Last Updated: June 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DARVOCET


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DARVOCET

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00652093 ↗ Lumbar Stenosis Outcomes Research II Terminated Endo Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2008-03-01 The primary objective of the proposed pilot study is to determine the efficacy of oxymorphone hydrochloride and propoxyphene/acetaminophen combination in prolonging the time to onset of pain and reducing the severity of pain associated with walking in patients lumbar spinal stenosis that have clinical symptoms of neurogenic claudication. Neurogenic claudication is defined as movement induced leg pain, numbness, heaviness, or vague discomfort in part or all of one or both legs provoked with walking and standing and relieved by sitting, squatting, or forward flexion posturing. The secondary objective is to examine the functional benefit of oxymorphone hydrochloride and propoxyphene/acetaminophen combination with respect to improvement in duration and distance of walking.
NCT00652093 ↗ Lumbar Stenosis Outcomes Research II Terminated University of Rochester Phase 4 2008-03-01 The primary objective of the proposed pilot study is to determine the efficacy of oxymorphone hydrochloride and propoxyphene/acetaminophen combination in prolonging the time to onset of pain and reducing the severity of pain associated with walking in patients lumbar spinal stenosis that have clinical symptoms of neurogenic claudication. Neurogenic claudication is defined as movement induced leg pain, numbness, heaviness, or vague discomfort in part or all of one or both legs provoked with walking and standing and relieved by sitting, squatting, or forward flexion posturing. The secondary objective is to examine the functional benefit of oxymorphone hydrochloride and propoxyphene/acetaminophen combination with respect to improvement in duration and distance of walking.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DARVOCET

Condition Name

Condition Name for DARVOCET
Intervention Trials
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DARVOCET
Intervention Trials
Spinal Stenosis 1
Constriction, Pathologic 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DARVOCET

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DARVOCET
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DARVOCET
Location Trials
New York 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DARVOCET

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DARVOCET
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DARVOCET
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DARVOCET

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DARVOCET
Sponsor Trials
University of Rochester 1
Endo Pharmaceuticals 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DARVOCET
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 5, 2026

Darvocet (propoxyphene): What do the clinical and market records show today?

What is “Darvocet” and what is its current development status?

Darvocet is a brand of propoxyphene (typically propoxyphene napsylate or propoxyphene HCl), an opioid analgesic product line historically marketed for pain.

Regulatory endpoint: withdrawal in most major markets

  • United States (FDA): The FDA requested market removal of propoxyphene products (including Darvocet) following safety risks, and propoxyphene-containing products were removed from the market. The FDA’s actions culminated in the removal of Darvon and Darvocet from the U.S. market (see FDA communications summarized in the agency’s consumer and safety materials and widely referenced in U.S. regulatory reporting) [1], [2].
  • European Union/UK: Propoxyphene was also withdrawn or removed from use in multiple EU and national markets over safety concerns, with later regulatory status reflecting discontinuation rather than active development [3].

Implication for “clinical trials update” and “market projection”
Darvocet has no active, sponsor-driven, late-stage clinical development pipeline in mainstream registries consistent with an ongoing re-entry or re-launch. The clinical and commercial record is dominated by discontinuation and safety-driven withdrawal, not current development.


What do registries show for ongoing or recent clinical trials?

A current “clinical trials update” for Darvocet must distinguish between:

  1. propoxyphene itself (Darvocet)
  2. research using propoxyphene as a comparator or historical reference
  3. non-Darvocet formulations in old or unrelated studies

For propoxyphene/Darvocet, the dominant pattern in public clinical-trials reporting is historical trials and post-marketing safety actions, rather than new pivotal trials. The modern regulatory posture is consistent with discontinued availability, which typically suppresses new interventional studies aimed at approval expansion or line extension.

Bottom line: The “update” is regulatory, not investigational: propoxyphene products were pulled due to safety risk, and new trials leading to a future market projection are not present in the active pipeline profile.


What were the key safety and clinical reasons driving withdrawal?

Propoxyphene has a safety profile centered on cardiac risk and risk of serious harm in overdose.

Key documented concerns:

  • Cardiac conduction effects / arrhythmia risk linked to propoxyphene exposure.
  • Potential for lethal outcomes in overdose, reflecting opioid class risk compounded by specific propoxyphene safety concerns.

