Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DACTINOMYCIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DACTINOMYCIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002489 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Non-testicular Malignant Germ Cell Tumors Completed Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Phase 2 1991-10-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have non-testicular malignant germ cell tumors.
NCT00002516 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy Plus Surgery and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Ewing's Sarcoma Unknown status Medical Research Council Phase 3 1992-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining more than one drug with surgery and radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is most effective in treating patients with Ewing's sarcoma. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare various combination chemotherapy regimens plus surgery and radiation therapy in treating patients who have Ewing's sarcoma.
NCT00002516 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy Plus Surgery and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Ewing's Sarcoma Unknown status University Hospital Muenster Phase 3 1992-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining more than one drug with surgery and radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is most effective in treating patients with Ewing's sarcoma. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare various combination chemotherapy regimens plus surgery and radiation therapy in treating patients who have Ewing's sarcoma.
NCT00002610 ↗ Chemotherapy With or Without Surgery, Radiation Therapy, or Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Young Patients With Kidney Tumors Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1996-01-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which therapy regimen is most effective for treating patients with kidney tumors. PURPOSE: Phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy, surgery, and/or peripheral stem cell or bone marrow transplantation in treating young patients with kidney tumors.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DACTINOMYCIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for DACTINOMYCIN
Intervention Trials
Sarcoma 13
Rhabdomyosarcoma 5
Kidney Cancer 5
Adult Rhabdomyosarcoma 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DACTINOMYCIN
Intervention Trials
Rhabdomyosarcoma 18
Sarcoma 16
Wilms Tumor 10
Kidney Neoplasms 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DACTINOMYCIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DACTINOMYCIN
Location Trials
United States 841
Canada 128
Australia 66
Japan 49
New Zealand 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DACTINOMYCIN
Location Trials
Texas 24
California 24
New York 24
Pennsylvania 22
Ohio 22
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DACTINOMYCIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DACTINOMYCIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 26
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DACTINOMYCIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
COMPLETED 19
Unknown status 11
Recruiting 8
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DACTINOMYCIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DACTINOMYCIN
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 24
Children's Oncology Group 18
Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group 5
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DACTINOMYCIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 66
NIH 24
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

DACTINOMYCIN Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 25, 2026

Dactinomycin: Clinical-Stage Landscape, Market Analysis, and Forward Projection

What is the current clinical-development status of dactinomycin?

Dactinomycin is an established oncology chemotherapy with long-standing clinical use. The most consequential “clinical trials update” for current commercial decision-making is not new first-in-class development but whether meaningful new-label studies, new formulations, or new combinations are ongoing that could extend lifecycle value in specific geographies or lines of therapy.

Global development signals (label-expansion and reformulation focus)

  • Dactinomycin is used in pediatric oncology regimens, most notably in pediatric solid tumors and in combination protocols where it is standard-of-care in many settings.
  • Current visible clinical activity trends for older cytotoxics typically cluster around:
    • label expansions (age, dosing schedule, and combination partners),
    • supportive care and regimen-optimization endpoints (response, toxicity, dosing intensity),
    • formulation changes (stability, concentration standardization, manufacturing continuity).

Regulatory anchor

  • Dactinomycin has a consolidated regulatory footprint across markets as an oncology drug product, reflecting mature clinical evidence and clinical adoption. (FDA Orange Book listings confirm historical approval and ongoing marketing status for specific product/manufacturer entries.) [1]

Clinical trials databases

  • The most practical way to track live recruiting and completed studies is ClinicalTrials.gov and EudraCT. However, this update requires an up-to-date, trial-by-trial extraction of study status, endpoints, phase, and geography. Without that live dataset, a precise “current clinical trials update” cannot be produced without risking factual errors.

Bottom line

  • Dactinomycin’s clinical stage is best characterized as late-life lifecycle management, not breakthrough early-phase development, for commercial planning purposes. The actionable question is label and manufacturing continuity risk, not phase-advancement timelines. (Core regulatory and marketing evidence is available via FDA and comparable registries.) [1,2]

Where does dactinomycin sell today?

Dactinomycin is a specialty oncology chemotherapy with demand driven by:

  • pediatric oncology incidence,
  • adherence to multi-agent protocols,
  • hospital purchasing cycles,
  • availability and supply continuity,
  • payer coverage in countries with pediatric oncology pathways.

Market demand drivers

  1. Pediatric solid tumor regimens
    • Dactinomycin is used in childhood cancers and treatment protocols where cytotoxic chemotherapy backbone matters.
  2. Protocol standardization
    • The drug is commonly embedded into multi-drug standards, which drives repeat procurement rather than fragmented uptake.
  3. Supply continuity and manufacturer footprint
    • For mature cytotoxics, availability is often a dominant driver of realized sales.

Pricing dynamics (typical for mature oncology generics)

  • Many older oncology cytotoxics trade with compressed pricing versus patented oncology agents.
  • Sales value is more sensitive to:
    • pack size and presentation,
    • wholesaler distribution terms,
    • tender outcomes,
    • country reimbursement structures.

Evidence base

  • The FDA Orange Book provides the legal status of approved drug products and active ingredients for each product listing. That establishes that dactinomycin is marketed through specific approved NDA/ANDA product entries, which is the starting point for market sizing by geography and manufacturer footprint. [1]
  • EMA and national agencies maintain product authorization registries that support cross-market availability mapping. [2]

What is the patent and exclusivity posture for dactinomycin?

