Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00001059 ↗ Comparison of Liposomal Doxorubicin Used Alone or in Combination With Bleomycin Plus Vincristine in the Treatment of Kaposi's Sarcoma in Patients With AIDS Completed Amgen Phase 2 1969-12-31 To evaluate the safety and efficacy of liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride ( DOX-SL ) alone or in combination with bleomycin and vincristine in the long-term treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. To determine whether the 3-drug combination enhances progression-free survival and quality of life. Liposomal formulations of chemotherapeutic agents increase drug accumulation in tumors, which permits disease palliation at relatively low doses and thus decreases some of the dose-limiting toxicity. Multi-agent therapy is considered to be more effective than single-agent therapy; therefore, DOX-SL will be combined with bleomycin and vincristine.
NCT00001059 ↗ Comparison of Liposomal Doxorubicin Used Alone or in Combination With Bleomycin Plus Vincristine in the Treatment of Kaposi's Sarcoma in Patients With AIDS Completed Sequus Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 1969-12-31 To evaluate the safety and efficacy of liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride ( DOX-SL ) alone or in combination with bleomycin and vincristine in the long-term treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. To determine whether the 3-drug combination enhances progression-free survival and quality of life. Liposomal formulations of chemotherapeutic agents increase drug accumulation in tumors, which permits disease palliation at relatively low doses and thus decreases some of the dose-limiting toxicity. Multi-agent therapy is considered to be more effective than single-agent therapy; therefore, DOX-SL will be combined with bleomycin and vincristine.
NCT00001059 ↗ Comparison of Liposomal Doxorubicin Used Alone or in Combination With Bleomycin Plus Vincristine in the Treatment of Kaposi's Sarcoma in Patients With AIDS Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 To evaluate the safety and efficacy of liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride ( DOX-SL ) alone or in combination with bleomycin and vincristine in the long-term treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. To determine whether the 3-drug combination enhances progression-free survival and quality of life. Liposomal formulations of chemotherapeutic agents increase drug accumulation in tumors, which permits disease palliation at relatively low doses and thus decreases some of the dose-limiting toxicity. Multi-agent therapy is considered to be more effective than single-agent therapy; therefore, DOX-SL will be combined with bleomycin and vincristine.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)

Condition Name

Condition Name for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)
Intervention Trials
Ovarian Cancer 69
Breast Cancer 57
Fallopian Tube Cancer 30
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)
Intervention Trials
Ovarian Neoplasms 130
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial 100
Breast Neoplasms 83
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)
Location Trials
Italy 135
China 88
Spain 63
Germany 57
Canada 53
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)
Location Trials
California 79
New York 68
Texas 58
Florida 51
Ohio 49
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 3
PHASE2 16
Phase 4 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 171
Recruiting 63
Terminated 52
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 67
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 12
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE (LIPOSOMAL)
Sponsor Trials
Other 425
Industry 253
NIH 70
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Doxorubicin Hydrochloride (Liposomal) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Launch Projections (2026)

Last updated: July 27, 2026

What clinical trials are ongoing for liposomal doxorubicin, and what do the updates show?

Answer: Liposomal doxorubicin trials in 2024-2026 focus on (1) first-line and relapsed settings across ovarian cancer, metastatic breast cancer, and sarcoma; (2) combination regimens with immune-oncology agents, PARP inhibitors, VEGF/VEGFR-pathway drugs, and targeted small molecules; and (3) next-generation liposome delivery platforms aimed at dose intensity or altered biodistribution. The near-term pipeline signal is highest in combination trials rather than stand-alone monotherapy studies.

Which indications have the most active trial density?

Common trial clusters

  • Ovarian cancer (including platinum-resistant disease)
  • Metastatic breast cancer (HER2-negative and TNBC subsets in some programs)
  • Sarcoma (notably leiomyosarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma subtypes)
  • Other solid tumors where anthracyclines remain a backbone option but where liposomal delivery is used to manage cardiotoxicity and tissue exposure

How are combination partners changing trial design?

The recurring pattern across active programs is pairing liposomal doxorubicin with agents that:

  • extend progression-free survival (PFS) in biomarker-defined cohorts (PARP inhibition, VEGF-pathway inhibition)
  • shift response patterns via immune engagement (PD-1/PD-L1 or other immune modulators)
  • improve tolerability or enable higher effective dose intensity (formulation- or schedule-driven)

What trial endpoints typically drive FDA-relevant readouts?

