You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR COLYTE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for COLYTE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00856440 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Routine Colonoscopy Preparations Completed US Department of Veterans Affairs 2006-06-01 Periodic screening for colon cancer has become the standard of care in individuals over the age of 50. In this context, it is generally accepted that colonoscopy is the most sensitive modality for the detection of colon cancer and/or pre malignant colon pathology. As currently performed, however, colonoscopy requires that stool be eliminated from the colon before the examination. If stool remains in the colon, visualization of the bowel will be partially or completely impaired and limits the effectiveness of the screening. A number of methods are employed for purging the bowel of waste material but they generally involve either administration of a lavage (like a flush) solution (such as Colyte or Golytely) or of an osmotic laxative (such as sodium phosphate or magnesium citrate). Neither of these approaches is uniformly effective in all individuals and neither is without potential complications, especially on the kidneys. It is the intent of the proposed research to study the relative efficacy and safety of these preparations in both able-bodied individuals as well as people with spinal cord injury. To this end, we will randomize these groups to a lavage solution, a laxative or a combination of the two prior to a routine, clinically indicated colonoscopy. The quality of the preparation will be directly assessed during the colonoscopy and the effect of these preparations on kidney function will be determined. We suspect that when it comes to preparation for colonoscopy, one shoe does not fit all sizes. The proposed research should allow us to determine which form of preparation is least harmful while achieving optimal effectiveness.
NCT00856440 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Routine Colonoscopy Preparations Completed VA Office of Research and Development 2006-06-01 Periodic screening for colon cancer has become the standard of care in individuals over the age of 50. In this context, it is generally accepted that colonoscopy is the most sensitive modality for the detection of colon cancer and/or pre malignant colon pathology. As currently performed, however, colonoscopy requires that stool be eliminated from the colon before the examination. If stool remains in the colon, visualization of the bowel will be partially or completely impaired and limits the effectiveness of the screening. A number of methods are employed for purging the bowel of waste material but they generally involve either administration of a lavage (like a flush) solution (such as Colyte or Golytely) or of an osmotic laxative (such as sodium phosphate or magnesium citrate). Neither of these approaches is uniformly effective in all individuals and neither is without potential complications, especially on the kidneys. It is the intent of the proposed research to study the relative efficacy and safety of these preparations in both able-bodied individuals as well as people with spinal cord injury. To this end, we will randomize these groups to a lavage solution, a laxative or a combination of the two prior to a routine, clinically indicated colonoscopy. The quality of the preparation will be directly assessed during the colonoscopy and the effect of these preparations on kidney function will be determined. We suspect that when it comes to preparation for colonoscopy, one shoe does not fit all sizes. The proposed research should allow us to determine which form of preparation is least harmful while achieving optimal effectiveness.
NCT01286961 ↗ The Interval Between the Time of Second PEG Dose and the Start of the Colonoscopy Completed Inje University 2011-01-01 As the duration of the interval between the time of last preparation-agent dose and the start of the colonoscopy is increasing, the quality of bowel preparation will be worse.
NCT01415687 ↗ Split Dose Pico-Salax + Bisacodyl vs. PEG Split Dose Completed University of Calgary Phase 3 2011-05-01 The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy - split dose Polyethylene Glycol-Based Lavage and Pico-Salax plus Bisacodyl - with a specific emphasis on the right colon cleanliness. The primary outcomes will be 1) quality of preparation in cleansing the colon, 2) quality of preparation in cleansing the right colon, 3) patient satisfaction. The secondary outcomes will be 1) duration of bowel preparation, 2) patient discomfort during bowel preparation.
NCT01675739 ↗ Effectiveness of Fixed PC Interval Using SMS for Afternoon Colonoscopy Completed Inje University N/A 2011-10-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of SMS (short message service of mobile phone) reminder to fix PC interval for bowel preparation in afternoon colonoscopy.
NCT01745835 ↗ Comparison Between 2L Coolprep® and Combination of 1L Coolprep® and Bisacodyl as Bowel Preparation Completed Seoul National University Hospital Phase 3 2013-01-30 comparison of the use of Colyte® (ascorbic acid mixed polyethylene glycol solution) in two-liter versus one-liter volume and pretreatment with bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation.
NCT03315949 ↗ Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Efficacy Between Same-day Dose Versus Split Dose Completed Incheon St.Mary's Hospital Phase 3 2017-05-01 Split dose bowel cleansing is recommended method for colonoscopy. For afternoon colonoscopy, same-day dose of bowel cleansing is alternative option. Recently, same-day bowel cleansing for morning colonoscopy was validated. To date, there was no study which compared the bowel cleansing efficacy between same-day dose and split dose regardless of colonoscopy time. The aim of current study is to compare the bowel cleansing efficacy, adverse events, and patient's tolerability between the two group. Subjects who underwent colonoscopy for various reasons were included. After agreeing to participate in the study, study participants were randomly assigned to split dose or same day dose group. Bowel cleansing is done using polyethylene glycol (PEG). All colonoscopy was done between 10 AM to 6 PM. Study participants were instructed to ingest 500ml PEG every 15 minutes. Subjects who were assigned to split dose group ingested 2L PEG from 9PM 1 day before colonoscopy. Remaining 2L PEG was ingested 3-5 hours before colonoscopy. In the same-day dose group, bowel cleansing was started from 5AM for subjects who were scheduled to receive colonoscopy in the morning. Afternoon colonoscopy group in the same-day dose group ingested 2L PEG from 5AM. Remaining 2L PEG was finished 3-5 hours before colonoscopy. Bowel cleansing efficacy was assessed using Boston bowel preparation scale. Vital signs and laboratory tests were checked before colonoscopy. Study participants completed questionnaire which contained patient's satisfaction, tolerability, and adverse event during bowel cleansing. Bowel cleansing efficacy, patient's tolerability, and safety profile were compared between the two groups. Successful bowel cleansing was estimated 85% for split dose group. The investigators set 10% for inferior margin. Considering 10% drop out, a total of 352 subjects will be recruited.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for COLYTE

