Last Updated: July 2, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR COTELLIC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for COTELLIC

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01656642 ↗ A Phase 1b Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Vemurafenib or Vemurafenib Plus Cobimetinib in Participants With BRAFV600-Mutation Positive Metastatic Melanoma Completed Genentech, Inc. Phase 1 2012-08-13 This is an open-label, multicenter, Phase Ib, dose-escalation and cohort-expansion study of atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1] antibody) in combination with vemurafenib or vemurafenib plus cobimetinib in participants with BRAFV600-mutation positive metastatic melanoma. Enrolled participants may continue treatment until they are no longer experiencing clinical benefit as assessed by the investigator and in alignment with the protocol.
NCT01928394 ↗ A Study of Nivolumab by Itself or Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Active, not recruiting Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 1/Phase 2 2013-10-24 To investigate the safety and efficacy of nivolumab as a single agent or in combination with ipilimumab in 6 tumor types - triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), gastric cancer (GC), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), bladder cancer (BC), and ovarian cancer (OC). A combination of nivolumab with ipilimumab and cobimetinib is also investigated in PC.
NCT02060188 ↗ An Investigational Immuno-therapy Study of Nivolumab, and Nivolumab in Combination With Other Anti-cancer Drugs, in Colon Cancer That Has Come Back or Has Spread Active, not recruiting Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 2 2014-03-12 The purpose of this study is to examine if Nivolumab by itself, or Nivolumab in combination with other anti-cancer drugs, will result in meaningful tumor size reduction, in patients with colon cancer that has come back or has spread, and who have a specific biomarker in their tumors.
NCT02091141 ↗ My Pathway: A Study Evaluating Herceptin/Perjeta, Tarceva, Zelboraf/Cotellic, Erivedge, Alecensa, and Tecentriq Treatment Targeted Against Certain Molecular Alterations in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors Active, not recruiting Genentech, Inc. Phase 2 2014-04-14 This multicenter, non-randomized, open-label study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of six treatment regimens in participants with advanced solid tumors for whom therapies that will convey clinical benefit are not available and/or are not suitable options per the treating physician's judgment.
NCT02303951 ↗ Neoadjuvant Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib + Atezolizumab in Melanoma: NEO-VC Terminated University Hospital Tuebingen Phase 2 2015-01-22 Evaluation of the efficacy, safety and biologic effects of neo-adjuvant treatment with vemurafenib + cobimetinib + atezolizumab in patients with limited metastasis of melanoma in stage IIIC/IV melanoma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for COTELLIC

Condition Name

Condition Name for COTELLIC
Intervention Trials
Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8 3
Malignant Melanoma 3
Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8 3
Stage III Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for COTELLIC
Intervention Trials
Melanoma 11
Neoplasms 10
Carcinoma 9
Adenocarcinoma 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for COTELLIC

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for COTELLIC
Location Trials
United States 144
Italy 12
Spain 10
Australia 10
Brazil 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for COTELLIC
Location Trials
Texas 14
Tennessee 10
Oregon 8
Massachusetts 8
California 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for COTELLIC

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for COTELLIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
Phase 2 19
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for COTELLIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 18
Active, not recruiting 9
Not yet recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for COTELLIC

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for COTELLIC
Sponsor Trials
Genentech, Inc. 11
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 10
Hoffmann-La Roche 6
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for COTELLIC
Sponsor Trials
Other 33
Industry 25
NIH 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: April 28, 2026

Cotellic (cobimetinib): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and 2024-2029 Projection

What is Cotellic and where does it sit in the portfolio?

Cotellic is cobimetinib, an oral MEK1/2 inhibitor marketed by Genentech/Roche for oncology. The drug’s market position is tied to targeted combinations in solid tumors, with clinical activity concentrated in melanoma and broader MEK-pathway combinations.

Key commercial context

  • Primary label anchor: Combination with vemurafenib for unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma.
  • Competitive set: Direct MEK inhibitors (binimetinib, trametinib in overlapping settings) and broader pathway competitors in BRAF-mutant disease.
  • Monetization model: Combination regimens drive usage, with pricing and mix tied to BRAF mutation testing and treatment sequencing.

(Clinical and market projections below are constructed from public trial registries, label indications, and oncology market structure; they do not rely on internal sales data.)


What does the clinical trials pipeline show right now?

Cotellic’s development emphasis is on combination regimens built around MEK inhibition. Publicly available data show ongoing trials across:

  • BRAF-mutant melanoma (checkpoint combinations and MEK backbone combinations)
  • Solid tumors beyond melanoma (tumor-agnostic approaches and pathway-selected trials)
  • Resistance management strategies (sequencing or combination with other targeted and immuno-oncology agents)

Pipeline signal categories (how to read current activity)

  1. Registration-path trials: Trials designed to generate label-supporting efficacy endpoints.
  2. Expansion trials: Trials in additional populations or line settings using existing label anchors.
  3. Exploratory combinations: Early- to mid-stage studies aimed at safety, dose, and proof-of-mechanism.

Clinical update snapshots (public registry level)

  • Ongoing melanoma combination studies: Cobimetinib continues to be tested with immunotherapy backbones and targeted combinations aimed at improving response durability and survival outcomes in BRAF-mutant disease.
  • Cross-tumor MEK strategy: Trials extend MEK inhibition into other pathway-driven tumor contexts where MAPK signaling is implicated.
  • Ongoing safety/biomarker refinement: Studies track pharmacodynamic markers and resistance biomarkers to support regimen selection.

Actionable interpretation for investors and R&D

  • Cotellic’s clinical activity is not a single late-stage pivot but a portfolio of combination attempts, which is typical for MEK inhibitors where single-agent efficacy is limited and benefit depends on partner selection.
  • Any material market uplift depends on positive survival readouts or broadening label into additional BRAF/MEK-relevant populations, rather than incremental response-rate wins.

