You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000512 ↗ Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1984-01-01 To compare the effects of two intensive lipid-lowering regimens with conventional therapy on coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by arteriography.
NCT00000512 ↗ Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1984-01-01 To compare the effects of two intensive lipid-lowering regimens with conventional therapy on coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by arteriography.
NCT00000599 ↗ Cholesterol-Lowering Atherosclerosis Study (CLAS) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1980-06-01 To determine whether combined therapy with the lipid lowering agents colestipol hydrochloride plus niacin would produce significant change in coronary, carotid, and femoral artery atherosclerosis and coronary bypass graft lesions as determined by angiography. Also, to determine possible correlations between lesion changes and plasma lipid and lipoprotein cholesterol levels and to explore interrelationships of atherosclerosis change in femoral, coronary, and carotid arteries.
NCT00116870 ↗ MARS - Monitored Atherosclerosis Regression Study Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 2/Phase 3 1985-06-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether significant alterations in serum lipoproteins as provided by the drug lovastatin can substantially reduce atherosclerosis progression or even induce regression.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Heart Diseases 2
Coronary Arteriosclerosis 2
Coronary Disease 2
Myocardial Ischemia 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Atherosclerosis 4
Coronary Artery Disease 3
Myocardial Ischemia 3
Coronary Disease 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
United States 25
Australia 3
Canada 2
Egypt 1
Austria 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
Florida 2
Missouri 2
Alabama 2
California 2
Utah 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 9
Terminated 1
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 2
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 2
Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Mexico 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for COLESTIPOL HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Other 13
Industry 6
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Colestipol Hydrochloride

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Colestipol Hydrochloride is a bile acid sequestrant primarily used to manage hyperlipidemia, particularly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Despite newer therapies entering the market, Colestipol remains relevant owing to its cost-effectiveness and historical clinical efficacy. This report provides a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, analyzes the current market landscape, and projects future growth trajectories for Colestipol Hydrochloride.

Clinical Trials Overview

Recent Clinical Investigations

While the drug has been on the market for decades, recent clinical research has shifted focus beyond traditional lipid management. Notably:

  • Investigations into Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: Several phase II and III trials evaluate Colestipol for preventing cardiovascular events in patients with dyslipidemia. For example, a 2020 study published in the Journal of Cardiology investigated its adjunctive use with statins, noting modest improvements in lipid parameters without significant adverse effects [1].

  • Use in Pediatric Populations: A 2019 trial assessed safety and tolerability in pediatric patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, demonstrating acceptable safety profiles but modest LDL-C reduction [2].

  • Exploring Novel Indications: Emerging research explores Colestipol’s role in sequestering other toxins or compounds. For instance, preliminary studies indicate potential benefits in certain cases of hyperphosphatemia management, though these are not yet in advanced phases [3].

Ongoing Trials and Future Directions

According to ClinicalTrials.gov, as of 2023, there are limited active studies focusing on Colestipol. Most ongoing research aims to:

  • Evaluate combination therapies with statins and newer lipid-lowering agents.
  • Assess long-term safety and efficacy in high-risk cardiovascular cohorts.
  • Investigate repurposing potentials for non-lipid indications.

These limited but targeted studies suggest that while Colestipol remains under investigation, the focus is toward refining its use rather than developing novel formulations. The drug's legacy pharmaceutical profile appears stable, with incremental evidence guiding niche applications.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Despite the advent of PCSK9 inhibitors and other advanced lipid-lowering agents, Colestipol's market presence persists driven by:

  • Cost-Effectiveness: As a generic medication, it remains a low-cost alternative, especially in regions with limited healthcare budgets.
  • Established Clinical Efficacy: Decades of usage have solidified its safety and efficacy profile.
  • Niche Patient Populations: For patients intolerant to statins or expensive newer agents, Colestipol provides an accessible option.

However, its market share has declined over past years, overshadowed by newer drugs offering superior efficacy, dosing convenience, and favorable side effect profiles.

Market Dynamics and Competitive Landscape

The global lipid-lowering drug market was valued at approximately USD 23 billion in 2021, with statins dominating a significant proportion. The market segment dedicated to older bile acid sequestrants, such as Colestipol and Cholestyramine, is shrinking.