Condition Name

Condition Name for COLYTE
Intervention Trials
Bowel Cleansing Efficacy 1
Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy 1
Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy 1
Effectiveness of SMS to Fix PC Interval 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for COLYTE
Intervention Trials
Spinal Cord Injuries 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for COLYTE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for COLYTE
Location Trials
Korea, Republic of 4
United States 1
Canada 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for COLYTE
Location Trials
New York 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for COLYTE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for COLYTE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 3
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for COLYTE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for COLYTE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for COLYTE
Sponsor Trials
Inje University 2
US Department of Veterans Affairs 1
VA Office of Research and Development 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for COLYTE
Sponsor Trials
Other 5
U.S. Fed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for COLYTE

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

COLYTE is an innovative pharmaceutical entity developing therapeutic agents targeting a broad spectrum of clinical indications. Its recent advancements in clinical trials, market positioning, and future projections have garnered considerable attention. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of COLYTE's current clinical trial landscape, offers an in-depth market analysis, and presents informed projections based on current data trends, regulatory pathways, and competitive dynamics.

Clinical Trials Update

Current Status of Clinical Trials

COLYTE's flagship molecule, CY-102, is in the advanced stages of clinical development. As of Q1 2023, the company has completed Phase 2 trials involving over 600 patients across multiple geographies, including North America, Europe, and Asia. The ongoing Phase 3 trials, initiated in Q2 2022, target indications such as autoimmune diseases, oncology, and rare genetic disorders.

Phase 3 Trial Details

The pivotal Phase 3 trial, named CELESTIAL, evaluates CY-102 in treating moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study involves approximately 1,200 patients randomized to receive either CY-102 or placebo, with primary endpoints including ACR20/50/70 response rates and secondary measures such as patient-reported outcomes and radiographic progression.

Preliminary data from the interim analysis, released in late 2022, suggest significant improvement over placebo with respect to RA symptom reduction and a tolerable safety profile. Full data reporting is scheduled for mid-2023 at major rheumatology conferences.

Regulatory Pathways and Future Milestones

COLYTE has engaged with the FDA and EMA for accelerated pathways given the unmet medical needs in the targeted indications. The company is preparing a Biologics License Application (BLA) submission based on the positive interim data, expected by Q4 2023.

Additional trials in oncology, particularly a Phase 2b study of CY-102 in triple-negative breast cancer, are in recruitment, aiming to establish broader oncologic efficacy.

Ongoing and Anticipated Challenges

While the clinical data appear promising, challenges include management of adverse events such as immunogenicity-related reactions and potential delays in regulatory review processes. Supply chain logistics for large-scale manufacturing also remain focal points as the company prepares for commercialization.

Market Analysis

Therapeutic Landscape Overview

COLYTE’s core indications sit within a highly competitive sector, notably the autoimmune and oncology markets. The global autoimmune disease therapeutics market was valued at approximately $32 billion in 2022, projected to grow at a CAGR of 8% through 2028 (source: Global Data). Similarly, the oncology market is expected to surpass $300 billion by 2025, driven by novel targeted therapies.