  • PFS and objective response rate (ORR) under RECIST
  • Overall survival (OS) as a key secondary endpoint, especially in earlier-line solid tumor trials
  • Safety: incidence of treatment-related adverse events, with special focus on cardiotoxicity signals and hematologic toxicity

Clinical trials update limitation: The topic request does not specify which specific marketed product is in scope (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin vs non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) or which geography. Without that, a complete, product-level trial ledger and timeline cannot be produced.


How big is the global market for liposomal doxorubicin, and what growth drivers matter most?

Answer: The market is anchored by established oncology use in ovarian cancer and metastatic breast cancer, with continued demand supported by the anthracycline role plus the liposomal formulation’s tolerability profile. Growth is constrained by generic/entry risk for older formulations and by competition from antibody-drug conjugates and other next-gen combination regimens.

Market segmentation that usually moves revenue

  • Indication: ovarian cancer accounts for sustained demand due to label alignment and clinician familiarity
  • Setting: first-line combination regimens vs relapsed/refractory use
  • Geography: US/EU drive pricing power; emerging markets add volume but have access constraints

Key growth drivers

  • Preference for liposomal anthracyclines in patients where cardiotoxicity risk is a deciding factor
  • Combination adoption that leverages anthracycline synergy with other modalities
  • Ongoing clinical and physician education efforts around tolerability management

Key headwinds

  • Patent and exclusivity expiry cycles for legacy formulations
  • Competitive pressure from:
    • antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)
    • novel chemotherapy backbones with better therapeutic indices
  • Treatment sequencing changes where clinicians may favor alternative agents earlier

When do liposomal doxorubicin products lose exclusivity, and what is the generic entry risk?

Answer: Exclusivity timing is product-specific and depends on whether the formulation is pegylated (common in the US/EU reference product) and on patent families covering composition, liposome structure, manufacturing, and method-of-use. Generic entry risk is driven by Orange Book listings, paragraph IV challenges, and settlement structure for each specific NDA.

Exclusivity and patent families that typically govern entry

  • Composition of matter (drug and liposome components)
  • Liposome size distribution and surface chemistry (pegylation parameters)
  • Manufacturing process patents (encapsulation method, gradient formation, purification)
  • Method-of-use patents tied to clinical regimens or line-of-therapy
  • Supplemental protection (formulation variants, dosing schedule claims)

Entry-risk limitation: The request does not specify the NDA/RLD or the marketed product name, preventing a defensible exclusivity and entry-risk timeline.


What patents protect liposomal doxorubicin formulations and how strong is the patent estate?

Answer: The patent estate for liposomal doxorubicin typically spans multiple layers: the core composition, the liposome structure and surface properties, encapsulation/manufacturing methods, and clinical regimen claims. Strength varies by family breadth and remaining term, and by whether patents are listed in the Orange Book for each dosage form and strength.

Where patent barriers usually concentrate

  • Manufacturing and process controls (often harder to design around)
  • Specific liposome structural parameters (size, polydispersity, pegylation density)
  • Composition claims tied to excipient system and drug loading

How to interpret “estate strength” for business planning

  • High strength: multiple unexpired families that cover both formulation and process, with corresponding FDA listings
  • Medium strength: formulation patents expired, leaving only method-of-use or process claims with narrower enforcement leverage
  • Low strength: mostly expired or non-listed patents, creating higher likelihood of at-risk launch

Patent-estate limitation: Without the specific product and jurisdiction, a complete patent map with expiration dates and enforcement strength cannot be provided.


What is the Orange Book status of liposomal doxorubicin in the US?

Answer: Orange Book status is specific to each NDA and dosage form. It requires mapping the RLD to listed patents with expiration dates and patent-type codes.

Orange Book fields business teams track

  • Patent number
  • Patent expiration date
  • Patent use code (composition, method-of-use, manufacturing)
  • NDA and dosage form listing
  • Whether patents are active/in-force and still listed near-term

Orange Book status limitation: Product/NDA not identified, so an accurate Orange Book listing is not producible.


Have there been Paragraph IV challenges or generic lawsuits for liposomal doxorubicin?

Answer: Paragraph IV challenges and subsequent litigation risk are product-specific and linked to Orange Book patent lists. The business impact depends on whether the challenge attacks formulation or method-of-use patents and on whether the case settles for non-entry or delayed entry.

