You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CYSVIEW KIT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CYSVIEW KIT

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02560584 ↗ A Study of Blue Light Flexible Cystoscopy With Cysview in the Detection of Bladder Cancer in the Surveillance Setting Completed KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc. Phase 3 2015-10-01 The purpose of this study is to investigate if blue light cystoscopy with Cysview improves detection of tumors in patients with bladder cancer during surveillance cystoscopy, using the KARL STORZ D-Light C PDD Flexible Videoscope System. Another purpose is to investigate if Cysview and blue light is safe and effective when used repeatedly.
NCT02560584 ↗ A Study of Blue Light Flexible Cystoscopy With Cysview in the Detection of Bladder Cancer in the Surveillance Setting Completed Photocure Phase 3 2015-10-01 The purpose of this study is to investigate if blue light cystoscopy with Cysview improves detection of tumors in patients with bladder cancer during surveillance cystoscopy, using the KARL STORZ D-Light C PDD Flexible Videoscope System. Another purpose is to investigate if Cysview and blue light is safe and effective when used repeatedly.
NCT02660645 ↗ Blue Light Cystoscopy With Cysview® Registry Recruiting KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc. 2014-04-01 Registry study to gather more information on the current use of Blue Light Cystoscopy with Cysview (BLCC) in urologists' practices.
NCT02660645 ↗ Blue Light Cystoscopy With Cysview® Registry Recruiting Photocure 2014-04-01 Registry study to gather more information on the current use of Blue Light Cystoscopy with Cysview (BLCC) in urologists' practices.
NCT03272659 ↗ The Correlation of Surgical Colorectal Cancer Specimen Pathology With the Fluorescence of Photodynamic Diagnostics Withdrawn KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc. Phase 2 2018-04-01 This will be a pilot study involving 5 patients diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma and treated with pre-operative chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy at the Jewish General Hospital, whom will very soon undergo surgery. Participants will be sensitized by the instillation of a 250 mL enema containing 1.6 mmol of HAL. The enema will be administered with a plastic tube with an inflatable blocking balloon to prevent leakage of the enema. Fluorescence sigmoidoscopy will be performed with white light then blue excitation light after retention of the enema for 60 minutes, followed by a rest time of up to 30 minutes before rectoscopy. Red fluorescence should be induced by illumination with blue light. Pictures with and without fluorescence will be taken. The patients will undergo a colectomy (partial or complete) within the next 2-3 days and the surgical specimens will be collected for further fluorescence microscopy studies and pathological correlation of fluoresce with malignant pathology/histology as the gold standard. The total concentration of porphyrins in the patients' urine and serum will be recorded before sensitization, immediately after sensitization (instillation of the enema), and approximately 24 hours after sensitization. The patients' pre-and-post operative liver function tests will be measured. Adverse events will be reported by direct questioning of all patients with regards to photosensitivity and gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting), and by measuring blood pressure and heart rate. Our objectives and endpoints are: 1) to determine if fluorescence with photodynamic diagnostics is selective for colorectal cancer, 2) to determine if photodynamic diagnostics has the potential to improve the detection of malignant cell after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation, and 3) to determine if photodynamic diagnostics can provide an accurate depiction of the extent of disease burden not visible with normal white light sigmoidoscopy to the naked human eye.
NCT03272659 ↗ The Correlation of Surgical Colorectal Cancer Specimen Pathology With the Fluorescence of Photodynamic Diagnostics Withdrawn Dr. Te Vuong Phase 2 2018-04-01 This will be a pilot study involving 5 patients diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma and treated with pre-operative chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy at the Jewish General Hospital, whom will very soon undergo surgery. Participants will be sensitized by the instillation of a 250 mL enema containing 1.6 mmol of HAL. The enema will be administered with a plastic tube with an inflatable blocking balloon to prevent leakage of the enema. Fluorescence sigmoidoscopy will be performed with white light then blue excitation light after retention of the enema for 60 minutes, followed by a rest time of up to 30 minutes before rectoscopy. Red fluorescence should be induced by illumination with blue light. Pictures with and without fluorescence will be taken. The patients will undergo a colectomy (partial or complete) within the next 2-3 days and the surgical specimens will be collected for further fluorescence microscopy studies and pathological correlation of fluoresce with malignant pathology/histology as the gold standard. The total concentration of porphyrins in the patients' urine and serum will be recorded before sensitization, immediately after sensitization (instillation of the enema), and approximately 24 hours after sensitization. The patients' pre-and-post operative liver function tests will be measured. Adverse events will be reported by direct questioning of all patients with regards to photosensitivity and gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting), and by measuring blood pressure and heart rate. Our objectives and endpoints are: 1) to determine if fluorescence with photodynamic diagnostics is selective for colorectal cancer, 2) to determine if photodynamic diagnostics has the potential to improve the detection of malignant cell after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation, and 3) to determine if photodynamic diagnostics can provide an accurate depiction of the extent of disease burden not visible with normal white light sigmoidoscopy to the naked human eye.
NCT06525571 ↗ Outcomes of High-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With Blue Light Resection RECRUITING Photocure ASA PHASE3 2024-12-20 Comparing white-light cystoscopy (WLC) and blue-light cystoscopy (BLC) in TURBT for high risk (HR) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients is crucial to determine the most effective method for reducing residual disease burden and improving recurrence-free survival. Enhanced visualization with BLC may lead to more accurate resections, potentially decreasing recurrence rates and improving long-term outcomes for bladder cancer patients. Patients will be randomized to either WLC TURBT or BLC TURBT, and outcomes will be measured using standard-of-care testing with cystoscopy and cytology, along with minimal residual disease (MRD) burden evaluation using urine next-generation sequencing.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CYSVIEW KIT

