Last Updated: May 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CIPRODEX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Ciprodex

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00945802 ↗ FST-201 In The Treatment of Acute Otitis Externa Terminated Shire Phase 3 2009-07-31 The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of FST-201 compared to Ciprodex in the treatment of acute otitis externa. This trial is designed to enable filing of a New Drug Application in support of FST-201 for the indication of acute otitis externa.
NCT00956748 ↗ N-Acetylcysteine as an Adjunct for Refractory Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media Withdrawn St. Paul's Hospital, Canada Phase 4 2019-11-29 Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) can be particularly difficult to treat as a number of patients do not respond to routine antibiotic or surgical treatments. The current treatment involves administering combination antibiotic anti-inflammatory ear drops such as Ciprodex (ciprofloxacin 0.3% / dexamethasone 0.1%). Although most patients experience a relief of symptoms, a fraction of patients remain refractory to treatment. Recent findings suggest that the addition of N-acetylcysteine (0.5-2%) to Ciprodex is a superior treatment for otitis media with effusion compared to the use of Ciprodex alone.
NCT00961675 ↗ FST-201 in the Treatment of Acute Otitis Externa Completed Shire Phase 3 2009-08-31 The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of FST-201 compared to Ciprodex in the treatment of acute otitis externa. This study will be conducted at one site, the Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) Tropical Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, in Pago Pago, American Samoa.
NCT01027494 ↗ Topical Treatment of Acute Otitis Media Through Tympanostomy Tubes (AOMT) and Its Effect on Microbial Flora Completed Alcon Research 2009-12-01 The purpose of this observational study was to evaluate the effects of a topical fluoroquinolone (antibiotic) instilled into the otic (ear) canal to treat Acute Otitis Media through Tympanostomy Tubes (AOMT) on selected bacterial species on the skin near the ear, in the nose, and in the throat.
NCT01359098 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Ciprodexa Otic Foam Compared to Twice-daily Ciprodex Ear Drops in Acute Otitis Externa Completed Otic Pharma Phase 2 2011-07-01 The purpose of this study is to assess the Safety and Efficacy of Ciprodexa Foam (0.3% Ciprofloxacin, 0.1% Dexamethasone Otic Foam), used once-a-day for 7 days for the treatment of Acute Diffuse Otitis Externa, compared to Ciprodex otic suspension used twice daily for 7 days.
NCT01908803 ↗ Proof-of-Concept Study of a Single Application of an Investigational Otic Suspension in Treatment of Acute Otitis Media With Tympanostomy Tubes Terminated Alcon Research Phase 2 2013-12-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate a single application of AL-60371/AL-817 Otic Suspension relative to ototopical CIPRODEX for sustained clinical cure, microbiological success, and time to cessation of otorrhea.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Ciprodex

Condition Name

Condition Name for Ciprodex
Intervention Trials
Acute Otitis Externa 3
Otorrhea 2
Acute Otitis Media 2
Otitis Externa 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Ciprodex
Intervention Trials
Otitis 9
Otitis Media 5
Otitis Externa 5
Otitis Media, Suppurative 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Ciprodex

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Ciprodex
Location Trials
United States 51
Puerto Rico 2
Canada 1
Israel 1
American Samoa 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Ciprodex
Location Trials
Texas 4
Florida 4
Virginia 3
Oregon 3
Ohio 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Ciprodex

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Ciprodex
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 5
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Ciprodex
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Terminated 4
Withdrawn 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Ciprodex

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Ciprodex
Sponsor Trials
Shire 2
Alcon Research 2
Novum Pharmaceutical Research Services 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Ciprodex
Sponsor Trials
Industry 10
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: April 30, 2026

Ciprodex (ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone): clinical-trials status, market snapshot, and demand projection

What is Ciprodex and what indications matter commercially?

Ciprodex is a fixed-dose combination of ciprofloxacin (antibiotic) plus dexamethasone (corticosteroid), marketed as an ophthalmic and otic topical therapy. The clinical evidence base and commercial pull typically concentrate on:

  • Acute bacterial otitis media/otitis externa uses for otic formulations (where antibiotic plus steroid reduces both pathogen burden and inflammation).
  • Bacterial eye infections with inflammatory components for ophthalmic formulations.
  • Post-procedural or post-surgical ocular indications where infection plus inflammation risk overlap.

This analysis treats Ciprodex as a branded fixed-dose asset with ongoing life-cycle pressure from generics, reformulations, and channel switching to cheaper equivalents.

Which clinical trials are active or newly active for Ciprodex?

No reliable, complete set of current interventional trial activity for Ciprodex across all geographies and formulations is available in the provided input. A full “clinical trials update” requires at minimum: trial registry pulls (ClinicalTrials.gov / EU CTR / other), record-level status, and endpoints per indication and formulation (otic vs ophthalmic). Without that dataset, a complete and accurate update cannot be produced.

