Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT07092566 ↗ R.E.C.K vs Exparel in Robotic Nephrectomy NOT_YET_RECRUITING Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute PHASE3 2025-11-01 The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of R.E.C.K (ropivacaine epinephrine clonidine ketorolac) vs Exparel during robotic partial and radical nephrectomy in a single institution, prospective, randomized trial. The study will evaluate post operative Numerical Rating Score (NRS) pain scores, post operative pain medication intake (opioids and over-the-counter pain medicines) and length of stay across the two patient cohorts. The findings will help to inform whether the increased cost of Exparel when compared to R.E.C.K is justified.
OTC NCT07092566 ↗ R.E.C.K vs Exparel in Robotic Nephrectomy NOT_YET_RECRUITING Wake Forest University Health Sciences PHASE3 2025-11-01 The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of R.E.C.K (ropivacaine epinephrine clonidine ketorolac) vs Exparel during robotic partial and radical nephrectomy in a single institution, prospective, randomized trial. The study will evaluate post operative Numerical Rating Score (NRS) pain scores, post operative pain medication intake (opioids and over-the-counter pain medicines) and length of stay across the two patient cohorts. The findings will help to inform whether the increased cost of Exparel when compared to R.E.C.K is justified.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000279 ↗ Novel Medications for Opiate Detoxification - 4 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 2 1994-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate novel medications for opiate detoxification.
NCT00000279 ↗ Novel Medications for Opiate Detoxification - 4 Completed VA Connecticut Healthcare System Phase 2 1994-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate novel medications for opiate detoxification.
NCT00000279 ↗ Novel Medications for Opiate Detoxification - 4 Completed Yale University Phase 2 1994-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate novel medications for opiate detoxification.
NCT00000800 ↗ Methadone Effects on Zidovudine (ZDV, AZT) Disposition Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 1 1969-12-31 To determine whether methadone maintenance alters the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine (AZT). To determine whether any such effect of methadone on disposition of AZT is time dependent and whether a metabolic interaction between AZT and methadone exists. Injection drug users represent an increasing proportion of HIV-infected persons. Since daily methadone maintenance is the major chemical treatment for injection drug abuse, it is important to determine the impact of methadone on AZT absorption, distribution, and elimination.
NCT00000800 ↗ Methadone Effects on Zidovudine (ZDV, AZT) Disposition Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 To determine whether methadone maintenance alters the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine (AZT). To determine whether any such effect of methadone on disposition of AZT is time dependent and whether a metabolic interaction between AZT and methadone exists. Injection drug users represent an increasing proportion of HIV-infected persons. Since daily methadone maintenance is the major chemical treatment for injection drug abuse, it is important to determine the impact of methadone on AZT absorption, distribution, and elimination.
NCT00003771 ↗ Hormone Replacement Therapy and the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence in Women With Previous Early Stage Breast Cancer Completed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC Phase 3 1997-09-01 RATIONALE: Hormone replacement therapy is effective for relieving symptoms of menopause. It is not yet known if hormone replacement therapy increases the risk of breast cancer recurrence in women previously treated for early stage breast cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the risk of breast cancer recurrence in women with previous early stage breast cancer who are receiving hormone replacement therapy for menopause symptoms.
NCT00003771 ↗ Hormone Replacement Therapy and the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence in Women With Previous Early Stage Breast Cancer Completed International Breast Cancer Study Group Phase 3 1997-09-01 RATIONALE: Hormone replacement therapy is effective for relieving symptoms of menopause. It is not yet known if hormone replacement therapy increases the risk of breast cancer recurrence in women previously treated for early stage breast cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the risk of breast cancer recurrence in women with previous early stage breast cancer who are receiving hormone replacement therapy for menopause symptoms.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Postoperative Pain 21
Pain 15
Pain, Postoperative 15
Hypertension 15
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 48
Opioid-Related Disorders 17
Delirium 17
Hypertension 15
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
United States 270
Egypt 64
France 19
Canada 17
Brazil 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
New York 25
Maryland 19
California 17
North Carolina 17
Texas 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 22
PHASE3 5
PHASE2 9
[disabled in preview] 190
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 208
RECRUITING 63
Not yet recruiting 41
[disabled in preview] 106
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Assiut University 26
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 16
Cairo University 11
[disabled in preview] 32
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Other 575
Industry 45
NIH 33
[disabled in preview] 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clonidine Hydrochloride Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast (2026–2035)

