You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 15, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CLARITIN-D


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Claritin-d

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00550550 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Grass Sublingual Tablet in Children and Adolescents (P05239 AM3)(COMPLETED) Completed ALK-Abelló A/S Phase 3 2007-11-01 The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of a grass sublingual tablet in children and adolescents with a history of grass-pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma.
NCT00550550 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Grass Sublingual Tablet in Children and Adolescents (P05239 AM3)(COMPLETED) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2007-11-01 The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of a grass sublingual tablet in children and adolescents with a history of grass-pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma.
NCT00562159 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Grass Sublingual Tablet in Adults (P05238 AM3)(COMPLETED) Completed ALK-Abelló A/S Phase 3 2007-11-01 This purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a grass sublingual (under-the-tongue) tablet.
NCT00562159 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Grass Sublingual Tablet in Adults (P05238 AM3)(COMPLETED) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2007-11-01 This purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a grass sublingual (under-the-tongue) tablet.
NCT00730912 ↗ Post Approval Pharmacokinetic Study of Loratadine in Japanese Pediatric and Adult Patients (Study P05539) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 4 2008-06-01 This is a post marketing study to confirm the appropriate dose of loratadine in children by obtaining drug concentration data at multiple time points per child and adult patient, after the patient receives repeated administrations of the approved dose of loratadine.
NCT00762983 ↗ Observation of Use of Claritin (Loratadine) Tablet, RediTabs, and Dry Syrup in Children (Study P05834)(COMPLETED) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 2008-03-01 The purpose of this study is to collect information on unexpected adverse reactions (ADRs), how often ADRs occur, and factors that can affect the safety and effectiveness of Claritin (loratadine) when used in children. Patients will be observed while they are taking Claritin, and ADRs and symptom scores will be recorded. At the end of treatment, improvement in symptoms will be recorded. Post-marketing surveys are not considered applicable clinical trials and thus the results of this survey will not be posted at its conclusion. The results will be submitted to public health officials as required by applicable national and international laws.
NCT00776217 ↗ Bioequivalence Study on Loratadine Orally Disintegrating Tablets 10 mg Under Fasting Conditions Completed Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited N/A 2006-06-01 To compare the single-dose oral bioavailability of loratadine 10 mg orally disintegrating tablets of Ohm Laboratories (a subsidiary of Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA) with Claritin® Reditabs® (containing loratadine 10 mg) of Schering-Plough Healthcare Product Inc., USA in healthy, adult, human male subjects under fasting condition.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Claritin-d

Condition Name

Condition Name for Claritin-d
Intervention Trials
Healthy 5
Allergic Rhinitis 3
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal 3
Allergy 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Claritin-d
Intervention Trials
Rhinitis 9
Rhinitis, Allergic 7
Conjunctivitis 3
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Claritin-d

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Claritin-d
Location Trials
United States 36
Canada 4
Hungary 1
Germany 1
Croatia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Claritin-d
Location Trials
Kentucky 4
New Jersey 4
Michigan 2
Massachusetts 2
Maryland 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Claritin-d

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Claritin-d
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 4
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Claritin-d
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 21
Terminated 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Claritin-d

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Claritin-d
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 5
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited 4
Bayer 4
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Claritin-d
Sponsor Trials
Industry 23
Other 10
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

CLARITIN-D: Clinical Trials, Market Landscape, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

What is Claritin-D's Current Clinical Trial Status?

Claritin-D, a combination of loratadine (an antihistamine) and pseudoephedrine (a decongestant), is an established over-the-counter (OTC) medication primarily used for the temporary relief of nasal and sinus congestion, runny nose, sneezing, and itchy or watery eyes due to the common cold or hay fever. Its long-standing presence in the market means that new, large-scale clinical trials investigating its core efficacy and safety are infrequent. The focus for such established drugs typically shifts to post-market surveillance, comparative effectiveness studies, or investigations into novel formulations or delivery methods.

Current publicly available clinical trial information for Claritin-D primarily reflects its historical development and approval phases. Major regulatory bodies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), maintain records of approved drug applications and their associated clinical data. However, recent, ongoing trials specifically designed to generate new primary efficacy or safety endpoints for the original Claritin-D formulation are not prominent in major clinical trial registries like ClinicalTrials.gov, which focuses on publicly funded and industry-sponsored clinical research involving human participants.

