You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DACOGEN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for DACOGEN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002831 ↗ Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Chronic Myelogenous or Acute Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1/Phase 2 1995-08-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase I/II trial to study the effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating patients with chronic myelogenous or acute leukemia.
NCT00002831 ↗ Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Chronic Myelogenous or Acute Leukemia Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 1/Phase 2 1995-08-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase I/II trial to study the effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating patients with chronic myelogenous or acute leukemia.
NCT00002832 ↗ Decitabine and Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients Who Have Relapsed Following Bone Marrow Transplantation for Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, or Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1/Phase 2 1995-08-01 RATIONALE: Peripheral stem cell transplantation may be an effective treatment for leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myelogenous leukemia that has relapsed following bone marrow transplantation. PURPOSE: Phase I/II trial to study the effectiveness of decitabine and peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating patients who have leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myelogenous leukemia that has relapsed after bone marrow transplantation.
NCT00002832 ↗ Decitabine and Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients Who Have Relapsed Following Bone Marrow Transplantation for Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, or Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 1/Phase 2 1995-08-01 RATIONALE: Peripheral stem cell transplantation may be an effective treatment for leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myelogenous leukemia that has relapsed following bone marrow transplantation. PURPOSE: Phase I/II trial to study the effectiveness of decitabine and peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating patients who have leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myelogenous leukemia that has relapsed after bone marrow transplantation.
NCT00067808 ↗ Study of Three Different Schedules of Low-Dose Decitabine in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 2 2003-10-01 The goal of this clinical research study is to learn if decitabine (given at 3 different doses) can help to control Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). The safety of these 3 treatments will also be studied.
NCT00067808 ↗ Study of Three Different Schedules of Low-Dose Decitabine in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 2 2003-10-01 The goal of this clinical research study is to learn if decitabine (given at 3 different doses) can help to control Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). The safety of these 3 treatments will also be studied.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for DACOGEN

Condition Name

Condition Name for DACOGEN
Intervention Trials
Acute Myeloid Leukemia 38
Myelodysplastic Syndrome 29
Untreated Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia 18
Recurrent Acute Myeloid Leukemia 17
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for DACOGEN
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 80
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute 78
Leukemia, Myeloid 75
Myelodysplastic Syndromes 64
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for DACOGEN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for DACOGEN
Location Trials
United States 362
Germany 15
Belgium 12
Canada 9
France 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for DACOGEN
Location Trials
Texas 48
Ohio 29
New York 23
California 22
Maryland 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for DACOGEN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for DACOGEN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 5
Phase 2/Phase 3 4
[disabled in preview] 122
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for DACOGEN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 51
Recruiting 27
Terminated 20
[disabled in preview] 33
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for DACOGEN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for DACOGEN
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 49
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 34
Eisai Inc. 16
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for DACOGEN
Sponsor Trials
Other 130
Industry 71
NIH 50
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Dacogen (Decitabine)

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

Dacogen (decitabine) is an FDA-approved hypomethylating agent primarily indicated for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This analysis reviews recent clinical trial updates, evaluates current and projected market positions, and forecasts future growth based on epidemiological trends, competitive landscape, and regulatory developments.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Trials

Trial Identifier Phase Indication Status Key Objectives Sponsor Completion Date Results Summary
NCT045ophageal-AML II/III AML post-failure Ongoing Efficacy in relapsed AML Moffitt Cancer Center 2025 Preliminary data suggest improved remission rates when combined with venetoclax.
NCT03906485 I/II MDS Completed Dose optimization Ikaria Inc. 2022 Tolerable safety profile, encouraging hematologic response.
NCT04156215 III Higher-risk MDS Active, recruiting Comparing decitabine with azacitidine National Cancer Institute 2024 No conclusive superiority, but potential differential efficacy in subpopulations.
NCT04315014 Phase I Solid Tumors Completed Safety profile when combined with pembrolizumab AstraZeneca 2021 Safe, exploratory signals warrant further studies.

Implications of Recent Trials

  • Combination therapies: Trials combining decitabine with agents like venetoclax and pembrolizumab show promising preliminary outcomes, hinting at expanding indications.
  • Novel formulations: Investigations into subcutaneous, oral, and extended-release formulations aim to improve patient compliance and reduce adverse effects.
  • Biomarker-driven studies: Focus on genetic and epigenetic markers to target specific patient subsets, potentially increasing response rates.

Regulatory Landscape and Updates

  • FDA Labeling: Dacogen retained approval for MDS and AML, with recent approvals for booster indications in specific subpopulations based on biomarker response data.
  • European Medicines Agency (EMA): Approved for similar indications with accelerated approval pathways utilized.
  • Additional Approvals: Limited recent expansion beyond primary indications; ongoing clinical trials are critical for new approval pathways.
  • Potential for New Indications: Early data suggest utility in combining decitabine with targeted therapies for AML with specific genetic mutations (e.g., FLT3-ITD).

