Last Updated: May 2, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFDINIR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Cefdinir

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00147914 ↗ Comparison Study Between Cefdinir & Amoxicilline/Clavulanate in Acute Sinusitis and Assessment of Quality of Life Completed University of Chicago Phase 4 2005-02-01 This study is a comparison between two commonly used antibiotics (Cefdinir vs. Amoxicillin/Clavulanate) in patients with acute sinus infection, surveying quality of life. The hypothesis is that the two treatments would be at the least equivalent based on clinical outcome measures of improvement in quality of life.
NCT00234949 ↗ A Study to Compare Cefdinir and Cephalexin for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Uncomplicated Skin Infections Completed Abbott Phase 4 2005-03-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of cefdinir to that of cephalexin in patients with mild to moderate uncomplicated skin/skin structure infections.
NCT00644774 ↗ A Pediatric Taste Test Study of Omnicef Versus Zithromax Antibiotic Suspension Medications Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-01-01 To compare the taste and smell acceptability of cefdinir (Omnicef) antibiotic suspension and azithromycin (Zithromax) antibiotic suspension following a single dose of each medication.
NCT00644891 ↗ Pediatric Taste Test Study of Cefdinir (Omnicef) Versus Amoxicillin Antibiotic Suspension Medications Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-01-01 To compare the taste and smell acceptability scores of cefdinir (Omnicef) versus amoxicillin oral antibiotic suspension medications in pediatric subjects. It was designed to determine if Omnicef or amoxicillin is preferred to the other with regard to taste or smell.
NCT00644943 ↗ A Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Cefdinir Oral Suspension Versus Amoxicillin/Clavulanate in Pediatric Subjects With Acute Otitis Media Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-02-01 The primary objective is to compare the safety and efficacy of cefdinir oral suspension, 7 mg/kg/day ql2hrs for 5 days, to amoxicillin/clavulanate oral suspension 45 mg/kg/day (based on amoxicillin component), in divided doses, q12h for 10 days, in children between 6 months and 6 years of age, with AOM.
NCT00645073 ↗ Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Cefdinir and Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Subjects With Acute Bacterial Sinusitis Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-11-01 To compare the safety and efficacy of a ten-day course of therapy of cefdinir, 600 mg QD, to a ten-day course of therapy of levofloxacin, 500 mg QD, in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Cefdinir

Condition Name

Condition Name for Cefdinir
Intervention Trials
Healthy 11
Acute Otitis Media 3
Urinary Tract Infections 2
Acute Bacterial Sinusitis 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Cefdinir
Intervention Trials
Otitis 3
Pneumonia 3
Sinusitis 3
Otitis Media 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Cefdinir

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Cefdinir
Location Trials
United States 78
France 14
Chile 2
Costa Rica 2
Guatemala 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Cefdinir
Location Trials
Texas 6
Ohio 6
Arizona 6
Pennsylvania 5
Utah 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Cefdinir

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Cefdinir
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 14
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Cefdinir
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 22
Recruiting 2
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Cefdinir

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Cefdinir
Sponsor Trials
Abbott 8
Sandoz 4
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA 4
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Cefdinir
Sponsor Trials
Industry 18
Other 15
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Cefdinir Clinical Trials Update and Market Analysis Projection

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What is cefdinir and what product forms matter commercially?

Cefdinir is an oral, third-generation cephalosporin used for bacterial infections. Commercial relevance centers on oral capsules and oral suspension, with dosing across common respiratory and skin/ear indications that support ongoing generic and branded competition.

Key commercial product format (core demand driver)

  • Oral: capsules and suspension (brand and generic).
  • Administration: outpatient-friendly dosing supports primary care and urgent care prescribing patterns.

What is the clinical trials update for cefdinir?

No current, high-salience phase transitions, late-stage readouts, or label-expansion pivotal programs were identified in the information provided in this exchange. The available dataset in this session is insufficient to produce a complete, accurate clinical-trials update with trial identifiers, dates, phases, endpoints, and results.

How is cefdinir used in clinical practice (demand channels)?

Cefdinir is typically positioned around common bacterial infection categories, with market uptake influenced by:

  • Primary care prescribing for mild to moderate infections.
  • Pediatric use via suspension formulations.
  • Competitor substitution among oral cephalosporins (second- and third-generation) and non-beta-lactams depending on payer formularies and local stewardship guidance.

Market analysis: how demand is shaped

Cefdinir’s market dynamics are dominated by:

  • Mature status and generic penetration: Most markets are supplied by generics, which compress price and keep growth modest.
  • Switching behavior among oral antibiotics: Prescribers trade between cephalosporins and alternative classes based on coverage, tolerability profiles, and guideline alignment.
  • Payer-driven formulary placement: Antibiotics are often managed through tiering, quantity limits, and step edits for certain indications, with impact varying by country and payer.

Competitiveness: what matters to buyers

For generic manufacturers and branded remnants, procurement is typically governed by:

  • Wholesale acquisition cost competitiveness for oral solids and liquids.
  • Availability and supply continuity across routine outpatient cycles.
  • Formulation reliability for suspension dosing in pediatrics.
  • HEOR and stewardship alignment via guideline concordance.

Market projection: what growth profile to expect

Cefdinir is a mature antibiotic with ongoing replacement demand driven by infection incidence rather than rapid innovation cycles. Without new label expansions or major differentiated reformulations, market trajectories typically follow:

  • Stable to low-growth volume (driven by infection burden and prescribing patterns).
  • Pressure on net sales from generic price erosion and competitive entry.
  • Potential demand volatility from seasonal respiratory infection cycles and antimicrobial stewardship trends that can reduce unnecessary antibiotic use.

Because this session does not include a quantified market baseline (current size, segmentation, and geographic split), it is not possible to deliver a complete and accurate market projection with defensible numbers.

Business implications for R&D, investment, and pipeline decisions

Given cefdinir’s mature profile, the decision set usually hinges on:

  • Differentiation through formulation (bioavailability, taste masking, stability, dosing convenience).
  • Regulatory strategy focused on incremental label clarifications rather than new claims.
  • Cost and supply execution as the core competitive lever in most geographies.
  • Brand versus generic positioning depending on local tender and reimbursement mechanics.

Regulatory and IP posture (high-level)

Cefdinir is widely available as a generic in most major markets. In practical terms:

  • IP-led exclusivity is not typically a primary growth driver for cefdinir today.
  • Competitive advantage is more often operational (cost, manufacturing scale, quality systems) than scientific differentiation.

Key Takeaways

  • Cefdinir demand is mature and volume-led, influenced by outpatient infection incidence and prescribing patterns.
  • Market growth is constrained by generic penetration and price competition.
  • A complete clinical trials update with trial-level proof cannot be produced from the information available in this exchange.
  • A numeric market projection cannot be produced without a current baseline and segmentation inputs.

FAQs

  1. Is cefdinir still actively researched in late-stage trials?
    A definitive late-stage update cannot be produced from the information available in this exchange.

  2. What drives cefdinir prescriptions commercially?
    Outpatient prescribing and pediatric use through oral suspension, plus formulary placement.

  3. What is the main threat to cefdinir net sales?
    Generic price erosion and formulary-driven substitution.

  4. Does cefdinir have growth upside without new indications?
    Limited upside typically comes from volume stability, seasonal demand, and supply execution rather than innovation.

  5. Where can a manufacturer create differentiation for a mature antibiotic?
    Formulation, reliability of supply, and cost position in contracted markets.

References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Drug Trials Snapshots: Cefdinir.
[2] DailyMed. Cefdinir prescribing information.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. Cefdinir search results.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.