Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DEPAKOTE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DEPAKOTE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00005015 ↗ Treatment of Depression in Youth With Bipolar Disorders Terminated National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Phase 3 1969-12-31 THIS STUDY HAS BEEN DISCONTINUED. The study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fluoxetine for treating children and adolescents with Bipolar Disorder who are experiencing an episode of major depression while being treated with a mood stabilizer. The study involves a 2-week assessment period. Patients who are on stable, therapeutic doses of lithium or valproate and continue to have depression will be randomized to a 12-week treatment of fluoxetine or placebo. Those who respond favorably to treatment will be followed openly for an 18-week continuation phase.
NCT00048802 ↗ Treatment and Outcome of Early Onset Bipolar Disorder Completed National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Phase 4 2002-08-01 This study will compare the effectiveness in the maintenance of continuing adjunctive atypical antipsychotic medication compared to traditional mood stabilizer(s) alone in the maintenance treatment of adolescents with bipolar disorder.
NCT00048802 ↗ Treatment and Outcome of Early Onset Bipolar Disorder Completed Northwell Health Phase 4 2002-08-01 This study will compare the effectiveness in the maintenance of continuing adjunctive atypical antipsychotic medication compared to traditional mood stabilizer(s) alone in the maintenance treatment of adolescents with bipolar disorder.
NCT00057681 ↗ Study of Outcome and Safety of Lithium, Divalproex and Risperidone for Mania in Children and Adolescents Completed National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Phase 3 2003-02-01 This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the medications, lithium (Eskalith®), valproate (Depakote®), and risperidone (Risperdal®) in treating children and adolescents with bipolar disorder or symptoms of mania.
NCT00057681 ↗ Study of Outcome and Safety of Lithium, Divalproex and Risperidone for Mania in Children and Adolescents Completed Washington University School of Medicine Phase 3 2003-02-01 This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the medications, lithium (Eskalith®), valproate (Depakote®), and risperidone (Risperdal®) in treating children and adolescents with bipolar disorder or symptoms of mania.
NCT00060905 ↗ An Inpatient Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Depakote ER in the Treatment of Mania/Bipolar Disorder Completed Abbott Phase 3 2003-01-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of Depakote ER compared to placebo in the treatment of bipolar disorder, manic or mixed type in adults.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DEPAKOTE

Condition Name

Condition Name for DEPAKOTE
Intervention Trials
Bipolar Disorder 26
Healthy 16
Schizophrenia 4
Mania 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DEPAKOTE
Intervention Trials
Bipolar Disorder 32
Disease 24
Depression 5
Mood Disorders 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DEPAKOTE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DEPAKOTE
Location Trials
United States 205
India 8
Canada 3
Korea, Republic of 2
Egypt 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DEPAKOTE
Location Trials
Texas 17
Ohio 15
Illinois 13
California 13
New York 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DEPAKOTE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DEPAKOTE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 29
Phase 3 18
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 38
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DEPAKOTE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 73
Terminated 10
Unknown status 5
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DEPAKOTE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DEPAKOTE
Sponsor Trials
Abbott 33
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) 10
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited 7
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DEPAKOTE
Sponsor Trials
Other 79
Industry 63
NIH 21
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: April 27, 2026

Depakote (divalproex/valproate) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

What is Depakote and what is the active regulatory scope?

Depakote is a brand of divalproex sodium, a prodrug of valproic acid. The clinical and regulatory positioning is tied to valproate-based therapy across multiple indications, with long-standing use in epilepsy and psychiatric disorders.

Key product/active-substance mapping used in market and clinical interpretation:

  • Depakote: divalproex sodium (valproate prodrug)
  • Therapeutic class: antiepileptic drug and mood stabilizer (valproate)

FDA reference labeling typically covers multiple Depakote presentations (e.g., delayed-release and extended-release formulations). In market modeling, these presentations behave as one commercial franchise because the same active moiety drives utilization, with formulation-driven switching rather than separate drug development.

How is Depakote’s clinical development status characterized?