What drives litigation outcomes

  • Validity and infringement arguments focused on manufacturing method equivalence or claim construction for liposome parameters
  • Settlement terms that can include an agreed launch date, design-around constraints, or licensing payments
  • Court scheduling and whether preliminary injunctions were sought

Litigation limitation: The request does not specify the RLD, so no case-level docket table can be created.


How does liposomal doxorubicin compare with conventional doxorubicin and other anthracycline delivery systems?

Answer: Liposomal delivery changes biodistribution and toxicity profile relative to conventional doxorubicin. Clinically, it is used to manage cardiotoxicity and alter tumor exposure. The competitive comparison in the market is now dominated by sequencing choices versus ADCs and alternative chemo backbones.

Practical comparison points that influence adoption

  • Cardiotoxicity management and cumulative dosing
  • Hematologic toxicity patterns
  • Response kinetics and tolerability in combination regimens

Business impact

If a formulation offers a cleaner tolerability profile, it can expand eligible patient pools and sustain line-of-therapy usage even when efficacy is comparable.


What formulation and manufacturing innovations are in the pipeline for liposomal doxorubicin?

Answer: Next-generation efforts commonly target:

  • tighter control of particle size and uniformity
  • modified pegylation density or alternative surface chemistry
  • improved encapsulation efficiency
  • process improvements aimed at batch consistency and scalable manufacturing

What matters for biosimilarity/generics analogs (chemically synthesized, not biologics)

Liposomal doxorubicin is a small-molecule drug in a drug-product platform. The regulatory comparison typically maps to:

  • physicochemical equivalence (particle size, drug-to-lipid ratio, encapsulation)
  • release and stability profiles
  • in vivo exposure comparability

Regulatory classification note: This affects how “design around” is handled in patent and how equivalence is tested for approval. Product/NDA still must be specified for a concrete regulatory pathway assessment.


Regional outlook: which geographies should outperform for liposomal doxorubicin through 2030?

Answer: Near-term revenue momentum is typically strongest where oncology chemotherapy intensity is higher and where reimbursement supports liposomal anthracyclines. US and major EU markets generally lead value, while emerging markets lead volume growth but face access constraints and local competition.

What to watch by region

  • Pricing and reimbursement pressure
  • Competitive entry cycles and procurement dynamics
  • Tender timing for hospital systems
  • Regulatory pathway speed for follow-on versions

Revenue projection model: what is the likely market trajectory for liposomal doxorubicin from 2026 onward?

Answer: The market trajectory is expected to follow a pattern of steady baseline demand supported by established oncology indications, with step changes driven by patent expiry/entry, channel mix shifts toward combinations, and competitive substitution by ADCs and newer regimens.

Projection structure (business-grade)

A defensible projection for 2026-2030 requires three scenario variables:

  1. Patent/entry events: delayed vs early generic entry by formulation strength and region
  2. Indication mix: share of ovarian/breast vs sarcoma/other
  3. Competition displacement: ADC and alternative chemo backbone uptake

Projection limitation: No product identity and no current revenue baseline were provided. Without a specific RLD or market revenue anchor, a quantified projection table with ranges and dates would be fabricated.


Key Takeaways

  • The liposomal doxorubicin pipeline emphasis is combination regimens that leverage tolerability and exposure control, with trial endpoints focused on PFS/ORR and safety.
  • Market demand remains anchored in ovarian cancer and metastatic breast cancer, with growth constrained by substitution from newer oncology therapies and by generic entry cycles.
  • Exclusivity, Orange Book status, Paragraph IV challenges, and litigation risk are product-specific and require mapping to the exact marketed RLD/NDA to produce a reliable timeline and entry scenarios.
  • Business impact through 2030 is primarily driven by (1) entry timing by strength and geography and (2) chemotherapy sequencing shifts in solid tumors.

FAQs

  1. Which cancer types account for the highest share of liposomal doxorubicin usage by line of therapy?
  2. What formulation attributes (particle size, drug-to-lipid ratio, pegylation density) are most critical for follow-on approval?
  3. How do combination regimens using liposomal doxorubicin affect cardiotoxicity monitoring and dose scheduling?
  4. What court outcomes most influence delayed generic entry for liposomal doxorubicin products?
  5. How do hospital procurement and reimbursement policies shape real-world uptake in the US versus EU?

References

  1. FDA. Drugs@FDA. (Accessed 2026-07-27).
  2. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (Accessed 2026-07-27).
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. Doxorubicin liposomal trials search results. (Accessed 2026-07-27).
  4. EudraCT/EMA resources for clinical trial registry cross-checks. (Accessed 2026-07-27).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.