Last Updated: June 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CYCLOSERINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CYCLOSERINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000194 ↗ Neurobiology of Opioid Dependence: 3 - 3 Withdrawn National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 2 1993-01-01 The purpose of this study is to study the effects of cycloserine on naloxone-precipitated opiate withdrawal.
NCT00000194 ↗ Neurobiology of Opioid Dependence: 3 - 3 Withdrawn Yale University Phase 2 1993-01-01 The purpose of this study is to study the effects of cycloserine on naloxone-precipitated opiate withdrawal.
NCT00000371 ↗ Trial of D-Cycloserine in Schizophrenia Completed Massachusetts General Hospital Phase 3 1996-08-01 To characterize further the effects of D-cycloserine augmentation of antipsychotic treatment on negative symptoms, performance on neurocognitive tasks, and on markers for glutamatergic, dopaminergic and serotonergic function in serum and cerebrospinal fluid. To determine if negative symptoms and cognitive function improve over time, if these improvements meaningfully impact quality of life factors, if they correlate with markers of neuronal function, and if subpopulations can be identified according to response. Dysfunction of glutamatergic neuronal systems has recently been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia based on the finding that non-competitive inhibitors of the NMDA receptor can reproduce in normals the positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive deficits of schizophrenia. Furthermore, glutamatergic dysfunction may alter forebrain dopaminergic neuronal activity, a system central to the antipsychotic action of typical neuroleptics. It is believed that enhancing NMDA receptor function by systemic treatment with D-cycloserine, a partial agonist at the glycine modulatory site of the NMDA receptor, will reduce symptoms in schizophrenia. Sixty schizophrenic outpatients with prominent, primary negative symptoms are treated with antipsychotic medication and are randomly assigned to D-cycloserine or placebo for a 6-month, fixed-dose trial. The primary outcome measure is the total score on the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). A neuropsychological battery, which emphasizes tests sensitive to prefrontal cortical function, is administered. Blood is obtained at several time points and CSF is obtained at Week 8 for assay of concentrations of D-cycloserine, glutamate, HVA, and 5HIAA.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CYCLOSERINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CYCLOSERINE
Intervention Trials
Schizophrenia 12
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder 9
Major Depressive Disorder 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CYCLOSERINE
Intervention Trials
Disease 19
Depression 18
Depressive Disorder 16
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CYCLOSERINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CYCLOSERINE
Location Trials
United States 115
China 44
Canada 11
Germany 5
Israel 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CYCLOSERINE
Location Trials
Massachusetts 23
New York 15
Texas 9
Florida 9
Illinois 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CYCLOSERINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CYCLOSERINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 16
Phase 3 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CYCLOSERINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 73
Recruiting 16
Unknown status 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CYCLOSERINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CYCLOSERINE
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) 15
Massachusetts General Hospital 15
University of Calgary 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CYCLOSERINE
Sponsor Trials
Other 203
NIH 29
Industry 17
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Cycloserine Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity/Entry Risks for TB and MDR-TB Use

Last updated: May 20, 2026

Cycloserine remains a narrow, legacy antibiotic used for tuberculosis (TB) and multidrug-resistant (MDR-TB), typically as part of combination therapy. Clinical-trial activity is sparse and largely reformulation or mechanistic rather than late-stage, registrational development. Market size is driven by the incidence of drug-resistant TB, country TB program procurement, and stewardship restrictions tied to neurotoxicity risk. Near-term upside is more dependent on TB program funding and guideline adoption than on new-label expansion.

What is cycloserine used for clinically and how is it positioned in MDR-TB regimens?

Cycloserine (active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis) is used primarily in TB regimens when first-line options are limited by resistance or intolerance. Its clinical role is anchored in combination therapy for drug-resistant disease, especially MDR-TB, where tolerability and regimen potency are balanced against safety.

Common clinical positioning

  • MDR-TB and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) regimens as a second-line component.
  • Use is usually reserved due to central nervous system (CNS) and neuropsychiatric adverse effects (the principal limiting factor for dosing and adherence).
  • Continued use depends on local susceptibility testing practices and regimen design standards.

Evidence base structure

  • For legacy antibiotics like cycloserine, clinical evidence is typically dated and not centered on modern, placebo-controlled phase 3 programs.
  • Current practice is more influenced by guideline-based regimen construction and regimen outcomes than by new pivotal trials.

What dosing constraints and safety signals limit broader clinical adoption?

Key limitation is neurotoxicity risk. This affects:

  • Monitoring requirements (psychiatric and neurologic status).
  • Treatment interruptions or dose reductions.
  • Real-world effectiveness, because regimen completion matters for MDR-TB outcomes.

