Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR COMBIVENT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for COMBIVENT

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00096616 ↗ Combivent® CFC Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) in Moderate to Severe Asthma Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 2 2004-11-01 The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the superior bronchodilator efficacy of inhaled Combivent® CFC MDI vs. Albuterol HFA MDI in moderate to severe asthma patients.
NCT00273962 ↗ A Comparison of Combivent UDV (Ipratropium 500mcg and Salbutamol 2.5mg) and Salbutamol UDV Alone (2.5mg) Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 4 2002-05-01 To compare the bronchodilator efficacy of ipratropium plus salbutamol (Combivent) with salbutamol alone given every 20 minutes for three doses in asthmatic children with severe acute exacerbation
NCT00354354 ↗ Bronchodilators and Oxygen Kinetics With Exercise in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients Completed Queen's University Phase 4 2006-03-01 Hypothesis: The reduction of dynamic hyperinflation and its negative effects on the respiratory system following a bronchodilator could lead to an improvement of cardiac function in terms of increased cardiac output. This may enhance oxygen delivery to the exercising muscles in COPD patients. Bronchodilator administration may also have an indirect effect on V'O2 kinetics via its action on cardiovascular and pulmonary variables. Objectives: 1. To evaluate the effects of a bronchodilators on V'E , V'CO2 , and V'O2 kinetics in COPD during constant work-rate cycle exercise, and to evaluate whether bronchodilators will accelerate, indirectly, phase 2 kinetics (usually slower in COPD patients than normal subjects) and shorten t for V'E, V'CO2 , and V'O2 and shorten half-times for HR and O2 pulse, thus showing an improvement of oxygen transport to the peripheral active muscles. 2. To determine the impact of a bronchodilator-induced reduction in dynamic hyperinflation, and its effects on cardiovascular and pulmonary function, on exercise limitation in COPD.
NCT00359788 ↗ A Trial Comparing Treatment With Tiotropium Inhalation Capsules to Combivent Inhalation Aerosol in COPD Patients. Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 4 2006-07-01 The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks treatment with tiotropium HandiHaler 18 micrograms (mcg) daily compared to Combivent Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) Chlorofluorocarbon Inhalation Aerosol 2 actuations four times a day in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients currently prescribed Combivent® MDI.
NCT00388882 ↗ Trial Comparing Treatment With Tiotropium Inhalation Capsules to Combivent® Inhalation Aerosol in COPD Patients. Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 4 2006-10-01 The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks treatment with tiotro pium HandiHaler® 18 mcg daily compared to Combivent® MDI CFC Inhalation Aerosol 2 actuations qid in COPD patients currently prescribed Combivent® MDI.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for COMBIVENT

Condition Name

Condition Name for COMBIVENT
Intervention Trials
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 9
Asthma 5
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 4
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for COMBIVENT
Intervention Trials
Lung Diseases 14
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 14
Chronic Disease 9
Lung Diseases, Obstructive 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for COMBIVENT

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for COMBIVENT
Location Trials
United States 145
China 9
Argentina 2
United Kingdom 2
Canada 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for COMBIVENT
Location Trials
Colorado 7
California 7
Texas 7
South Carolina 7
Idaho 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for COMBIVENT

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for COMBIVENT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 6
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for COMBIVENT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 15
Terminated 4
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for COMBIVENT

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for COMBIVENT
Sponsor Trials
Boehringer Ingelheim 15
Queen's University 2
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for COMBIVENT
Sponsor Trials
Other 25
Industry 17
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Combivent (ipratropium bromide/albuterol): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: April 28, 2026

What is Combivent and which product forms matter commercially?

Combivent is a fixed-dose combination of ipratropium bromide (antimuscarinic) plus albuterol (short-acting beta-agonist) for treatment of COPD with bronchospasm. Commercial relevance comes from two lineages:

  • Combivent (MDI): ipratropium + albuterol delivered by metered-dose inhaler.
  • Combivent Respimat (SMI): ipratropium + albuterol delivered by soft-mist inhaler (Respimat).

Across COPD treatment patterns, the inhaler form impacts adoption because of technique requirements, dosing convenience, and payor preference.

What is the clinical trials update for Combivent?

No active, company-sponsored late-stage clinical development was identified for Combivent line products in current major trial registries at a level that would support a forward projection of new regulatory indications or label-expansion programs. Clinical activity for the class tends to shift toward:

  • switch-therapy studies versus modern maintenance regimens (LABA/LAMA combinations),
  • device or formulation bridging studies,
  • utilization and real-world effectiveness studies in COPD cohorts.

From a business standpoint, the clinical read-through for Combivent is that the product is treated as a legacy acute bronchodilator option inside COPD management pathways, not as a pipeline driver.

How does Combivent fit into COPD treatment algorithms?

Combivent is positioned as a rescue or symptom-relief bronchodilator in COPD. Current practice generally prioritizes:

  • maintenance therapy for persistent symptoms (LABA, LAMA, or combinations),
  • as-needed short-acting bronchodilators for breakthrough dyspnea.

Within that framework, Combivent competes with:

  • SABA rescue (albuterol),
  • SAMA rescue (ipratropium),
  • single-agent inhalers and combo rescue alternatives where available,
  • neb-based bronchodilators in certain settings.

Key consequence: Combivent’s demand is more sensitive to COPD patient pool, prescribing habits, and formulary status than it is to new clinical endpoints.


What does the market look like today for Combivent?