These safety drivers are the basis for the FDA’s market-removal actions and the broader withdrawal outcome [1], [2].


How big was the market, and what is the realistic commercial trajectory now?

A forward-looking market projection for Darvocet hinges on availability. After withdrawal, the “market” becomes:

  • residual off-market activity (rare, typically via remaining inventory in jurisdictions where timelines differed)
  • substitution by other opioid analgesics and non-opioid options

Practical market projection:

  • Near term (0-3 years): essentially zero new sales in the U.S. due to non-availability, with similar posture across markets that adopted withdrawal.
  • Medium term (3-7 years): no credible growth pathway without regulatory reintroduction; the product history points to continued non-authorization rather than pipeline renewal.
  • Long term (7+ years): any “return” would require a new development program and regulatory re-approvals, which is inconsistent with the established safety-driven discontinuation record.

What does the evidence suggest about future clinical use?

Because Darvocet is linked to a withdrawn analgesic active ingredient, routine prescribing is not a growth engine. Clinicians instead shift to:

  • other opioids with more current risk management approvals
  • multimodal analgesia strategies (non-opioid analgesics, adjuvants)
  • non-pharmacologic pain management

This shift is consistent with the policy direction embedded in withdrawal actions and the subsequent substitution landscape [1], [2].


Commercial and R&D implications for investors and developers

1) Patent and competitive landscape reality

  • Darvocet’s value is historically tied to propoxyphene IP and brand exclusivities that do not translate into an active, re-entry market strategy without regulatory clearance.
  • The dominant commercial “asset” today is not the Darvocet brand but whether any new chemical entity or reformulation claims could ever overcome the safety record. No such mainstream re-launch program is reflected in the public record as an active development pathway.

2) Development risk profile

  • Any attempt to bring propoxyphene back would face a high regulatory bar because the withdrawal was safety-driven and tied to known pharmacology risk.
  • Even a new formulation is likely to trigger extensive safety scrutiny if exposure risks (cardiac conduction, overdose harm) remain relevant.

What is the actionable conclusion on “clinical trials update + market projection” for Darvocet?

Darvocet’s current state is best characterized as:

  • Discontinued product in major markets due to propoxyphene safety risks [1], [2]
  • No active, visible late-stage clinical program consistent with a market re-entry trajectory
  • Market projection is flat at effectively zero for U.S. and other withdrawn markets absent an overhaul development path that is not reflected in the current public pipeline record

Key Takeaways

  • Darvocet is propoxyphene, and it is withdrawn/discontinued in the U.S. following FDA safety actions [1], [2].
  • The safety record centers on cardiac risk and serious overdose harm, which drove removal [1], [2].
  • A modern “clinical trials update” is dominated by discontinuation, not active new pivotal development.
  • Market projection for Darvocet in major withdrawn jurisdictions is effectively zero without a new regulatory reintroduction program, which is not evidenced as active.

FAQs

1) Is Darvocet still available for new prescriptions in the U.S.?

No. FDA actions led to removal of propoxyphene-containing products from the U.S. market [1], [2].

2) Are there new clinical trials for Darvocet propoxyphene aimed at re-approval?

No active, mainstream late-stage clinical re-approval program for Darvocet/propoxyphene is apparent in the contemporary public record; the product status is dominated by withdrawal and safety actions [1], [2].

3) Why did regulators remove propoxyphene products?

Reported safety concerns include cardiac conduction/arrhythmia risk and serious harm in overdose, driving the FDA’s market-removal actions [1], [2].

4) What happens to pain management demand after Darvocet withdrawal?

Prescribers shift to other analgesics and opioid alternatives, supported by broader pain-management practice and the absence of Darvocet availability in withdrawn jurisdictions [1], [2].

5) What would it take for Darvocet to return to market?

A new, safety-clearing development and regulatory pathway would be required for propoxyphene exposure risks; no such active re-entry program is indicated in the current record [1], [2].


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). FDA drug safety communications and related materials on propoxyphene (Darvon/Darvocet) market withdrawal. FDA.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Propoxyphene (Darvon/Darvocet) withdrawal and safety information. FDA.
[3] European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). Product information and regulatory status related to propoxyphene-containing medicines. EMA.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.