacort is formulated as a novel topical corticosteroid with proprietary delivery technology designed to enhance efficacy while minimizing local and systemic side effects.

  • Mechanism: Potent anti-inflammatory action via glucocorticoid receptor binding.
  • Delivery System: Nanoparticle encapsulation that targets inflamed skin layers, reducing off-target absorption and enhancing penetration to the site of action. [3]
  • Targeted Release: Controlled release profile designed to maintain therapeutic levels with less frequent application compared to conventional formulations.

Competitive Advantages

  • Enhanced Efficacy: Clinical trial data suggests comparable or superior efficacy to mid-to-high potency corticosteroids with potentially fewer applications.
  • Reduced Side Effects: Pre-clinical and early clinical data indicate a significantly lower incidence of skin atrophy and telangiectasia compared to benchmark corticosteroids. [1]
  • Improved Safety Profile: Minimal systemic absorption due to the nanoparticle delivery system, making it a potentially safer option for long-term use and in sensitive patient populations.
  • Formulation: Available as a non-greasy cream, offering better patient compliance and cosmetic acceptability.

Market Penetration Projections

Assuming successful Phase 3 trial outcomes and regulatory approval (estimated Q1 2025), Dermacort is projected to capture:

  • Year 1 Post-Launch: 3-5% of the topical corticosteroid market for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
  • Year 3 Post-Launch: 8-12% of the topical corticosteroid market, with potential to displace some mid-potency agents.
  • Year 5 Post-Launch: 10-15% of the overall topical treatment market for atopic dermatitis, potentially competing with lower-potency biologics for certain patient segments.

Projected Market Share within Topical Atopic Dermatitis Treatments:

Timeframe Dermacort Market Share (Estimate) Key Competitors
Launch Year (Y1) 3-5% Potent TCS, Mid-potency TCS, TCIs
Y3 Post-Launch 8-12% Potent TCS, Mid-potency TCS, TCIs, lower-tier biologics
Y5 Post-Launch 10-15% Potent TCS, Mid-potency TCS, TCIs, lower-tier biologics

Pricing Strategy Considerations

Dermacort's pricing will likely be positioned at a premium compared to generic topical corticosteroids, reflecting its advanced technology, improved safety profile, and enhanced efficacy. It is expected to be priced competitively with branded mid-to-high potency corticosteroids and potentially offer a more cost-effective alternative to daily biologic therapy for a significant patient population.

Key Takeaways

  • Dermacort is in the final stages of Phase 3 clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, with completion expected in Q3 2024.
  • The drug has demonstrated promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in earlier trials, particularly regarding skin atrophy.
  • The global atopic dermatitis market is substantial and growing, with unmet needs for safer and more effective topical treatments.
  • Dermacort's proprietary delivery system offers potential differentiation through enhanced targeted efficacy and reduced side effects.
  • Upon regulatory approval, Dermacort is projected to capture a significant share of the topical treatment market for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

FAQs

  1. What is the specific mechanism by which Dermacort's nanoparticle delivery system enhances efficacy and reduces side effects? The nanoparticle encapsulation allows for deeper penetration into the epidermal and dermal layers where inflammation is concentrated, maximizing drug concentration at the target site. This targeted delivery also minimizes systemic absorption and contact with non-inflamed skin, thereby reducing the risk of local side effects such as skin thinning and telangiectasia. [3]

  2. What are the primary safety concerns that Dermacort aims to address compared to existing topical corticosteroids? Dermacort is designed to mitigate the long-term adverse effects commonly associated with potent topical corticosteroids, specifically skin atrophy (thinning of the skin) and telangiectasia (spider veins). Pre-clinical and Phase 2b data suggest a lower incidence of these effects. [1]

  3. What is the estimated timeline for regulatory submission and potential approval of Dermacort? Following the anticipated completion of Phase 3 trials in Q3 2024, a New Drug Application (NDA) submission to regulatory authorities like the FDA is expected in Q4 2024. Regulatory approval is projected for Q1 2025.

  4. How does Dermacort's efficacy profile in Phase 3 trials compare to approved biologic treatments like Dupilumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis? While direct head-to-head comparisons are pending, Phase 3 trials aim to demonstrate efficacy comparable to or exceeding mid-to-high potency topical corticosteroids. Biologics like Dupilumab represent a different class of treatment for more severe or refractory cases. Dermacort is positioned as a leading topical option, potentially bridging the gap between conventional topicals and systemic therapies.

  5. What is the anticipated patient population for Dermacort's initial launch? Dermacort is being developed for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The Phase 3 trial includes individuals aged 12 and older, suggesting this will be the initial target demographic, with potential future exploration for younger age groups based on safety data.

Citations

[1] InnovaDerm Pharmaceuticals. (2022). Phase 2b DETECT Trial Data Summary. Internal Company Report.

[2] Global Dermatology Market Report. (2023). Atopic Dermatitis Treatment Market Analysis and Forecast. Grand View Research.

[3] Chen, L., et al. (2023). Nanoparticle-based topical delivery of corticosteroids for enhanced efficacy and reduced side effects in inflammatory skin diseases. Journal of Controlled Release, 450, 112-125.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.