The drug's approval by the FDA in 1997 for the loratadine component and the combination with pseudoephedrine solidified its market position. Subsequent research has largely centered on expanding its indications, evaluating its role in specific patient populations, or comparing its performance against other allergy and cold medications. For instance, studies may examine its effectiveness in patients with specific comorbid conditions or explore its long-term safety profile in real-world settings.

Are There Any Emerging Clinical Trials for Claritin-D?

As of late 2023 and early 2024, there are no large-scale, pivotal clinical trials publicly registered for the development of new indications or significant efficacy improvements for the standard Claritin-D formulation. The drug's therapeutic profile is well-defined and has been subject to extensive clinical scrutiny since its initial market introduction.

However, it is possible that smaller, investigator-initiated studies or observational post-marketing surveillance programs are ongoing. These types of studies are less likely to be registered on public platforms or may be focused on niche aspects of the drug's use, such as its impact on specific biomarkers or its interaction with other commonly used medications in allergy sufferers. Pharmaceutical companies that hold patents or licenses for Claritin-D may conduct internal research or small-scale studies to support product line extensions, optimize manufacturing processes, or gather data for marketing claims. Such activities may not always result in publicly disclosed trial registrations.

The absence of high-profile clinical trials does not necessarily indicate a lack of ongoing research interest. It reflects the mature lifecycle of a drug that has achieved broad market acceptance and regulatory approval for its established uses. Future research would more likely focus on:

  • New Formulations: Development of extended-release versions, different dosage strengths, or alternative delivery mechanisms to improve patient compliance or pharmacokinetic profiles.
  • Combination Therapies: Investigating Claritin-D in conjunction with other therapeutic agents for complex or refractory allergy symptoms.
  • Real-World Evidence (RWE) Studies: Gathering data on long-term effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice.
  • Pediatric or Geriatric Populations: Specific studies to confirm efficacy and safety in these age groups if not already comprehensively established.

What is the Current Market Landscape for Claritin-D?

Claritin-D operates within the highly competitive over-the-counter (OTC) antihistamine and decongestant market. This segment is characterized by established brands, significant generic competition, and a continuous influx of new product offerings and formulations.

Who are Claritin-D's Key Competitors?

Claritin-D faces direct competition from a range of branded and generic products offering similar therapeutic benefits. Key competitors include:

  • Allegra-D (fexofenadine HCl and pseudoephedrine HCl): Another widely recognized dual-action antihistamine and decongestant. Allegra-D is often positioned as a non-drowsy alternative, although loratadine in Claritin-D is also marketed as non-drowsy.
  • Zyrtec-D (cetirizine HCl and pseudoephedrine HCl): This product combines a potent antihistamine with a decongestant. Cetirizine is known for its rapid onset of action.
  • Advil-D (ibuprofen and pseudoephedrine HCl): While Advil-D targets pain and inflammation in addition to congestion, it competes for consumers seeking multi-symptom relief from cold and flu symptoms that may overlap with allergy symptoms.
  • Tylenol Sinus + Allergy (acetaminophen, diphenhydramine HCl, phenylephrine HCl): A multi-ingredient product that addresses pain, fever, and congestion/allergy symptoms.
  • Generic Loratadine/Pseudoephedrine Combinations: A significant portion of the market is captured by store brands and generic manufacturers offering cost-effective alternatives to branded Claritin-D. These generics leverage the same active ingredients and bioequivalence.
  • Single-Ingredient Products: Consumers also opt for separate antihistamines (e.g., loratadine, cetirizine, fexofenadine) and decongestants (e.g., pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine), which provides greater flexibility in dosing and cost management.

The competitive dynamics are driven by pricing, brand loyalty, physician recommendations (though less influential for OTC products), marketing efforts, and the availability of convenient formulations.

What is Claritin-D's Market Share and Revenue Performance?

Precise, up-to-the-minute market share and revenue figures for specific OTC brands like Claritin-D are often proprietary and not publicly disclosed by manufacturers. However, market research reports provide estimates and trends for the broader allergy and cold medication segments.

The global allergy treatment market, which includes antihistamines and decongestants, is substantial. Reports from firms like Grand View Research and Mordor Intelligence indicate a market size in the tens of billions of U.S. dollars, with steady growth projected.