What does the latest cycloserine clinical trials landscape show in 2024-2026?

Cycloserine’s trial landscape is characterized by limited sponsor-heavy late-stage activity. Where trials exist, they tend to be:

  • Small, investigator-led studies.
  • PK/PD, therapeutic drug monitoring, or safety characterization.
  • Reformulation or manufacturing-reliability work needed for continuity of supply.

Featured snippet answer: No dominant global phase 3 registrational program with a clean readout pathway has become the center of cycloserine’s current development cycle; clinical activity is focused on operational use constraints (PK, safety, monitoring) and supply continuity rather than new indications.

Are there ongoing phase 3 trials for cycloserine in drug-resistant TB?

Clinical development for cycloserine has historically not followed the modern “new chemical entity” pattern. For ongoing trials, the operational intent typically determines endpoints:

  • Safety endpoints such as neuropsychiatric adverse events.
  • PK endpoints supporting therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).
  • Regimen-level outcomes when included in combination cohorts.

Do new formulations or dose-optimization studies exist for cycloserine?

Reformulation or route optimization can be relevant because cycloserine tolerability and adherence affect regimen completion:

  • Controlled-release or bioavailability-focused studies, where pursued, aim to reduce peak-related side effects.
  • TDM studies aim to keep exposures within a safer therapeutic window.

What is the latest regulatory status of cycloserine in the US and major markets?

Cycloserine is an established drug in TB therapy. In the US, the key regulatory instrument for generics and formulation changes is the FDA’s Orange Book listing status tied to existing approvals and patent/regulatory exclusivities where applicable.

Featured snippet answer: Cycloserine is not in a “new drug exclusivity” phase like modern TB agents; it is primarily an established, off-patent legacy antibiotic where regulatory differentiation typically comes from formulation and manufacturing.

What is the Orange Book status of cycloserine?

A complete Orange Book mapping requires drug-specific NDC labeling and the exact FDA product listing. Without that mapping, it is not possible to state the patent/exclusivity posture by US product-strength and dosage form in a way that is operationally usable for freedom-to-operate.

Does cycloserine have FDA fast-track, breakthrough, or priority review designations?

For a legacy antibiotic, development programs that justify modern designation pathways are uncommon. For operational strategy, the priority is typically supply reliability and sourcing, not accelerated review.

How big is the cycloserine market and what drives demand?

Cycloserine demand is less about general TB incidence and more about the share of patients treated for drug-resistant TB, regimen availability, and procurement at national program levels.

Demand drivers

  • MDR-TB and XDR-TB prevalence.
  • Treatment guidelines that include cycloserine in background regimens.
  • Patient access and affordability through national TB programs and donor funding.
  • Availability risk when supply disruptions occur.
  • Toxicity-management capacity (monitoring and TDM access).

Market segments that matter

  • Public sector procurement (high relevance).
  • Hospital or clinic dispensing within MDR-TB specialty programs.
  • Procurement channels tied to WHO TB frameworks and national tenders.

What is the revenue pool logic for cycloserine?

Because cycloserine is generic/legacy, revenue is split among:

  • Generic manufacturers by country.
  • Contract manufacturing and tender pricing.
  • Formulation availability by strength and dosage form.

This creates a market that is price-sensitive with low margin elasticity to volume unless supply constraints emerge.

How do price, supply continuity, and neurotoxicity risk affect cycloserine adoption and demand?

Price sensitivity

  • MDR-TB programs bargain aggressively.
  • Competitive generics compress pricing, so volume growth must be driven by program scale or supply stabilization.

Supply continuity

  • TB programs do not tolerate shortages.
  • If manufacturers exit or fail quality checks, procurement shifts to available suppliers.

Neurotoxicity

  • Real-world usage depends on monitoring and patient selection.
  • Exposure management can be a limiting factor for uptake in lower-resource settings.

What is the competitive landscape for cycloserine (generics, sourcing, and manufacturing barriers)?

Competition is mainly generic and supply-chain driven. The differentiators are:

  • Regulatory compliance and quality systems.
  • Manufacturing scalability at required strengths and package formats.
  • Stability and bioequivalence outcomes (for generic or reformulated products).
  • Ability to meet tender volumes and delivery schedules.

Which company dynamics are likely to dominate supply in the next 24 months?

For legacy antibacterials, consolidation and manufacturing capacity constraints shape the supply picture. Without a product-level NDC and manufacturer dataset, it is not possible to name specific “top suppliers” with high confidence.

What is the patent and exclusivity estate for cycloserine and when does it lose exclusivity?

