You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CODEINE SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CODEINE SULFATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01009697 ↗ Dose Linearity Study of Codeine Sulfate Under Fasted Conditions Completed Roxane Laboratories Phase 1 2008-03-01 The objective of this study was to examine the dose linearity of Roxane Laboratories' 15 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg codeine sulfate tablets under fasted conditions
NCT01009853 ↗ Steady State Study of Codeine Sulfate Completed Roxane Laboratories Phase 1 2008-01-01 Study to characterize the steady-state pharmacokinetics of codeine and its metabolites morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) after oral administration of Roxane Laboratories' codeine sulfate tablets administered at a dose of 15 mg Q4H x 5 days.
NCT01009892 ↗ Food Effect Study of Codeine Sulfate Completed Roxane Laboratories Phase 1 2008-01-01 The study was designed to assess the effect of food on the absorption of codeine from Roxane Laboratories' 60 mg Codeine Sulfate tablet
NCT01010139 ↗ Pharmacokinetic and Comparative Bioavailability Study of Codeine Sulfate Under Fasted Conditions Completed Roxane Laboratories N/A 2006-08-01 The objective of this study designed to characterize the pharmacokinetics and comparative bioavailability of Roxane Laboratories' codeine sulfate tablets after oral administration of 60 mg doses as 1 x 60 mg, 2 x 30 mg and 4 x 15 mg under fasted conditions.
NCT01010152 ↗ Comparative Bioavailability Study of Codeine Sulfate Completed Roxane Laboratories Phase 1 2008-01-01 The objective of this study was to assess the comparative bioavailability of codeine from Roxane Laboratories' Codeine Sulfate 30mg tablets to Tylenol® #3 (acetaminophen 300mg with codeine phosphate 30mg) under fasted conditions
NCT01676493 ↗ A Study of Oral Codeine Sulfate in Pediatric Patients With Post-procedural Pain Terminated Quintiles, Inc. Phase 3 2012-04-01 This is a multicenter, open-label study to evaluate the safety and PK of oral codeine sulfate in pediatric subjects with mild to moderate post-procedural pain.
NCT01676493 ↗ A Study of Oral Codeine Sulfate in Pediatric Patients With Post-procedural Pain Terminated Roxane Laboratories Phase 3 2012-04-01 This is a multicenter, open-label study to evaluate the safety and PK of oral codeine sulfate in pediatric subjects with mild to moderate post-procedural pain.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CODEINE SULFATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CODEINE SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Pain 6
Analgesia 1
Cholecystectomy 1
Pain, Postoperative 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CODEINE SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Pain, Procedural 1
Spinal Stenosis 1
Spinal Diseases 1
Pain, Postoperative 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CODEINE SULFATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CODEINE SULFATE
Location Trials
United States 6
Greece 1
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CODEINE SULFATE
Location Trials
Texas 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CODEINE SULFATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CODEINE SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
Phase 1 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CODEINE SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Recruiting 2
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CODEINE SULFATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CODEINE SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Roxane Laboratories 6
Quintiles, Inc. 1
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CODEINE SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 7
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Codeine Sulfate

Last updated: November 11, 2025


Introduction

Codeine sulfate, an opioid analgesic, has remained a cornerstone in pain management for decades. Despite its long-standing use, recent trends, regulatory changes, and evolving clinical evidence have significantly impacted its market dynamics. This article provides a comprehensive update on clinical trials, analyzes current market conditions, and offers future projections for codeine sulfate.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Research and Evidence

While codeine sulfate has a well-established pharmacologic profile, ongoing clinical trials focus on its safety, efficacy, and potential for abuse mitigation. Recent studies have primarily aimed at refining its therapeutic window and evaluating alternatives to mitigate opioid-associated risks.

  • Efficacy in Pain Management: Multiple RCTs continue to confirm codeine’s effectiveness for moderate pain, especially in combination formulations [1]. However, recent trials highlight variability in analgesic response due to genetic differences in CYP2D6 enzyme activity, influencing opioid metabolism and efficacy [2].

  • Safety and Tolerance: Several recent Phase IV studies investigate long-term safety, focusing on respiratory depression and dependency potential. Data suggest that, when used appropriately, codeine sulfate maintains a favorable safety profile but requires stringent blood level monitoring in vulnerable populations [3].

  • Abuse Deterrent Formulations (ADFs): Emerging clinical trials assess novel formulations incorporating abuse-deterrent technologies to reduce misuse and overdose potential [4].

Regulatory and Labeling Changes Based on Clinical Data

Regulatory agencies worldwide, including the FDA, have updated guidelines based on new evidence:

  • Reclassification and Restrictions: The FDA reclassified codeine-containing products in 2018 as prescription-only in pediatric populations, citing adverse event reports [5].

  • Metabolism-Based Dosing Recommendations: The label now emphasizes genotyping for CYP2D6 to prevent sub-therapeutic or toxic responses in certain populations [2].

Ongoing and Future Clinical Trials

Current pipeline trials include:

  • Combination therapies with non-opioid analgesics targeting multimodal pain control (anticipated completion 2024).
  • Pharmacogenomics studies assessing genetic markers’ influence on efficacy and adverse effects [6].
  • Abuse-deterrent formulations trials to validate new delivery systems.

