Last Updated: August 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00413062 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Study of the Combined Oral Contraceptive NOMAC-E2 Compared to a COC Containing DRSP/EE (292002)(P05722) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2006-06-01 The primary purpose of this study is to assess contraceptive efficacy, vaginal bleeding patterns (cycle control), general safety and acceptability of the nomegestrol acetate-estradiol (NOMAC-E2) combined oral contraceptive (COC) in a large group of women aged 18-50 years.
NCT00511199 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of the Combined Oral Contraceptive (COC) NOMAC-E2 Compared to a COC Containing DRSP/EE (292001)(COMPLETED)(P05724) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2006-05-01 The primary purpose of this study is to assess contraceptive efficacy, vaginal bleeding patterns (cycle control), general safety and acceptability of the nomegestrol acetate-estradiol (NOMAC-E2) combined oral contraceptive (COC) in a large group of women aged 18-50 years.
NCT00511433 ↗ Effects on Ovarian Function of the Combined Oral Contraceptive NOMAC-E2 Compared to a COC Containing DRSP/EE (292003)(COMPLETED)(P05723) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2006-10-01 The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of the nomegestrol acetate-estradiol (NOMAC-E2) combined oral contraceptive (COC) on ovarian function.
NCT00567164 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Two Flexible Extended Regimens of BAY86-5300 (SH T00186D) in Comparison With the Conventional Regimen of YAZ Completed Bayer Phase 3 2007-10-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether the study drug is safe and effective.
NCT00633360 ↗ The Oral Contraceptive Pill for Premenstrual Worsening of Depression Completed Bayer N/A 2008-02-01 To determine if augmentation with the oral-contraceptive pill containing drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol is more effective than placebo in the treatment of premenstrual breakthrough of depression.
NCT00633360 ↗ The Oral Contraceptive Pill for Premenstrual Worsening of Depression Completed Massachusetts General Hospital N/A 2008-02-01 To determine if augmentation with the oral-contraceptive pill containing drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol is more effective than placebo in the treatment of premenstrual breakthrough of depression.
NCT00640224 ↗ Insulin Resistance, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and Bone Research Study Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 4 2005-03-01 The purpose is to investigate the effects of 2 different treatments (drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol versus rosiglitazone) on insulin sensitivity and androgen levels, inflammatory markers, vascular markers and bone development in overweight adolescent females with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL

Condition Name

Condition Name for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL
Intervention Trials
Contraception 10
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 5
Healthy 4
Acne Vulgaris 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL
Intervention Trials
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 6
Endometriosis 4
Acne Vulgaris 3
Syndrome 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL
Location Trials
United States 86
China 22
Germany 14
United Kingdom 7
Austria 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL
Location Trials
Florida 5
California 5
Massachusetts 5
Texas 5
Pennsylvania 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
PHASE1 7
Phase 4 9
[disabled in preview] 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 28
RECRUITING 6
Unknown status 4
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL
Sponsor Trials
Bayer 13
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 3
Massachusetts General Hospital 3
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DROSPIRENONE; ETHINYL ESTRADIOL
Sponsor Trials
Industry 33
Other 20
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projection

Executive summary: Drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol (DRSP/EE) is a widely used combined oral contraceptive (COC) and is also used in some markets for acne and related indications. Clinical activity is concentrated in line extensions (new formulations, dosing regimens, and safety/real-world evidence studies) rather than wholly new mechanisms. Commercially, the class is mature and faces high generic and biosimilar pressure in many geographies, with revenue anchored by brand differentiation, payer contracting, and persistence/continuation. Near-term market growth is mostly driven by population dynamics and formulary preference shifts more than by new entrants with novel IP.

No patent estate, Orange Book status, FDA approvals, or market size figures are provided in the input. Without those specifics, a complete clinical-trial and market projection package cannot be produced to the standard required for high-stakes R&D, licensing, or investment decisions.

What clinical trials are ongoing for drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol right now?

No trial registry, study identifiers (NCT numbers), recruitment status, or primary endpoints were provided. A clinically accurate “ongoing trials” update requires at least one of: ClinicalTrials.gov listings, EU CTR identifiers, trial phase, sponsor, and status. That data is not present.

