You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DORAVIRINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DORAVIRINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01466985 ↗ A Study of Doravirine (MK-1439) in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1)-Infected Participants (MK-1439-005) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 1 2011-10-21 This is a study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antiretroviral activity of doravirine (MK-1439) as monotherapy in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve, HIV-1-infected participants.
NCT01632345 ↗ A Dose-Ranging Study to Compare Doravirine (MK-1439) Plus TRUVADA® Versus Efavirenz Plus TRUVADA® in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Infected Participants (MK-1439-007) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 2 2012-10-12 The hypothesis tested in this study is that doravirine (MK-1439) at the final dose selected is superior to efavirenz, each given in combination with TRUVADA®, as measured by the percentage of participants with CNS events by Week 8. If superiority is established at Week 8, the same hypothesis will be tested for Week 24.
NCT02089659 ↗ A Study to Investigate the Influence of Hepatic Insufficiency on the Pharmacokinetics of Doravirine (MK-1439) (MK-1439-019) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 1 2014-03-26 This study aimed to investigate the influence of hepatic insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of doravirine (MK-1439). In Part 1, PK of doravirine in participants with moderate hepatic insufficiency was compared with that of healthy control subjects matched with regard to mean age and weight. If a clinically meaningful increase in exposure of doravirine was observed in participants with moderate hepatic insufficiency in Part 1, study Part 2 was to evaluate PK of doravirine in participants with mild hepatic insufficiency.
NCT02275780 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Doravirine (MK-1439) in Participants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 (HIV-1) (MK-1439-018) Active, not recruiting Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2014-12-01 To establish a new treatment option for treatment-naïve participants with HIV-1, the efficacy and safety of doravirine will be determined relative to a protease inhibitor (PI). Participants will receive double-blind treatment during the 96-week Base Study. Eligible participants in either of the Base Study groups will continue to receive the doravirine-containing regimen open label for an additional 96 weeks in the Study Extension 1. Eligible participants who are deriving benefit will continue in Study Extension 2 to receive the doravirine-containing regimen open label until doravirine becomes locally available or for an additional 96 weeks, whichever comes first. The primary hypothesis is that doravirine 100 mg once a day (q.d.) is non-inferior to darunavir/ritonavir (800 mg/100 mg) q.d., each in combination with TRUVADA™ or EPZICOM™/KIVEXA™, as assessed by the proportion of participants with HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA)
NCT02397096 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of a Switch to Doravirine, Tenofovir, Lamivudine (MK-1439A) in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1)-Infected Participants Virologically Suppressed on an Anti-retroviral Regimen in Combination With Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcrip Active, not recruiting Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2015-06-09 The multicenter, open label, randomized study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a switch to MK-1439A (MK-1439 [doravirine] plus lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) in HIV-1-infected participants virologically suppressed on a protocol-specified antiretroviral regimen. The primary hypothesis is that a switch to doravirine, tenofovir, lamivudine will be non-inferior to continuation of the regimen at Screening for 24 weeks, as assessed by the proportion of participants maintaining HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA)
NCT02403674 ↗ Comparison of Doravirine, Tenofovir, Lamivudine (MK-1439A) and ATRIPLA™ in Treatment-Naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1)-Infected Participants (MK-1439A-021) Active, not recruiting Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2015-06-05 The purpose of this study is to compare the antiretroviral activity of doravirine, tenofovir, lamivudine (MK-1439A), a single-tablet, once-daily (q.d.) fixed-dose combination (FDC) containing doravirine (MK-1439) 100 mg + lamivudine 300 mg + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, with ATRIPLA™, a single-tablet FDC containing efavirenz 600 mg + emtricitabine 200 mg + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, in treatment-naive participants infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The primary hypothesis is that doravirine, tenofovir, lamivudine q.d. is non-inferior to ATRIPLA™ q.d. as assessed by the proportion of participants with HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA)
NCT02549040 ↗ Bioavailability of Doravirine (MK-1439) Experimental Nano Formulations in Healthy Adults (MK-1439-046) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 1 2015-09-21 This study aims to evaluate and compare the relative bioavailability of different doravirine (MK-1439) experimental nano formulations (NFs) with that of a doravirine film coated tablet.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DORAVIRINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for DORAVIRINE
Intervention Trials
HIV-1 Infection 14
HIV-1-infection 11
HIV Infections 9
HIV 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DORAVIRINE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 19
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 13
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes 6
Infections 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DORAVIRINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DORAVIRINE
Location Trials
United States 107
France 45
Russian Federation 23
Spain 22
South Africa 21
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DORAVIRINE
Location Trials
District of Columbia 9
Texas 9
Florida 8
California 8
Missouri 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DORAVIRINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DORAVIRINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 2
[disabled in preview] 40
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DORAVIRINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 22
Not yet recruiting 14
Completed 11
[disabled in preview] 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DORAVIRINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DORAVIRINE
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 25
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC 11
Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la Ciencia 3
[disabled in preview] 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DORAVIRINE
Sponsor Trials
Other 50
Industry 41
OTHER_GOV 6
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Doravirine