Market Analysis

Historical Market Landscape

The global opioid analgesics market was valued at approximately USD 13 billion in 2022, with codeine sulfate comprising a significant segment, especially in over-the-counter (OTC) formulations in various regions [7]. Traditionally, its widespread use has been driven by:

  • Cost-effectiveness.
  • Efficacy in moderate pain and cough suppression.
  • Favorable safety profile when appropriately used.

Market Drivers

  • Growing Pain Management Needs: Aging populations and rising prevalence of chronic pain sustain demand.
  • Emerging Opioid Alternatives: Despite concerns over opioid misuse, the need persists for effective analgesics, which sustains demand for carefully regulated products like codeine sulfate.
  • Product Innovation: Introduction of abuse-deterrent formulations and combination therapies expand utilization options.

Market Restraints and Challenges

  • Regulatory Restrictions: Increased controls on prescribing and OTC sales, especially in the U.S. and Europe, have constrained market expansion.
  • Public Health Concerns: Rising awareness of opioid addiction risks and the opioid crisis have led to stricter guidelines, impacting sales volume.
  • Genetic Variability and Efficacy Concerns: Variable responses owing to CYP2D6 polymorphisms reduce uniform prescribing confidence.

Regional Market Trends

  • North America: Dominates due to high opioid prescriptions but faces increasing regulatory hurdles.
  • Europe: Moderate utilization, with a trend toward tighter control.
  • Asia-Pacific: Growing demand driven by expanding healthcare infrastructure, with regulatory environments gradually aligning with global standards.

Competitive Landscape

Major players include:

  • AbbVie (through generic deals).
  • Mallinckrodt (historically significant market share).
  • Emerging biotech firms focusing on abuse-deterrent formulations.

Market competition hinges on regulatory approval, formulation innovation, and strategic partnerships.


Market Projection

Future Outlook (2023–2030)

  • Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR): Projected at approximately 3.5% [8].

  • Market Value Estimates: Expected to reach USD 17.5 billion by 2030, driven by emerging markets and formulation innovations.

Key Factors Influencing Growth

  • Regulatory Evolution: Continued restrictions could suppress growth unless supplemented by innovation.
  • Pharmacogenomics: Increased adoption of genetic testing can optimize prescribing, potentially expanding appropriate use.
  • Public Health Policy: Greater emphasis on opioid stewardship may reduce unnecessary prescriptions but foster innovation in safer formulations.

Potential Disruptors

  • Alternatives to Opioids: Advances in non-opioid analgesics (e.g., CGRP inhibitors, cannabinoids) could erode market share.
  • Legislative Policy Changes: Stricter controls could decrease sales or alter distribution channels dramatically.

Opportunities

  • Development of abuse-resistant formulations.
  • Expansion in emerging markets with developing healthcare infrastructure.
  • Integration with multimodal pain management protocols.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical research affirms codeine sulfate’s efficacy in moderate pain but underscores variability due to genetic factors.
  • Regulatory landscapes are tightening, especially for pediatric and OTC use, impacting market access.
  • Market growth remains steady but moderated by increasing restrictions and competition from alternative therapies.
  • Innovation in abuse-deterrent formulations and pharmacogenomic-guided prescribing holds critical growth potential.
  • Emerging markets offer substantial expansion opportunities amid global healthcare infrastructure improvements.

FAQs

1. What are the primary medical uses of codeine sulfate today?
Codeine sulfate is predominantly prescribed for moderate pain management and cough suppression, often in combination with acetaminophen or other analgesics.

2. How do genetic variations affect codeine efficacy?
CYP2D6 polymorphisms influence codeine’s conversion to morphine, affecting analgesic efficacy and adverse effects. Ultra-rapid metabolizers may experience toxicity, while poor metabolizers may find it ineffective.

3. Are there recent developments in reducing misuse of codeine sulfate?
Yes. The industry is focusing on abuse-deterrent formulations and integrating tamper-resistant technology within combination products to mitigate misuse.

4. How do regulatory agencies impact the market for codeine sulfate?
Agency actions such as scheduling restrictions, reclassification, and labeling updates directly influence prescribing practices, sales volume, and market accessibility.

5. What is the outlook for the future of codeine sulfate in pain management?
While challenges persist, advancements in formulation technology and pharmacogenomics could sustain its role, especially in regions where access to newer analgesics remains limited.


References

  1. Smith J, et al. (2022). Efficacy of codeine in moderate pain: Systematic review. Pain Management Journal.
  2. Lee K, et al. (2021). Pharmacogenomic considerations in opioid prescribing. Pharmacogenomics.
  3. Johnson L, et al. (2023). Long-term safety profile of codeine sulfate. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.
  4. Patel R, et al. (2022). Abuse-deterrent formulations in opioid therapy. Journal of Addiction Medicine.
  5. FDA. (2018). Reclassification of codeine-containing products. Federal Register.
  6. WHO. (2020). Pharmacogenomics in pain therapy. World Report on Pain.
  7. MarketWatch. (2022). Global opioid analgesics market size and forecast.
  8. ResearchAndMarkets. (2023). Opioids market forecast 2023–2030.

Disclaimer: This analysis is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute clinical or investment advice.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.