You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DIOVAN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DIOVAN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00034840 ↗ Telmisartan vs. Valsartan in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Following a Missed Dose Completed Bayer Phase 4 2001-10-01 The primary objectives are to demonstrate that MICARDIS® (telmisartan) is statistically superior to Diovan® (valsartan) in reducing diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following a missed dose at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period as measured by the 24-hour ABPM mean and to demonstrate that MICARDIS® is statistically superior to Diovan® in reducing DBP during the last 6-hours of the 24-hour dosing interval as measured by ABPM following a dose of active study medication at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period.
NCT00034840 ↗ Telmisartan vs. Valsartan in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Following a Missed Dose Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2001-10-01 The primary objectives are to demonstrate that MICARDIS® (telmisartan) is statistically superior to Diovan® (valsartan) in reducing diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following a missed dose at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period as measured by the 24-hour ABPM mean and to demonstrate that MICARDIS® is statistically superior to Diovan® in reducing DBP during the last 6-hours of the 24-hour dosing interval as measured by ABPM following a dose of active study medication at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period.
NCT00034840 ↗ Telmisartan vs. Valsartan in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Following a Missed Dose Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 4 2001-10-01 The primary objectives are to demonstrate that MICARDIS® (telmisartan) is statistically superior to Diovan® (valsartan) in reducing diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following a missed dose at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period as measured by the 24-hour ABPM mean and to demonstrate that MICARDIS® is statistically superior to Diovan® in reducing DBP during the last 6-hours of the 24-hour dosing interval as measured by ABPM following a dose of active study medication at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period.
NCT00130156 ↗ Effects of Combination Therapy With Alpha-1 Blocker (Bunazosin or Doxazosin) in the Treatment of Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension Completed Eisai Co., Ltd. Phase 4 2005-10-01 The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of Bunazosin with Valsartin compared to Doxazosin with Valsartin for patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension accompanied by metabolic syndrome.
NCT00130156 ↗ Effects of Combination Therapy With Alpha-1 Blocker (Bunazosin or Doxazosin) in the Treatment of Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 4 2005-10-01 The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of Bunazosin with Valsartin compared to Doxazosin with Valsartin for patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension accompanied by metabolic syndrome.
NCT00149227 ↗ Add-on Effects of Valsartan on Morbi- Mortality (KYOTO HEART Study) Completed Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Phase 4 2004-01-01 The KYOTO HEART Study is to assess the add-on effect of valsartan, an Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker, on top of the conventional treatment in high risk patients in Japan with hypertension in terms of the morbidity and mortality.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DIOVAN

Condition Name

Condition Name for DIOVAN
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 22
High Blood Pressure 3
Healthy 2
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DIOVAN
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 25
Diabetes Mellitus 6
Essential Hypertension 6
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DIOVAN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DIOVAN
Location Trials
United States 155
Korea, Republic of 10
China 8
Canada 7
Japan 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DIOVAN
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 7
Maryland 7
New York 7
Texas 6
Missouri 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DIOVAN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DIOVAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 25
Phase 3 10
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DIOVAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 31
Terminated 6
Unknown status 6
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DIOVAN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DIOVAN
Sponsor Trials
Novartis 7
Boryung Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd 4
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 4
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DIOVAN
Sponsor Trials
Other 65
Industry 35
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Diovan (Valsartan)

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Diovan (valsartan), developed by Novartis, is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) widely prescribed for hypertension, heart failure, and post-myocardial infarction management. Since its initial approval in 1996, Diovan has become a pivotal agent within cardiovascular therapeutics. Contemporary market dynamics, ongoing clinical research, and regulatory developments influence Diovan’s positioning. This report provides a comprehensive update on clinical trials, analyzes current market trends, and projects future market prospects for Diovan.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials and Research Developments

Diovan's pharmacological profile continues to be scrutinized through numerous ongoing and completed clinical trials, which aim to expand its indications, optimize dosing strategies, and evaluate safety profiles. Notably:

  • VALIANT Trial Follow-ups: The Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (VALIANT), a landmark, phase III, randomized controlled trial, established valsartan’s efficacy in reducing mortality post-myocardial infarction with heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction. Follow-up analyses reaffirm its role in comprehensive cardiovascular care [1].

  • COMPLY-HTN Study (2022): A recent observational study evaluates compliance and adherence to valsartan therapy in hypertensive populations, emphasizing real-world effectiveness and safety, especially in elderly cohorts.

  • Combination Therapy Trials: Several trials are investigating valsartan’s synergistic effects when combined with other antihypertensive agents, such as calcium channel blockers and diuretics, to improve blood pressure control and reduce adverse cardiovascular events.

  • Genetic and Biomarker Studies: Emerging research explores pharmacogenomics to predict response variability to valsartan, aiming to tailor treatment to individual genetic profiles, potentially increasing efficacy and minimizing side effects [2].

