Last Updated: April 30, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CANDESARTAN CILEXETIL; HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00383929 ↗ Antihypertensive Efficacy and Safety of Candesartan/HCT 32/12.5 and 32/25 mg in Comparison With Candesartan 32 mg Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2006-09-01 In this study it is intended to compare the blood pressure lowering effect of the combination of candesartan cilexetil (candesartan) 32 mg and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) 25 mg and the combination of candesartan 32 mg and HCT 12.5 mg to that of candesartan 32 mg alone in patients whose blood pressure is not well controlled on candesartan 32 mg monotherapy. The Primary Objectives are to compare sitting BP lowering effect of candesartan/HCT 32/25 mg and candesartan/HCT 32/12.5 mg with that of candesartan 32 mg, respectively.
NCT00434967 ↗ Antihypertensive Efficacy and Safety of Candesartan/HCT 32/25 mg in Comparison With Individual Components and Placebo Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2007-01-01 The aim is to compare the blood pressure lowering effect of the combination of candesartan cilexetil (candesartan) 32 mg and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) 25 mg to that of candesartan 32 mg alone, HCT 25 mg alone and placebo in hypertensive adults.
NCT00621153 ↗ Candesartan Effect in Second Stage Arterial Hypertension Completed AstraZeneca Phase 4 2008-02-01 To compare the changes in mean sitting DBP from baseline after 4 weeks of therapy with either candesartan cilexetil/HCT combination therapy or candesartan cilexetil monotherapy regimen
NCT01012479 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Candesartan Cilexetil Plus Hydrochlorothiazide in Subjects With Severe Hypertension Completed Takeda Phase 4 2009-10-01 The purpose of this study is to see if Candesartan, once daily (QD), added with Hydrochlorothiazide may be helpful in treating people with newly diagnosed severe essential hypertension.
NCT02016183 ↗ Candesartan Cilexetil / Hydrochlorothiazide Combination Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance: Long-term Use (12 Months) Completed Takeda 2009-04-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term use of candesartan cilexetil / hydrochlorothiazide combination tablets (ECARD) Combination Tablets LD&HD in hypertensive patients in the routine clinical setting
NCT02094924 ↗ A Relative Bioavailability Study of a Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Tablets of GSK587323 Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 1 2014-04-17 This study is required to confirm the suitability of a candidate FDC of 16mg candesartan cilexetil/12.5mg HCTZ (GSK587323) formulation for further development and provide data to allow the design of a future pivotal bioequivalence study. This study aims to determine the relative bioavailability of a FDC tablet formulation of 16mg candesartan cilexetil/12.5mg HCTZ relative to the reference product of same fixed dose combination (16mg candesartan cilexetil/12.5mg HCTZ) in healthy adult humans. This will be an open-label, randomised, single dose, two-way crossover study. Each subject will participate in two treatment periods and will be randomized to one of two sequences and administered one of the two treatments, A or B, as per the randomization schedule. The two treatment periods will be separated by a washout period of 7 to 14 days to ensure the candesartan and HCTZ have been effectively eliminated from the subject between dosing occasions. The study will enroll 16 healthy subjects to ensure that 14 subjects complete the study as planned.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide

Condition Name

Condition Name for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 5
Stage II Hypertension 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide
Location Trials
Ukraine 2
Germany 2
Denmark 1
Slovakia 1
France 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 2
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide
Sponsor Trials
AstraZeneca 3
Takeda 2
GlaxoSmithKline 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Candesartan Cilexetil; Hydrochlorothiazide
Sponsor Trials
Industry 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Candesartan cilexetil + Hydrochlorothiazide: Clinical Trial Update and Market Outlook

Last updated: April 27, 2026

What is the current clinical development status?

Candesartan cilexetil plus hydrochlorothiazide is a marketed fixed-dose combination (FDC) used for hypertension. Public clinical trial activity that is still recruiting or yielding registrational outcomes is limited in mainstream regulatory and trial registries relative to newer antihypertensive classes.

What is visible in the public trial pipeline

  • ClinicalTrials.gov does not show a broad, ongoing wave of new, late-stage interventional trials that would typically drive label expansion for the specific two-drug FDC in the way seen for novel agents. The visible footprint is mostly consistent with routine comparative studies, formulation work, or local/regional investigations, without clear global registrational endpoints dominating the record. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (search portal) [1].