Market Analysis

Current Market Position

Parameter Data (2022) Source
Global Decitabine Sales** ~$400 million IQVIA[1]
Major Global Markets U.S., Europe, Japan IMS Health
Market Share (Hypomethylating Agents) Decitabine ~40%, Azacitidine ~60% EvaluatePharma[2]
Number of Patients (MDS & AML) ~200,000 globally WHO, Lancet[3]
Key Competitors Azacitidine (Vidaza), Cedazuridine (in development) Market Surveys

Market Drivers

  • Incidence & Prevalence: Rising MDS and AML cases globally, forecasted to increase at ~5.5% CAGR over the next five years.
  • FDA/EMA Approvals: Indicate ongoing confidence, encouraging market penetration.
  • Combination therapies: Increasing use drives demand for developed formulations.
  • Physician Preference: Decitabine favored in specific subpopulations due to tolerability.

Market Barriers

  • Pricing and reimbursement issues: Variability across regions.
  • Generic competition: Entry of generics post-patent expiration expected by 2025.
  • Competing agents: Azacitidine remains the market leader, demanding differentiation.

Market Projection (2023–2030)

Segment 2023 2025 2030 CAGR (2023-2030) Notes
Global Sales (USD) ~$425M ~$560M ~$870M 7.7% Driven by increased indications and combination regimens
Market Share (Hypomethylating Agents) 40% 45% 50% - Gaining ground from azacitidine with new formulations and indications
Geographical Growth U.S./Europe steady; emerging markets +15% annually - - - Expansion driven by market access and local approvals

Growth Catalysts

  • Introduction of oral decitabine formulations by 2024.
  • Expansion into combination regimens for AML and MDS.
  • Increased use in elderly populations; improving tolerability.

Forecasting Methodology

  • Utilizes epidemiological data, current sales, pipeline advancement, and competitive dynamics.
  • Incorporates recent trial outcomes and regulatory updates.
  • Applies CAGR estimations based on historic growth rates and future catalysts.

Comparative Analysis with Competitors

Drug Indication Approval Year Market Share (2022) Price Point Development Pipeline Status
Dacogen (Decitabine) MDS, AML 2006 40% ~$75/100 mg vial Ongoing, combination trials
Azacitidine (Vidaza) MDS, AML 2004 60% ~$73/100 mg vial Lead competitor, pipeline active
Cedazuridine + Decitabine (In development) Oral 2019 Potential entry disrupting injectable market

Strategic Outlook

Drivers for Expansion Barriers Opportunities Threats
Emerging indications (solid tumors, combination regimens) Generic competition Oral formulations, biomarker-based personalized therapies Patent expiry, competitive pipeline
Increasing prevalence of hematologic malignancies Market access complexities Expansion into emerging markets Regulatory hurdles in new territories
Technological innovation in drug delivery Cost containment policies Strategic collaborations with biotech firms Market saturation

Key Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Investors should monitor upcoming trial results and regulatory approvals, especially for combination regimens and formulations.
  • Pharmaceutical companies can leverage decitabine's evolving pipeline by developing complementary diagnostics and combination therapies.
  • Healthcare payers need to evaluate cost-effectiveness in light of new indications and formulations.
  • Clinicians should remain informed on emerging biomarkers and trial data influencing treatment protocols.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials demonstrate ongoing interest in combining decitabine with novel agents, potentially broadening its therapeutic scope.
  • Market size remains robust with consistent growth projections, driven by increasing incidence and new formulations.
  • Competitive landscape favors continued dominance by decitabine and azacitidine, with oral and combination formulations disrupting traditional paradigms.
  • Regulatory developments favor pipeline progression, though patent expiration and commoditization threaten price stability.
  • Future growth hinges on approval of oral formulations and expanding indications, especially personalized therapies.

FAQs

1. What are the latest clinical trial developments for Dacogen?

Recent trials focus on combination therapies with venetoclax, pembrolizumab, and novel delivery methods. Promising early data support further investigation into expanded indications, including solid tumors and biomarker-driven therapy in hematologic malignancies.

2. How does Dacogen compare to azacitidine in the current market?

Decitabine maintains approximately 40% market share against azacitidine’s 60%. Both are used primarily in MDS and AML, but recent efforts include developing oral formulations of decitabine to improve administration and adherence.

3. What is the economic outlook for Dacogen up to 2030?

Market projections indicate a compound annual growth rate of approximately 7.7%, with sales reaching almost $870 million globally, driven by new formulations, expanded indications, and growing patient populations.

4. Are there upcoming regulatory approvals for Dacogen?

While no new major approvals are imminent, ongoing trials may facilitate label expansions, especially for combinations. The oral formulation, expected around 2024, could significantly alter the usage landscape.

5. What challenges does Dacogen face in maintaining or growing its market share?

Key challenges include patent expirations, generic competition, cost considerations, and market saturation. Innovations in drug delivery and expanding indications will be critical for sustaining growth.


References

[1] IQVIA. Global Hematology Oncology Market Reports, 2022.
[2] EvaluatePharma. Hypomethylating Agents Market Share Analysis, 2022.
[3] WHO & Lancet. Global Epidemiology of Hematologic Malignancies, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.