Depakote has an established clinical profile with long-running real-world use; the “trial update” lens for an incumbent valproate product is most usefully expressed as:

  1. Ongoing trials tied to new dosing, new populations, or new endpoints (often observational or pragmatic rather than pivotal new-drug registration).
  2. Post-approval evidence generation and guideline-driven utilization changes.
  3. Safety and tolerability studies that support lab monitoring and risk mitigation (e.g., teratogenicity and hepatic toxicity monitoring historically define valproate management frameworks).

Clinical-trials visibility for Depakote as a brand tends to be low versus newer pipeline drugs because the product is not typically the sponsor of new registration-defining phase programs years after launch. PubMed and clinical-trials registries continue to show valproate research, but not consistently as Depakote-branded trial programs.

Regulatory anchors still determine clinical behavior:

  • Valproate has historically carried high-impact risk warnings for teratogenicity and pregnancy exposure, driving restriction policies and prescribing patterns in many markets (EU and US frameworks).

What is the current clinical trials footprint (registries and likely focus areas)?

A practical “clinical trials update” for Depakote must distinguish new Depakote registration trials from valproate evidence work. Depakote branded trials are comparatively sparse; trial activity is more commonly:

  • Comparative effectiveness studies versus alternative antiseizure medications (ASMs)
  • Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic work to refine therapeutic drug monitoring
  • Safety monitoring studies aligned to pregnancy prevention and liver function management
  • Switching studies across formulation types or adherence-support strategies

That said, clinical development strategy for an incumbent valproate product generally does not produce large-scale market-shifting trial readouts unless a new regulatory indication emerges or a major label expansion occurs.

What do guidelines and payer policies imply for Depakote utilization?

Depakote utilization is strongly influenced by:

  • Disease area: epilepsy treatment standards, especially for generalized seizures and specific syndromes where valproate remains a key option
  • Safety constraints: pregnancy-related restrictions reduce use in women of childbearing potential in many geographies
  • Formulary placement: generics of divalproex and competing ASMs affect access, not efficacy

Because divalproex is widely generic, payer behavior is less about brand-level reimbursement and more about best net cost among generics and selected alternatives.


Depakote Market Analysis

How is Depakote positioned in a generics-heavy antiseizure and mood-stabilizer market?

Depakote is subject to structural pricing pressure:

  • Multiple generic divalproex sodium products dominate volume
  • Brand spend is primarily residual and dependent on negotiated reimbursement and patient-specific needs (formulation tolerability, dosing convenience, and historical continuity)

Market modeling must therefore track the broader valproate/divalproex utilization pool rather than treat Depakote as a standalone brand with proprietary pricing power.

What demand drivers matter most for divalproex/valproate?

Four demand forces typically dominate:

  1. Epilepsy prevalence and treatment algorithm position
    Valproate remains a common option for certain seizure types and for treatment of some seizure disorders where it has guideline relevance.
  2. Switch dynamics among ASMs
    Newer ASMs can displace valproate, but displacement is moderated when valproate’s efficacy matches the seizure phenotype and when cost pressures favor generics.
  3. Psychiatric use (bipolar disorder)
    Valproate has established use; utilization rises and falls with prescriber habits, competing generics, and atypical antipsychotic and lamotrigine adoption patterns.
  4. Safety and pregnancy restrictions
    These reduce eligible patient volume in many markets and shift prescribing toward alternatives for women of reproductive potential.

What supply and pricing dynamics shape revenue trajectory?

For Depakote-branded revenue, the dominant driver is generic competition:

  • Brand erosion occurs as patents expire and generics capture formulary access.
  • Depakote’s future brand revenue depends on:
    • remaining brand share for specific populations
    • managed care contracting
    • patient continuity preferences and formulation switching economics

For “economic market” projections, the core metric that holds is not premium pricing but volume stability in the divalproex/valproate class and the pace of substitution toward other generics or non-valproate ASMs.


Market Projection

What is the base case projection for Depakote (brand) and divalproex (class-level)?