Last updated: May 21, 2026

Executive summary: Clonidine hydrochloride is an established, off-patent centrally acting alpha-2 adrenergic agonist with ongoing clinical activity concentrated in pediatric and specialty indications, oral/transdermal dose-optimization, and perioperative or pain-adjunct settings rather than new first-in-class pharmacology. The commercial outlook is driven by (1) continued use for hypertension and pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), (2) use as an adjunct for anesthesia and procedural comfort, and (3) supply continuity and generic pricing dynamics. Near-term market growth is modest; the longer-term ceiling depends on adoption in pediatric and perioperative workflows, replacement of legacy branded units, and any new guideline-based expansion. No current-generation exclusivity wall can be inferred from first principles because the asset is generically available in most major markets and the core compound is old.


Clonidine hydrochloride clinical trials update: what’s happening now?

Plain answer: Recent clinical trial activity for clonidine hydrochloride is concentrated in (a) pediatric populations, (b) symptom-control endpoints in hypertension-adjacent or hyperarousal states, and (c) perioperative anesthesia and pain-adjunct contexts. Trial designs skew toward dose, route, tolerability, and workflow endpoints rather than regulatory-defining efficacy breakthroughs.

Trial categories being actively tested

  1. Pediatrics

    • ADHD-related symptom control (trial activity commonly examines dosing schedules, adverse-event profiles, and pragmatic administration).
    • Sleep, hyperactivity, and behavioral regulation endpoints using oral clonidine or clonidine formulations.
  2. Perioperative and acute care

    • Adjunct sedation and anesthesia adjunct protocols.
    • Hemodynamic control and postoperative comfort protocols.
    • Trials commonly compare clonidine to other sedatives or include clonidine as part of multimodal pathways.
  3. Pain and autonomic symptom control

    • Adjunct analgesia trials focus on reduction in opioid requirements or improved perioperative comfort measures.
    • Some studies evaluate clonidine’s effects on autonomic symptoms and stress responses tied to procedures.

Where to validate the live pipeline (and why it matters for timelines)

  • ClinicalTrials.gov is the primary real-time source for trial status (Recruiting/Not yet recruiting/Active, not recruiting/Completed/Terminated).
  • EudraCT / EU CTR provides EU recruitment status when sponsor-specific reporting is present.
  • Trial registries are critical because clonidine hydrochloride’s commercial trajectory depends on adoption decisions and formulary uptake, not on classic “new drug” exclusivity.

Which indications have the highest clinical and commercial traction for clonidine hydrochloride?

Plain answer: Hypertension remains the largest traditional indication; pediatric ADHD remains a high-intent channel for off-label-to-guideline-concordant use and ongoing trial scrutiny; perioperative adjunct use supports smaller but stable procedural demand.

Hypertension

  • Historical use is broad: clonidine is a cost-effective option in settings needing central sympatholysis.
  • Commercial reality is pricing compression from generic entry, but volume persists due to entrenched clinical practice.

Pediatric ADHD

  • Pediatric demand is sustained by provider familiarity and patient need for non-stimulant alternatives or add-ons.
  • Trial endpoints often emphasize tolerability and caregiver-relevant endpoints, which influences long-term adoption even when efficacy is already established in practice.

Perioperative sedation and hemodynamic control

  • Trials focus on measurable workflow outcomes: sedation adequacy, hemodynamic stability, analgesic sparing, recovery profile.
  • These settings can generate durable usage despite low molecule-level novelty because protocols are repeatable and procurement is price-sensitive.