How does Ciprodex compete in-market?

Ciprodex competes primarily on:

  • Formulation type (otic vs ophthalmic) and dosing regimen
  • Brand strength vs generic penetration in most established markets
  • Prescriber familiarity and channel relationships in ENT and ophthalmology

Generic ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone drops the brand premium where payers and providers can substitute without clinical penalty. Because Ciprodex is a combination product, biosimilar-style dynamics do not apply, but substitution still occurs through generic equivalents of the same actives and route (where approved).

Market structure and drivers

Demand drivers

  1. Persistent incidence of bacterial ear and eye infections treated in outpatient settings (ENT and ophthalmology).
  2. Preference for fixed-dose anti-infective plus anti-inflammatory regimens in cases where both infection control and symptom reduction matter.
  3. Constrained use of systemic therapy for uncomplicated localized infections, pushing topical utilization.

Headwinds

  1. Generic erosion that reduces average selling price over time.
  2. Guideline shifts toward narrower antibiotic stewardship pathways that can reduce use duration or restrict combinations in some settings.
  3. Safety and stewardship scrutiny for fluoroquinolone-containing topical products (even when localized), affecting formulary placement.

Market projection framework (what can be projected with certainty vs what cannot)

A numeric “projection” for Ciprodex requires:

  • Historic sales (brand and/or combination category) by geography
  • Pricing and volume trajectories
  • Generic entry timing per market
  • Uptake/decline slopes by indication (otic vs ophthalmic)
  • Regulatory and payer channel updates that impact substitution

No numeric sales history, entry dates, or payer/volume data is present in the provided input, so a complete and accurate numeric projection cannot be produced.

What is actionable for strategy without a numeric forecast?

Even without a quantified market curve, the business logic for Ciprodex positioning is clear:

1) Protect the highest-velocity subsegments

Focus on channels and prescriber networks where fixed-dose combo topical therapy is standard:

  • ENT outpatient practices for otic bacterial infections
  • Ophthalmology clinics where inflammatory component co-occurs with infection management

2) Defend formulary through outcomes and stewardship framing

Where policies allow, anchor clinical rationale on:

  • rapid symptom relief due to steroid component
  • reduction in adjunct anti-inflammatory use
  • adherence gains from fixed dosing

3) Reduce net revenue dilution risk

Expect generic substitution pressure and manage through:

  • contract strategy in pharmacy and hospital channels
  • mix management across otic vs ophthalmic SKUs
  • pricing and pack-size engineering where permitted

4) Life-cycle management

For combination brands, the main levers are:

  • line extensions (where clinically and regulatorily justified)
  • formulation improvements
  • geographic focus to slow substitution rate
  • co-promotion with high-volume specialty segments

Clinical-trials update: what counts for investors

For Ciprodex specifically, “value-relevant” trials typically fall into these categories:

  • New dosing regimens with demonstrated non-inferiority or better safety vs existing standards
  • New target indications with distinct endpoints (e.g., specific subtypes of otitis/ocular inflammation-infection overlap)
  • Pivotal comparative studies versus other topical antibiotic-steroid combinations

Without registry data in the input, a trial-by-trial update cannot be completed.

Key Takeaways

  • Ciprodex is a fixed-dose ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone topical combination used mainly in otic and ophthalmic bacterial infection contexts with inflammation.
  • A complete clinical-trials update requires registry pulls and record-level status; that dataset is not present in the input, so no accurate trial activity summary can be produced.
  • A numeric market projection also requires historic sales, pricing, and generic entry timelines by geography; those inputs are absent, so no accurate forecast can be produced.
  • Actionable near-term strategy centers on subsegment protection (ENT/ophthalmology channels), formulary defense through stewardship framing, and net revenue protection against generic substitution.

FAQs

1) Is Ciprodex used for both ears and eyes?

Yes. Ciprodex is marketed as topical otic and ophthalmic therapy (ciprofloxacin plus dexamethasone).

2) Why is the ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone combination commercially sticky?

It pairs an antibiotic with an anti-inflammatory steroid in one product, aligning with symptom reduction and localized infection-inflammation overlap.

3) What is the biggest market risk for Ciprodex?

Generic competition and substitution that compresses pricing and brand share over time.

4) Do new clinical trials drive the Ciprodex brand value?

Only trials with value-relevant design (new endpoints, new dosing, or meaningful indication expansion) tend to move investor and payer decisions. Routine supportive studies usually have limited commercial impact.

5) Can a credible numeric market projection be produced without sales and generic entry data?

No. A projection requires historical brand/category sales, pricing trends, volume drivers, and substitution timelines.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. Ciprodex studies and related trials (query results required for record-level status and endpoints). https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Product information and approved indications for ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone combination products. https://www.ema.europa.eu/
[3] U.S. FDA. Labeling and approval information for ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone topical combination products. https://www.fda.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.