For business planning, the key is whether there is any remaining exclusivity that blocks generic entry for specific presentations, strengths, or routes.

Legal status reference

  • The FDA Orange Book is the definitive source for granted exclusivity and patent listings tied to specific product applications. [1]
  • The presence or absence of active patents and exclusivities determines whether sales can be protected by reference product strategy versus generic price pressure.

Commercial implication

  • For most legacy cytotoxics like dactinomycin, patents have typically fallen away long ago, with market share determined by:
    • manufacturing capacity,
    • regulatory compliance,
    • supply reliability,
    • contracting and tender win rates.

Actionable point

  • Any meaningful value protection usually comes from:
    • manufacturing continuity,
    • controlled market access through contracting,
    • and any remaining patent coverage on specific formulation or process claims listed for particular product entries (if any exist in the Orange Book). [1]

What does market projection look like for dactinomycin (2026-2031)?

A credible projection for a mature oncology cytotoxic must be built on:

  • incidence-driven volume stability,
  • protocol retention,
  • generic price erosion or stabilization depending on supply,
  • manufacturer churn risk,
  • and any incremental demand from label expansions (if any).

Projection structure (base case logic)

  1. Volume (units)
    • Generally stable to modestly growing with oncology treatment volume and population growth in pediatric cohorts.
  2. Net price
    • Typically declines over time in generic-heavy categories unless:
      • supply constraints tighten (price floors),
      • there is limited number of compliant suppliers,
      • or tender dynamics favor reliable suppliers.
  3. Revenue outcome
    • Revenue can be flat or modestly declining even if volume holds, depending on price erosion and supply stability.

Constraints on precision

  • Producing a numeric revenue forecast requires current market size data and unit pricing by geography, which is not available in the provided information set. A numeric projection without those inputs would risk being incorrect.

Actionable projection guidance

  • Investable view for dactinomycin typically values:
    • risk-adjusted supply reliability,
    • distribution and tender access,
    • and operational execution (manufacturing scale, sterile quality, lot release timelines).

Regulatory and listing-based market mapping

  • The market projection hinges on which NDA/ANDA-labeled products are active and in what form (strength, package, manufacturer) across major markets. The Orange Book and European authorization records enable that mapping. [1,2]

Clinical trials update: what to monitor now for dactinomycin?

Even without live extraction, the “update” framework that drives commercial action for legacy cytotoxics is consistent:

  • New combo regimens: changes in pediatric protocols can shift utilization rates.
  • Toxicity and dosing schedule refinements: protocol-level decisions can increase or decrease utilization intensity.
  • Formulation continuity: supply disruptions create short-term price and volume swings.
  • Geographic label adjustments: any regulatory approval changes can move tender eligibility in that market.

Regulatory monitoring channels

  • FDA Orange Book product listings and patents/exclusivities by product application. [1]
  • EMA authorization records for market availability across EU member states. [2]
  • ClinicalTrials.gov/EU trial registries for status changes in ongoing studies. [3]

Key Takeaways

  • Dactinomycin is a mature oncology chemotherapy with market value primarily driven by pediatric protocol adoption, procurement behavior, and supply continuity, not phase advancement.
  • The authoritative source for competitive and exclusivity positioning is product-by-product mapping in FDA Orange Book (and EU authorization records), which determines whether any patent or exclusivity protection still affects specific presentations. [1,2]
  • A numeric market projection cannot be stated accurately without current market size, pricing, and unit volume by geography; the forecast approach for commercial decision-making is volume stability with generic-influenced pricing pressure and supply-driven variability.
  • The actionable “clinical trials update” for dactinomycin is monitoring label expansions, combination protocol adoption, and formulation continuity signals rather than expecting breakthrough late-phase readouts.

FAQs

1) Is dactinomycin still being developed in new phases?

Dactinomycin is best characterized as a lifecycle-managed oncology chemotherapy with clinical activity that is more often label-optimization and protocol integration than new first-in-class phase programs. Live phase status must be confirmed in registries for specific studies. [3]

2) Where do I verify patent and exclusivity status for dactinomycin products?

Use FDA Orange Book for each approved product entry and its listed patents and exclusivity details, which are application-specific. [1]

3) Why does supply continuity matter more for dactinomycin than for novel oncology drugs?

For mature cytotoxics, realized sales often depend on lot availability and tender outcomes more than on differentiated clinical efficacy narratives. Procurement shifts quickly when supply tightens or when manufacturing constraints arise.

4) What data sources should be used for a complete clinical trials update?

ClinicalTrials.gov and EU trial registries provide study status, phase, endpoints, and enrollment by geography; FDA and EMA provide regulatory and product-authorization context. [1-3]

5) How should investors think about market projection for older oncology cytotoxics?

Model revenue as a product of unit demand (protocol incidence and adherence) and net price (generic competition and tender dynamics), then stress supply risk and any label-expansion approvals. [1,2]


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: FDA Approved Drug Products (Orange Book). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
[2] European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). Medicine authorisation details and EU product information. https://www.ema.europa.eu/
[3] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.