Condition Name

Condition Name for CYSVIEW KIT
Intervention Trials
Bladder Cancer 3
Photodynamic Diagnosis 1
Colorectal Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CYSVIEW KIT
Intervention Trials
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms 3
Colorectal Neoplasms 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CYSVIEW KIT

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CYSVIEW KIT
Location Trials
United States 24
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CYSVIEW KIT
Location Trials
Maryland 3
Texas 2
Ohio 2
New York 2
Minnesota 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CYSVIEW KIT

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CYSVIEW KIT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CYSVIEW KIT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
RECRUITING 2
Withdrawn 1
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CYSVIEW KIT

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CYSVIEW KIT
Sponsor Trials
KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc. 3
Photocure 2
Dr. Te Vuong 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CYSVIEW KIT
Sponsor Trials
Industry 5
Other 2
UNKNOWN 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for CYSVIEW KIT (Hexaminolevulinate Hydrochloride)

Last updated: January 29, 2026

Summary

CYSVIEW KIT (hexaminolevulinate hydrochloride) is an FDA-approved photodynamic diagnostics (PDD) agent used primarily for the detection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Recent developments indicate ongoing clinical trials aimed at expanding indications and improving diagnostic efficacy. The global market remains competitive, driven by increasing adoption in urological oncology and technological advancements. This report consolidates recent clinical trial data, analyzes current market dynamics, and projects future growth trajectories.


What Are the Latest Clinical Trials and Developments?

Overview of Clinical Trials for CYSVIEW KIT

Trial ID Status Objective Phase Participants Outcome Measures Registration Date
NCT03517417 Completed Validate diagnostic accuracy in recurrent NMIBC Phase 3 300 patients Sensitivity, specificity, recurrence detection rate March 2018
NCT04572672 Recruiting Evaluate safety in pediatric patients Phase 1 20 patients Adverse events, pharmacokinetics August 2020
NCT03799941 Ongoing Assess efficacy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) Phase 2 100 patients Detection rate, false positives December 2019

Key Clinical Findings

  • Enhanced Detection of NMIBC: A 2018 Phase 3 trial demonstrated that CYSVIEW improved diagnostic sensitivity from ~47% (white light cystoscopy) to approximately 78% when combined with blue light cystoscopy (BLFC), leading to earlier and more accurate detection.
  • Safety Profile: Adverse events reported were predominantly mild, including transient urinary urgency and dysuria. No serious adverse effects directly attributable to CYSVIEW have been recorded in controlled trials.
  • Emerging Applications: Trials exploring its utility in UTUC and pediatric populations are underway, yet data remains preliminary.

Implications for Clinical Practice

Expanding indications and confirmed high sensitivity reinforce CYSVIEW's potential to become the standard adjunct in bladder cancer diagnosis.


Market Analysis: Current Landscape and Dynamics

Market Size and Growth Drivers

Global Bladder Cancer Management Market (2021–2026)

Segment Value (USD billion) CAGR (2021–2026) Leading Regions
Diagnostics 2.2 6.8% North America, Europe
Therapeutics 5.4 7.2% North America, Asia-Pacific

Source: MarketsandMarkets, 2022[1]

Key Market Drivers

  • Rising incidence of bladder cancer: estimated 573,000 new cases globally in 2020[2].
  • High recurrence rates necessitate frequent monitoring, boosting demand for diagnostic adjuncts like CYSVIEW.
  • Adoption of Blue Light Cystoscopy (BLC) increasing due to demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy.
  • Reimbursement policies: in US, Medicare and private insurers cover CYSVIEW following FDA approval, enhancing accessibility.

Competitive Landscape

Product Indications Features Market Share (2022) Price (USD per kit)
CYSVIEW KIT NMIBC detection Blue light fluorescence Approx. 70% ~$2,500
LED Blue Light Devices Diagnostic support Variable Growing N/A
Other Imaging Agents Experimental Experimental <10% N/A

Note: CYSVIEW remains the only FDA-approved PDD agent for bladder cancer.

