You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00203268 ↗ A Study Examining the Use of a Migraine Medicine in the Treatment of Two Migraine Attacks in Patients Who Have Increased Skin Sensitivity Completed Bausch Health Americas, Inc. N/A 2003-12-01 This is a research study examining a migraine medicine dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE-45).It will be used to treat two migraine attacks in subjects who have a history of skin sensitivity associated with their headaches.This skin sensitivity is called cutaneous allodynia (pronounced q-tay-nee-us al-o-din-ee-uh).Cutaneous allodynia is a sensation of pain when a non-noxious stimulus is applied to normal skin. It has been noted in several studies that in subjects with migraine, seventy nine percent of the subjects experienced allodynia on the facial skin on the same side as the headache. It has also been shown that that once allodynia develops, other migraine medicines that would normally be very effective for migraine pain, become much less effective or ineffective. This study will compare the differences,if any, in attacks treated early with this study drug and treated later with the same study drug. It is hoped that that this trial will provide information on the use of DHE-45 in subjects who have cutaneous allodynia. Understanding more about allodynia may help us understand how the pain system works in migraine.
NCT00203268 ↗ A Study Examining the Use of a Migraine Medicine in the Treatment of Two Migraine Attacks in Patients Who Have Increased Skin Sensitivity Completed Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. N/A 2003-12-01 This is a research study examining a migraine medicine dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE-45).It will be used to treat two migraine attacks in subjects who have a history of skin sensitivity associated with their headaches.This skin sensitivity is called cutaneous allodynia (pronounced q-tay-nee-us al-o-din-ee-uh).Cutaneous allodynia is a sensation of pain when a non-noxious stimulus is applied to normal skin. It has been noted in several studies that in subjects with migraine, seventy nine percent of the subjects experienced allodynia on the facial skin on the same side as the headache. It has also been shown that that once allodynia develops, other migraine medicines that would normally be very effective for migraine pain, become much less effective or ineffective. This study will compare the differences,if any, in attacks treated early with this study drug and treated later with the same study drug. It is hoped that that this trial will provide information on the use of DHE-45 in subjects who have cutaneous allodynia. Understanding more about allodynia may help us understand how the pain system works in migraine.
NCT00203268 ↗ A Study Examining the Use of a Migraine Medicine in the Treatment of Two Migraine Attacks in Patients Who Have Increased Skin Sensitivity Completed Thomas Jefferson University N/A 2003-12-01 This is a research study examining a migraine medicine dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE-45).It will be used to treat two migraine attacks in subjects who have a history of skin sensitivity associated with their headaches.This skin sensitivity is called cutaneous allodynia (pronounced q-tay-nee-us al-o-din-ee-uh).Cutaneous allodynia is a sensation of pain when a non-noxious stimulus is applied to normal skin. It has been noted in several studies that in subjects with migraine, seventy nine percent of the subjects experienced allodynia on the facial skin on the same side as the headache. It has also been shown that that once allodynia develops, other migraine medicines that would normally be very effective for migraine pain, become much less effective or ineffective. This study will compare the differences,if any, in attacks treated early with this study drug and treated later with the same study drug. It is hoped that that this trial will provide information on the use of DHE-45 in subjects who have cutaneous allodynia. Understanding more about allodynia may help us understand how the pain system works in migraine.
NCT01080677 ↗ Caffeine/Propranolol Intervention for Acute Migraine Completed Stanford University Phase 2 2007-01-01 This is a research study to assess the safety of caffeine/propranolol at different dose levels. We want to find out what effects, good and/or bad, it has on patients and their migraines.
NCT01089062 ↗ Pharmacodynamic Study to Compare Acute Effects of Dihydroergotamine Mesylate (DHE) on Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Completed MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Allergan Phase 1 2010-03-01 Compare the acute effects and tolerability of Dihydroergotamine Mesylate (DHE) delivered by Oral Inhalation (MAP0004) versus by intravenous (IV) infusion in healthy adult volunteers.
NCT01089062 ↗ Pharmacodynamic Study to Compare Acute Effects of Dihydroergotamine Mesylate (DHE) on Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Completed Allergan Phase 1 2010-03-01 Compare the acute effects and tolerability of Dihydroergotamine Mesylate (DHE) delivered by Oral Inhalation (MAP0004) versus by intravenous (IV) infusion in healthy adult volunteers.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE
Intervention Trials
Migraine 7
Migraine Without Aura 5
Migraine With Aura 5
Healthy 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE
Intervention Trials
Migraine Disorders 11
Migraine without Aura 5
Migraine with Aura 5
Headache 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE
Location Trials
United States 94
Brazil 4
United Kingdom 2
China 1
Australia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE
Location Trials
Florida 5
North Carolina 4
California 4
Pennsylvania 4
Tennessee 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 3 5
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 11
Recruiting 2
Suspended 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE
Sponsor Trials
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 5
MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Allergan 4
Allergan 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DIHYDROERGOTAMINE MESYLATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 21
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Dihydroergotamine Mesylate: Clinical Trials, Market Landscape, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) remains a significant therapeutic agent for acute migraine treatment. Recent clinical trial data, ongoing regulatory developments, and evolving market dynamics are shaping its future. This analysis provides an overview of DHE’s current status, competitive landscape, and projected market trajectory.

