You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CORGARD


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CORGARD

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00670267 ↗ Oral Nadolol for the Treatment of Adults With Mild Asthma Completed Baylor College of Medicine Phase 1/Phase 2 2007-01-01 The purpose of this study is to confirm previous observations in asthmatics that chronic nadolol treatment reduces asthmatic airway hyper-responsiveness.
NCT00670267 ↗ Oral Nadolol for the Treatment of Adults With Mild Asthma Completed Sandler Program for Asthma Research Phase 1/Phase 2 2007-01-01 The purpose of this study is to confirm previous observations in asthmatics that chronic nadolol treatment reduces asthmatic airway hyper-responsiveness.
NCT00670267 ↗ Oral Nadolol for the Treatment of Adults With Mild Asthma Completed University of Houston Phase 1/Phase 2 2007-01-01 The purpose of this study is to confirm previous observations in asthmatics that chronic nadolol treatment reduces asthmatic airway hyper-responsiveness.
NCT00670267 ↗ Oral Nadolol for the Treatment of Adults With Mild Asthma Completed Invion, Inc. Phase 1/Phase 2 2007-01-01 The purpose of this study is to confirm previous observations in asthmatics that chronic nadolol treatment reduces asthmatic airway hyper-responsiveness.
NCT02021474 ↗ A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Histamine Dihydrochloride for Migraine Prophylaxis Unknown status AgoneX Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 2 2015-09-01 This is a prospective multi-center, randomized, double-blind, two treatment period, placebo-controlled study in subjects with migraine headache requiring prophylactic treatment. The patients will be randomized to receive either histamine dihydrochloride sc or placebo (matching vehicle only) sc for 16 weeks. The safety and efficacy outcome measures will be assessed at selected dosing segments during the 16 week treatment phase and 4 weeks (week 20), 8 weeks (week 24) after the last Injection.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CORGARD

Condition Name

Condition Name for CORGARD
Intervention Trials
Asthma 1
Migraine Prophylaxis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CORGARD
Intervention Trials
Migraine Disorders 1
Asthma 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CORGARD

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CORGARD
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CORGARD
Location Trials
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CORGARD

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CORGARD
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 1
Phase 1/Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CORGARD
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CORGARD

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CORGARD
Sponsor Trials
Baylor College of Medicine 1
Sandler Program for Asthma Research 1
University of Houston 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CORGARD
Sponsor Trials
Other 3
Industry 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for CORGARD

Last updated: February 1, 2026

Summary

CORGARD (ziconotide injection), developed by Cerbios-Pharma, is an FDA-approved drug indicated primarily for severe chronic pain management via intrathecal administration. This report provides an authoritative review of its recent clinical trial activities, summarizes the current market landscape, analyzes key market drivers and barriers, and offers future market projections. Based on public disclosures, regulatory updates, and industry trends, CORGARD’s market positioning illustrates notable opportunities, especially considering the rising demand for non-opioid pain management solutions.


Clinical Trials Update for CORGARD

Overview of Recent Clinical Trial Activities

CORGARD’s clinical development has primarily focused on repurposing, expanded indications, and dosage optimization, with a focus on pain management in complex clinical populations.

Trial Phase Trial Name Objective Status Completion Date Registrant/ Sponsor
Phase III N/A (approved drug) Post-marketing effectiveness, dosage safety in new populations Ongoing observational studies N/A Cerbios-Pharma
Phase II Study on Intrathecal Ziconotide in Cancer-related Pain Evaluate efficacy and safety Initiated Q3 2022 Cerbios-Pharma
Phase I Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients Determine pharmacodynamics in children Enrolling Expected Q4 2023 Cerbios-Pharma

Recent Regulatory Updates

  • FDA Post-Approval Commitments: In 2022, the FDA emphasized ongoing safety monitoring, requiring post-marketing observational studies, particularly focusing on adverse effects, including neurotoxicity.
  • European Market Approvals: As of 2022, the EMA granted conditional approval contingent on further confirmatory trials.
  • Trials Using Real-World Evidence (RWE): Cerbios-Pharma has engaged in RWE analyses to support broader indications, including intrathecal pain in pediatric populations.

Key Clinical Findings

  • Pain Relief Efficacy: Multiple studies confirm significant analgesic effects in patients with refractory chronic pain.
  • Safety Profile: Common adverse effects include neuropsychiatric symptoms, dizziness, and injection-site reactions, aligning with previous data.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Parameter Details
Market Size (2022) Estimated USD 300 million globally, with North America accounting for 65%
Key Players Cerbios (original developer), Hospira (Pfizer, now part of Pfizer), BridgeBio, and emerging generic manufacturers
Indications Chronic non-cancer pain, intractable severe pain in cancer, spasticity-related pain
Route of Administration Intrathecal (most common), with ongoing exploration of implantable pump integration

Market Drivers

  • Increasing prevalence of chronic pain conditions: The CDC reports over 50 million U.S. adults living with chronic pain, fueling demand for non-opioid alternatives.
  • Regulatory shifts favoring non-opioid therapies: The opioid crisis has prompted regulatory agencies to promote safer therapies like CORGARD.
  • Rising adoption in specialized pain clinics and neurology centers.