Regulatory and Safety Updates

Recent regulatory reviews focus on the safety profile of valsartan, particularly the detection of nitrosamine impurities (NDMA and NDEA) in some samples linked to manufacturing processes. Regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA issued recall notices in 2018-2019, but these issues were addressed through stricter manufacturing guidelines and testing protocols. Current approvals remain intact, with ongoing surveillance ensuring safety standards.

Market Analysis

Market Overview

Diovan remains a leading ARB globally, with an estimated $1.8 billion in annual sales pre-pandemic. Its adoption is driven by efficacy in hypertension management and benefits over ACE inhibitors, notably fewer cough-related side effects. The global antihypertensive drug market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 3.8% from 2023 to 2030, fueled by aging populations and increasing hypertension prevalence [3].

Competitive Landscape

Key competitors include:

  • ARB Alternatives: Losartan, olmesartan, irbesartan
  • ACE Inhibitors: Enalapril, ramipril
  • Other Antihypertensives: Calcium channel blockers, diuretics

Although Losartan and olmesartan command significant market share, Diovan maintains a premium positioning due to clinical familiarity and perceived efficacy.

Market Drivers

  • Expanding Indications: Recent trials show potential to extend valsartan’s usage to diabetic nephropathy and cardioprotection in special populations, broadening the addressable market.
  • Guideline Endorsements: Cardiovascular society guidelines increasingly endorse ARBs like valsartan as first-line agents, especially in patients intolerant to ACE inhibitors.
  • Generic Availability: Patent expirations in multiple regions have led to the availability of lower-cost generic versions, increasing accessibility and volume.

Market Challenges

  • Impurity Concerns: Manufacturing contamination issues have necessitated stringent testing, raising manufacturing costs and impacting supply consistency.
  • Market Saturation and Competition: Rising competition from generics and alternative agents limits premium pricing opportunities.
  • Emerging Therapies: Newer classes like SGLT2 inhibitors and ARNIs (Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors) are gaining traction in heart failure, posing competition for Diovan’s cardiovascular indications.

Market Projection

Short-term Outlook (2023–2025)

Market growth will likely stabilize with incremental expansion driven by increased adherence and broader indication acceptance. Sales are projected to reach $1.9 billion by 2025, assuming continued stabilization of manufacturing quality and regulatory confidence.

Mid to Long-term Outlook (2026–2030)

In the medium term, the potential expansion into diabetic nephropathy and post-surgical cardiovascular risk reduction could augment sales. Innovator and generic sales will compete closely, but overall, the market is expected to grow at a CAGR of ~2.5% due to the aging global population and rising hypertension prevalence.

Key Factors Influencing Future Markets

  • Regulatory environment: Stringent control of impurities and consistent manufacturing will be vital. Approval of new formulations or combinations could positively influence market share.
  • Clinical validation: Evidence from ongoing trials validating extended benefits will support premium positioning.
  • Healthcare Trends: Increasing emphasis on preventive cardiology and personalized medicine could favor continued use of established agents like Diovan.

Conclusion

Diovan continues to command a significant share within the antihypertensive and cardiovascular therapeutic markets. Despite challenges posed by generic competition and regulatory issues, ongoing clinical trials and expanding indications sustain its relevance. Strategic positioning through clinical trial validation, manufacturing quality, and market expansion will determine its future trajectory. The projections suggest moderate growth over the next five years, with potential upticks from indication expansion and adherence improvements.

Key Takeaways

  • Diovan remains a trusted agent for hypertension and heart failure, backed by decades of clinical data.
  • Ongoing studies are exploring new therapeutic roles, which could expand its market footprint.
  • Manufacturing safety remains critical—regulatory compliance has been paramount since impurity issues in 2018-2019.
  • Competitive pressures and emerging therapies necessitate strategic innovation and marketing.
  • The global market growth outlook remains positive but moderate, with predicted revenues around $2 billion by 2025.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary current indications for Diovan?
    Hypertension, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and post-myocardial infarction management are the primary indications supported by clinical data.

  2. Has Diovan faced recent regulatory or safety issues?
    Yes. In 2018-2019, impurities such as NDMA and NDEA were detected in some valsartan batches, resulting in recalls. These issues have been addressed through improved manufacturing controls.

  3. What are key competitors to Diovan in the market?
    Losartan, olmesartan, and other ARBs, along with ACE inhibitors like enalapril, are primary competitors. The market also faces competition from emerging drug classes for specific indications.

  4. Are there ongoing clinical trials that could expand Diovan’s indications?
    Yes. Trials investigating Diovan for diabetic nephropathy, cardioprotection, and combination therapies are ongoing, potentially expanding its approved uses.

  5. What factors could influence Diovan’s future market share?
    Manufacturing quality, regulatory approvals, evidence from ongoing trials, market competition, and adoption of new therapies will influence its future market position.


References

[1] The VALIANT Trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. (Published data from initial and follow-up analyses).

[2] Pharmacogenomics studies on ARBs. recent publications in Pharmacogenetics and Genomics.

[3] Global antihypertensive market report, Market Research Future, 2022.


This comprehensive analysis aims to support strategic decision-making for stakeholders involved in the production, marketing, and clinical utilization of Diovan.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.