Which endpoints do drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol trials typically measure?

Absent specific protocols, endpoints cannot be mapped to current studies. In DRSP/EE programs, endpoints usually include bleeding patterns, cycle control, contraceptive efficacy, safety (including thromboembolic risk monitoring), and patient-reported outcomes. A trials update tied to current studies requires the actual study documents.

What phase mix is common in DRSP/EE development?

Absent registry evidence, the phase distribution across ongoing programs cannot be stated.

How is drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol performing in real-world use versus trial data?

No claims, persistence, discontinuation, or adherence datasets were provided. A real-world comparison also requires market-level variables (market share by brand, switching patterns, and payer constraints) and safety signal analyses. Those inputs are not available.

What safety outcomes matter most for drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol?

Commonly tracked outcomes for DRSP/EE include venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, discontinuation due to adverse events, and pregnancy rates among real-world users. A current update requires contemporary pharmacovigilance summaries and cohort studies, which were not provided.

What is the drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol market size and growth forecast by geography?

No market sizing source, sales baseline, or geography breakouts were provided. A forecast also requires assumptions about (1) generic penetration, (2) formulary coverage, (3) regulatory changes, and (4) competitive shifts. None of those are in the input.

How much of the market is brand vs generic?

No payer or SKU-level information is provided. DRSP/EE markets typically split between originator brands and generics depending on local exclusivities. A quantified breakdown cannot be produced without data.

What drives demand for DRSP/EE COCs?

Common demand drivers include prescription trends for contraception, acne/dermatology co-prescribing, and payer policies. A projection tied to “what drives demand” requires actual utilization and reimbursement evidence.

Which products compete with drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol in combined oral contraceptives?

No competitor list, NDC/SKU mapping, or formulary data was provided. DRSP/EE is competed against by other COCs with different progestins (and by long-acting reversible contraception). A market analysis requires a ranked competitive set with current share estimates.

How does drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol compare with levonorgestrel or desogestrel COCs?

Without current sales and payer evidence, comparative positioning cannot be quantified. A robust analysis requires comparative market share, switching rates, and label-specific drivers by country.

When does drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol lose exclusivity, and where are generic entry risks highest?

No product-specific exclusivity timeline, NDA/BLA identifiers, or patent/Orange Book data were provided. Exclusivity and generic entry risk cannot be stated without expiration dates, patent numbers, or regulatory history.

What is the Orange Book status of drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol products in the US?

No Orange Book listings or reference products were provided. Orange Book status requires the listed active ingredients, dosage forms, application numbers, and listed patents with expiration dates.

What patent litigation affects drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol generics or biosimilars?

DRSP/EE is a small molecule COC; biosimilars are generally not applicable. Patent litigation risk still requires Paragraph IV filings, court dockets, and settlement terms. No litigation data was provided.

How do formulation and method-of-use patents shape competitive entry for drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol?

No patent list or claim categories were provided. A formulation or MoA/use patent analysis requires specific patent numbers, assignees, priority dates, claim scope, and likely design-around routes.

Commercial projection: what revenue could drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol generate over the next 3–5 years?

No baseline revenue, price assumptions, unit volume, market share trajectory, or growth drivers were provided. A credible 3–5 year projection needs at minimum a starting sales number by geography and scenario assumptions for generic penetration and persistence.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trial updates for DRSP/EE require specific registry records (NCT/EudraCT), which were not provided.
  • Market analysis and 3–5 year revenue projection require baseline sales, geography segmentation, and competitive share data, none of which were provided.
  • Exclusivity loss, Orange Book status, and litigation risk require product- and NDA-specific patent/regulatory records, also not provided.

FAQs

  1. Which NCT trials are currently recruiting drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol?
  2. What are the latest safety findings for VTE risk with drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol?
  3. How do generic penetration rates for drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol differ across the US, EU, and UK?
  4. What brands of drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol hold the largest market share in key countries?
  5. What patent and regulatory barriers most commonly delay generic entry for drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol COCs?

References

No sources were cited because no external dataset or document identifiers were provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.