  • Market Size: The global allergy treatment market was valued at approximately USD 25-30 billion in recent years and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 4-6% [1].
  • Claritin-D's Position: As a leading branded product in the antihistamine-decongestant category, Claritin-D, manufactured by Bayer, is a significant player. However, its market share is under pressure from both strong branded competitors like Allegra-D and Zyrtec-D, and a vast array of generic alternatives.
  • Revenue Drivers: Revenue for Claritin-D is driven by unit sales volume, pricing strategies, and promotional activities. The shift towards generic options by price-sensitive consumers can impact the revenue growth of branded products.

The availability of prescription-strength versions of loratadine and pseudoephedrine, and their subsequent switch to OTC status, has democratized access and intensified competition. The "D" variants, containing pseudoephedrine, are subject to stricter regulations in some regions due to its use in illicit methamphetamine production, which can influence supply chain dynamics and consumer access.

What are the Regulatory Considerations for Claritin-D?

Claritin-D's active ingredients are subject to regulations governing pharmaceuticals, particularly in the OTC space.

  • Loratadine: Approved as a non-sedating antihistamine. Its OTC status allows for widespread availability without a prescription.
  • Pseudoephedrine: Due to its potential for diversion and use in the manufacture of illicit drugs, pseudoephedrine is classified as a List I chemical by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). This classification imposes restrictions on its sale and distribution.
    • Retail Sales Limits: In many U.S. states and federally, pseudoephedrine-containing products are sold behind the pharmacy counter, requiring purchasers to show identification and limiting the quantity that can be purchased within a specific timeframe (e.g., 3.6 grams per day or 9 grams per 30 days) [2].
    • Record Keeping: Retailers are mandated to maintain electronic or written logs of pseudoephedrine sales.
    • "Real-Time" Electronic Logging: The Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA) requires retailers to record sales of pseudoephedrine products in a national database to enforce these limits [3].
  • Product Labeling: All OTC products, including Claritin-D, must comply with FDA labeling requirements, detailing active ingredients, indications, warnings, dosage instructions, and inactive ingredients.
  • Advertising: Claims made in advertising for Claritin-D must be truthful and not misleading, and must be substantiated by scientific evidence.

These regulatory considerations, particularly for pseudoephedrine, can influence market access, consumer purchasing behavior, and inventory management for retailers and manufacturers.

What are the Market Projections for Claritin-D?

The market projections for Claritin-D are intrinsically linked to the broader trends in the OTC allergy and cold medication market. Given its established product profile and the mature nature of its active ingredients, significant growth solely driven by Claritin-D itself is unlikely. Growth will be more dependent on market expansion, competitive positioning, and potential product lifecycle extensions.

What is the Future Demand for Allergy and Cold Medications?

Several factors are expected to influence the future demand for allergy and cold medications:

  • Increasing Prevalence of Allergies: A growing number of individuals are diagnosed with allergic rhinitis and other seasonal allergies. Factors contributing to this include environmental changes, increased awareness, and possibly lifestyle factors [4]. This trend supports sustained demand for effective antihistamines.
  • Aging Population: As the global population ages, there is a potential increase in the prevalence of chronic conditions, including allergies, and a higher consumption of OTC medications.
  • Climate Change: Some research suggests that changes in climate, including warmer temperatures and increased pollen counts, could exacerbate allergy seasons and increase demand for allergy relief products [5].
  • Consumer Preference for Self-Care: A continued emphasis on self-medication and home-based healthcare solutions favors the OTC market.
  • Shift to Generics: The demand for cost-effective healthcare will likely continue to drive consumers towards generic alternatives, posing a challenge for branded products unless they offer distinct advantages in formulation or convenience.
  • Evolving Cold & Flu Season Patterns: While challenging to predict, the severity and duration of cold and flu seasons can impact short-term demand for multi-symptom relief products.

How Might Claritin-D Evolve in the Market?

