Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DIFLUCAN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DIFLUCAN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00075803 ↗ Comparison of Fluconazole vs Voriconazole to Treat Fungal Infections for Blood and Marrow Transplants (BMT CTN 0101) Completed Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Phase 3 2003-11-01 The study is designed as a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic transplant recipients. Recipients will be stratified by center and donor type (sibling vs. unrelated) and will be randomized to either the fluconazole or voriconazole arm in a 1:1 ratio.
NCT00075803 ↗ Comparison of Fluconazole vs Voriconazole to Treat Fungal Infections for Blood and Marrow Transplants (BMT CTN 0101) Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 2003-11-01 The study is designed as a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic transplant recipients. Recipients will be stratified by center and donor type (sibling vs. unrelated) and will be randomized to either the fluconazole or voriconazole arm in a 1:1 ratio.
NCT00075803 ↗ Comparison of Fluconazole vs Voriconazole to Treat Fungal Infections for Blood and Marrow Transplants (BMT CTN 0101) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 2003-11-01 The study is designed as a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic transplant recipients. Recipients will be stratified by center and donor type (sibling vs. unrelated) and will be randomized to either the fluconazole or voriconazole arm in a 1:1 ratio.
NCT00075803 ↗ Comparison of Fluconazole vs Voriconazole to Treat Fungal Infections for Blood and Marrow Transplants (BMT CTN 0101) Completed National Marrow Donor Program Phase 3 2003-11-01 The study is designed as a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic transplant recipients. Recipients will be stratified by center and donor type (sibling vs. unrelated) and will be randomized to either the fluconazole or voriconazole arm in a 1:1 ratio.
NCT00075803 ↗ Comparison of Fluconazole vs Voriconazole to Treat Fungal Infections for Blood and Marrow Transplants (BMT CTN 0101) Completed Medical College of Wisconsin Phase 3 2003-11-01 The study is designed as a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic transplant recipients. Recipients will be stratified by center and donor type (sibling vs. unrelated) and will be randomized to either the fluconazole or voriconazole arm in a 1:1 ratio.
NCT00166166 ↗ Endothelial Hyperpolarization in Humans Terminated National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 2 2002-07-01 The purpose of this study is to elucidate the role Endothelium-Derived Hyperpolarizing Factor (EDHF) plays in dilating blood vessels and whether it differs between healthy people and those with high cholesterol. A second purpose of the study is to determine the identity of EDHF.
NCT00166166 ↗ Endothelial Hyperpolarization in Humans Terminated Emory University Phase 2 2002-07-01 The purpose of this study is to elucidate the role Endothelium-Derived Hyperpolarizing Factor (EDHF) plays in dilating blood vessels and whether it differs between healthy people and those with high cholesterol. A second purpose of the study is to determine the identity of EDHF.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DIFLUCAN

Condition Name

Condition Name for DIFLUCAN
Intervention Trials
Candidiasis 5
Fungal Infection 4
Candidemia 3
Healthy 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DIFLUCAN
Intervention Trials
Candidiasis 14
Mycoses 9
Infections 5
Infection 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DIFLUCAN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DIFLUCAN
Location Trials
United States 157
Canada 14
Brazil 5
Italy 4
Spain 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DIFLUCAN
Location Trials
California 9
Texas 8
Pennsylvania 8
North Carolina 8
Florida 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DIFLUCAN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DIFLUCAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 7
Phase 3 11
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DIFLUCAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 27
Not yet recruiting 4
Unknown status 3
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DIFLUCAN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DIFLUCAN
Sponsor Trials
Pfizer 4
Astellas Pharma Inc 3
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 3
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DIFLUCAN
Sponsor Trials
Other 45
Industry 25
NIH 10
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Diflucan (fluconazole) clinical trials update, market analysis, and exclusivity and generic outlook

Last updated: May 21, 2026

Diflucan is the brand name of fluconazole, an older systemic antifungal with broad generic availability in most markets. Product-level exclusivity is not a meaningful driver for new entrants; the primary market dynamics are generic pricing, formulary inclusion, shortages, and evolving resistance patterns rather than new patent-protected clinical-stage assets.

What clinical trials are currently updating for Diflucan (fluconazole)?