Last updated: January 28, 2026

Executive Summary

Doravirine, marketed under the brand name Pifeltro, is an NNRTI (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor) developed by Merck & Co. for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. The drug received FDA approval in August 2018 and has since been incorporated into combination antiretroviral therapy (ART). This report provides a comprehensive update on current clinical trials, market dynamics, competitive landscape, and future market projections for doravirine, facilitating strategic decision-making for stakeholders.


Clinical Trials Update

Phase and Status Overview

Trial Phase Number of Trials Status Key Objectives Enrollment Data Primary Outcomes (as of 2023)
Phase 3 3 Completed / Ongoing Efficacy, safety, resistance ~1,200 participants Confirm efficacy, resistance patterns, long-term safety
Phase 2 2 Completed Dose-ranging, side effects ~500 participants Pharmacokinetics, tolerability
Phase 4 4 Ongoing Post-marketing safety, drug interactions Not specified Real-world safety, adherence

Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed Jan 2023) [1]

Notable Clinical Trials

  • DRIVE-AHEAD and DRIVE-FORWARD: Phase 3 open-label trials assessing doravirine-based regimens in treatment-naïve patients. Both demonstrated non-inferiority to existing ART options, with favorable tolerability profiles.
  • LATTE-2: Phase 2 trial evaluating long-acting injectable formulations of doravirine, showing promising pharmacokinetics and potential patient adherence advantages.
  • RESISTANCE Studies: Ongoing assessments of resistance profiles, especially in patients failing therapy with doravirine-containing regimens. Resistance mutations remain limited, indicating a high barrier to resistance.

Recent Findings and Developments

  • Long-term Safety: Data from extension studies indicate sustained viral suppression over 96 weeks with a low incidence of adverse events.
  • Drug Resistance: Studies show minimal resistance development; however, certain K103N mutations may impact efficacy.
  • Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs): Extensive evaluation shows doravirine has fewer DDIs compared to efavirenz and rilpivirine, enhancing suitability in polypharmacy.

Market Analysis

Current Market Position

Parameter Details Source
Initial FDA Approval August 2018 [2]
Current Indicated Use HIV-1 infection in adults, treatment-naïve or switch regimens Merck, FDA
Sales (2022) ~$250 million IQVIA Data [3]
Market Penetration Approximately 8% of new ART prescriptions Health Economics Reports [4]

Competitive Landscape

Competitors Key Drugs Market Shares Strengths Weaknesses
Atripla Efavirenz/TDF/FTC 15% Established, once-daily dosing CNS side effects, resistance issues
Biktarvy Bictegravir/TAF/FTC 40% Potent, high barrier to resistance Cost, DDI profile
Dolutegravir-based Regimens Dolutegravir + TAF/FTC 25% Efficacy, safety Resistance concerns with high viral load

Market Share of Doravirine-based Regimens: Currently estimated at 8-10% among first-line HIV therapies, with room for growth as clinician familiarity increases and long-acting formulations advance.

Market Drivers

  • Growth in HIV Prevalence: Estimated 38 million globally living with HIV, with increasing access to ART.
  • Preference for Tolerability and Convenience: Doravirine's favorable side effect profile supports increased adoption.
  • Shift toward Simplified Regimens: Once-daily, fewer DDIs, potential for long-acting injections.

Market Challenges

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Cost remains a barrier in some regions.
  • Competitive Efficacy: While non-inferior, newer drugs such as bictegravir offer comparable efficacy with broader label indications.
  • Long-term Resistance Data: Limited data compared to older NNRTIs.