What to expect in evidence generation

  • For an established FDC, the highest-impact evidence typically comes from:
    • bioequivalence or formulation optimization (non-trial-new-chemical-entity type),
    • comparative effectiveness/real-world evidence studies,
    • subgroup pharmacodynamic bridging when dosing or formulation changes are proposed.
  • Those patterns tend to produce incremental rather than transformative clinical updates for the FDC itself.

Practical read-through for R&D planning

  • The core clinical and dose rationale for candesartan + hydrochlorothiazide is established; near-term clinical value is more likely to come from:
    • new combination strengths,
    • optimized release/formulation,
    • population-specific evidence (elderly, CKD, comorbidity strata),
    • adherence or regimen simplification studies rather than new mechanism claims.
  • This is consistent with the limited late-stage interventional visibility in public registries. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov [1].

How big is the market today, and what drives demand?

Market structure

The candesartan class (angiotensin receptor blockers, ARBs) plus diuretic combinations sit in the mainstream chronic cardiovascular therapeutic market:

  • Primary use: essential hypertension.
  • Key adoption drivers: guideline-based step-up from monotherapy, need for improved blood-pressure control, and tolerability profiles that support long-term therapy.
  • Pricing and volume drivers: generic penetration for both components and for many FDC presentations.

Competitive positioning

  • The FDC competes against:
    • ARB + thiazide-type diuretic combinations,
    • ACE inhibitor + thiazide combinations,
    • ARB + calcium channel blocker combinations,
    • single-pill dual therapies from multiple manufacturers.
  • Competitive pressure is strongest where generic substitution is active and where payers favor lowest net cost.

External demand tailwinds

  • Hypertension prevalence growth and treatment intensification remain stable long-term demand inputs.
  • But market growth for an established ARB + thiazide FDC is typically constrained by:
    • generic price erosion,
    • payer formulary switching,
    • clinical guideline shifts toward specific preferred combinations and fixed-dose regimens.

Market data anchoring

  • A complete, single-number market size call for this exact FDC is difficult to state from the public record without narrowing to a specific geography and product definition (strength-specific FDC vs class-level).
  • For business planning, the class-level dynamics (ARB + diuretic dual therapy as a continuing preference category) are the more robust signal. Source: WHO ATC classification (C09DA) framework and drug taxonomy use in markets [2].
    • ATC classification confirms therapeutic category grouping for combinations of ARBs with diuretics, which is how commercial market sizing is commonly structured in databases. [2]

What is the projection for 3-5 years: volume, pricing, and share?

Base-case projection logic (established FDC)

For an ARB + thiazide FDC where both actives are old and many products are generic:

  • Volume: likely stable to modestly growing in line with hypertension treated populations and regimen adherence trends toward single-pill combinations.
  • Net revenue: more likely to be flat to declining due to generic price compression.
  • Share: can shift between strengths, pack sizes, and payer-preferred SKUs.

Key scenario variables

Pricing erosion

  • Expected to continue due to generic competition and tender-based contracting.
  • Any revenue lift would more likely come from preferred placement or strength-specific rebates rather than breakthrough pricing.

Formulary dynamics

  • Payers typically rationalize to a limited set of dual therapies, often selecting lowest-cost or best-covered brands.
  • If a manufacturer holds a preferred position for a given strength range, it can maintain volume even as unit prices fall.

Clinical and adherence behavior

  • Fixed-dose dual therapy maintains uptake because it improves persistence compared with multi-pill regimens in routine care patterns.
  • But that advantage is strongest in early line therapy, and less so when patients later switch due to side effects or kidney function changes.

Technology cycle risk

  • Newer antihypertensives can steal attention, but ARB + diuretic combinations remain guideline-consistent and commercially resilient because they are effective, safe, and inexpensive.

Bottom line projection

  • For revenue: modest downside or flat trend is more probable than sustained growth.
  • For demand: steady baseline is more probable than steep decline.
  • For product-level strategy: strength optimization and payer targeting matter more than brand-new clinical differentiation.

What regulatory and safety benchmarks matter to commercialization?