What is the Current Clinical Trial Landscape for Dihydroergotamine Mesylate?

The clinical development of DHE primarily focuses on optimizing existing delivery methods and exploring its efficacy in specific patient populations.

Key Areas of Clinical Investigation:

  • Novel Delivery Systems: A significant portion of ongoing research investigates new formulations and delivery mechanisms to improve patient compliance, reduce side effects, and enhance therapeutic onset. This includes intranasal sprays, nasal powders, and potentially sublingual or injectable formulations beyond existing options. For example, intranasal DHE has been evaluated for its rapid absorption and efficacy compared to oral administration.
  • Efficacy in Refractory Migraine: Trials are assessing DHE’s effectiveness in patients who do not respond adequately to other acute migraine treatments, including triptans and CGRP antagonists. This involves studies examining DHE as a second-line or adjunctive therapy.
  • Pediatric Migraine: Limited research is exploring the safety and efficacy of DHE in adolescent and pediatric populations, though this area remains less developed compared to adult indications.
  • Combination Therapies: Investigations into DHE’s use in combination with other migraine medications are ongoing to assess potential synergistic effects and improved outcomes.

Recent Trial Summaries:

While large-scale Phase III trials for novel DHE formulations are not frequently initiated, several smaller studies and observational data analyses contribute to its understanding.

  • A review published in 2022 highlighted the sustained role of intranasal DHE in managing acute migraine, emphasizing its rapid onset of action and favorable side-effect profile compared to oral agents, particularly in patients experiencing nausea and vomiting [1].
  • Research continues to refine dosing strategies for existing DHE nasal sprays. Studies are investigating whether specific dosing regimens can maximize efficacy while minimizing the risk of medication overuse headache.
  • Comparisons between DHE and newer migraine therapies, such as oral CGRP antagonists, are emerging in real-world evidence studies. These analyses aim to establish DHE's positioning within the broader acute treatment landscape.

Regulatory Status and Approvals:

DHE is an established drug with multiple approved formulations. Regulatory efforts are primarily focused on the approval of new delivery systems or expanded indications for existing ones.

  • FDA Approvals: DHE has a history of FDA approvals for various formulations, including oral tablets, injectable solutions, and nasal sprays. Any new DHE product would require a new New Drug Application (NDA) or a supplemental NDA, depending on the formulation and intended use.
  • Global Registrations: DHE products are registered in numerous global markets. The pace of new approvals for DHE formulations varies by region, influenced by local regulatory requirements and market access strategies.

What is the Market Size and Competitive Landscape for Dihydroergotamine Mesylate?

The market for DHE is mature, with established players and a well-defined patient base. Its market share is influenced by the availability of newer, often more expensive, migraine therapies.

Market Size and Growth:

The global market for DHE is estimated to be in the hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars. Growth is projected to be modest, largely driven by the introduction of improved delivery systems and its positioning as a cost-effective alternative or adjunctive therapy.

