Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DESONATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DESONATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00690833 ↗ Efficacy of Desonide (Desonatetm) Gel 0.05% in Younger and Older Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis Completed Wake Forest University Phase 4 2007-08-01 The purpose of this research study is to better understand how this study drug works when people use it to treat atopic dermatitis. Desonate has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for atopic dermatitis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DESONATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for DESONATE
Intervention Trials
Atopic Dermatitis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DESONATE
Intervention Trials
Dermatitis 1
Eczema 1
Dermatitis, Atopic 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DESONATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DESONATE
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DESONATE
Location Trials
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DESONATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DESONATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DESONATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DESONATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DESONATE
Sponsor Trials
Wake Forest University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DESONATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

DESONATE (desonide) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity/Generic Risk Projection

Last updated: May 24, 2026

Desonate is a branded topical corticosteroid (active: desonide) marketed in the U.S. in cream/gel/ointment formats (formulation specifics vary by label). Publicly accessible clinical-trials reporting for desonide itself is limited, and most commercial dynamics are driven by topical-steroid lifecycle management, label changes, and generic entry rather than large new Phase 3 programs. A defensible projection for near- to mid-term U.S. market outcomes is therefore anchored on formulation-level exclusivity, Orange Book status, and generic competitiveness rather than expecting material late-stage clinical expansion.

What is DESONATE (desonide) and what formulations are sold?

Answer: Desonate is desonide, a low-to-mid potency topical corticosteroid used for inflammatory, corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses. The U.S. product is marketed in multiple topical dosage forms (commonly cream and/or ointment; gels exist depending on distributor and label).

What conditions does desonide treat under the U.S. label?

Topical corticosteroids like desonide are used for inflammatory skin conditions responsive to steroids. Label indications typically include dermatitis and other corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses, subject to age and application-site limitations.

How do vehicle and strength affect competition?

For topical steroids, vehicle (cream vs ointment vs gel) changes skin penetration, cosmetically acceptable appearance, and adherence. Those differences are commercial battlegrounds because generic substitution often follows perceived efficacy and tolerability rather than active ingredient alone.

What clinical trials exist for DESONATE/desonide and what is the latest update?

Answer: Public registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and literature) show intermittent clinical activity for desonide across vehicle, pediatric, and comparative tolerability domains, but no sustained recent, large Phase 3 development that would materially extend market exclusivity for a branded Desonate product.

What types of studies show up most for topical desonide?

Typical categories for topical corticosteroid programs include:

  • Vehicle or formulation bioequivalence and pharmacodynamic comparability (often using vasoconstriction assays or exposure surrogates).
  • Safety and tolerability in specific populations (pediatric and/or different anatomic sites).
  • Comparative trials against other topical steroids focusing on onset and adverse-event profiles.

Why does this matter for market projection?

If the branded product has no active late-stage pipeline with meaningful regulatory milestones, market trajectory is usually determined by:

  • patent and exclusivity expiration for the branded formulation,
  • generic approval and launch timing,
  • payer and wholesaler substitution behavior.

When do DESONATE patents and exclusivity expire, and when does it lose exclusivity?

Answer: Without Orange Book mapping for the exact Desonate NDC(s) and dosage forms in force, a complete exclusivity timeline cannot be built. The decisive step for U.S. generic risk is identification of the last Orange Book-listed patent and any applicable pediatric exclusivity or data exclusivity tethered to the original NDA/section of approval.

What to check in the Orange Book for topical corticosteroids

For topical products, the key items are:

  • drug substance and drug product patents tied to formulation/vehicle,
  • method-of-use patents (less common for classic corticosteroids, but possible when label expansions exist),
  • any exclusivity listed by application number.

What generic entry risks exist if exclusivity has ended?

Once exclusivity and listed patents expire or are cleared via Paragraph IV, competition usually shifts quickly to:

  • AWP/discount pressure,
  • increased shelf competition by vehicle (cream vs ointment vs gel),
  • loss of branded share to multisource generics.

What patents protect DESONATE (desonide) and how strong is the patent estate?

Answer: A patent-strength assessment requires exact patent numbers and assignee coverage for the specific Desonate formulation(s). Those specifics are not available in the provided prompt, so a complete estate map cannot be produced.

What would typically be in a desonide branded patent estate

For legacy topical steroids, patent families usually cluster around:

  • formulation compositions and/or stabilizers,
  • manufacturing methods for the drug product,
  • packaging and delivery constraints (less frequently),
  • label-use compositions if a later indication or dosing regimen is patented.

How many Paragraph IV ANDA challenges are filed for desonide products like DESONATE?

Answer: A reliable count requires ANDA litigation and FDA filing data for the exact Desonate NDC(s). That dataset is not present in the prompt, so the number and status of Paragraph IV challenges cannot be stated accurately.

What usually drives ANDA timing for topical corticosteroids

  • Whether the branded product has Orange Book patents still listed as “unexpired.”
  • Whether generic can carve out protected aspects (formulation, strength, or vehicle).
  • Whether the generic applicant settles rather than litigates.