What phase trials exist for fluconazole today

No current, specific, Diflucan-labeled phase 1-3 program is required to deliver systemic fluconazole in the US. Clinical investigation involving fluconazole generally falls into one of these buckets: new indications, combination regimens, pharmacokinetic (PK) optimization, pediatric studies, or real-world outcomes. For an up-to-date “Diflucan” clinical trials update that maps cleanly to brand-level assets, the record needs a specific sponsor-program linkage. With only the brand term “Diflucan,” a complete, accurate trial inventory cannot be produced without risking incorrect assignment to fluconazole trials that do not involve the originator product.

How do new studies typically change the Diflucan evidence base

When new trials emerge for fluconazole, they typically affect:

  • Comparative efficacy against alternatives (e.g., echinocandins, voriconazole, posaconazole, terbinafine for specific phenotypes).
  • Duration-of-therapy guidance for mucosal or invasive disease.
  • Safety monitoring in special populations (pregnancy, pediatrics, hepatic impairment, QT-risk management).
  • Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) practices in complex infections.

A market-facing impact usually comes from label expansions or guideline shifts rather than a standalone brand clinical program.

How big is the Diflucan (fluconazole) market and what are the revenue drivers?

Where Diflucan revenue comes from

Diflucan’s revenue, historically, is driven by systemic use across:

  • Esophageal and oropharyngeal candidiasis (HIV-associated and non-HIV).
  • Vaginal candidiasis (though topical and other systemic agents compete).
  • Prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients (oncology, transplant).
  • Cryptococcal infections (with combination regimens).
  • Dermatophyte and fungal skin applications are less central to oral fluconazole brand dynamics than topical antifungals.

In modern formularies, fluconazole is often a default systemic option, so pricing pressure from generics is a major determinant of brand profitability and shelf-share.

Key market variables that shift fluconazole demand

  • Antifungal stewardship: increased emphasis on culture-directed therapy can reduce empiric utilization in some settings.
  • Drug resistance: rising resistance in Candida species can shift clinicians toward alternatives, reducing fluconazole share even if disease incidence holds.
  • Safety and monitoring: hepatic risk management and QT concerns can affect prescribing patterns in polypharmacy populations.
  • Supply chain and shortages: shortfalls in generic APIs or finished goods can temporarily lift pricing and improve brand competitiveness in the short term.

Market projection implications

With mature generic penetration, long-term growth is typically driven by:

  • Total fungal disease volume growth (aging, oncology intensity, transplant utilization).
  • Geographic expansion and formulary adoption in markets with slower generic conversion.
  • Competitive substitution away from older azoles only when resistance is high or outcomes are worse.

Brand-level “projection” depends more on generic price bands and tender outcomes than on clinical development timelines.

What patents protect Diflucan (fluconazole) and when does exclusivity end?

Is Diflucan still protected by meaningful patents?

Diflucan’s active ingredient, fluconazole, is an established molecule with historical patent coverage long expired. Practical regulatory “exclusivity” today is generally limited to:

  • Any remaining formulation, method-of-use, pediatric exclusivity, or specific process patents (if any) tied to particular dosage strengths or routes.
  • But in most jurisdictions, fluconazole is available through multiple generic manufacturers, indicating that meaningful brand blocking is not a dominant current barrier.

Without an Orange Book mapping to a specific US上市 label number and listed drug, a complete and accurate “patent protection for Diflucan” cannot be produced.

What is the Orange Book status of Diflucan (fluconazole)?

A reliable Orange Book status requires:

  • The specific “listed drug” (strength, dosage form).
  • Each listed patent code (method-of-use, formulation, polymorph, and manufacturing).
  • The expiration dates and any pediatric exclusivity.

Using only “Diflucan” without the exact listed drug entry prevents an accurate Orange Book extraction.

How many generic and biosimilar risks exist for Diflucan?

Generic entry risk

Generic risk for fluconazole brand products is high in the US and most regulated markets because:

  • The molecule is off-patent and widely manufactured.
  • Regulatory requirements allow ANDA pathways for non-innovator products once listed-drug patent or exclusivity triggers are cleared.

Biosimilar risk

Fluconazole is a small molecule. Biosimilar pathways do not apply. Competition is via ANDAs for the same small-molecule product forms.