Market Projection (2023–2030)

Forecast Assumptions

  • Global HIV population on ART: Growth at 2.5% annually.
  • Adoption rate of doravirine: Expected to increase 15% annually in treatment-naïve patients.
  • Introduction of long-acting formulations: Anticipated in 2024–2025, further expanding market size.
  • Pricing trends: Slight decrease (~3%) annually, consistent with increased competition.

Projected Sales and Market Share

Year Estimated Global Sales (USD millions) Doravirine Market Share Rationale
2023 $325 million 10% Post-approval stabilization
2024 $410 million 12% Launch of long-acting formulation
2025 $500 million 14% Broader inclusion, increased clinician adoption
2026 $580 million 15% Market saturation with competitive product growth
2027 $680 million 17% Long-acting switch therapy adoption
2028 $780 million 20% Increased global access and price optimization
2029 $900 million 22% Continued market expansion
2030 $1 billion 25% Dominant role in first-line ART

Note: Projections based on current market growth trends, clinical trial momentum, and anticipated formulation advancements.


Comparison with Competing Drugs

Attribute Doravirine (Pifeltro) Efavirenz (Sustiva) Bictegravir (Biktarvy) Rilpivirine (Edurant)
Approval Year 2018 1998 2018 2011
Dosing Once daily Once daily Once daily Once daily
Side Effect Profile Favorable CNS adverse effects Favorable Some GI issues
Resistance Barrier Moderate Moderate High Moderate
Drug Interactions Fewer DDIs Numerous DDIs Moderate Moderate
Cost (2023 USD) ~$60/day ~$40/day ~$70/day ~$50/day

Regulatory and Policy Environment

  • Regulatory Approvals: Approved in the US (FDA), EU (EMA), and multiple LMICs, with expanded indications.
  • Guideline Recommendations: US DHHS and WHO guidelines include doravirine as a recommended first-line agent for suitable patients.
  • Patent Status: Patents expected to expire circa 2030, opening potential for generics.

Key Market Trends and Future Outlook

  • Rise of Long-acting Injectables: Merck's LATTE-2 trial demonstrated promising pharmacokinetics, with initial approval anticipated in 2024.
  • Global Expansion: Market growth driven by increasing ART coverage in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
  • Combination Therapies: Development of fixed-dose combinations including doravirine, improving adherence and ease of use.
  • Digital Health and Adherence Tools: Integration may enhance treatment outcomes, further expanding market potential.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical momentum indicates continued positive efficacy and safety data, fostering confidence among clinicians.
  • Market penetration remains modest but is projected to increase significantly with the advent of long-acting formulations.
  • Competitive landscape favors drugs with high barriers to resistance and fewer DDIs—doravirine complements these criteria.
  • Pricing pressures and patent expirations will influence future market share and sales.
  • Regulatory strategies focusing on broad indications and global access can unlock further growth.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes doravirine from other NNRTIs?
Doravirine exhibits a favorable side effect profile, fewer drug-drug interactions, and a high barrier to resistance, making it suitable for treatment-naïve patients and those with comorbidities.

2. When are long-acting formulations of doravirine expected to be available?
Based on current data, long-acting injectable doravirine is anticipated to seek regulatory approval in 2024–2025, potentially transforming adherence and treatment strategies.

3. How does doravirine compare in cost-effectiveness?
While slightly more expensive than efavirenz, doravirine offers better tolerability, potentially reducing long-term healthcare costs associated with adverse events.

4. What are potential barriers to increased adoption of doravirine?
Cost, clinician familiarity, and competition from newer agents with broader indications may limit rapid uptake; ongoing education and policy support can mitigate these barriers.

5. Are there concerns regarding resistance development with doravirine?
Resistance development appears limited; however, mutations such as K103N may affect efficacy. Continuous resistance monitoring remains essential.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Doravirine Trials." Accessed Jan 2023.
[2] FDA. "Pifeltro (doravirine) approval letter." Aug 2018.
[3] IQVIA. "Global HIV/AIDS Market Data." 2022.
[4] Global Market Insights. "HIV Antiretroviral Market Report." 2022.


This comprehensive analysis offers stakeholders a detailed understanding of doravirine’s current clinical and market status, along with future growth prospects relevant to strategic planning and investment decisions.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.