For freedom-to-operate and launch timing, the controlling factors are:

  • Any remaining formulation patents (if present) tied to specific dosage forms or manufacturing methods.
  • Any method-of-use patents (less common for established antibiotics, but possible for regimen protocols).
  • The absence of new composition-of-matter exclusivity for the active ingredient itself.

Featured snippet answer: For strategic planning, cycloserine is treated as a legacy active with minimal active substance exclusivity; remaining IP, if any, would most likely be formulation or method-specific and therefore highly product- and jurisdiction-dependent.

Do Orange Book listings create entry barriers for generic cycloserine?

Generic entry barriers, if any, are mediated by:

  • Product-specific patent listings.
  • Any method-of-use patents that could be asserted if a generic label includes a protected use statement.
  • Orange Book exclusivity blocks tied to specific NDA/BLA products and dosage forms.

A complete “how many patents cover cycloserine” analysis requires product-NDC mapping and patent-number extraction from the Orange Book.

What Paragraph IV challenges could affect cycloserine generic entry?

Paragraph IV challenges are relevant when:

  • A listed patent blocks generic approval.
  • The sponsor has a clear basis to challenge or carve out a patent.

Featured snippet answer: No single, identifiable Paragraph IV event set can be stated without a product-level Orange Book and litigation dossier; for legacy drugs like cycloserine, most patent contests are sporadic and formulation-specific.

What patent litigation history exists for cycloserine that impacts market entry risk?

Patent litigation for legacy antibiotics usually centers on:

  • Formulation composition or process patents.
  • Method-of-use claims that align with label language.

Featured snippet answer: A deterministic litigation-impact map cannot be produced without case-by-case retrieval of cycloserine-specific docket numbers and asserted patents by jurisdiction.

How strong is the patent estate for cycloserine, and what are the typical IP/IPR barriers for entrants?

For most legacy active ingredients:

  • Composition-of-matter IP has expired.
  • Remaining IP is narrower and easier to design around.

Operational barrier profile

  • Label carve-outs for method-of-use claims.
  • Formulation design and bioequivalence work for tablet/capsule strengths.
  • Manufacturing process controls if process patents are asserted.

What generic launch scenarios exist for cycloserine and what risks remain?

Generic launch scenarios depend on:

  • Whether a specific product’s listed patents still block approval.
  • Whether settlements require design modifications or non-launch periods.
  • Whether there are secondary exclusivities tied to specific reference products.

Featured snippet answer: The practical generic-entry risk for cycloserine typically comes from product-specific formulation patents or label-based method-of-use restrictions, not from active-ingredient exclusivity.

How does cycloserine compare with other TB second-line agents from a market and development standpoint?

Cycloserine competes within the TB second-line “background regimen” bucket where:

  • Usage is guideline-driven and susceptibility-guided.
  • Uptake is limited by toxicity.
  • Modern drug developers may displace legacy agents when new, better-tolerated options enter guidelines.

Market implication

  • Cycloserine market growth is constrained unless newer regimens still require legacy components or unless supply stability issues create continued demand.

Which attributes decide whether cycloserine remains in regimens?

  • Tolerability and monitoring feasibility.
  • Susceptibility patterns.
  • Regimen outcome data at the patient level.

Clinical trial pipeline: what endpoints and study designs are most likely to matter for cycloserine?

For legacy antibiotics, studies that move the needle usually focus on operational constraints:

  • Therapeutic drug monitoring and exposure-response relationships.
  • Safety characterization (neuropsychiatric monitoring tools).
  • Regimen feasibility in real-world program settings.

Study designs likely to appear

  • Prospective PK/TDM cohorts.
  • Retrospective adverse event validation with dosing-adjustment algorithms.
  • Small comparative studies of formulations or dosing strategies.

Key takeaways

  • Cycloserine remains clinically relevant in TB drug-resistant regimens, but development is not driven by large late-stage registrational trials.
  • Demand is procurement- and guideline-anchored, with neurotoxicity risk and monitoring capacity as practical limiting factors.
  • Market upside is constrained by generic competition and limited labeling expansion potential.
  • IP and generic entry risk, where present, would be formulation- and label-specific rather than active-ingredient exclusivity, making freedom-to-operate highly product- and jurisdiction-dependent.

FAQs

  1. Does cycloserine require therapeutic drug monitoring in MDR-TB patients?
  2. What neuropsychiatric adverse events most commonly drive cycloserine dose reductions?
  3. How do TB treatment guidelines decide when to use cycloserine versus other second-line agents?
  4. Can reformulated cycloserine reduce peak-related neurotoxicity compared with immediate-release?
  5. What product-specific data is needed to assess Orange Book patent barriers for cycloserine generics?

References (APA)

  1. [No citable sources were provided in the prompt.]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.