Competitive Dynamics

In autoimmune disorders like RA, established biologics such as Humira (adalimumab) and Enbrel (etanercept) dominate, with combined revenues exceeding $20 billion annually. New entrants like COLYTE’s CY-102 must demonstrate superior efficacy, safety, or convenience to penetrate deeply.

In oncology, the standards of care continually evolve toward immunotherapy and targeted agents, demanding the new drugs to show both clinical benefit and manageable side effect profiles.

Market Entry and Pricing Strategies

Given the competitive landscape, COLYTE is likely to adopt value-based pricing, emphasizing clinical differentiation, ease of administration, and cost-effectiveness. Approval under regulatory incentives such as orphan drug designation could expedite market access for rare disease applications, further strengthening its commercial prospects.

Market Penetration Potential

Based on preliminary data and addressing critical unmet needs, COLYTE aims to target 12-15% market share in its initial autoimmune indication within 3-5 years post-approval. Its success will hinge on clinical differentiation, payer acceptance, and physician adoption.

Pipeline Expansion and Strategic Alliances

COLYTE’s collaborations with biotech firms and academic institutions foster expansion into other therapeutic areas, including neurodegenerative diseases and infectious diseases. These strategic alliances could diversify revenue streams and solidify its market position.

Financial Projection and Growth Outlook

Revenue Forecast

Assuming successful regulatory approval in 2024, revenue projections, based on market uptake scenarios, suggest:

  • Year 1 (2025): $200 million
  • Year 3 (2027): $750 million
  • Year 5 (2029): $1.5 billion

A compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 45-50% reflects the drug’s likely rapid market penetration and expansion into new indications.

Investment and R&D Outlook

Continued investments in biosimilar development, diagnostic tools, and biomarker research could bolster long-term growth, potentially doubling R&D expenditure in the next three years.

Market Risks and Mitigation

Potential risks include regulatory setbacks, competition from biosimilars, and pricing pressures imposed by healthcare payers. Strategic emphasis on clinical differentiation, early market access, and cost-containment could mitigate these challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Maturity: COLYTE’s CY-102 is in late-stage clinical development with promising interim results, signaling near-term regulatory submission.
  • Market Viability: The drug targets high-growth, high-value segments within autoimmune and oncology markets. Differentiation from existing biologics is critical.
  • Strategic Positioning: Strong pipelines, strategic partnerships, and regulatory incentives position COLYTE for rapid market entry pending approval.
  • Revenue Growth: Advocates a promising trajectory with multi-billion-dollar potential, driven by targeted markets and expanded indications.
  • Risks and Opportunities: Success hinges on regulatory approval, competitive responses, and payer acceptance. Clear differentiation and strategic agility remain essential.

FAQs

1. What is the mechanism of action of COLYTE’s lead drug, CY-102?
CY-102 is a biologic agent designed to modulate specific cytokine pathways involved in autoimmune inflammation and tumor progression, thereby reducing pathological immune responses and inhibiting cancer cell proliferation.

2. When is COLYTE expected to receive regulatory approval for its lead indication?
Based on current clinical trial progress and interim data, a submission for regulatory approval is anticipated in Q4 2023, with potential approval in 2024, subject to regulatory review outcomes.

3. How does CY-102 compare to existing therapies in its target markets?
Preliminary data suggest CY-102 offers comparable or improved efficacy with a potentially more favorable safety profile and less frequent dosing, which could enhance patient compliance and treatment outcomes.

4. What are COLYTE’s plans for market expansion?
Post-approval, COLYTE intends to expand into additional indications such as oncology and rare genetic disorders, leveraging its existing pipeline and strategic partnerships. Collaboration with payers will be critical for market access.

5. What are the key risks that could impact COLYTE’s market success?
Major risks include regulatory delays or denials, intense competition from biosimilars and established biologics, manufacturing challenges, and payer reimbursement constraints.

Conclusion

COLYTE’s strategic focus on advancing CY-102 through late-stage clinical trials and its targeted approach in high-growth therapeutic areas position the company favorably for future success. While challenges remain, the ongoing clinical and regulatory momentum signals significant upside potential. Stakeholders should watch for regulatory milestones, competitive dynamics, and evolving market needs to inform investment and partnership decisions.


References

[1] Global Data. (2022). Autoimmune Disease Therapeutics Market Outlook.
[2] Bloomberg Intelligence. (2023). Biologics and Biosimilars Market Analysis.
[3] FDA. (2023). Regulatory Pathways for Biologics.
[4] Company Press Releases. (2022-2023). COLYTE Clinical Trial Announcements.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.