Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DEXTENZA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for DEXTENZA

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT04237012 ↗ ACCURATE Study for Subjects With Dry Eyes Recruiting The Eye Centers of Racine and Kenosha Phase 4 2019-12-16 To determine treatment and imaging outcomes in bilateral ocular surface disease management with an intracanalicular dexamethasone (0.4 mg) insert compared to standard topical over-the-counter artificial tears lubrication management
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for DEXTENZA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04168112 ↗ Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert for Post-Corneal Cross-Linking Inflammation and Pain- The LINK Study Active, not recruiting Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. Phase 4 2020-02-12 There is no standard of care medication regimen for the management of pain and inflammation post-corneal crosslinking (CXL), although most cornea specialists agree on use of an antibiotic and steroid eye drop in the immediate postoperative period. However, steroid tapering schedule and use of additional topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) eyedrops vary amongst practitioners. The goal of this study is to compare postoperative pain scores between patients receiving a tapering dose of topical steroids over 1-month post-CXL, versus those receiving an intracanalicular dexamethasone insert.
NCT04168112 ↗ Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert for Post-Corneal Cross-Linking Inflammation and Pain- The LINK Study Active, not recruiting Sight Medical Doctors PLLC Phase 4 2020-02-12 There is no standard of care medication regimen for the management of pain and inflammation post-corneal crosslinking (CXL), although most cornea specialists agree on use of an antibiotic and steroid eye drop in the immediate postoperative period. However, steroid tapering schedule and use of additional topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) eyedrops vary amongst practitioners. The goal of this study is to compare postoperative pain scores between patients receiving a tapering dose of topical steroids over 1-month post-CXL, versus those receiving an intracanalicular dexamethasone insert.
NCT04200651 ↗ Prospective Study on DEXTENZA® Safety And Efficacy Following Concomitant MIGS and Cataract Surgery Recruiting Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. Phase 4 2020-01-13 In this study, the investigators are comparing dexamethasone ophthalmic insert (DEXTENZA®) to the current standard of care, prednisolone acetate 1% eye drops, in a glaucoma population receiving both cataract and minimally-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). DEXTENZA® and prednisolone acetate 1% drops are both steroids used to control inflammation after eye surgery. DEXTENZA®'s method of delivery differs by offering a sustained release of steroid that does not necessitate postoperative anti-inflammatory eye drops. The investigators hypothesize that DEXTENZA® will be as safe as prednisolone acetate 1% drops and as effective at controlling postoperative inflammation following concomitant cataract-MIGS in a glaucoma population. The investigators also hypothesize that DEXTENZA® will be preferred by patients over prednisolone acetate 1% drops.
NCT04200651 ↗ Prospective Study on DEXTENZA® Safety And Efficacy Following Concomitant MIGS and Cataract Surgery Recruiting The New York Eye Surgery Center Phase 4 2020-01-13 In this study, the investigators are comparing dexamethasone ophthalmic insert (DEXTENZA®) to the current standard of care, prednisolone acetate 1% eye drops, in a glaucoma population receiving both cataract and minimally-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). DEXTENZA® and prednisolone acetate 1% drops are both steroids used to control inflammation after eye surgery. DEXTENZA®'s method of delivery differs by offering a sustained release of steroid that does not necessitate postoperative anti-inflammatory eye drops. The investigators hypothesize that DEXTENZA® will be as safe as prednisolone acetate 1% drops and as effective at controlling postoperative inflammation following concomitant cataract-MIGS in a glaucoma population. The investigators also hypothesize that DEXTENZA® will be preferred by patients over prednisolone acetate 1% drops.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DEXTENZA

Condition Name

Condition Name for DEXTENZA
Intervention Trials
Cataract 7
Dry Eye 4
Dry Eye Syndromes 3
Cataract Surgery 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DEXTENZA
Intervention Trials
Cataract 14
Inflammation 13
Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca 8
Dry Eye Syndromes 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DEXTENZA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DEXTENZA
Location Trials
United States 42
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DEXTENZA
Location Trials
California 6
New York 6
Florida 5
Indiana 4
Illinois 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DEXTENZA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DEXTENZA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 41
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DEXTENZA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 24
Not yet recruiting 14
Enrolling by invitation 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DEXTENZA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DEXTENZA
Sponsor Trials
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. 22
Vance Thompson Vision 2
Prism Vision Group 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DEXTENZA
Sponsor Trials
Other 42
Industry 24
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: April 28, 2026

DEXTENZA (dexamethasone ophthalmic insert) — Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and 12-Month Projection

What is DEXTENZA and how is it positioned commercially?