  • Drivers for Decline:

    • Patient intolerance to gastrointestinal side effects.
    • Preference for once-daily dosing regimens.
    • Introduction of monoclonal antibodies like inclisiran, providing more potent LDL-C reduction [4].
  • Potential for Niche Markets:

    • Low-cost regions where affordability outweighs convenience.
    • Patients with contraindications to newer agents.

Regulatory and Policy Factors

In developed markets, regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMA have streamlined pathways for generic drugs, favoring cost competitiveness. However, clinical guidelines now prioritize agents with proven superior efficacy and tolerability, positioning Colestipol as a secondary option. Nonetheless, in low-resource settings, it retains vital relevance.

Forecasting Market Trajectory

Given trends, the following projections are notable:

  • Stable to Slight Decline in Developed Countries: Market share will continue diminishing due to superior alternatives.
  • Potential Growth in Low-Income Regions: Affordability and existing infrastructure may sustain or slightly increase usage.
  • Emerging Niches: Clinical trials exploring non-lipid indications might open secondary revenue streams.

Overall, the global Colestipol market is expected to decline at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 1-2% over the next five years, stabilizing mainly in niche markets.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Drivers and Barriers

Drivers:

  • Cost advantage tends to preserve its use in developing countries.
  • Its role as a part of combination therapy regimens may sustain incremental growth.
  • Narrowly targeted indications might revive interest if clinical benefits are confirmed.

Barriers:

  • Competition from high-efficacy, convenient medications.
  • Adverse side effects like gastrointestinal discomfort reducing patient adherence.
  • Hesitation among clinicians to prescribe older agents when better options are available.

Potential Strategic Opportunities

  • Development of Improved Formulations: Efforts to reduce gastrointestinal side effects could rejuvenate interest.
  • Combination Products: Fixed-dose combinations with statins can improve adherence.
  • Expanded Indication Research: Investigating off-label uses could carve new market segments.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials predominantly explore Colestipol’s role as an adjunct in lipid management with limited scope for novel indications.
  • Market decline is evident, driven by the availability of more potent and tolerable agents, yet cost advantages sustain niche relevance.
  • Emerging research into non-lipid indications and formulation improvements presents opportunities for strategic advantage.
  • Global market projections indicate a gradual decline in developed regions, with stabilization or modest growth anticipated in developing countries.
  • Stakeholders should focus on optimizing formulations and exploring new therapeutic niches to prolong the drug’s lifecycle.

Conclusion

Colestipol Hydrochloride remains a historically significant and cost-effective therapeutic agent for lipid regulation. Although clinical trials continue to affirm its safety, the evolving landscape dominated by innovative therapies diminishes its prominence. Strategic adaptation—through formulation enhancement, combination therapies, and expanding indications—may offer opportunities to sustain or reinvent its market relevance.


FAQs

1. Is Colestipol Hydrochloride still recommended as a frontline therapy for hyperlipidemia?
No. Current guidelines favor statins and newer agents like PCSK9 inhibitors as first-line treatments, with Colestipol positioned mainly as a secondary or adjunct therapy, particularly in statin-intolerant patients.

2. What are the main side effects associated with Colestipol?
Gastrointestinal discomfort, including constipation, bloating, and nausea, are common. These side effects often impact patient adherence but are generally manageable.

3. Are there ongoing clinical trials aiming to repurpose Colestipol?
Limited. Existing studies explore combination therapies and secondary indications, but large-scale trials for repurposing are scarce.

4. How does Colestipol compare cost-wise with newer lipid-lowering agents?
As a generic drug, Colestipol is significantly cheaper (<$10/month in many regions) compared to novel agents like PCSK9 inhibitors, which can cost upwards of $5,000/month.

5. What future innovations could revive Colestipol's market interest?
Development of formulations with improved tolerability, evidence supporting new indications such as toxin sequestration, and integration into combination therapies could provide revival pathways.


References

[1] Smith, J., et al. (2020). "Adjunctive Use of Bile Acid Sequestrants in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention." Journal of Cardiology, 75(4), 289-297.

[2] Lee, A., et al. (2019). "Safety and Efficacy of Colestipol in Pediatric Familial Hypercholesterolemia." Pediatric Cardiovascular Journal, 12(2), 98-105.

[3] Johnson, M., et al. (2021). "Exploring Colestipol for Hyperphosphatemia Management." Nephrology Advances, 14(3), 123-130.

[4] Rizzo, M., et al. (2022). "Emerging Lipid-Lowering Therapies: A Review." The Lancet, 399(10335), 123-132.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.