Combivent sits in a crowded bronchodilator market. The competitive set is dominated by:

  • modern maintenance inhalers (LABA/LAMA, triple therapy),
  • generic SABA/SAMA rescue inhalers,
  • a mix of brand and generic combination rescue products depending on geography and tender dynamics.

Even when maintenance therapy takes a larger share of total COPD prescriptions, rescue bronchodilator utilization still matters because COPD is chronic and exacerbations remain common. Combivent’s unit economics depend on:

  • how often prescribers select ipratropium plus albuterol versus either agent alone,
  • patient adherence to inhaler technique,
  • payer coverage and copay design,
  • inhaler device preference between MDI and Respimat delivery.

Market structure indicators that typically govern Combivent demand

  1. Generic penetration in short-acting bronchodilators
    • SABA and SAMA generics have broad substitution, which compresses brand pricing.
  2. Payer formulary position
    • Brand inclusion depends on negotiated rebates versus lower-cost alternatives.
  3. Clinical guideline alignment
    • If guidelines emphasize LABA/LAMA maintenance, rescue use becomes a smaller fraction of total scripts but still drives recurring demand.

What is the projection for Combivent revenue and volume?

A defensible projection treats Combivent as a steady, but mature product line with growth constrained by:

  • generic substitution pressures,
  • maintenance therapy migration,
  • absence of late-stage label-expansion catalysts.

Projection model (directional, not point estimates)

The most likely trajectory for Combivent over the next 5 years is:

  • Volume: low growth to mild decline, driven by COPD prevalence offset by substitution to generics and modern maintenance patterns.
  • Net revenue: flattish to declining in real terms due to price compression and mix shift toward lower-cost rescue options.
  • Geographic differentiation: markets with tighter substitution or higher Respimat/brand retention may show slower erosion.

Scenario outcomes (business use)

  • Base case: modest net revenue decline offset by COPD incidence growth and baseline rescue demand continuity.
  • Upside: formulary retention for Respimat plus stable copay management and steady rescue prescribing patterns.
  • Downside: faster switch to single-agent generics and broader maintenance-driven symptom control that reduces rescue frequency.

What are the key risks to the Combivent forecast?

  1. Formulary and rebate pressure
    • Brands in mature rescue categories face recurring renegotiation cycles and higher scrutiny versus generics.
  2. Switching to maintenance-first management
    • Better symptom control from LABA/LAMA and triple therapy reduces rescue use frequency.
  3. Device preference and technique
    • Inhaler technique issues can reduce persistence and drive substitution to alternative devices or regimens.
  4. Competitive rescue combos
    • Where combination rescue alternatives are favored, Combivent’s share can erode even if total rescue prescriptions rise.

What are the key opportunities in the Combivent forecast?

  1. High-burden COPD subgroups
    • Patients with frequent breakthrough symptoms can remain on combination rescue strategies longer than average.
  2. Respimat channel dynamics
    • If Respimat maintains a favorable adoption curve among prescribers and institutions, it can mitigate overall erosion.
  3. Institutional prescribing patterns
    • Nursing homes, ambulatory COPD programs, and certain payer networks can preserve brand selection.

How should investors and R&D leaders underwrite Combivent exposure?

A practical underwriting approach is to treat Combivent as:

  • a cash-flow stabilizer with limited upside,
  • exposed primarily to price and formulary dynamics, not clinical differentiation.

Investment-relevant diligence focus:

  • channel checks on Respimat vs MDI mix,
  • formulary status by payer tier,
  • script share in COPD rescue segments,
  • replacement risk from generic and alternative combo products.

R&D implications:

  • Combivent is unlikely to generate label expansion returns unless paired with a specific device or adherence intervention tied to measurable endpoints.
  • Any new clinical program would likely be positioned as comparative effectiveness or pragmatic studies rather than novel mechanisms.

Key Takeaways

  • Combivent is a mature COPD rescue bronchodilator (ipratropium plus albuterol) whose demand is driven more by formulary coverage, substitution dynamics, and rescue prescribing frequency than by new clinical development.
  • Current clinical development momentum is limited for label-expansion-grade outcomes; market evolution is driven by maintenance therapy migration and generic pressure.
  • The most probable 5-year path is stable-to-declining net revenue with low volume growth, modulated by Respimat adoption and payer retention.
  • Forecast risk is dominated by rebate cycles, generic substitution speed, and symptom-control shifts under modern maintenance regimens.

FAQs

  1. Is Combivent used for COPD rescue or maintenance?
    It is used for bronchospasm relief, typically in a rescue or breakthrough symptom role within COPD management.

  2. What matters most for Combivent market performance: clinical outcomes or payer access?
    For a mature rescue product, payer access and substitution are typically the dominant drivers.

  3. Does Combivent compete mainly with other rescue inhalers?
    Yes, but it also competes indirectly as COPD care shifts to maintenance LABA/LAMA or triple therapy, which can reduce rescue frequency.

  4. Is Respimat (Combivent Respimat) expected to outperform MDI long-term?
    The forecast depends on device adoption and payer preferences; Respimat can slow erosion if it retains share, but it does not remove generic and maintenance-driven pressures.

  5. What would change the direction of the Combivent projection most?
    A material shift in formulary positioning, payer cost pressure relief, or a measurable change in COPD care patterns that increases rescue use.


References

[1] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[2] FDA. Drug Approval Package / labeling access for Combivent and related products. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
[3] Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD. https://goldcopd.org/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.