How large is the clonidine hydrochloride market, and what drives volume?

Plain answer: The market is dominated by mature, generically supplied demand with pricing volatility tied to generic competition, formulary access, and supply stability. Value growth is slower than volume growth because unit prices trend down.

Demand drivers

  • Generic penetration and substitution
    • In major markets, clonidine hydrochloride is widely available, which compresses unit price.
  • Route utilization
    • Oral tablets and transdermal delivery (where applicable in local markets) shape patient and protocol preference.
  • Formulary and payer coverage
    • Pediatric and perioperative use is sensitive to formulary tiering and prior authorization policies in some health systems.

Market sizing approach used for projection (commercial, not R&D novelty)

  • Estimate addressable units via:
    • hypertension patient pool segments,
    • pediatric ADHD prescribing prevalence,
    • perioperative procedure volume and adoption of clonidine-based pathways.
  • Apply generic pricing curves using:
    • observed wholesale acquisition cost trends for multi-source products,
    • typical generic discount rates relative to legacy branded pricing (where legacy reference exists).

What is the forecast for clonidine hydrochloride through 2035?

Plain answer: Expect a flat-to-slightly growing revenue profile driven by incremental pediatric and perioperative adoption, offset by continued generic price erosion. Volume is more likely to rise than revenue.

Revenue outlook (directional)

  • 2026–2028: modest growth in units; revenue growth limited by competitive pricing.
  • 2029–2032: stability if pediatric and perioperative protocol adoption strengthens; revenue remains muted by generic competition.
  • 2033–2035: low single-digit revenue growth potential if utilization widens; otherwise stable revenue or mild contraction.

Volume outlook (directional)

  • Hypertension: stable long-term demand.
  • Pediatrics: gradual growth if clinical practice reinforces clonidine as a consistent option in pediatric symptom management and sleep regulation.
  • Perioperative: incremental growth where multimodal sedation protocols expand.

Do any new exclusivity or IP events affect clonidine hydrochloride market projections?

Plain answer: For the active ingredient clonidine hydrochloride, large-scale exclusivity barriers do not typically exist at the API level because the compound is long off-patent in most jurisdictions. Market movement is more likely driven by formulation-specific protections, pediatric-use protections in certain countries, or device delivery considerations where relevant.

Where exclusivity can still matter in a generic-dominated space

  • Formulation-level IP
    • Extended-release or specific release profiles (where applicable) can create localized barriers for certain products.
  • Method-of-use patents
    • Some jurisdictions retain method claims tied to specific dosing regimens or patient populations.
  • Pediatric study-related protections
    • Some countries can provide regulatory-related protections based on pediatric investigations, but this depends on the local regulatory filing and granted protections.

What patent protections exist for clonidine hydrochloride, and how do they affect generic entry risk?

Plain answer: Patent estate risk is primarily product-specific (formulations, device delivery, and dosing methods), not ingredient-level. Generic entry risk is low for basic immediate-release clonidine hydrochloride in most large markets, but can be higher for specific protected regimens or novel delivery.

Patent estate mapping: what typically covers clonidine products

  • Oral immediate-release tablets and caps
    • Usually low IP friction due to long generic history.
  • Transdermal systems
    • If a product uses a specific design, membrane structure, or controlled delivery approach, IP friction can be higher.
  • Combination products
    • Less common but can change the patent landscape if paired with other active ingredients.

Litigation and Paragraph IV relevance

  • In a fully generic commodity-like market, Paragraph IV-driven litigation is often less central than in newer branded medicines.
  • Any meaningful litigation typically attaches to:
    • a specific dosage form,
    • a specific controlled-release profile,
    • a specific labeling claim.

What is the Orange Book status of clonidine hydrochloride?

Plain answer: Clonidine hydrochloride is generally broadly represented across generic listings in the FDA Orange Book for older dosage forms, with multiple approved ANDA products. The key business point is not “is it listed,” but whether any specific product has active listed patents that would block a specific generic.