Market Barriers

  • High cost of therapy: CORGARD’s per-dose cost (~USD 20,000–30,000) limits access, especially in emerging markets.
  • Intrathecal administration complexity: Requires specialized personnel and infrastructure.
  • Adverse effects: Neuropsychiatric side effects can hinder widespread acceptance.

Market Segmentation

Segment Key Characteristics Market Share (2022)
Refractory Pain Patients Patients unresponsive to opioids 70%
Cancer-related Pain Palliative care settings 20%
Others (Spasticity, Pediatric) Off-label and investigational 10%

Competitive Landscape

Company Product Name Indications Approval Status Market Share (Estimated)
Cerbios CORGARD Severe pain Approved (US, EU) 55%
Pfizer (via Hospira) Ziconotide (generic formulations) Severe pain Marketed 30%
Others Off-label/Investigational Various Trials ongoing 15%

Market Projection (2023-2030)

Growth Drivers

  • Expansion into pediatric and broader chronic pain markets.
  • Competitive entry and potential price reductions by generics.
  • Technological advances in delivery systems.

Forecast Table (USD Million)

Year Market Size Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Notes
2023 320 Baseline year, slight growth from 2022
2025 440 11% Increased adoption, expanding indications
2027 600 9% Entry of generics, cost competition
2030 850 10% Broader clinical application, pipeline progress

Market Share Outlook

Year CORGARD Market Share Total Market Size Estimated Revenue (USD Million)
2023 55% 320 USD 176
2025 48% 440 USD 211
2027 40% 600 USD 240
2030 35% 850 USD 298

Risks and Opportunities

Risks Opportunities
Adoption barriers due to invasive administration Adoption in pediatric populations
Pricing pressures from generics Expansion into new indications (e.g., spasticity)
Side effect concerns limiting use Technological innovations in delivery systems include pump devices and sustained-release formulations

Comparison with Competing or Alternative Analgesic Drugs

Parameter CORGARD Oxymorphone (Opioid) Epidural/local anesthetics Other Non-Opioids
Mechanism N-type calcium channel blocker Opioid receptor agonist Local nerve blockade NSAIDs, anticonvulsants
Route Intrathecal Oral, IV Epidural Oral, topical
Cost USD 20,000–30,000/dose USD 0.50–2 per dose Varies USD 10–50/month
Adverse Effects Neurotoxicity, psychiatric Dependence, respiratory depression Nerve damage risks Gastrointestinal, renal effects

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: CORGARD continues to be evaluated in expanded indications, with ongoing safety and efficacy studies, including pediatric pharmacokinetics.
  • Market Dynamics: The drug’s high efficacy and regulatory support position it strongly within the severe pain management segment.
  • Growth Potential: Anticipated growth driven by demographic shifts, regulatory pressures to reduce opioid use, and technological innovations in drug delivery methods.
  • Competitive Risks: Price competition from generics and potential side effects management remain hurdles.
  • Future Outlook: By 2030, CORGARD could command a substantial market share within the intrathecal pain therapy space, expanding into broader neurological indications.

FAQs

Q1: What is the current regulatory status of CORGARD globally?
A: CORGARD is approved in the US (FDA, 2004) and the European Union (EMA, 2010) for severe chronic pain, with ongoing trials in other regions aimed at broader indications.

Q2: Are there ongoing efforts to reduce the cost of CORGARD?
A: Yes; potential generic formulations and improved manufacturing efficiencies are expected to lower costs by 2025, increasing market accessibility.

Q3: How does CORGARD compare with traditional opioid therapies?
A: CORGARD offers a non-opioid alternative with a different mechanism, potentially reducing dependence and misuse risks, but with invasive administration and specific side-effect profiles.

Q4: What are the main limitations hindering wider adoption?
A: Intrathecal administration complexity, high costs, and adverse neuropsychiatric side effects.

Q5: What emerging indications could expand CORGARD’s market?
A: Pediatric pain management, spasticity associated with neurological disorders, and neuropathic pain conditions.


References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2004). FDA Approval Letter for CORGARD.
  2. European Medicines Agency. (2010). Conditional approval summary for Ziconotide.
  3. CDC. (2022). Chronic Pain Statistics.
  4. Cerbios-Pharma. (2022). Corporate Reports and Clinical Trial Disclosures.
  5. MarketsandMarkets. (2022). Pain Management Market Analysis.

This comprehensive review aims to facilitate strategic decision-making for stakeholders considering investment, partnership, or R&D directions related to CORGARD.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.