DEXTENZA is an ophthalmic insert delivering dexamethasone for post-cataract inflammation control. It is marketed in the U.S. under the 0.4 mg dexamethasone ophthalmic insert formulation by Ocular Therapeutix (now part of or integrated into its commercial structure; product is sold in the U.S. through established ophthalmology channels). The product’s commercial logic is procedure-linked: cataract surgery is a recurring demand engine and post-op steroid utilization is a standard-of-care component.

Indication (U.S., label-consistent):

  • Reduction of inflammation in patients following ocular surgery (commonly framed around cataract surgery workflow) (per prescribing information).

Clinical differentiation thesis (market-facing):

  • Sustained local steroid exposure via an inserted depot intended to improve adherence versus drops and reduce dosing burden for post-op regimens.

Regulatory and evidence anchor:

  • Approval and pivotal clinical evidence underpinning DEXTENZA’s U.S. commercialization are described in FDA labeling and associated FDA review materials (see cited sources at end).

What is the latest clinical trial activity for DEXTENZA?

Based on the publicly indexed record available in current major clinical-trial registries and the linked FDA-reviewed evidence base, DEXTENZA’s near-term clinical landscape is characterized less by new registration-grade Phase 3 expansion and more by:

  • Continued support of approved-use evidence through publication cycles.
  • Post-approval studies and real-world evidence efforts that are not consistently reflected as new interventional trials in the registries.

Practical read-through for an R&D calendar:

  • DEXTENZA’s core value proposition already sits on an approved mechanism and established post-op use-case.
  • The dominant “clinical trial update” signal for investors is whether new U.S./EU label expansions are actively recruiting or generating registration-path outcomes. Public registry activity for that pattern is limited in the current visible set tied to DEXTENZA’s base product.

Actionable summary for decisioning:

  • If the commercial plan depends on label expansion, the near-term watch item is whether new interventional trials with endpoints tied to new indications are initiated, not whether incremental publications occur.

(No additional trial details are provided here because the available registry-linked evidence set in the cited sources below does not provide a complete, defensible map of “latest” active recruiting Phase 3/Phase 2 programs for DEXTENZA beyond the already-established approval evidence.)


How big is the cataract/post-op ophthalmic steroid market and where does DEXTENZA fit?

The DEXTENZA commercial field sits inside the broader U.S. ophthalmology therapeutics market for:

  • Post-cataract inflammation management
  • Steroid class use around surgery recovery

Market drivers that directly impact DEXTENZA demand:

  • High and stable cataract surgery volume in the U.S. and aging demographics.
  • Established adoption of topical steroid regimens post-op.
  • Economic incentives for reducing dosing steps and improving adherence in typical discharge workflows.

Substitution dynamics:

  • Competing steroids in drop form (generic and branded) can undercut pricing and increase competitive intensity.
  • “Adherence and convenience” is the main differentiator; when patient-level adherence is a payer or provider concern, depot inserts can gain traction.

Where DEXTENZA has to win:

  • Formulary access and channel penetration with ophthalmology practices and surgery centers.
  • Budget justification versus generic drop equivalents, usually via outcomes, reduced dosing burden, and reduced drop failure in real-world adherence.

What does the competitive landscape look like?

DEXTENZA competes primarily in the post-op steroid segment where:

  • Branded and generic topical corticosteroids are widespread.
  • Depot-based steroid inserts can address adherence and administration friction.

Competitive implications for market share:

  • Generic erosion is the baseline risk for any steroid therapy positioned around a widely used post-op indication.
  • Depot inserts must maintain differentiation value long enough to sustain reimbursement and formulary preference.

What is the 12-month market projection for DEXTENZA?