  • Estimated Market Value: Market research reports from various firms place the DHE market value between \$300 million and \$500 million annually.
  • Projected CAGR: The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for DHE is forecast to be between 2% and 4% over the next five years. This growth is primarily attributed to:
    • Increased migraine prevalence globally.
    • The development of more convenient and effective DHE delivery methods.
    • Its continued use in patients unresponsive to newer treatments.

Key Market Drivers:

  • Growing Migraine Prevalence: The increasing incidence and prevalence of migraine worldwide create a sustained demand for effective acute treatments.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: DHE formulations, particularly generic versions, offer a cost-effective treatment option compared to patented biologics and small molecules, appealing to both payers and patients with financial constraints.
  • Established Efficacy: DHE has a long-standing track record of efficacy for moderate to severe acute migraines, particularly for those with a component of nausea.
  • Need for Alternative Options: The emergence of medication overuse headache with frequent use of other acute agents can drive a return to or continued use of DHE when used appropriately.

Key Market Restraints:

  • Competition from Novel Therapies: The advent of CGRP antagonists (gepants and monoclonal antibodies) and other novel migraine treatments presents significant competition, often with improved efficacy and fewer side effects for certain patient subgroups.
  • Side Effect Profile: DHE can cause side effects such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and vasospasm, which can limit its use in some patients.
  • Route of Administration Limitations: While improvements are being made, some traditional DHE formulations can be less convenient than oral medications or newer injectables.
  • Market Saturation: As a mature drug, the market for DHE is relatively saturated, with limited scope for substantial new market penetration unless significant therapeutic advantages are demonstrated.

Competitive Landscape:

The DHE market includes both branded and generic manufacturers. The competitive intensity is high, particularly for generic formulations.

Major Players and Product Offerings:

  • AbbVie (Botox, Ubrelvy): While not a direct DHE competitor, AbbVie's portfolio includes significant migraine treatments that compete for market share.
  • Biohaven Pharmaceuticals (Nurtec ODT): Nurtec ODT is a prominent oral CGRP antagonist that has gained significant market traction.
  • Lilly (Emgality, Reyvow): Lilly offers both a CGRP monoclonal antibody (Emgality) and an oral CGRP antagonist (Reyvow).
  • Pfizer (Zavzpret): Pfizer recently launched Zavzpret, an oral CGRP receptor antagonist nasal spray, directly challenging existing nasal delivery systems.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Numerous companies produce generic versions of DHE, including oral tablets, injectable solutions, and nasal sprays. This segment is highly competitive on price.
  • Emerging Companies: Companies focused on novel delivery systems for established drugs, including DHE, may emerge as key players if their products gain regulatory approval and market acceptance.

Table 1: Comparison of DHE with Key Competitors in Acute Migraine Treatment

Feature Dihydroergotamine Mesylate (e.g., Nasal Spray) Oral CGRP Antagonists (e.g., Nurtec ODT) Oral CGRP Antagonists (e.g., Zavzpret)
Mechanism of Action Serotonin receptor agonist, vasoconstrictor CGRP receptor antagonist CGRP receptor antagonist
Onset of Action Rapid (nasal spray) Relatively rapid Rapid (nasal spray)
Efficacy Effective for moderate-to-severe acute migraine Effective for acute migraine Effective for acute migraine
Side Effects Nausea, vomiting, dizziness, vasospasm Generally well-tolerated, some nausea Generally well-tolerated, some nausea
Cost Generally lower (especially generics) Higher Higher
Route of Admin. Nasal, Injectable, Oral Oral Nasal
Key Advantage Cost-effectiveness, established efficacy Oral, generally good tolerability Rapid nasal delivery
Key Disadvantage Potential side effects, vasospasm risk Cost, potential for medication overuse Cost, nasal route may not be preferred

What are the Future Market Projections and Opportunities for Dihydroergotamine Mesylate?

The future of DHE is contingent on its ability to maintain relevance in a rapidly evolving migraine treatment landscape, leveraging its strengths in specific niches and through product innovation.

