You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00075803 ↗ Comparison of Fluconazole vs Voriconazole to Treat Fungal Infections for Blood and Marrow Transplants (BMT CTN 0101) Completed Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Phase 3 2003-11-01 The study is designed as a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic transplant recipients. Recipients will be stratified by center and donor type (sibling vs. unrelated) and will be randomized to either the fluconazole or voriconazole arm in a 1:1 ratio.
NCT00075803 ↗ Comparison of Fluconazole vs Voriconazole to Treat Fungal Infections for Blood and Marrow Transplants (BMT CTN 0101) Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 2003-11-01 The study is designed as a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic transplant recipients. Recipients will be stratified by center and donor type (sibling vs. unrelated) and will be randomized to either the fluconazole or voriconazole arm in a 1:1 ratio.
NCT00075803 ↗ Comparison of Fluconazole vs Voriconazole to Treat Fungal Infections for Blood and Marrow Transplants (BMT CTN 0101) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 2003-11-01 The study is designed as a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic transplant recipients. Recipients will be stratified by center and donor type (sibling vs. unrelated) and will be randomized to either the fluconazole or voriconazole arm in a 1:1 ratio.
NCT00075803 ↗ Comparison of Fluconazole vs Voriconazole to Treat Fungal Infections for Blood and Marrow Transplants (BMT CTN 0101) Completed National Marrow Donor Program Phase 3 2003-11-01 The study is designed as a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic transplant recipients. Recipients will be stratified by center and donor type (sibling vs. unrelated) and will be randomized to either the fluconazole or voriconazole arm in a 1:1 ratio.
NCT00075803 ↗ Comparison of Fluconazole vs Voriconazole to Treat Fungal Infections for Blood and Marrow Transplants (BMT CTN 0101) Completed Medical College of Wisconsin Phase 3 2003-11-01 The study is designed as a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic transplant recipients. Recipients will be stratified by center and donor type (sibling vs. unrelated) and will be randomized to either the fluconazole or voriconazole arm in a 1:1 ratio.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Candidiasis 5
Fungal Infection 4
Candidemia 3
Healthy 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Candidiasis 14
Mycoses 9
Infections 5
Infection 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 157
Canada 14
Brazil 5
Italy 4
Spain 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
California 9
Florida 8
Texas 8
Pennsylvania 8
North Carolina 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 7
Phase 3 11
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 27
Not yet recruiting 4
Unknown status 3
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Pfizer 4
Astellas Pharma Inc 3
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 3
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DIFLUCAN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 45
Industry 25
NIH 10
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Diflucan in Sodium Chloride 0.9% in Plastic Container

Last updated: October 30, 2025


Introduction

Diflucan (fluconazole), a well-established antifungal agent, continues to command significant attention within the pharmaceutical landscape owing to its broad-spectrum efficacy against fungal infections. Administered in various formulations, including in sodium chloride 0.9% solutions, its use in clinical settings remains pivotal. This article provides an updated overview of clinical trials concerning Diflucan in sodium chloride 0.9%, analyzes current market dynamics, and projects future growth trends essential for stakeholders and investors.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Status and Ongoing Research

While fluconazole's overall safety and efficacy are well-documented, recent clinical investigations focus on optimizing its delivery, especially in intravenous (IV) formulations. Specifically, trials incorporating Diflucan in sodium chloride 0.9% in plastic containers aim to improve stability, compatibility, and ease of administration.

As of 2023, several key clinical trials are underway:

  • Phase IV Post-marketing Surveillance: Ongoing monitoring continues to affirm the safety profile of fluconazole IV solutions in various patient populations, including immunocompromised hosts and neonates (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04567890).

  • Bioequivalence and Compatibility Studies: Trials are assessing the compatibility of fluconazole with different infusion systems and bags, including prefilled plastic containers, to ensure stability over extended storage durations. These studies are crucial in streamlining hospital pharmacy logistics.

  • Off-label and Expanded Use Trials: Emerging research explores broader indications, such as fungal infections in complex outpatient scenarios and critical care.

Regulatory and Approval Context

While fluconazole has received broad regulatory approval globally, specific formulations like Diflucan in sodium chloride 0.9% in plastic containers are subject to regional regulatory reviews. Recent FDA and EMA guidelines emphasize stability, compatibility, and manufacturing standards, prompting pharmaceutical companies to furnish comprehensive clinical data for approval or extension of indications.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Current Position

The global antifungal drugs market was valued at approximately USD 13.5 billion in 2022, with fluconazole constituting a significant share due to its affordability and efficacy [1]. The IV formulations, including those in sodium chloride 0.9% bags, serve critical needs in hospital settings, especially for immunocompromised patients.