What are the most relevant competitive dynamics for MEK inhibitors?

MEK inhibitors are constrained by:

  • Class effect tolerability (rash, ocular events, diarrhea, cardiomyopathy) that affects dose intensity and switching behavior.
  • Evolving sequencing with BRAF-targeted triplets and checkpoint combinations that may reduce the share of MEK-only backbones.
  • Biomarker-driven patient identification: usage rises or falls with testing penetration and guideline treatment algorithms.

Competitive benchmark (high level)

  • Binimetinib competes in melanoma MEK-combination space.
  • Trametinib competes in MEK backbone regimens with its own combination ecosystem.
  • Third-agent strategies increasingly win attention as clinicians move toward triplets or IO-based backbones.

How big is the addressable market for Cotellic in melanoma and beyond?

Cotellic’s addressable market is defined by:

  1. BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma treated in frontline and subsequent settings where MEK inhibitors are used in combination.
  2. Second-line and post-progression use where current algorithms keep MEK options in the mix.
  3. Potential expansion into other BRAF/MEK-driven solid tumors if trials support label growth.
Market driver table (structural, not brand-internal) Driver Mechanism Market impact direction
BRAF testing adoption Determines eligible patient pool Up
Guideline regimen selection Shifts balance between IO, BRAF/MEK, and triplets Mixed
Combination partner choice Determines efficacy and tolerability Up if optimized
Safety management Dose modifications and discontinuation rates Mixed
Competition (other MEK inhibitors) Impacts share and payer positioning Down on price/share

What is the market outlook for cobimetinib: 2024-2029 projection?

The projection framework below uses:

  • oncology dosing patterns (MEK combination duration driven by response),
  • competitive class substitution,
  • the probability distribution typical for late-stage oncology pipeline outcomes,
  • and the known tendency of MEK inhibitors to face share pressure as standards shift.

Base-case unit share model (brand-level, projected) Because Cotellic’s growth is primarily label-and-line driven, the base-case trajectory is shaped by whether the combination ecosystem adds new label scope or improves line inclusion.

Projected commercial performance (global)

  • 2024: Mid-scale oncology brand sales in BRAF-mutant melanoma combination regimens.
  • 2025-2026: Flattish to modest decline pressure from competition and regimen sequencing changes.
  • 2027-2029: Mild recovery only if pipeline outcomes broaden usage or strengthen inclusion in treatment pathways; otherwise decline resumes.

Revenue projection bands (global)

Year Base-case revenue trend Upside conditions Downside conditions
2024 Stable to slight up Positive trial readouts that support broader use Payer or guideline shift away from MEK backbone
2025 Slight down Expansion approvals or strong payer contracting Reduced combo share vs triplets/IO-dominant strategies
2026 Slight down New label line expansion Safety-driven discontinuations or increased competition
2027 Turn to flat Demonstrated survival benefit in expansion populations Continued substitution by newer standards
2028-2029 Flat to modest down Durable label expansion and consistent adoption No new approvals, continued class compression

Projection takeaway

  • The base-case is a mature oncology brand with performance dominated by melanoma combination use, not by blockbuster expansion.
  • Material upside requires label-broadening clinical success that changes regimen selection at scale.

What would move Cotellic’s trajectory most?

Most likely high-impact events (in the order of market relevance)

  1. Regulatory label expansion based on late-stage evidence in melanoma or additional solid tumor contexts.
  2. Guideline adoption of Cotellic-containing combinations in new lines or populations.
  3. Partner optimization where cobimetinib is retained as MEK partner of choice versus class rivals.
  4. Competitive displacement if standards shift toward other MEK inhibitors or triplet/IO-first strategies that reduce MEK combination share.

Low-impact events

  • Early-phase response signals without a path to label support.
  • Minor biomarker-only readouts that do not change inclusion criteria.

Key Takeaways

  • Cotellic remains anchored to BRAF-mutant melanoma combination therapy, with clinical activity focused on combination strategies across melanoma and selected solid tumor contexts.
  • The pipeline pattern supports a mature franchise profile: growth depends on label expansion and guideline inclusion, not incremental efficacy.
  • The 2024-2029 outlook is flat to modest decline in the base case, with upside tied to regulatory or guideline-changing clinical results that broaden cobimetinib’s eligible populations or line usage.

FAQs

1) What is Cotellic’s main commercial indication?

Cotellic (cobimetinib) is used with vemurafenib for unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma.

2) Why is cobimetinib largely a combination-driven product?

MEK inhibitors depend on pathway inhibition in combination settings to generate durable clinical benefit, and tolerability constraints often shape use with partner selection.

3) What is the biggest market risk for cobimetinib through 2029?

Loss of share from evolving melanoma sequencing, including increased use of competing MEK inhibitors and IO or triplet-dominant strategies.

4) What event would most likely lift the revenue trajectory?

A late-stage readout that supports label expansion or changes guideline positioning for Cotellic-containing regimens in new populations or lines.

5) Does the pipeline suggest a major shift away from melanoma?

Public clinical activity indicates continued melanoma focus with cross-tumor exploration, but Cotellic’s market scaling remains most plausible through melanoma-driven label and guideline effects.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Cotellic (cobimetinib) Prescribing Information. FDA label documentation.
[2] European Medicines Agency. Cotellic (cobimetinib) Assessment Reports and Product Information. EMA documents.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies for cobimetinib (Cotellic): results and recruiting trials.
[4] Roche/Genentech. Cotellic (cobimetinib) product and development materials. Company resources.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.