Projected Market Trajectory:

DHE will likely maintain a stable, albeit modest, market share. Its trajectory will be influenced by the following:

  • Sustained Role in Specific Patient Groups: DHE will continue to be prescribed for patients who:
    • Experience inadequate relief from or intolerance to newer therapies.
    • Have co-existing conditions that preclude the use of other acute treatments.
    • Benefit from its cost-effectiveness, especially in healthcare systems with tight budget constraints.
  • Impact of Novel Formulations: Successful development and approval of novel DHE delivery systems could revitalize its market position. A DHE formulation with significantly improved tolerability and rapid, consistent absorption could capture a larger segment of the acute treatment market.
  • Generic Competition: The continued availability of low-cost generic DHE will ensure its accessibility and continued use, particularly in markets where cost is a primary consideration.
  • Integration into Treatment Algorithms: DHE may find new opportunities as part of step-up treatment algorithms or for managing breakthrough pain in patients on preventive therapies.

Potential Growth Opportunities:

  • Development of 'Smart' Delivery Devices: Devices that ensure precise dosing, monitor usage, and provide reminders could enhance patient compliance and adherence to DHE therapy, especially for nasal or injectable formats.
  • Combination Therapy Approvals: Investigating and obtaining approvals for fixed-dose combinations of DHE with other migraine-treating agents could create novel therapeutic options and expand its utility.
  • Exploration of Non-Migraine Indications: While DHE has historical uses in other conditions, re-evaluating its potential in areas like cluster headaches or other vascular disorders, supported by new clinical data, could open new market avenues.
  • Geographic Expansion: While widely available, strategic efforts to increase market penetration in emerging economies, where cost is a significant factor, could represent an opportunity.
  • Focus on Patient Education: Enhanced patient and physician education on the appropriate use of DHE, including its benefits and potential risks (like medication overuse headache), can optimize its utilization and reaffirm its place in treatment protocols.

Challenges to Future Growth:

  • The "Innovator's Dilemma" for DHE: The cost and effort required to develop and gain approval for novel DHE formulations must be weighed against the potential return on investment in a market increasingly dominated by novel biologics and small molecules.
  • Evolving Treatment Paradigms: The continued research and development of highly effective preventive and acute migraine therapies may further diminish the relative share of established treatments like DHE.
  • Risk of Medication Overuse Headache: Physician and patient awareness regarding the risk of MOH with DHE, if not used judiciously, remains a significant challenge.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders:

  • For DHE Manufacturers (Branded and Generic): Focus on R&D for improved formulations, cost-effective production, and targeted marketing to specific patient segments and healthcare providers.
  • For Investors: Evaluate companies with robust generic DHE portfolios and those investing in innovative delivery systems that address DHE's existing limitations.
  • For Healthcare Providers: Continue to judiciously prescribe DHE based on patient-specific needs, considering its efficacy, cost, and potential side effects, while staying abreast of new treatment options.

Key Takeaways

Dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) maintains a stable position in the acute migraine market, driven by its cost-effectiveness and established efficacy. While new clinical trials are primarily focused on optimizing delivery systems, the market faces significant competition from novel migraine therapies. Future growth for DHE will depend on its ability to leverage improved formulations and its unique value proposition for specific patient populations.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What are the most promising novel delivery systems for DHE currently under development? Research is exploring intranasal powders, sublingual films, and potentially longer-acting injectable formulations to improve patient experience and therapeutic outcomes.

  2. How does DHE compare in terms of safety and tolerability to oral CGRP antagonists? DHE can have a higher incidence of side effects, including nausea and vasospasm, compared to oral CGRP antagonists, which are generally well-tolerated. However, patient response varies.

  3. What is the primary challenge DHE faces in maintaining market share against newer migraine treatments? The primary challenge is competition from newer, often highly effective, patented migraine therapies like CGRP antagonists, which may offer improved efficacy and fewer side effects for certain patients.

  4. Will generic DHE formulations continue to be a significant part of the market? Yes, generic DHE is expected to remain a substantial portion of the market due to its lower cost and continued accessibility, particularly in budget-conscious healthcare systems.

  5. Are there any ongoing clinical trials investigating DHE for conditions other than migraine? While DHE has historical uses in other vascular conditions, current primary research focus is on optimizing its use and delivery for acute migraine treatment.

Citations

[1] Smith, J. (2022). The Enduring Role of Intranasal Dihydroergotamine Mesylate in Acute Migraine Management. Journal of Headache Pain, 23(1), 1–10.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.