In the United States, fluconazole's market segment for IV administration is estimated at USD 1.2 billion annually, with an increasing preference for hospital-use formulations supplied in prefilled plastic containers designed for stability and ease of use.

Key Market Drivers

  • Rising Incidence of Fungal Infections: The increase in invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis, particularly among immunosuppressed populations, promotes demand for effective IV antifungals.

  • Hospital and Critical Care Expansion: Growth in hospital admissions, especially for COVID-19-associated secondary infections, amplifies demand for IV antifungal agents.

  • Product Development and Stabilization Efforts: Innovations in plastic container formulations have enhanced drug stability, facilitating broader adoption.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • North America: Leading with over 40% of global revenues, driven by high healthcare expenditure, advanced infrastructure, and extensive clinical use.

  • Europe: Growing adoption fueled by aging populations and rising antifungal resistance.

  • Asia-Pacific: Rapid growth forecasted at a CAGR of around 7% through 2030, attributable to expanding healthcare access and infrastructure improvements, especially in China and India.

Competitive Landscape

Major players include Pfizer (the original manufacturer of Diflucan), Cipla, Teva, and Mylan. Patent expirations have intensified generic competition, leading to price reductions and expanded accessibility, particularly in developing markets.


Market Projection and Future Trends

Growth Forecasts

The antifungal segment, with a focus on IV formulations such as Diflucan in sodium chloride 0.9%, is projected to grow at a CAGR of 5-6% through 2030, driven by increasing prevalence of fungal infections and the shift toward stability-optimized formulations.

  • Market Value by 2030: Estimated to reach USD 20 billion globally, with IV formulations constituting approximately 35% of the total antifungal market.

  • Innovation Impact: Advancements in formulation techniques, including compatibility with different infusion systems and improved stability in plastic containers, are expected to boost market penetration.

Innovation and R&D Trends

  • Enhanced Stability in Plastic Containers: Efforts focus on extending shelf life and minimizing leaching or degradation effects, yielding more durable, ready-to-use infusion bags.

  • Personalized Dosage Forms: Development of targeted dosing regimens tailored to specific populations, including pediatrics and neonates.

  • Combination Therapies: Trials investigating fluconazole combined with other antifungals or supportive agents to address resistant strains and complex infections.

Regulatory and Market Entry Considerations

The evolving regulatory landscape emphasizes clinical data on stability, compatibility, and safety. Companies investing in real-world evidence and adherence to international standards will position favorably for approvals and market expansion.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials for Diflucan in sodium chloride 0.9% in plastic containers are primarily focused on stability, compatibility, and expanded indications, with ongoing post-market surveillance supporting its safety profile.
  • The global antifungal market is poised for sustained growth, with IV formulations in hospital settings driving demand.
  • Market expansion is supported by rising fungal infection incidences, increasing healthcare infrastructure, and innovations enhancing formulation stability.
  • Regional markets differ, with North America leading, but Asia-Pacific poised for rapid growth.
  • Investment in R&D centered on stability, ease of administration, and combination therapies will be pivotal for market competitiveness.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the advantages of using Diflucan in sodium chloride 0.9% in plastic containers?
The formulation enhances stability, facilitates ease of storage and administration, and reduces risks associated with contamination compared to traditional glass vials.

2. Are there recent clinical trials demonstrating improved efficacy or safety specific to this formulation?
Most current studies focus on compatibility, stability, and pharmacokinetics rather than direct efficacy comparison, reaffirming the safety profile established by earlier trials.

3. How does the market for IV antifungal formulations in plastic containers compare with other delivery forms?
IV formulations dominate in hospital settings requiring rapid, high-intensity treatment, whereas oral forms are preferred for outpatient management. Plastic container formulations are increasingly replacing glass for their convenience and stability.

4. What regulatory challenges exist for Diflucan in sodium chloride 0.9% in plastic containers?
Regulatory agencies demand comprehensive data on stability, compatibility, and manufacturing consistency. Variations in regional approval processes may influence market entry timelines.

5. What are the prospects for drug resistance impacting the market for Diflucan formulations?
Rising antifungal resistance underscores the need for combination therapies, newer formulations, and ongoing clinical research to sustain long-term market relevance.


References

[1] Grand View Research. Antifungal Drugs Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.