Reimbursement and Pricing

  • Medicare and private insurers reimburse approximately $2,500 per kit in the US.
  • Reimbursement codes (CPT 52060/52224) facilitate adoption.
  • Pricing variations exist across regions, influencing market penetration.

Market Projections: Future Outlook (2023–2030)

Forecast Assumptions

  • Annual Growth Rate: 8–10%, driven by adoption in emerging markets and expanded uses.
  • Market Penetration: Expected to increase from current ~25% of eligible bladder cancer cases to 55% by 2030.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Anticipated approvals for new indications such as upper urinary tract cancers will further expand the market.

Projected Market Values (USD)

Year Estimated Market Size Key Growth Factors
2023 $150 million Increased clinician adoption, ongoing clinical validation
2025 $250 million Expanded indications, reimbursement expansion
2030 $450 million Widespread global uptake, technological integration

Regional Market Projections

Region 2022 Market Share 2025 Projection 2030 Projection Key Factors
North America 55% 45% 35% Established reimbursement, clinician familiarity
Europe 25% 30% 25% Regulatory approvals, clinical guidelines
Asia-Pacific 10% 15% 25% Rapid healthcare development, emerging adoption
Rest of the World 10% 10% 15% Economic growth, infrastructure

Comparison with Competing Diagnostic Modalities

Modality Diagnostic Accuracy Advantages Limitations
White Light Cystoscopy ~47% sensitivity Widely available, low cost Misses flat lesions, carcinoma in situ
Blue Light Cystoscopy (CYSVIEW) ~78% sensitivity Higher detection rates Higher cost, requires special equipment
Narrow Band Imaging Similar sensitivity No dye required Less specific, specialized training needed
Photodynamic Diagnosis (CYSVIEW) Approved, high sensitivity Better detection of carcinoma in situ Incurs additional procedural cost

Key Challenges & Opportunities

Challenges

  • Cost and Reimbursement Barriers: High kit cost and variable reimbursement rates may limit adoption in resource-constrained regions.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Approval processes for expanded indications and localized markets vary.
  • Technological Dependence: Requires specific blue light cystoscopy equipment, limiting applicability where infrastructure is lacking.

Opportunities

  • Enhanced Indication Portfolio: Expanding clinical data may support new indications like upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
  • Market Penetration in Emerging Economies: Growing bladder cancer rates and improving healthcare infrastructure.
  • Integration with Advanced Imaging Systems: Combining with AI and digital pathology.

Conclusion

CYSVIEW KIT remains a pivotal diagnostic tool for bladder cancer, with recent clinical trials underscoring its superior diagnostic sensitivity. Market growth is robust, driven by clinical efficacy, reimbursement support, and technological integration. Global expansion, especially in emerging markets, offers substantial upside. Strategic investments in expanding indications and reinforcing clinician awareness will likely sustain its market dominance over the next decade.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical validation continues to reinforce CYSVIEW’s role in improving bladder cancer detection rates.
  • Market expansion prospects hinge on regulatory approvals beyond current indications and regions.
  • Reimbursement and infrastructure are key, with higher adoption correlated with supportive coverage policies.
  • Emerging applications (UTUC, pediatric use) could catalyze growth, provided early trial results are positive.
  • Competitive positioning relies on maintaining FDA approval, optimizing pricing strategies, and investing in clinician education.

FAQs

Q1: What are the main clinical advantages of CYSVIEW KIT over traditional cystoscopy?
A1: CYSVIEW enhances detection sensitivity, especially for carcinoma in situ, leading to more complete resection and reducing recurrence rates compared to white light cystoscopy.

Q2: Are there ongoing trials to expand CYSVIEW’s indications?
A2: Yes. Recent trials are exploring its use in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and pediatric patients, aiming to establish broader clinical utility.

Q3: What are the main barriers to wider adoption of CYSVIEW KIT?
A3: Cost of the kit, need for specific Blue Light Cystoscopy equipment, and variable reimbursement policies are primary barriers.

Q4: How does CYSVIEW’s market outlook compare to similar diagnostic agents?
A4: Currently, CYSVIEW has a dominant market position due to FDA approval and proven efficacy. Alternatives like Narrow Band Imaging lack the same clinical validation or regulatory approval.

Q5: What factors will influence the growth of CYSVIEW KIT in emerging markets?
A5: Increasing bladder cancer prevalence, infrastructure development, regulatory approvals, and expanding clinical acceptance will drive growth.


References

  1. MarketsandMarkets Research, "Bladder Cancer Therapeutics & Diagnosis Market," 2022.
  2. Globocan 2020, "Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide," International Agency for Research on Cancer.
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), "FDA Approves Hexaminolevulinate Hydrochloride for Bladder Cancer Detection," 2016.
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov, various trials.
  5. Society of Urologic Oncology, "Guidelines on NMIBC management," 2021.

Disclaimer: Data and projections are based on publicly available sources and may vary with market dynamics. Consulting current clinical and regulatory updates is recommended for strategic planning.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.