Mechanism-of-action considerations that drive label and use

  • Candesartan (ARB) reduces angiotensin II mediated vasoconstriction and aldosterone secretion.
  • Hydrochlorothiazide (thiazide diuretic) supports sodium and water excretion.

Safety profile that affects utilization

  • Typical ARB-class risks: renal function changes, hyperkalemia, hypotension in volume-depleted patients.
  • Typical thiazide-class risks: hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hyperuricemia, glucose changes in susceptible patients.

Clinical monitoring compliance

  • For chronic use, real-world utilization depends on routine lab monitoring and dose adjustment pathways.

Classification anchor

  • ATC category C09DA covers angiotensin II receptor antagonist combined with diuretics, the market taxonomy used by many databases and commercial intelligence tools. Source: WHO ATC classification [2].

What is the competitive landscape and pricing pressure?

Market competition map (practical)

  • Direct FDC competitors: other ARB + thiazide FDCs with overlapping strength ranges.
  • Indirect dual-therapy competitors: ARB + calcium channel blocker FDCs and ACE inhibitor + diuretic FDCs.
  • Monotherapy substitution: less common when a patient requires intensification, but it happens when titration rules or cost controls favor single agents.

Generic substitution

  • Given the long commercial history of both actives, generic erosion is the dominant commercial fact.
  • The economic outcome depends on:
    • payer contract terms,
    • supply reliability,
    • ability to defend preferred SKU status.

Where differentiation can still exist

  • Strength-specific availability and dosing flexibility.
  • Patient adherence via single-pill formulations and tolerability management.
  • Packaging, distribution coverage, and rebate execution.

What does “clinical trials update” mean for investors and developers now?

Expectations for new interventional evidence

  • For an established FDC, clinical trial “signal” typically does not mean new efficacy superiority.
  • It usually means one of:
    • confirming bioequivalence for reformulation,
    • providing local evidence in specific populations,
    • comparing adherence endpoints, or
    • updating safety surveillance.

What to watch in registries

Use public registry activity as a screening tool for:

  • ongoing formulation or pharmacokinetic studies,
  • end-of-study dates that can yield publication or regulatory documentation,
  • any recruiting interventional trial using meaningful endpoints (BP control, persistence, discontinuation rates).

Registry anchor

  • Trial activity visibility should be checked through ClinicalTrials.gov for interventional record updates. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov [1].

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical pipeline: public registries show limited late-stage interventional activity that would typically change global labeling for the candesartan cilexetil + hydrochlorothiazide FDC; visible activity is more consistent with incremental studies than new registrational breakthroughs. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov [1].
  • Market outlook: demand is structurally supported by chronic hypertension treatment and fixed-dose dual therapy adoption, but revenue growth is constrained by generic price pressure.
  • Projection (3-5 years): likely stable to modestly growing volume with flat to declining unit economics, making payer contracting and strength-specific SKU strategy the primary levers.
  • Commercial focus: differentiation is more likely to come from formulary execution, packaging, and strength availability than from new clinical claims.

FAQs

1) Is there meaningful late-stage clinical development for the specific FDC now?
Public registry visibility suggests no dominant late-stage registrational wave specific to the FDC as a whole; activity is largely incremental and not characterized by major label-changing interventional programs. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov [1].

2) What drives prescribing of candesartan cilexetil + hydrochlorothiazide?
Guideline step-up for hypertension after monotherapy and the practical benefit of single-pill dual therapy for adherence and blood pressure control. (Category context: ARB + diuretic) [2].

3) Why is market revenue less resilient than volume for this product type?
Ongoing generic competition for both actives and many FDC presentations leads to continuous net-price erosion under payer contracting.

4) What safety monitoring determines real-world persistence?
Routine labs and dose adjustment for renal function, electrolytes (potassium, sodium), and blood pressure in chronic use.

5) How is this FDC typically categorized in market analytics?
Under ATC category C09DA (angiotensin II receptor antagonist combined with diuretics), which maps it to dual-therapy competition sets and sizing models. Source: WHO ATC [2].


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide studies (search results portal). U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[2] World Health Organization. (n.d.). ATC classification: C09DA (Angiotensin II receptor antagonists, plain + diuretics). WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. https://www.whocc.no/atc/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.