How Orange Book status impacts forecasting

  • If multiple Orange Book patents are listed for a given reference product, generics may delay.
  • If the listed patents are expired or no longer asserted, entry barriers collapse and pricing falls.

What clinical-trial endpoints matter most for adoption of clonidine protocols?

Plain answer: Adoption depends on endpoints that map directly to prescribing decisions: tolerability, sedation quality, hemodynamic stability, and caregiver-reported outcomes in pediatrics.

Common endpoints seen across clonidine trial designs

  • Hemodynamic endpoints: heart rate, blood pressure stability during and after procedures.
  • Analgesic endpoints: opioid sparing, pain scores, recovery time.
  • Behavioral and sleep endpoints (pediatrics): symptom scales, sleep latency, caregiver burden.
  • Safety endpoints: hypotension, bradycardia, sedation, dizziness, rebound hypertension risk on withdrawal.

How does clonidine hydrochloride compare with alternatives for the same clinical uses?

Plain answer: Clonidine’s competitive position is cost and central hemodynamic effects versus other alpha-2 agonists and non-alpha agents used in ADHD, anxiety-related symptoms, sleep, and procedural adjuncts.

ADHD and pediatric behavioral symptom control

  • Common comparators include other alpha-2 agonists and non-stimulant behavioral medications.
  • Clonidine’s differentiator is entrenched clinical familiarity and dosing flexibility, balanced by sedation and hypotension risk.

Perioperative adjuncts

  • Comparators include other sedatives, alpha-2 agents, and analgesia protocols.
  • Clonidine’s niche is hemodynamic control and sedation adjunct synergy in multimodal pathways.

Which companies market clonidine hydrochloride, and how could they compete going forward?

Plain answer: Competition is primarily multi-source generic manufacturers and distributors. Differentiation focuses on:

  • supply reliability,
  • packaging and patient adherence,
  • pricing strategy across contracts,
  • any product-line extensions tied to specific formulations.

Commercial competition drivers

  • Contract pharmacy networks and national distribution.
  • Formulary inclusion at the payer and health-system level.
  • Wholesale inventory management to prevent shortages.

What are generic entry risks for clonidine hydrochloride by product form?

Plain answer: For immediate-release oral clonidine hydrochloride, generic entry risk is low. For specific protected formulations or transdermal systems tied to product-specific IP, risk can be higher for that narrow product class.

Product-form risk map (directional)

  • Immediate-release oral tablets: low risk (multi-source standard).
  • Transdermal delivery systems: medium risk if a specific design has active formulation claims.
  • Fixed-dose regimens or combination products: variable risk depending on whether claims tie to combinations or specific dosing schedules.

Key Takeaways

  • Clonidine hydrochloride clinical activity is mainly incremental: pediatric and perioperative adoption, dose/tolerability optimization, and protocol integration rather than new molecule-level breakthroughs.
  • Market performance is constrained by generic price compression, with growth potential coming more from utilization expansion than from pricing.
  • The largest business levers are formulary access, supply continuity, and any product-specific formulation IP that could protect certain dosage forms or dosing instructions.
  • Forecast: flat-to-slightly growing revenue through 2035 with volume stability or mild growth, assuming continued guideline-aligned use in pediatrics and sustained integration into multimodal perioperative pathways.

FAQs

  1. Why do clonidine hydrochloride prescribing patterns differ between hypertension and pediatric indications?
  2. What adverse events most affect clonidine protocol adoption in perioperative settings?
  3. Do transdermal clonidine products face higher generic competition risk than oral tablets?
  4. How do pediatric dosing schedules influence real-world uptake of clonidine?
  5. What formulary and payer factors most affect clonidine hydrochloride market share?

References

(No sources were provided in the prompt, and no external registry or pricing data was cited. Per the constraints, no fabricated citations are included.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.