What is the Orange Book status of DESONATE for cream, gel, and ointment?

Answer: Orange Book status is NDC-specific. Without NDC-level identification for Desonate dosage forms and strengths, Orange Book listing counts, expiration dates, and claim scope cannot be provided.

What to extract for a market-risk dashboard

For each NDC:

  • application number,
  • dosage form and strength,
  • listed patents (numbers, types: composition vs method vs packaging),
  • listed expiration dates and regulatory exclusivity end dates.

How does DESONATE compare with competing branded and generic topical desonide products?

Answer: Commercially, branded topical steroids compete primarily on trust, physician familiarity, vehicle preference, and payer contracts. For desonide specifically, competition is usually dominated by:

  • multisource generics at lower net prices,
  • adjacent topical steroid strengths and alternative actives that form therapeutic substitutes in payer formularies.

What matters in prescribing behavior

  • Cosmetic acceptability (cream vs ointment).
  • Perceived effectiveness (often treated as vehicle-dependent).
  • Safety profile perceptions (especially with pediatric use).

What generic entry scenarios exist for DESONATE and what is the projected share impact?

Answer: Generic share loss projections require baseline branded sales and an exclusivity/patent clearance timeline. Those inputs are not provided, so an evidence-based quantitative projection cannot be produced.

Qualitative scenario framework for projection (directional)

  • If the branded formulation has unexpired Orange Book patents: generic launches are delayed; brand share decays slowly.
  • If patents expire with no injunction: rapid generic uptake typically follows in months to a year, with price erosion.
  • If litigation blocks entry: share is partially protected until resolution.

What FDA regulatory pathway applies to generics for desonide, and how does it affect timing?

Answer: Generic desonide topical products typically pursue ANDA pathways with bioequivalence and formulation comparability appropriate to topical corticosteroid products.

What regulatory events cause market shifts

  • FDA approval date for the generic ANDA.
  • Launch timing by distributors.
  • Label carve-outs and exclusivity triggers for new dosage forms or strengths.

What manufacturing and IP barriers can delay generic DESONATE entry?

Answer: For topical steroids, the practical barriers that delay entry include formulation-specific manufacturing controls and any patent-protected composition elements.

Where delays usually appear

  • stability and preservative system matching,
  • vehicle viscosity and spreadability targets,
  • particle/solubilization and reconstitution constraints (where relevant for gels).

Clinical trial activity in the U.S.: does it signal new exclusivity or reformulation?

Answer: For legacy topical steroids, sporadic clinical trials rarely reset exclusivity unless they tie to a legally meaningful regulatory event (new application, new dosage form with exclusivity, or an NDA supplement that changes regulatory exclusivity).

How to connect trial updates to commercial value

  • If trials are formulation comparability for generics, they reduce risk for competitors, not for the brand.
  • If trials are for label expansions, they may support regulatory IP, but this requires the specific supplement and approval details.

Market analysis for DESONATE: pricing pressure, payer dynamics, and demand durability

Answer: Branded topical corticosteroids generally face net-price compression after generic entry, while demand remains relatively durable due to chronic and recurrent inflammatory skin indications. The main commercial swing factor is whether the brand remains protected by unexpired patents/exclusivity tied to the marketed NDC/formulation.

What drives net price in topical steroids

  • Generic substitution rates.
  • Contracting status with pharmacy benefit managers and integrated delivery networks.
  • AWP-to-net spreads and rebates.

What sustains volume when the brand loses share

  • continuing indications and prescriber habit,
  • refill patterns for ongoing conditions,
  • vehicle-driven switching rather than full discontinuation.

Regulatory and litigation timelines: what should investors or litigators track?

Answer: For an actionable timeline, the tracking objects are Orange Book patent expiry, any FDA approvals for generics, and any court outcomes tied to Paragraph IV certifications.

Key timeline objects

  • Patent expiration date(s) by NDC.
  • FDA ANDA tentative approval, approval date, and labeling.
  • Court filing and settlement dates if there is a 505(j) settlement.

Key Takeaways

  • DESONATE is desonide, a topical corticosteroid whose near- to mid-term market outcome is primarily determined by formulation-specific Orange Book status and generic entry, not by a visible late-stage clinical expansion.
  • A complete exclusivity and patent-expiration projection requires NDC-level Orange Book mapping for the exact Desonate dosage forms and strengths.
  • Without patent numbers, expiration dates, NDCs, and branded sales baselines, a quantitative clinical and market projection cannot be produced reliably.

FAQs

  1. What does the Orange Book list for desonide topical products by NDC and dosage form?
  2. How do Paragraph IV ANDA certifications work for topical corticosteroids like desonide?
  3. Do pediatric trials for topical corticosteroids extend branded exclusivity?
  4. How do cream versus ointment vehicle changes affect generic substitutability for desonide?
  5. What litigation patterns are common in 505(j) cases for legacy dermatology brands?

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for desonide topical corticosteroid studies.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.