A defensible forward projection requires current sales, payer mix, and channel inventory position. The cited materials below focus on regulatory and product description rather than providing complete, up-to-the-minute sales figures. Given that constraint, the most defensible projection is a scenario framework based on adoption mechanics rather than a numeric revenue forecast.

Base-case projection framework (12 months):

  • Volume driver: steady cataract surgery procedure flow.
  • Share driver: incremental uptake in practices that adopt depot/inserts for post-op adherence and workflow reduction.
  • Price driver: continued pricing pressure from generic drops and contracting behavior.

Resulting directional forecast:

  • DEXTENZA is expected to track the upper end of steroid post-op growth only if it sustains:
    • Formulary placement
    • Per-procedure utilization rate
    • Reimbursement consistency
  • Without new label expansion or demonstrable incremental clinical advantage against standard-of-care regimens, growth will likely be moderated by generic substitution.

Business conclusion:

  • The highest leverage variable for the next 12 months is not “more efficacy,” it is access and channel conversion: practice adoption, distribution reach, and payer contracting stability tied to depot usage.

Key regulatory and product facts that drive valuation and planning

What does DEXTENZA deliver and how is it administered?

  • Dosage form: dexamethasone ophthalmic insert
  • Strength: 0.4 mg insert (U.S. label) (per prescribing information).
  • Dosing context: post-ocular surgery regimen with depot behavior designed for sustained local delivery (per label).

What does FDA labeling and approval history indicate about evidence and claims?

FDA labeling ties approved claims to clinical evidence and defines:

  • Indication scope
  • Administration instructions
  • Safety warnings and contraindications
  • Clinical pharmacology relevant to local steroid activity (per prescribing information and FDA review materials) (see citations).

Where DEXTENZA stands vs. “new growth cycles”

What is the realistic growth path in the absence of major new trials?

If DEXTENZA does not add new registered indications in the near term, the growth path is:

  • Deeper penetration in existing post-cataract use settings
  • Higher utilization per surgery where depot insert workflows are already accepted
  • Continued payer channel stabilization that limits conversion to low-cost generic drops

This is the typical profile for established ophthalmic depot assets:

  • Mature clinical narrative
  • Ongoing channel and access competition
  • Valuation depends on adoption and reimbursement durability more than on pipeline novelty

Key Takeaways

  • DEXTENZA (dexamethasone 0.4 mg ophthalmic insert) is positioned for post-ocular surgery inflammation control, anchored in FDA labeling and approved clinical evidence.
  • Clinical trial “update” signal for the product is limited in the visible registries compared with pipeline-heavy assets; near-term activity is more consistent with ongoing support rather than new registration-grade Phase 3 expansions.
  • Market outlook over 12 months is primarily governed by cataract procedure volume plus depot insert adoption and payer/formulary contracting, with generic topical steroids remaining a structural substitution threat.
  • The most actionable lever for near-term performance is channel conversion (surgeons, surgery centers, and formulary access), not new clinical claims.

FAQs

1) Is DEXTENZA a prescription drop alternative or a separate administration pathway?

It is a topical depot insert delivered as an ophthalmic insert intended to provide sustained local steroid exposure after ocular surgery, not a conventional drop regimen (per U.S. labeling).

2) What drives patient demand for DEXTENZA?

Demand is procedure-driven, tied to post-ocular surgery inflammation management workflows, with cataract surgery volume as the main utilization driver (per product indication context).

3) What is the main competitive threat to DEXTENZA?

Topical corticosteroid drops, including generics, that can meet the same broad clinical use-case at lower price points, pressuring uptake and formulary preference.

4) What would most change the 12-month outlook?

A measurable change in reimbursement/formulary access that increases depot insert utilization, or new label expansion evidence that changes clinical or payer behavior.

5) Does DEXTENZA require new Phase 3 trials to sustain its position?

Not to sustain the approved-use market, but new indications or meaningful differentiation would require registration-grade data for label expansion (based on how FDA approvals are tied to labeled claims and clinical evidence).


References

  1. FDA. DEXTENZA (dexamethasone ophthalmic insert) Prescribing Information. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. FDA. Approval history and regulatory review documents for DEXTENZA (FDA database materials linked to product approval and labeling).
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. DEXTENZA (dexamethasone ophthalmic insert) trial listings (registry entries associated with the product).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.