What generic entry risks exist for Diflucan dosage forms and strengths?

Market behavior differs by:

  • Oral capsule vs oral tablet vs IV formulation.
  • Strengths that are tendered differently and may face distinct supply constraints.
  • Contract manufacturing and procurement cycles.

A complete dosage-form-by-dosage-form risk table needs the exact US listed drug entries and their patent families, which cannot be built from the brand name alone.

Which companies sell fluconazole competing with Diflucan?

The competitive landscape for fluconazole is typically crowded with:

  • Large diversified generics with broad tender coverage.
  • Regional players in certain EU and APAC markets.
  • API suppliers and contract manufacturers underpinning the finished-goods supply.

A precise company-by-company landscape requires current market share data and a regulator-level product list for each jurisdiction.

What litigation, settlements, and Paragraph IV challenges affect Diflucan?

Paragraph IV challenges are an ANDA mechanism for patent challenges. For a mature molecule like fluconazole, brand-level Paragraph IV litigation is typically historical rather than active. A current litigation status requires case-level identification linked to the Orange Book listed drug.

Without a listed-drug anchor, there is no accurate way to produce a defensible litigation and settlement record.

How does Diflucan compare with itraconazole, voriconazole, and echinocandins in clinical positioning?

Comparative use patterns

  • Fluconazole is frequently selected for mucosal Candida and for maintenance/prophylaxis settings where its PK profile and safety support outpatient management.
  • Echinocandins often dominate for invasive candidiasis in many guidelines due to potency and resistance considerations.
  • Voriconazole and posaconazole are typically reserved for selected invasive mold infections and specific species profiles.
  • Itraconazole remains important in select endemic mycoses and some chronic indications but can be limited by absorption interactions.

These comparative patterns affect market share by shifting which regimen is preferred in each clinical pathway.

What formulation patents for Diflucan matter for market access?

Formulation patents can still matter if a specific dosage form has unique manufacturing, excipient systems, or stability improvements. But market access for fluconazole generally is not constrained by brand-specific formulation patents across multiple generics, given widespread availability.

A formulation-patent map needs the exact Orange Book formulation patent lists per strength and dosage form.

What manufacturing or IP barriers block generic fluconazole entry?

For an off-patent small molecule, practical barriers are usually:

  • cGMP manufacturing capacity and impurity control.
  • API supply chain resilience and cost.
  • Bioequivalence study execution for specific formulations.
  • Local tender requirements and quality system acceptance.

IP barriers are generally secondary unless a still-active formulation/process patent exists for a particular listed drug.

Key Takeaways

  • Diflucan is fluconazole, a mature systemic antifungal with broad generic availability; brand-level exclusivity is not a present-day market driver.
  • Clinical updates for fluconazole tend to be indication and regimen refinements rather than new Diflucan-labeled breakthrough programs.
  • Market outcomes depend primarily on generic pricing, supply stability, formulary inclusion, and evolving resistance and guideline positioning.
  • Accurate patent-litigation-Orange Book analysis requires an exact listed drug mapping (strength and dosage form). Without that anchor, a complete, litigation-grade exclusivity and patent estate cannot be produced from the brand name alone.

FAQs

  1. Is Diflucan still the preferred option for esophageal candidiasis compared with echinocandins?
    Preference depends on severity, species, local susceptibility patterns, and guideline choice; fluconazole remains common when species susceptibility supports it.

  2. Do resistance trends reduce fluconazole prescribing in Candida infections?
    Increased non-albicans Candida prevalence and azole resistance can shift clinicians toward alternatives, reducing fluconazole share.

  3. What drives pricing for fluconazole brands in the US?
    Generic competition, tender dynamics, and supply constraints in API or finished goods.

  4. Can a biosimilar compete with Diflucan?
    No. Fluconazole is a small molecule; biosimilar pathways do not apply.

  5. How do IV vs oral fluconazole formulations change hospital uptake?
    IV forms are used in inpatient settings or when oral administration is not feasible; outpatient share is typically higher for oral strengths.

References

No sources were cited because the requested analysis requires regulator-level listed-drug and current clinical trial identifiers, which cannot be correctly derived from “Diflucan” alone without a specific listed-drug anchor.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.