A credible projection framework for Depakote must separate:

  • Depakote brand revenue (shrinking under generics)
  • Divaproex/valproate class volume and value (more stable, though pressured by newer ASM adoption and safety-driven constraints)

Base case directional outlook (typical for incumbents after generic penetration):

  • Brand: low growth to continued decline, limited upside absent new label expansions or meaningful exclusivity restoration.
  • Class-level: comparatively stable or modest decline depending on:
    • growth in epilepsy incidence and diagnosis rates
    • sustained displacement by newer ASMs
    • pregnancy-restriction enforcement intensity
    • competitive pricing among generics

Where could upside come from?

Upside is structurally constrained for a non-recently launched branded drug. Potential upside channels are limited to:

  • Formulation-level retention (patients staying on specific extended-release or delayed-release tolerability profiles)
  • Switchbacks from newer ASMs due to tolerability, efficacy, or cost
  • Constrained formularies where generic valuation still keeps divalproex preferred

Where is downside concentrated?

Downside concentrates in:

  • ongoing generic price compression (brand versus generic)
  • continued prescriber and payer shift toward alternatives, especially for patients where valproate is not preferred due to pregnancy risks
  • substitution toward other mood stabilizers in bipolar disorder

Business Implications and Actionable Readouts

What should investors and R&D strategists do with this profile?

For a drug like Depakote:

  • Treat Depakote as a cash-flow legacy asset rather than a growth engine.
  • View market competition primarily as class-level substitution rather than “brand clinical trial risk.”
  • If evaluating related valproate opportunities, focus diligence on:
    • patient subpopulations that remain valproate-appropriate
    • formulation and adherence improvements
    • safety mitigation programs that preserve eligible usage

How does the competitive landscape typically reshape utilization?

Valproate competes on:

  • efficacy in specific seizure types
  • low-cost generic access (key in payers)
  • safety tradeoffs requiring monitoring and restriction frameworks

Newer ASMs can displace valproate when they offer:

  • improved tolerability
  • fewer monitoring burdens
  • better pregnancy-related preference profiles

Key Takeaways

  • Depakote is divalproex sodium (valproate prodrug) with a mature clinical footprint and ongoing evidence generation that typically does not change brand registration status.
  • Depakote brand performance is dominated by generic divalproex competition and payer contracting rather than new clinical trial catalysts.
  • Demand for the divalproex/valproate class is driven by epilepsy phenotype fit, bipolar disorder prescribing patterns, and especially pregnancy-related restriction frameworks.
  • Projections are directionally stable to modestly down at class level and more clearly down at brand level, consistent with incumbent generic penetration dynamics.

FAQs

1) Are there new phase-3 Depakote trials that could materially change the label?

Depakote is an established product; registration-defining new trials for the brand are generally not the primary pattern. Clinical activity more often reflects comparative effectiveness and safety monitoring rather than label-changing readouts.

2) Does valproate still have a meaningful role in epilepsy?

Yes, valproate remains relevant for specific seizure types and clinical scenarios where its efficacy and experience support its use, tempered by safety and monitoring requirements.

3) What most reduces eligible Depakote patients in many markets?

Pregnancy-related risk frameworks and prescribing restrictions for patients who can become pregnant.

4) How does generic competition impact Depakote forecasts?

It compresses brand share and pricing power; brand revenue typically erodes while class volume may remain more stable.

5) What signals should be monitored to refine projections?

Policy enforcement intensity around valproate pregnancy restrictions, payer formulary positioning versus newer ASMs, and real-world adherence and switching patterns across delayed-release and extended-release formulations.


References

[1] FDA. Depakote (divalproex sodium) prescribing information and related labeling. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (Access via FDA label repository).
[2] EMA. Valproate product information and risk minimization documents (including pregnancy prevention program materials). European Medicines Agency.
[3] DailyMed. Depakote (divalproex sodium) label and sections on contraindications, warnings, pregnancy, and adverse reactions. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
[4] PubMed. Valproate/divalproex clinical research publications (epilepsy, bipolar disorder, safety monitoring, pharmacokinetics). National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.