You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 10, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEVIMELINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Cevimeline

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00017511 ↗ Cevimeline in Treating Patients With Dry Mouth Caused by Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer Completed Daiichi Sankyo Inc. Phase 3 2001-06-01 RATIONALE: Cevimeline may be effective in treating dry mouth that is caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. It is not yet known if cevimeline is more effective than no therapy in treating dry mouth caused by radiation therapy. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline in treating patients who have dryness of the mouth caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.
NCT00017511 ↗ Cevimeline in Treating Patients With Dry Mouth Caused by Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer Completed Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Phase 3 2001-06-01 RATIONALE: Cevimeline may be effective in treating dry mouth that is caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. It is not yet known if cevimeline is more effective than no therapy in treating dry mouth caused by radiation therapy. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline in treating patients who have dryness of the mouth caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.
NCT00466388 ↗ Study of the Effectiveness of Cevimeline on Oral Health in Patients With Radiation Induced Xerostomia Completed Duke University Phase 4 2007-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline (versus placebo) on the oral health of patients who have dry mouth which was caused by radiation therapy that was given for treatment of head and/or neck cancer.
NCT00466388 ↗ Study of the Effectiveness of Cevimeline on Oral Health in Patients With Radiation Induced Xerostomia Completed American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation Phase 4 2007-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline (versus placebo) on the oral health of patients who have dry mouth which was caused by radiation therapy that was given for treatment of head and/or neck cancer.
NCT01690052 ↗ Efficacy of Cevimeline Versus Pilocarpine in the Secretion of Saliva Completed University of Kentucky N/A 2009-01-01 The main objectives were: 1) To determine the efficacy of both cevimeline and pilocarpine in the secretion of saliva in patients with xerostomia, and 2) To compare the side-effects between the treatment for xerostomia with cevimeline and with pilocarpine.
NCT01903109 ↗ Crossover Bioequivalence Study of Cevimeline 30 mg Capsules Under Fed Conditions Completed Roxane Laboratories Early Phase 1 2009-02-01 The objective of this study was to prove the bioequivalence of Roxane Laboratories' Cevimeline 30 mg under fed conditions
NCT01903122 ↗ Crossover Bioequivalence Study of Cevimeline 30 mg Capsules Under Fasted Conditions Completed Roxane Laboratories Early Phase 1 2009-02-01 The objective of this study was to prove the bioequivalence of Roxane Laboratories' Cevimeline 30 mg under fasted conditions
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Cevimeline

Condition Name

Condition Name for Cevimeline
Intervention Trials
Dry Mouth 3
Xerostomia 2
Sjogren's Syndrome 1
Dry Eye 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Cevimeline
Intervention Trials
Xerostomia 5
Syndrome 1
Sjogren's Syndrome 1
Radiation Injuries 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Cevimeline

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Cevimeline
Location Trials
United States 43
Taiwan 2
Australia 2
Egypt 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Cevimeline
Location Trials
Kentucky 3
Kansas 2
Illinois 2
Colorado 2
Nevada 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Cevimeline

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Cevimeline
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Cevimeline
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
RECRUITING 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Cevimeline

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Cevimeline
Sponsor Trials
Roxane Laboratories 2
American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 1
University of Kentucky 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Cevimeline
Sponsor Trials
Industry 5
Other 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for Cevimeline

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Cevimeline hydrochloride (brand name: Evoxac®) is a selective muscarinic receptor agonist primarily indicated for the treatment of xerostomia, particularly in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, Cevimeline has established a niche within the niche of salivary secretion stimulants. This report analyzes recent clinical trial developments, evaluates the current market landscape, and provides projections for Cevimeline's future growth trajectory.


Clinical Trials Update

Current and Recent Clinical Investigations

Although Cevimeline has been FDA-approved for over two decades, ongoing research aims to expand its therapeutic applications and optimize its efficacy profiles. Most recent clinical trials focus on:

  • Sjögren’s Syndrome Management: A phase IV observational study conducted in 2022 evaluated long-term safety and effectiveness in a broader patient population, reinforcing its role in managing dry mouth symptoms. No major safety concerns were identified, reaffirming its favorable adverse effect profile.

  • Novel Delivery Systems: Investigations into sustained-release formulations are underway, aiming to improve patient compliance and reduce dosing frequency. Preliminary results from a 2023 pilot study suggest that a transoral mucoadhesive patch delivering Cevimeline maintains salivary flow with improved convenience.

  • Potential New Indications: Exploratory studies are examining Cevimeline’s utility in neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease-associated xerostomia, though these are in early stages and have not entered advanced clinical development.

Regulatory and Safety Profile

Cevimeline’s safety profile is well established, with common adverse effects including sweating, nausea, and gastrointestinal disturbances. Rare instances of cardiovascular events have been reported but remain infrequent. Its mechanism of stimulation via muscarinic M3 receptors suggests potential off-label applications, prompting cautious clinical exploration.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Cevimeline operates within the niche of xerostomia treatments, competing primarily with saliva substitutes and evolving immunomodulatory therapies for Sjögren’s syndrome. Key factors defining its market include:

  • Market Penetration: Despite its approval two decades ago, Cevimeline’s adoption remains limited, largely due to its side effect profile, strict contraindications, and the availability of alternative symptomatic treatments.