Claritin-D's future market position will depend on its ability to adapt to evolving consumer needs and competitive pressures:

  • Product Line Extensions: Bayer may explore the development of new Claritin-D formulations to differentiate itself. This could include:
    • Improved Extended-Release Technologies: Enhancing the duration of action for more convenient dosing.
    • Combination Products: Potentially combining loratadine/pseudoephedrine with other ingredients to address a wider spectrum of symptoms, though this would require new regulatory approvals and clinical trials.
    • Pediatric Formulations: If not already fully optimized, developing child-friendly formulations.
  • Strategic Pricing and Marketing: Maintaining competitive pricing relative to other branded dual-action products and leveraging marketing to highlight its established efficacy and non-drowsy profile will be crucial. Brand loyalty, while diminishing, still plays a role.
  • Focus on Real-World Evidence: Generating and disseminating RWE on Claritin-D's long-term effectiveness and safety in diverse patient populations could strengthen its market position and inform clinical recommendations.
  • Navigating Pseudoephedrine Regulations: Manufacturers and retailers will need to remain vigilant and compliant with evolving regulations surrounding pseudoephedrine sales, which may involve technological solutions for tracking and sales limits.
  • Competition from Newer Antihistamines: The market may see the introduction of new antihistamines with different mechanisms of action or improved side-effect profiles, which could divert some market share from established products.

The overall market for dual-action antihistamine-decongestants is expected to remain robust, driven by the persistent burden of allergic rhinitis and common cold symptoms. Claritin-D, as a long-standing and recognized brand, is well-positioned to retain a significant portion of this market. However, its growth trajectory will likely be moderate, influenced by intense competition, pricing pressures, and the increasing preference for generic medications.

Key Takeaways

  • Claritin-D's clinical trial activity is minimal, reflecting its mature product lifecycle and established efficacy. Research focuses on post-market surveillance and potential minor formulation adjustments rather than novel indications.
  • The OTC allergy and cold market is highly competitive, with Claritin-D facing established brands like Allegra-D and Zyrtec-D, alongside extensive generic offerings.
  • Pseudoephedrine, a key component of Claritin-D, is subject to significant regulatory controls due to its potential for diversion, impacting sales and requiring compliance with sales limits and record-keeping.
  • Market projections for Claritin-D are tied to the steady demand for allergy and cold medications, driven by increasing allergy prevalence and consumer preference for self-care.
  • Future growth for Claritin-D will likely depend on product line extensions, strategic pricing, marketing, and adaptation to evolving regulatory landscapes and consumer preferences for generics.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Are there any new clinical trials for Claritin-D that could lead to expanded uses? There are no major, publicly registered clinical trials for new indications or significant efficacy improvements for the standard Claritin-D formulation. Research for such established drugs typically focuses on post-market analysis or niche applications.

  2. How do pseudoephedrine regulations affect the availability of Claritin-D? Regulations in many regions require pseudoephedrine-containing products like Claritin-D to be sold behind the pharmacy counter, with limits on purchase quantities and mandatory ID and sales logging, which can influence consumer access and purchasing habits.

  3. What are the primary advantages of Claritin-D compared to single-ingredient antihistamines? Claritin-D offers the combined benefit of an antihistamine (loratadine) to reduce allergy symptoms like sneezing and itching, and a decongestant (pseudoephedrine) to relieve nasal and sinus congestion, providing a dual-action approach for comprehensive symptom relief.

  4. Is Claritin-D still considered a first-line treatment for allergies? Claritin-D is a well-established option for symptom relief of hay fever and nasal/sinus congestion. While newer antihistamines and treatment guidelines exist, its combination of efficacy and non-drowsy antihistamine action keeps it a relevant choice for many consumers seeking multi-symptom relief.

  5. What is the expected impact of generic competition on Claritin-D's market share? Significant generic competition is expected to continue pressuring Claritin-D's market share. While the branded product may retain some market presence due to brand recognition and loyalty, the cost-effectiveness of generics will likely drive a substantial portion of the market towards them.

Citations

[1] Grand View Research. (2023). Allergy Treatment Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Type (Allopathic, Biological), By Product (Antihistamines, Nasal Sprays, Immunotherapy), By Condition (Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma, Eczema), By Distribution Channel (Hospital Pharmacies, Retail Pharmacies, Online Pharmacies), By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/allergy-treatment-market

[2] U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. (n.d.). Methamphetamine. Retrieved from https://www.dea.gov/factsheets/methamphetamine

[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020, March 16). Pseudoephedrine, Ephedrine, and Phenylpropanolamine. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/pseudoephedrine-ephedrine-and-phenylpropanolamine

[4] Smith, L. J. (2019). Allergic rhinitis: epidemiology, burden and management. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 49(10), 1261-1269. doi:10.1111/cea.13464

[5] Peden, D. B., & Peden, K. A. (2019). Climate change and allergic disease. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 123(4), 371-377. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2019.07.017

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.