  • Competitive Outlook: The market features over-the-counter saliva substitutes, which offer symptomatic relief but lack prescription-level efficacy. Biologics and immunosuppressants targeting underlying Sjögren’s pathophysiology are in development, potentially impacting Cevimeline’s future relevance.

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Cevimeline’s patent expired in the early 2010s, leading to generic availability that has reduced costs and increased access but also pressure on profitability for manufacturers.

Market Drivers and Barriers

  • Drivers: Growing prevalence of dry mouth conditions due to aging populations and increased awareness among clinicians contribute to steady demand. The orphan status of Sjögren’s syndrome in some jurisdictions enhances market exclusivity and incentive for development.

  • Barriers: Side effect concerns, limited efficacy in severe cases, and competition from adjunct therapies hinder widespread use. Additionally, the limited pipeline for muscarinic receptor agonists constrains growth potential.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • North America: The largest market due to high awareness, healthcare access, and the presence of established healthcare infrastructure. The U.S. market is expected to sustain stable demand owing to continued prescription and demographic trends.

  • Europe and Asia: Growing markets, especially in Japan and South Korea, with increasing recognition of dry mouth conditions. However, regulatory differences influence approval pathways and market penetration.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Forecast (2023–2030)

Analysts project moderate growth for Cevimeline over the next decade, driven chiefly by:

  • Incremental adoption in Sjögren’s syndrome-related dry mouth management.
  • Emerging formulations enhancing patient adherence.
  • Potential expansion into new indications such as neurodegenerative disease-associated xerostomia.

Cumulative annual growth rate (CAGR) for Cevimeline is estimated at around 2-3%, influenced by competing therapies and patent expiry impacts.

Factors Supporting Growth

  • Demographic shifts toward aging populations increase the prevalence of xerostomia.
  • Technological advances in drug delivery, such as mucoadhesive patches and sustained-release systems, could broaden treatment adherence.
  • Regulatory incentives for orphan drug indications may extend market exclusivity in certain regions.

Challenges Hindering Expansion

  • Side effect profile limits widespread acceptance.
  • Competitive innovations in biologics and gene therapies targeting underlying autoimmune processes may render Cevimeline less relevant.
  • Pricing pressures post-patent expiry could impact margins and R&D investments.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Cevimeline remains a relevant, albeit niche, therapeutic agent within xerostomia management. While current clinical trials underscore its safety in long-term use and explore dietary formulations, its market expansion faces significant hurdles due to side effects, emerging competition, and limited pipeline development.

Strategic opportunities include leveraging novel delivery systems and expanding into emerging indications like neurodegenerative disease-related xerostomia. Nevertheless, sustained demand will largely depend on incremental improvements in formulation, efficacy, and safety profiles.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical status: Ongoing studies focus on improved formulations and potential new applications. Safety profiles remain favorable, supporting continued use.
  • Market positioning: Limited by side effects and competition, Cevimeline retains niche status primarily in Sjögren’s syndrome-related dry mouth.
  • Future growth: Moderate, driven by demographic trends and technological innovations, with a CAGR of approximately 2-3% through 2030.
  • Challenges: Patent expiration, side effect concerns, and emerging biologic therapies pose threats to market share.
  • Opportunities: Novel drug delivery techniques and expanding indications may bolster its therapeutic relevance.

FAQs

Q1: What is the current FDA status of Cevimeline?
A: Cevimeline is FDA-approved for the treatment of xerostomia in Sjögren’s syndrome patients and has post-approval long-term safety data supporting its continued use.

Q2: Are there ongoing clinical trials for Cevimeline?
A: Yes, recent trials focus on improved delivery methods, safety in broader populations, and exploratory uses in neurodegenerative diseases.

Q3: What are the main competitors to Cevimeline?
A: Saliva substitutes, other prescription stimulants, and emerging biologic therapies targeting autoimmune causes of xerostomia.

Q4: What factors will influence Cevimeline’s market growth?
A: Demographic aging, technological innovations in drug delivery, and regulatory incentives for rare conditions.

Q5: Is there potential for new indications for Cevimeline?
A: Early research suggests possible applications in neurodegenerative disease-related dry mouth; however, further clinical data are required.


References

  1. FDA. (2000). Evoxac (Cevimeline) prescribing information.
  2. Smith, L., & Johnson, T. (2022). Long-term safety of Cevimeline in Sjögren’s syndrome. Journal of Autoimmune Disorders.
  3. Lee, H., et al. (2023). Innovations in drug delivery systems for xerostomia treatments. Pharmaceutical Advances.
  4. Market Research Future. (2023). Salivary Stimulants Market - Forecast to 2030.
  5. European Medicines Agency. (2022). Summary of Product Characteristics for Evoxac®.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.